[Patrick Barron]

Unverified Voracity Says Furk Comment Count

Brian September 25th, 2019 at 1:20 PM

UFR is delayed. It's due to crippling bouts of ennui. I'm sure you understand. Anyway, let's have some fun!

The situation. A follow-up from the stat on the podcast about how Michigan has failed to cover the last six spreads by at least two touchdowns from Dimitri Nakassis:

EFKH1_qUwAEAySM

On the bright side, when you click to the big version of an image on twitter and save it, twitter no longer gives you a ".jpg-large" file that has to be renamed before you can actually use it. So I got to skip that step while inserting the neat summary of a half-season stretch in which Michigan has vastly underperformed expectations.

Oh God I just remembered why this graph looked strangely familiar.

1CaVO00

RIP, Prevail and Ride. Also us.

[After THE JUMP: surely it gets more cheerful!]

Well, there's that. Adam Rittenberg gets some useful anonymous coach quotes that attempt to explain what is happening to Michigan's offense. "Speed in space" is just a rumor as Michigan plays without Mike Sainristil and doesn't do any speed in space things:

"There's no tempo in the offense," a Big Ten assistant told me. "There's no hurry-up ... and there's no get-the-ball-out-quick on the perimeter."

Against Wisconsin, Michigan's wide receiver screens went to a tight end.

And Shea Patterson is almost never finding someone to throw to in rhythm:

A coach who studied Michigan told me, "The ball is supposed to come out on a plant-and-throw or one hitch. If the quarterback's on his third hitch and the ball ain't out, that's a problem. To blame the O-line is outrageous." A former Big Ten coordinator added of Patterson, "He's not a quick-trigger guy, he's just not. He's a run around and make plays guy. It's a problem."

The problem isn't so much that Patterson can run around and make plays, it's that way too many plays end up breaking down into that after the actual design fails to do anything, whether that's because Patterson isn't finding receivers or everyone is covered.

Toughness: a thing people talk about. I'm not sure how you measure it or how to judge how it affects football games, but it's a press conference staple when things are going badly, and this is no exception:

“Emphasis on physicality, emphasis on toughness and emphasis on hustle,” Harbaugh said. “We’ll make that part of the practice plan more and also playing the players that are dedicated and playing physically at all times. Get those players in the ballgame.”

Ben Mason is tough but Ben Mason is legislated out of this offense; Carlo Kemp might be tough but he's also Just A Guy at DT—if that. Michigan didn't set an edge on Taylor's long TD, and repeatedly flew out of the middle of the field on draw plays and traps. Is that a toughness issue? It seems like a coaching issue when Wisconsin inserts their fullback to the backside of the formation and runs opposite it, like they do all the time, and your linebacker/safety level continually falls for it.

This guy cracked the code. Sometimes signals are not subtle.

It's a tough blitz though.

Good for the gander. The NCAA is really grooving their fastballs these days:

Restoring name and image rights to athletes won't reduce the overall pool of money available but may redirect it towards athletes as donors cut out the middleman. This is bad news for people running organizations of middle-men. Not bad enough to turn down a hard seltzer sponsorship, apparently.

Murphy's referencing TCU's AD, by the way. Prepare for word salad:

“I understand the free market concept and I understand the country we live in is exceptionally prideful and that’s part of our freedom,” Donati said. “But I also think there’s a tremendous amount of monetary value in place on these kid’s educations. That’s a tremendous investment we’re making investing into this amateur model.

“I just think it’d be a shame to throw it away so haphazardly from what I’ve heard. It has potential to be a wild, wild west situation, which is scary as an athletic director."

The Skinner bill has the potential to be the wild, wild west in the same way that legalizing marijuana does: legalizing and regulating a black market economy is the exact opposite of a lawless free-for-all.

They have come for Kansas. The NCAA dropped off a hefty notice of allegations on Kansas's doorstep:

Kansas has been charged with lack of institutional control, three Level I violations in men’s basketball and there is a head coach responsibility charge against coach Bill Self, according to multiple sources. There also are allegations against football, sources added, although those are Level II violations. The football allegations include charges of allowing an extra coach to work during practice under former head coach David Beaty.

The Level I violations are tied, in part, to the recruitments of Billy Preston and Silvio De Sousa. Court testimony and documents tied to the federal basketball corruption cases over the past two years included details of veteran adidas consultant T.J. Gassnola having “conspired to illicitly funnel approximately at least $90,000” to the mother of Preston. Gassnola also testified in court that he paid De Sousa’s guardian $2,500, although he denied arranging a $20,000 payment that had been discussed on wiretaps.

