Worst Game Plan You've ever seen

Submitted by jimmyshi03 on

Yesterday's edition of Podcact Ain't Played Nobody featured an interesting question: What is the worst single game plan you've ever seen?

Bill Connelly, he of S&P+ and a Mizzou fan, cited a game in the mid-2000s in which Mizzou, with Brad Smith at quarterback, played at Nebraska, with what he described as 40 mph+ winds, and featured Smith throwing 40 times, rather than running.

Obviously, the pr-Harbaugh era featured a number of bad game plans, including the 27 for 27 game and the 2013 and 2014 MSU games. 

Are there any that stand out for you? Any game plans against Michigan that seemed out of left field?

EDIT: In thinking about it further, I think a special place in hell is reserved for the 27 for 27 game, because of the reliance on a gimmick, the Tackle Over, as a central element of the game plan, especailly because they had to know that 2013-AJ Williams was not going to be capable of holding up, blocking wise. 

4yearsofhoke

December 21st, 2016 at 1:13 PM ^

Hoke versus any uptempo/spread offense/zone read was a joke (ND, OSU, Indiana, even 2014 RUTGERS). Gave up 47 and thankfully won because Indiana had a pitiful defense as well (UM scored in the 60s).

I remember him talking about practicing up-tempo all week before the game. During the game the entire defense looked GASSED.

Ryno2317

December 21st, 2016 at 1:16 PM ^

The Bears vs. Colts in the Super Bowl.

Lovie Smith refuses to bring pressure on Manning even though he already threw a pick the one time they blitzed him early in the game.  Instead, Smith decides that its best to give Manning "the short stuff" and Indy goes on a 7-minute drive to put the game out of reach.

Terrible. 

stephenrjking

December 21st, 2016 at 1:16 PM ^

This thread, to me, demonstrates how hard it is for laypeople like myself to tell what is a good gameplan and what is a bad gameplan. There are some obvious choices, like Brian Kelly throwing out of the shotgun a bunch of times in a hurricane. But it's hard to tell beyond that what events are a product of a poor gameplan and what are just the result of getting beaten. 

Did a team not throw long because their gameplan was bad, or because the defense was dropping an extra safety deep? Was a team's running game pitiful because the coach refused to step away from running the ball, or was the OL getting so owned that running for a yard or two was the only way to keep pressure off of the QB? Was a gameplan good because a team won by 20, or bad because it could have won by 38?

It's hard for us to tell, except for the really obvious mishaps. I have a pretty good memory for stuff like this and finding games where Michigan's gameplan was distinctly bad (as opposed to other problems, like a bad OL or an inaccurate QB or just a generally conservative philosophy) that stick on in memory. There's the trash tornado and the Devin/Denard game at OSU. On the positive side there's the occasional stroke of genius, like the defensive lockdown of Purdue in 2003. 

But that stuff is easy to pick out and there's not a lot of it. It's hard to evaluate this without expertise.

titanfan11

December 21st, 2016 at 1:27 PM ^

and your earlier comment.  There is a difference between a gameplan and a play call.  There is also a difference between not being able to stop something and not planning for it.  

I think of something where a team has film and scouting of another team, but doesn't plan accordingly.  I don't have nealy the memory of the specifics of games as others on here do, but the Super Bowl last year could fit...the Panthers had just seen Denver pressure Brady all day, but then did not give extra help to keep Miller off of Newton.  

zebbielm12

December 21st, 2016 at 1:18 PM ^

2007 OSU game. Injured Henne in the rain throws 34 times. Hart is useless because he's injured and OSU's defense has done nothing but practice defending our single run play for a week. 91 total fucking yards. 

BlueMan80

December 21st, 2016 at 1:31 PM ^

We had a young D-line, but in general, this was as I recall, the first complete defensive meltdown against a spread offense.  Northwestern got chunk play after chunk play and a lot of it on the ground.  Jim Hermann had no clue what to do.  Randy Walker looked like a genius.  Northwestern scored 18 points in the fourth quarter to win the game.  As the future would show, the coaching staff didn't learn any lessons from this hot mess.

PopeLando

December 21st, 2016 at 1:42 PM ^

Notre Dame in 2007. Weis decides to install a gimmick offense preseason, abandons it in the second quarter of game 1 when it isn't working, then starts Clausen in a pro set in game 2. His season opening QB transfers - without telling anyone - by game 3. By game 5 they were back in training camp mode.

