On The Pearson Report
Well, it's out: 70 pages of Wilmer-Hale billable hours on what went down with Mel Pearson and the hockey program over the last couple years. Pearson chased off team captain Strauss Mann, was ineffectual at best when dealing with a subordinate's abusive behavior towards women, instructed players to lie about positive COVID tests before the 2021 NCAA tournament, and repeatedly lied to investigators.
So what are we doing here? It is August 2nd. This report was issued to the university in May. Warde Manuel has done nothing either way since. The report was made available to the public by MLive, not the actual university. Mel Pearson costs zero dollars to fire. What could possibly justify the three months of limbo the hockey program has been in? A week, maybe two is understandable. Three months is absurd.
As for what happens now, I cannot imagine that Pearson is allowed to continue. I mean:
The evidence shows that, despite what [Pearson] us in his interviews, [Pearson] was aware of Complainant’s concerns about mistreatment of female staff members
That's on page five and should be a fireable offense. There are 65 more pages, many of which make it clear that Pearson shouldn't be in charge of Michigan's hockey program. John U Bacon is probably the most careful member of the media out there and he says it's "not clear to me how U-M could retain Pearson and claim it is serious about protecting students and employees." And well, yeah:
The investigators raise the question of Pearson’s “inability or unwillingness to hold Mr. Bancroft accountable for his conduct.” In other words, Pearson was well aware of the abuse, or should have been, and did nothing.
— John U. Bacon (@Johnubacon) August 2, 2022
He's got to go.
That Pearson is still Michgian's hockey coach brings Warde Manuel's competency into question. His reaction to Strauss Mann's situation seems naïve at best:
Manuel, the athletic director, testified that he confronted Pearson about the allegations of retaliation but that he “never felt (Pearson) was retaliating against (Mann)’” and that Mann left the university “on his own.” But that belief was not shared by some of the players and staffers who participated in the survey. “Several responses noted that Coach Pearson recently removed Strauss Mann, the former team captain and starting goaltender, from the team in retaliation,” the summary reads.
Manuel's been a cipher since day one, and while that's a huge improvement over his (non-interim) predecessor he hasn't exactly been the kind of bold leader who has much of a track record to oppose what appears to be an inexplicable do-nothing approach to this situation. Manuel's made a few obvious hires, extended some contracts, done nothing to improve the fan experience, and generally faded into the background. That provided an extended honeymoon that now seems over.
As for what future awaits the hockey program: if I was in charge I'd axe Mel immediately and just replace him with Bill Muckalt, who everyone seems to love. If that's not possible because he is implicated in the report—it does not seem like he is but it might be a tough sell to promote Pearson's right hand man—then I guess Brian Wiseman just left a job with the Islanders. At this point making a splash hire outside the program seems tough because, you know, it's August.
OTOH, I don't think these kinds of offenses are rare at all (except, perhaps the Dr Anderson stuff).
So at least in response to the Anderson disaster we're digging into potential issues and holding those responsible (mostly) accountable instead of enabling and sweeping them under the rug (like I'm sure many other institutions do, and like we used to do).
Although Warde seems to be dropping the ball with this one.
Anyone who believes their institution is above it all is wrong. I love Michigan. Its not a special magical unicorn of a place.
What bothers me about Warde, although I think his removal may be necessary, is that Juwan seemed to get the short end of the stick, not that his conduct shouldn't have been different, but there was significant blame to go around and that didn't happen.
With Pearson, a problem coach was removed but Warde likely didn't get the big picture. He has had the report for a while and something should have been done by now. I wonder if not having a new University president until recently might have been a factor and there are always the Regents.
I'm not trying to justify Warde's indecision, but if there was a reason we don't know about or other circumstances beyond his control, the fair thing would be to consider these other factors.
People wanted Juwan FIRED.
Warde tried to play the middle, like he typically does. He's a compromiser.
You say 10, he says 1...Best believe it's going to be 5 or 6.
August 3rd, 2022 at 12:03 PM ^
What Juwan did is not even close to what Mel did. Juwan definitely didn't deserve to get fired. I thought his punishment was appropriate. Mel should be gone though.
Is this already the “hawt take” segment? I mean “instructed players to lie about positive Covid tests”? What? I see a footnote about close contacts but literally nowhere in the report is that stated and even in the footnote it is a reference to another report from last year. No one in this report makes the allegation you report as fact.
Misinformation!!
The May 2021 climate survey report noted that “[m]ultiple respondents reported that[Respondent] directed players to lie on health forms and to NCAA personnel at the NCAA Tournament about whether they had had close contact with someone who had tested positive for Covid, which upset and scared them.
Technically inaccurate, but the allegation is not that far off:
"Complainant stated that the student athletes told him that they had been instructed by Respondent to provide false information on their COVID contact-tracing forms. A roommate of the two student athletes (who was also a teammate) tested positive for COVID before the team left for the [March 2021 NCAA] tournament. As relayed by Complainant, the student athletes who called him traveled to the tournament, where they were told to report on contract-tracing forms that they had not had close contact with a COVID-positive person. While attending the tournament, one of those student athletes tested positive for COVID, and the other reported feeling sick. " (p. 6).