The charge against Self will potentially prove a compelling and high-profile application of the NCAA’s head coach responsibility bylaws. Evidence tied to the case included Gassnola and Self talking openly in text messages about Adidas helping Kansas recruit players. “I’m happy with Adidas,” Self wrote Gassnola. “Just got to get a couple real guys.”

Will this be enough to result in meaningful penalties? If not this, then nothing will. When Yahoo showed the NOA to a "veteran compliance officer" his reaction was thus:

“That’s everything that compliance is employed to prevent. That’s the trifecta, that’s unbelievable. That’s the reason why compliance exists, just thinking about it gives me anxiety.”

Anything short of a long-term nuking of Kansas, Arizona, and especially Louisville basketball is an invitation to keep it going.

This space is in favor of nuking these teams because that will convert those fanbases from organizations that support the status quo because it benefits them to fanbases who want to burn the whole enterprise down. This is naturally why programs do not suffer long-term nukes. The NCAA is bedfellows with the black market; the two work together. The guys funneling chump change to players aren't noble vigilantes, they're symbiotic bacteria that help smooth amateurism's ability to digest giant piles of money. 

For its part, Kansas is set to engage in a fistfight:

“In its haste [two years after the FBI investigation was announced] and attempt to regain control, the enforcement staff has created a false narrative regarding me and our basketball program,” Self said in a statement. “The narrative is based on innuendo, [court proceedings] half-truths, [wiretaps] misimpressions [facts] and mischaracterizations [also facts]. In reality, we all know there is only one version of the truth [Kansas pays players and Self knows it]. The truth is based on verifiable facts, and I am confident the facts we will demonstrate in our case will expose the inaccuracies of the enforcement staff’s narrative.”

This might be good? Usually programs get the NOA, complain a little, take their solitary year of post-season ban and light scholarship restrictions, and move on. Here Kansas looks set to fight because not doing so may bring the NCAA's first real punishment in forever. It might happen! The Athletic's roundtable on the situation is pretty interesting:

O’Neil: The depth and scope is pretty massive. The NCAA clearly is cashing in all of its chips to take some very serious allegations — paying Billy Preston’s mother and Silvio De Sousa’s handler — and padding them with others equally damning, albeit less sensational. There is federal testimony, text messages and phone records, and all of it includes multiple infractions involving more than one player. Those are not easy things to get over.

Moore: The allegations that Self and his staff were aware of T.J. Gassnola’s recruiting attempts and allowed it without reporting. The NCAA is attempting to establish a pattern of negligence and show the athletic department also tried to hide violations it knew were occurring. …

Davis: The most important dynamic in play is that Kansas has already challenged these allegations. That means we are going to see the very first test of the NCAA’s new Independent Resolution Panel. This was put in place as part of the Complex Case Unit that came out of Condi Rice Commission’s recommendations, and it will effectively take the case out of the hands of the NCAA and its Committee of Infractions. First, an independent group of investigators will gather to ascertain all the facts. These are people who are professional investigators, prosecutors, etc. Then they will present those facts to the panel. If you look at the roster of panel members, you will not see a lot of familiar names and organizations — or any, really. Again, these are professional legal and compliance minds who are for the most part not technically part of the NCAA. To say all bets are off does not do justice to the uncertainty at hand.

Burn it all.

A divergence in efficiency. Off the bounce threes are increasing in number despite remaining inefficient options overall:

Those NBA numbers are wild, man. In college off the bounce threes remain a meh option, though some guys (Derrick Walton) can make it work.

Etc.: More on state challenges to the NCAA. Emmert calls this an "existential threat." I do not think he knows what that word means.

Comments

FoSho

September 25th, 2019 at 1:47 PM ^

All I keep thinking about is... how did Jalen Wilson and his team not evaluate risk/reward if the NCAA got invovled? Why not UNC or anyone not KU/Arizona/Louisville, if the coaching change here moved him off?

cornman

September 25th, 2019 at 1:48 PM ^

A coach who studied Michigan told me, "The ball is supposed to come out on a plant-and-throw or one hitch. If the quarterback's on his third hitch and the ball ain't out, that's a problem. To blame the O-line is outrageous." A former Big Ten coordinator added of Patterson, "He's not a quick-trigger guy, he's just not. He's a run around and make plays guy. It's a problem."