Mturner

December 21st, 2016 at 1:52 PM ^

OSU vs MSU last year. Urban kept 2 deep safeties despite the injury pushing TOC into the lineup and only attempting 2 passes the entire second half. Idiotic STACK DA BOX



Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad

Boner Stabone

December 21st, 2016 at 2:06 PM ^

Here are some of mine:

Bo (1987)  First game of the year vs Notre Dame.  The offense was so predictable.  We got pounded 25-7 at home.  It was awful.

Moeller (1993)  @MSU  lost 17-7 and with a running back of Ty Wheatley and QB Todd Collins this should have never happened.

Lloyd ( 2002) Iowa home game. The playcalling was awful, no rythmn, and they blasted us at home 34-9.  Terrible coaching in all facets.

Rich Rod (2010)  @Ohio St.  lost in embarrasing fashion.  The game plan was awful, the defense even worse, and special teams was a disaster.

Hoke (2013)  Nebraska home.  A winnable game with a Borges pro-style attack.  I lost count on how many times I watched Fitz Touissant ran for -1 yards on every play. Lost 17-13 and I officially put Hoke on the hot seat after that.

CTSgoblue

December 21st, 2016 at 3:27 PM ^

Good game to forget.  We were right in the middle of our Hoke ineptitude.

 

  • The previous week, we played MSU and they racked up 11 TFLs and 7 sacks, while we rushed for -48 yards.
  • Then we played Nebraska, who racked up 15 TFLs and 7 sacks while we had -21 yards rushing.  
  • Then we played Northwestern, who only had 10 TFLs and 5 sacks, but they also paired that with 10 PBUs.
  • Then we played Iowa, who had 10 TFLs and held us to 60 yards rushing on a windy, miserable day.

 

We were a miserable team that padded the defensive stats for a lot of our B1G brethren and probably helped get a few guys paid that year in the draft.

Oh yeah, the Nebraska game was the infamous "Mary Sue is drunk" game, too.

Don

December 21st, 2016 at 2:13 PM ^

Carr: "What we discussed at the half we are still in the game at 3-3 was going earlier to our two-minute offense [shotgun formation, more open plays]," he said. "But we wanted to protect our defense, so we decided to stay with the plan."

beedub93

December 21st, 2016 at 6:26 PM ^

Pulling Tretiak after one period on 2/22/80. And then not pulling Myshkin to get an extra skater on the ice.

That, and rolling out the fucking 3-3-5 midweek before the '08 Purdue game.



Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad

YoOoBoMoLloRoHo

December 21st, 2016 at 9:24 PM ^

Borges' refusal to throw anything to the WRs despite numbers advantage or the decision to run up the middle to set long FG for a kicker on a cold streak. Oh, 27 for 27 was agony. I put Home in the toast category after that debacle.

rob f

December 21st, 2016 at 10:02 PM ^

I'm surprised nobody has mentioned RichRod rolling out the 3-3-5 @ Purdue in 2008. We go into Ross-Ade Stadium against a totally beatable Purdue team and Rodriguez forces Schaefer to install a defense he's completely unfamiliar with, using players not recruited to that style of defense. That defensive game plan was DOOMED from the start.

M-Dog

December 21st, 2016 at 11:00 PM ^

That was one of the worst WTF disasters in game planning ever.

It was also when the Rich Rod futility began to look like more than just a one year growing-pains thing.

I had seen Michigan lose some games it shouldn't, but I never saw us look more disorganized up to that point.

steve sharik

December 21st, 2016 at 11:31 PM ^

Shafer was essentially a position coach while Gibson and the Southern Miss guy (Hopson?) installed the 3-3-5.

Really, really dumb move by Rodriguez. Still, at least it was an attempt to solve a problem. It was a bad idea, but at least it was an idea.

To me, with a chance to do something special, and having been shown their game plan failed miserably against the spread vs. IU only two weeks prior, Durkin/Harbaugh come out with essentially the exact same fucking game plan against our arch-rival. Having been utterly exposed against a scheme, the solution was to do...the exact same thing? Just flabbergastingly mind-boggling.

beedub93

December 22nd, 2016 at 8:54 AM ^

IMO, defense was not the problem leading up up that point. Rodriguez essentially let Gibson lead a mid-week mutiny and neuter Shafer.

That was the first time I started questioning things.

The ugly buyout with WVU and other issues that started to crop up left me with feelings of indifference, which manifested itself until JJH.



Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad