St. Thomas (MN) kicked out of NCAA D3 conference for being too good, jumping up to Division 1

Submitted by Wolverine Devotee on October 21st, 2019 at 10:13 AM

One of the wildest stories I’ve ever heard.

Division III power St. Thomas (MN) was voted out of their conference (MIAC) for being too dominant. Enrollment size and resources being cited as factors. 

The Summit League, home to schools such as Denver, North Dakota State, Western Illinois etc has extended an invite to St. Thomas to jump up all the way from D3 to D1. St. Thomas has accepted and will be in Division 1 as early as 2021 pending NCAA approval waiver. 

I can’t recall a D3 ever jumping directly to D1. Pretty unprecedented to see a conference remove a school too. 

http://m.startribune.com/university-of-st-thomas-wants-to-go-division-i-gets-invitation-to-summit-league/562174952/

goblue234

October 21st, 2019 at 10:24 AM ^

They are a decent sized school, and have a fairly well regarded law school in Minneapolis. I'm not totally surprised that they would want to move to D1 for more notoriety. 

rob f

October 21st, 2019 at 10:48 AM ^

Approximately 10,000 students and located in St.Paul MN, I would think they could somewhat succeed in most sports other than football in Div I (and as the linked article says, their football program is trying to join either the Pioneer League or Missouri Valley Conference---FCS/div I-AA). 

What catches my eye most, though, is that they're trying to make a move to join up with a group of schools (including Michigan Tech, Ferris, Northern Michigan, Lake Superior State and others) whose hockey programs are leaving the WCHA to form their own conference.  That might be their toughest task, as they would be recruiting against a slew of other Minnesota schools as they try to upgrade to Div I hockey.

goblue234

October 21st, 2019 at 12:15 PM ^

They are located in the heart of college hockey talent. This would be similar to a Florida college trying to upgrade their football program. It's probably not going to be top 10, but they'll be able to become relevant without a ton of effort.

FatGuyTouchdown

October 21st, 2019 at 10:55 AM ^

St Thomas isn't really too good for the conference. They're usually behind rival St. Johns in the conference. Yes, they beat up on the smaller schools, but the resources and enrollment is a really serious driving factor in the decision. It's not like they win the conference year in and year out. They're a great team, but there were some serious concerns about school size.

droptopdoc

October 21st, 2019 at 5:52 PM ^

read an article that said they dominate the most sports out of the conference winning the "All-Sports" competition for men and women for 12 years running, based on overall record  from the city pages. They go on to say since 08 when the current football head coach took over they have won 118 of 137 games, winning 6 of 9 miac titles,with 31 consecutive conference victories 2014-2018  if thats not domination i dont know what is, this is pretty much on the level of valdosta st's run, and the basket ball team is just as dominate

trueblueintexas

October 21st, 2019 at 11:29 AM ^

As other's have pointed out, this is less about being too good and more about schools wanting to compete against like competition. 

If it was simply about competition Mount Union and Wisconsin-Whitewater would have been kicked out of their conferences over a decade ago. 

Eberwhite82

October 21st, 2019 at 11:40 AM ^

Just to reiterate: They didn't get voted out because they were "too good." They got voted out after years of strife in the conference because of their enrollment size and  the resources going into their athletic department. These are areas where St. Thomas started to increase over time, so it's not like the other schools just looked up and noticed an existing situation. 

St. Thomas has had designs on being a D1, regional school for about 12 years now. And that's perfectly fine. But it's also perfectly fine and reasonable for the teams in their D3 conference to call them out on this stuff.

D3 schools are that classification for a reason. It's simply an unfair and unbalanced situation when one school steps outside of those parameters. 

MgoBlueprint

October 21st, 2019 at 11:51 AM ^

I’m sure if either of these two teams got kicked out. But, know that Johns Hopkins and Hobart both are D-3 programs with their lacrosse teams being D-1. Hobart absolutely dominated D-3 for years before moving up to D-1 years ago. I’m not sure if either teams move was voluntary or not though

Alton

October 21st, 2019 at 12:05 PM ^

When the Division system was created by the NCAA in the early '70s, schools were allowed to put one sport in Division I even if they chose to be lower division in everything else.

That's how you have Michigan Tech as DI in hockey, Lock Haven as DI in wrestling, Johns Hopkins as DI in lacrosse, etc.  Once the NCAA added women's sports, the exception was allowed for one women's program as well.  The exception has been removed for football and basketball--if you are DI in one of those sports, you are DI in every sport.

 

Alton

October 21st, 2019 at 11:51 AM ^

This has interesting implications for hockey.  Once the rest of the WCHA abandons the Alaska schools and UAH, St. Thomas will have completed its probationary period and will be ready to become the eighth member of whatever the new conference is going to be called (with Bowling Green, Ferris State, Lake Superior State, Michigan Tech, Northern Michigan, Bemidji State and Minnesota State-Mankato).

MadMatt

October 21st, 2019 at 12:11 PM ^

I for one would really like to see some of the dominant powers in Div 3 swimming kicked up to Div 2. Swimming is a sport that lends itself to the dominant recruiting program always prevailing. You can look at a heat sheet before the start of the meet, and often tell that one team is so far ahead of the field that they will win even if everyone on their team has a mediocre to poor meet. This is how schools like Kenyon win 20 National Championships in a row. The recruiting pitch is simple: come to Kenyon and we can guarantee you will be part of at least 3 National Championships in the four years you're here. Or, go to a Div 1 school and maybe make the travel squad if you get as fast as projected.

The result is that swimmers who might make a qualification time for Div 1 National Championships will chose to go to Kenyon instead. One Div 3 head coach  I know took a look at Kenyon's line-up in the 400 IM. He compared it to the line up for the Div 1 program where he had  been an assistant coach, and said it was the same. Kenyon had three guys under 4 minutes, and his old Div 1 program tried to ensure they had three guys under 4 minutes.

The consequence of this is boring 20 year runs of unbroken dominance for the teams that get the recruiting pipeline going, and insanely fast qualification times for what is supposed to be a Div 3 meet. If you get three or four of these Div 1 in disguise teams going at the same time, they could fill all the heats themselves, and precious few other teams will get invited. In 2012 a particular swimmer from a team in the same Conference where I was a volunteer made the U.S. Olympic Trials. I got curious, and compared the automatic qualification time for Div 3 Nationals (the "A cut") in his event with the qualification time for, I repeat, U.S. Olympic Trials. Within a couple hundreths of a second, no difference.

Kenyon, you guys are wonderful, amazing. Great job, congratulations. Go pick on someone your own size.

MaizeAndBlueWahoo

October 21st, 2019 at 12:37 PM ^

Swimming is kind of a rich-kids sport anyway because 1) inner city schools don't really have the resources to operate a pool and 2) as with any sport, it's hard to be really good without being on a club team, and you have to pay to do that because it's not a money-generating sport like basketball.

That said, it's kind of unfair to categorize Kenyon as a rich-kid program full of brats who only went there because their parents told them it would look good on a resume.  Kind of insulting to competitors.  D-III schools all find ways to give scholarships without actually giving scholarships, so the financial situation isn't a thing either.