I suspected this as well.  I guess the question is why is Patterson not getting the ball out quick?  Are the receivers not open?  Is he scared of throwing a pick?  Can he not read the defense?  

Durham Blue

September 25th, 2019 at 2:35 PM ^

This incenses me a little bit because if it is of utmost importance to the offense that the QB gets the ball out quickly then why wasn't this drilled home and practiced to death in spring and fall camp?  Is the defense going easy on the offense in practice such that the offense is fooled into thinking they are awesome?  Patterson chokes in game action?  Patterson isn't good enough?  It's mind boggling that a program with so many high ranked athletes and highly compensated star coaches and analysts can produce an on-field product so lacking.

mlax27

September 25th, 2019 at 2:27 PM ^

This seems like the biggest offensive issue of all that won't just get fixed when the turnovers get better.  To compound it, we aren't running enough quick routes, screens, or just a straight up fade to the big tall guys on the outside.  Those require little thinking by Patterson and would give the offense some rhythm.  

Tom Bombadil

September 25th, 2019 at 1:49 PM ^

So our revamped offense threw out the things we did well in an effort to get rid of the things we didn't do well, but didn't get rid of the things we didn't do well and so now we don't do anything well. At this point I feel stupid for expecting anything different.

Mgoczar

September 25th, 2019 at 1:50 PM ^

Ahem. 

So not one of the posters who wants a back up QB just because, but I predicted the offense needs Milton type QB or atleast a QB who can run the zone read by you know, running. I continue to believe that we will be seeing major Milton minutes down the road. 

Hold on to your butts. 

 

Mgoczar

September 25th, 2019 at 2:46 PM ^

If you read what I said, I think he can take hits. I am assuming here ofcourse. We have history of both Shea and Dylan getting injured on hits. These are the type of hits Mcsorely took and got up. If Milton can then atleast zone read can open up. If that opens up or he is a credible run threat, may be we can have the "oh so open" receivers that we want speed in space to be. 

El Jeffe

September 25th, 2019 at 2:08 PM ^

Those NBA stats are kind of bonkers because the overall 3PT% last year was 35.5%. That means that on average players shot only 36.3% on spot-up 3s, compared to 33% on 3s off the bounce. Not nearly as big a gap as I would have imagined.

spiff

September 25th, 2019 at 2:43 PM ^

Also, is the assertion that it isn't a great option in college correct? The question is compared to what other shot? I'm guessing the alternative to most off the bounce 3's is a pull up 2 or at best a contested drive to the basket. Some drive and kick but probably that isn't the majority.

30% on a three pointer is an expected 0.9 points. That would require 45% on pull up two/contested drive. I call it a wash.

njvictor

September 25th, 2019 at 2:31 PM ^

"He's not a quick-trigger guy, he's just not. He's a run around and make plays guy. It's a problem."

Huh? At Ole Miss he definitely had a quick trigger and could get the ball out quick. I'm not sure what has changed

bronxblue

September 25th, 2019 at 3:55 PM ^

He did that during blowouts or against overmatched competition.  When he played teams like Alabama, Auburn, Cal, etc. he got sacked quite a bit because he held onto the ball too long.  

Patterson's big problem appears to be he struggles/in tentative reading defensive coverage.  He's not terrible or anything, but he seems to hold onto the ball a bit too long (unless it's just going deep) seemingly because he wants to see guys open and not just throw to where they should be.  That's likely due to, again, this being his third offensive system in 3 years and just getting comfortable with it.  But nothing has really changed as much as everyone only selectively remembers his Ole Miss games.

Maize and Blue AF

September 25th, 2019 at 10:17 PM ^

This has to be the best (and most fair) assessment of Patterson.  Too many people say Shea is no good, when I don't think that's the case at all.  He's a good, not great, QB who tends to hold onto the ball a little too long.  I'd like to see him throw his receivers open a little more, rather than waiting for three feet of separation before pulling the trigger.

MGoLow

September 25th, 2019 at 2:46 PM ^

I mean, at this point I only expect UFRs after wins (not that I really blame Brian). Pretty soon the podcasts after losses will just be 22 minutes of Gregorian chanting.

MGoLow

September 26th, 2019 at 9:19 AM ^

I'd also like to see it after losses. It just seems like Brian's approach to losses is increasingly to just have the bare minimum content about them. It feels like a self-defense mechanism to prevent himself from going to far into the BPONE. I totally get it. But yeah, I miss UFR when we don't get it. 

iawolve

September 25th, 2019 at 3:01 PM ^

Why are we not talking about the real issue here- Natural Light Hard Seltzer?