So wavintheflag is right. There is no allegation that players lied about testing positive. Yes, they were instructed to lie about contact tracing, but that's definitely not the same thing. Odd that they had to be instructed to do so.
Brian also makes no assertion that "players lied about testing positive." The statement is "instructed players to lie about positive COVID tests."
If the question is "Have you been in contact with anyone who has tested positive?" and you have and you answer "No" then you have lied about a positive COVID test. It doesn't say your own COVID test.
So no, neither you nor wavintheflag is right.
Horseshit. "If" the question is: "Have you been in contact with someone who has tested positive?", they can answer "No" meaning either of two things: they didn't know that someone they had contact with tested positive (that would be lying about a positive test) or they didn't come in contact with someone who tested positive. The latter is perfectly plausible, and most certainly doesn't mean they are lying about a positive test.
There is even a definition of what "close contact" means, so I find it hard to believe most people are lying about the test, rather than the contact itself.
At least two of the players in question lived with someone who had tested positive.
“Complainant stated that the student athletes told him that they had been instructed by Respondent to provide false information on their COVID contact-tracing forms.” If they were told to provide false information, weren’t they told to lie? If they hadn’t been in contact with someone they knew had tested positive, why would they have been told to provide false information?
Yes, they were told to lie. About being in contact. Nothing anyone has posted supports that they were told to lie about positive tests. There is most certainly a difference.
I am so confused. Who were they lying about being in contact with? Isn’t it someone who had a positive test? Isn’t that what everyone has been saying (and what the quote seems to make pretty clear? If there was no knowledge of the positive test, there would be nothing to lie about.
August 3rd, 2022 at 12:06 AM ^
Your logic is correct. In fairness, it was just an allegation. The report expressly states that the allegation was outside the scope of the investigation, and they did not make a finding on this issue. Brian is, in a sense, inaccurate insofar as he portrays it as a finding. But the poster to whom I replied said there wasn’t even an allegation of lying about COVID test results. On that, I agree with your logic and Brian’s characterization—the people were alleged to have been told to lie about coming into contact with someone who had tested positive, which is lying about a positive test.
That is some seriously questionable logic. it's actually a load of shit, as a matter of fact. A personal COVID test is not the same as contract tracing. A third party is neither obligated nor even allowed to report on another party's COVID test. Violation of HIPPA.Your "logic" is just such a load of bullshit it's ridiculous.
HIPAA applies to health care providers and health plans. If I know my friend tested positive and share that information, HIPAA has no bearing.
August 3rd, 2022 at 12:01 AM ^
Sigh. Another opportunity for COVID deniers to express outrage about COVID.
This is the “finger on the scale” stuff that really annoys me about the editorial side of the site sometimes … please make an honest argument vs being manipulative and offering the most tortured reading that gives false impressions. Guess a good enough controversy to get the site relaunch going.
Brian Cook writes for a living. He chooses words for a living.
He could have just as easily chosen the words that reflected what actually happened.
"Instructed players to lie about positive COVID tests before the 2021 NCAA tournament" is not what actually happened.
He did not need to embellish. It damages credibility. What actually happened can stand on its own (de)merits.
August 2nd, 2022 at 10:23 PM ^
It literally is exactly what happened
August 3rd, 2022 at 12:10 AM ^
Not sure “exactly what happened” is fair. It’s alleged that players were told to lie about being in contact with other people who had tested positive. I agree the “lied about a positive test” is nitpicky, but the report expressly does not make a finding on the allegation, so Brian overstates that (or comes to his own conclusion).
August 2nd, 2022 at 10:17 PM ^
Your interpretation is objectively correct. Good job 👍🏽
kind of surprising more mgoboarders don’t have a more precise grasp of the English language
It was odd that they had to be instructed to lie about contact tracing?
Exactly!!! Nor does it ever say that he lied, either.
Just that there were “inconsistencies in Respondent’s recollection, perception, and/or characterization of key incidents and issues as compared with other participants”. You generally wouldn’t highlight something like this in your report if you felt that Pearson was being completely forthright.
Is there any analysis on the issue brought up in the report that one (or more) players tried to get their coach fired after the 2021 season? Also seems odd that no recent players, including Mann who refused to participate, appeared to have been interviewed aside from an anonymous survey in 2021.
I think the fearing retribution part of the report can explain why no recent players wanted to participate. Some of these guys are early enough in their professional careers that bad words from former coaches could have an impact. Some of them are still at Michigan. I think there are valid reasons for people being afraid to speak up.
There's not one graduated player no longer playing hockey that they could have talked to? Even anonymously? What if two players said they wanted their coach fired but the rest of the guys said, "We're not in on that"?