What kind of sick f&ck created that abomination? Who in the hell would drink it? This is disturbing.

maizenbluenc

September 25th, 2019 at 4:17 PM ^

Every time I go to the liquor store the shelf space for apple, vanilla and other fruit flavored liquors eats away at the real stuff. Not to mention meade, hard ciders and fruit selzers edging out beers.

I guess the generation raised on juice boxes / ice blue powerades has a sweet tooth a mile long, and can't handle the real stuff.

Yes - get off my damned lawn!

I Bleed Maize N Blue

September 25th, 2019 at 3:06 PM ^

Emmert calls this an existential threat. I do not think he knows what that word means.

Isn't it an existential threat to him? I mean, what's a money-pass-through guy supposed to do when there's less money to pass through?

matty blue

September 25th, 2019 at 3:26 PM ^

if i were better with the googles, i'd do a search of how many times the phrase "will this be enough to result in meaningful penalties? if not this, then nothing will" has appeared on this here blog.

bronxblue

September 25th, 2019 at 3:41 PM ^

Anything short of a long-term nuking of Kansas, Arizona, and especially Louisville basketball is an invitation to keep it going.

So...it's going to keep going.  I don't see any way anything substantial happens here; PSU got to keep their damn wins after Paterno died and Baylor is still, as far as I know, playing D1 football after basically ignoring numerous campus rapes.  The NCAA does not care about anything as long as it's not in front of the media, and my guess is most people already assume college basketball is shady.

As always, pay the players above board and a lot of these issues go away.  

As for the betting ling stuff - yes, they haven't covered as much as expected.  It's also only 5 games; if Michigan suddenly covers 4 of the next 5 games would we all rejoice that they've "figured it out"?  Probably not.  

wolverine1987

September 25th, 2019 at 3:46 PM ^

Brian is nothing if not consistent in dismissing anything related to emotion/toughness as "feelings ball' and reducing everything to scheme. Despite the fact that the vast majority of actual athletes believe the team that plays with the most "feelings" (emotion, will, toughness etc) is at an advantage. 

I'll go with the athletes and experience in real life--people that try harder and work with more passion usually succeed in life, they don't out scheme others.

dnak438

September 25th, 2019 at 4:03 PM ^

I tend to be with Brian on this one... I guess the problem with chalking it up to toughness is that it forecloses any discussion. Once you've said that X team lost because of emotion, then there's nothing much left to say, whereas if it's about scheme and execution then you can actually talk about (a) what aspects of the scheme don't work and (b) what parts of the scheme aren't being executed.

andrewgr

September 25th, 2019 at 4:17 PM ^

Not speaking for Brian, but I think you're setting up a straw-man version of his stance.  I think a more accurate version would be: to the extent that emotion/toughness matters, it does so in ways that show up in the statistics and result in good plays that can be analyzed on film. 

If Hawkins starts playing at a really high level next Saturday and carries it through the season, any narrative about what happens will be post hoc, and even the explanation given by the player himself would need to be taken with a grain of salt-- plenty of studies have been done demonstrating how terrible human memory is and how easily we "remember" what happened in accordance to our current beliefes and emotions, not those we had at the time.

So in this hypothetical scenario, you could argue that the reason Hawkins suddenly improved was because of a fiery motivational speech given by a former player that really resonated with him and got him approaching practice and games in a different mindset, and I don't think Brian would say you're wrong; I suspect he'd say we really don't have a way to know whether that's actually what happened or not.  What he would say (I think) is that starting with that game, he had a higher percentage of passes defended and more interceptions; and that in film review, you could see that he was diagnosing certain plays better, that his timing on when to look back at the ball improved, etc.  

The proximate cause of his elevated play would be in those observable improvements resulting in better statistics.  Whether the original push that got it moving in that direction was motivation, or a position coach taking a different approach to teaching, or of reaching a certain threshold of repetitions so that he didn't need to think anymore, or whatever, probably isn't knowable with any great degree of certainty.

Ben Mason is a fierce warrior, a credit to the university, and an inspirational player.  None of that puts or takes away a single point on the board.  Unless/until he finds a way to contribute in ways that show up on film and on the stat sheet, none of those fine qualities are doing any good for helping Michigan win football games.  Claiming otherwise is "feelings ball".