Also, didn't Mann just sign with the Sharks (after the apparent retribution)?
I think that's closer to the truth. If I had to guess. Mel's not an NHL guy and even if he was, teams evaluate talent on their own. And half of these kids are already drafted.
Shields was previously associated with the Sharks, right? Also, didn’t Mann go to Sweden to avoid the retribution?
Wiseman has a history of sexual assault/abuse too, I can't (and don't want to) see him hired as replacement. Muckalt would be the better choice for sure.
Details or a link so that the rest of us unaware of this can research your claim?
https://www.chicagotribune.com/news/ct-xpm-1996-02-17-9602170118-story.html
"He and a fitness instructor in Chatham, Ontario, each are charged with two counts of sexual assault in the alleged incident in the summer of 1991. It was first reported to police in April 1993; charges were filed later that year."
Yes, he was acquitted. But that's not the same as innocent, as we and OJ Simpson all know. Maybe especially so for a good young hockey player in the Canadian court system. I think it's important that the next coach have a clean record, which Wiseman doesn't.
"Complainant stated that Respondent told him, “We’re going to go in another direction.” Complainant said that Respondent refused otherwise to explain why Complainant was being terminated. Complainant said that he reacted to the termination by saying, “Oh this is about Strauss,” and Respondent replied that he did not know what Complainant was talking about. Complainant said that he then turned to Mr. Muckalt and said, in sum or substance,“Guys that knew that we were being abused get to stay and guys like me leave.”
That's damning.
Actually, I think Muckalt should be let go too. It's not just a Pearson problem, it's a culture problem. It looks like a house that needs to be cleaned.
The next coach should be from outside the program.
Not defending him at all and maybe questions should be asked but you are taking one claim from thirty years ago where he was acquitted. Yes, it's possible he did something not appropriate and got away with it but it's also very possible that it did not occur. When you said he has a history, I was thinking there were many incidents in him past - that does not seem to be the case.
I appreciate the link. I looked for more information and unfortunately, there are just not enough public details for me to make a judgment on the accusations. However, I can see how some people may feel that it's a pretty risky hire. With nothing else to go on, he was acquitted.
Wiseman was acquitted on all counts of sexual assault charges in 1996.
The more I read and hear, the more damning the big picture becomes (and I'm only a half-dozen pages into reading the actual report. Mel is right now dangling there, clearly on borrowed time provided by an indecisive Warde Manuel.
I think it's time that Santa gets his lumps of coal ready and delivers them early.
Agree. But I sure hope we don't have to wait until October when Santa starts here before some action is taken on Pearson's status. The longer this drags on, the more damage will be done to the hockey program.
We retain Howard but folks want Pearson to go. Nope doesn't work that way.
Put him on double-secret probation and lets win a NC.
Right, there is absolutely nothing different between a post-game blowup and a fostering a culture of systemic toxicity such that female staff members are chased out, seniors en-mass confront the coach, and a captain is chased out of the program and his future career prospects are threatened, right?
Exactly. Juwan made a series of bad choices over the span of a few seconds. Pearson made a series of bad choices over the span of a few seasons.
Objection: more hearsay!!
All the facts never are known in a few days, weeks, months, even years!. Learn from history or repeat past failures!
I think most of us - including the admins of this blog - would've understood if Howard was fired for his behavior, especially because it was a second offense. It was a foolish, violent thing to do after a game. It was momentary, but very very bad.
This is worse - it is also very very bad, but a record of actions that drove a captain to leave the program early and saw inaction over toxic culture in a white collar setting. This isn't a coach yelling at players on the ice - this was a guy wearing a tie yelling at people - mostly but not exclusively women - who were also working at computers and wearing business attire. Mel didn't do the yelling, but he ignored it. Couple that with the dishonesty, and the implied retaliation against players who acted honestly and as leaders - I'm sorry, I love M hockey and want us to win the 'ship, but he needs to go.
Do we have any facts to show this? Right now, all I've seen are allegations and hearsay. I'm not saying he shouldn't be fired; I'm saying we shouldn't fire anyone until we have the collaborated facts to back it up.
This is a huge major problem today, with social media its even worst, folks always jumping to conclusion. We no longer have 'innocent until proven guilty' in life.
I will be the one standing alone, or with a select few others, as usually, just like the Howard incident, when Mel coaches this fall, business as usual.
Time marches on, people will learn eventually from experience, history has meaning yesterday, today and in the future!
Go Blue & Go Michigan Hockey with Mel Pearson as our Head Coach!!
I've defended Warde a bit because I think people over-estimate even the AD's power in the context of a big machine, but this is getting silly. I thought he was too light on Howard, but this is beyond that. He seems to have done fuck all nothing for months, and even if he was secretly doing stuff, the optics of not visibly doing anything at all are so obviously bad that he's incompetent not to have realized that. Can we just not hire someone from Michigan that was buddies with or played for Bo? Please?
Comments