Sam Zell donating $60 million to Ross School

Submitted by 1464 on

Sam Zell is donating $60 million to the Ross School of Business.  $10 million is to be used as seed money for Michigan entrepreneurs that have launched startups that have made it to the seeding stage of development.  A stated goal is that it will develop the local economy and bring jobs and prestige to the region.

Pretty cool stuff.  

http://money.cnn.com/2015/07/13/smallbusiness/sam-zell-entrepreneurs-donation/index.html?iid=hp-stack-dom

Michigan Eaglet

July 13th, 2015 at 11:44 AM ^

The Masters of Entrepreneurship that they started a few years back is really doing well and it'd be great to see even more highly sought after jobs and businesses come to the area.

Blue4U

July 13th, 2015 at 11:58 AM ^

I watch CNBC all the time and they have Sam Zell as a guest host often.  Smart guy obviously.  Him and Ken Langone (Home Depot co-founder) are two guys that I pay attention and watch when they are on.

Pinky

July 13th, 2015 at 1:05 PM ^

I'm not going to rip on a dude who just gave $60 million to the University, but there are many, many people in the business community who do not think Zell is a good guy.

Let's be honest:  You don't amass a fortune of $5 billion without screwing some people along the way.

sadeto

July 13th, 2015 at 3:31 PM ^

How much money does Donald Trump have? We never really know, except it's usually a lot less than he says he's worth. At least twice in the past 30 years his personal net worth has been negative, really negative, and that's to say nothing of his four corporate bankruptcies. Four. But he loves to talk about how valuable he is, personally, even if he's lost boatloads of investor money. When Trump gives something away, it usually isn't coming out of his pocket, and he sometimes reneges on the agreement. Let's hope Zell isn't the same way, he doesn't exactly have a stellar track record either. I'd be curious as to exactly where this $60M is coming from. 

mackbru

July 13th, 2015 at 12:13 PM ^

Sam Zell absolutely decimated two of the country's greatest newspapers: the Chicago Tribune and the LA Times. He's notorious. Just another rich asshole trying to buy a legacy.

wolpherine2000

July 13th, 2015 at 12:55 PM ^

...the Tribune company had plenty of market challenges, but those shouldn't excuse his well documented incompetence as a leader.  There might be something to his entrepreneurial model: somehow his investments seem to have a way of working out well for him, and being disastrous for his equity partners...

robpollard

July 13th, 2015 at 2:49 PM ^

...Zell specifically decimated the Tribune Company, which ran the Chicago Tribune and Los Angeles Times.

While pretty much every major newspaper has had big, big challenges, the NYT, Wash Post, and WSJ etc have weathered them far better than the Tribune or LAT (who went bankrupt b/c of Zell's financial machinations and loading them up in debt in an LBO).

He's been sued by employees b/c he used their retirement money (illegally) to fund the deal, and he's been pursued by the IRS b/c he structured the deals to "avoid" paying taxes. To top that off, both those papers (and in particular the Tribune) are nothing close to as good as they were, and are now far behind the other papers I mentioned, particularly digitally.

I could go on, including the sexual harrassment by managers he brought in, but you get the idea; there were more than "management issues traced to his ownership."

http://www.neontommy.com/news/2010/11/la-times-employees-suing-zell-sco…

http://www.washingtonpost.com/business/economy/how-zell-is-sinking-trib…

 

bronxblue

July 14th, 2015 at 12:05 AM ^

Oh, I'm sure Zell has done some shady stuff; I remember his name from a couple of articles I've read about the fall of the Tribune.  But at the same time, he never struck me as needlessly meddlesome in the everyday affrairs.  Papers and magazines have always been vanity projects to an extent; outside of NYT, WSJ, and maybe the Washington Post, I don't know many "city" papers that have consistently been profitable.  Most struggled with the transition to digital, and even papers that seem to have gotten a decent handle on it (particularly NYT and WaPo under Bezos) have had trouble staying relevant given some of the constraints the medium continues to be hampered by (e.g. remaining beholden to word count for longer stories online).

Here in NYC, the Times really isn't doing all that well; it is still a big paper, but they already had to lease out big parts of their nice new building in Midtown, and there have been dismissals and people leaving at a decent clip.  I'm not the first person to say papers are struggling, and crappy ownership is absolutely part of it, but I just don't think good ownership would have really been able to save papers like the LA Times and the Tribune from the struggles they've experienced.  Maybe dull them slightly, but no amount of business insight would have helped in lots of these cases without absolutely radical changes in management.

mackbru

July 13th, 2015 at 12:37 PM ^

Wrong. This was well before the Internet devastation. Look it up. He's loathed in those cities. Also, why do zillionaire a continually give money to those who need it least? How about giving money to parts of the school that need it more?

Blue in Yarmouth

July 13th, 2015 at 12:48 PM ^

but would go even further and ask why give it to a university at all? Why not try and end world hunger or homelessness or something. A number of years ago now Ted Turner was interviewed and challanged the worlds billionaires to donate half their fortunes to elmnating world hunger. He stated that if only the billionaires did this it could elimintae it completely. The sad fact is most rich people are rich because they are ruthless and greedy. I do believe he donated half his fortune though...

Blue in Yarmouth

July 13th, 2015 at 1:52 PM ^

obviously you're one of those people who, you know...has a home to live in and food on your table. I would bet that to those many millions of individuals who dont have those things it makes a big difference. I'm not talking about going past a homeless person and dropping a dollar in their coffee cup, I'm talking about finding real solutions to the problem. You think giving money to a business school is more valuable than that? I guess we just disagree, which is fine. 

Photogenic

July 13th, 2015 at 2:19 PM ^

If this money serves as the capital needed to start companies which eventually employ 100k people in SE Michigan, I don't see how you could classify this as a bad thing. It's the whole "Give a man a fish, he'll eat for a day. Teach a man to fish, and he'll eat forever" situation. The goal is to create objects and organizations that are self sustaining, and this eliminates the need for Government and charitable organizations to keep people afloat.

Trust me, I don't believe the business community is perfect. But capitalism has lifted more people out of povevrty than any other system ever created.

Blue in Yarmouth

July 13th, 2015 at 2:53 PM ^

I never said it was a bad thing, i simply implied there are better things. Also, I didn't say they should give these people handouts, because that never works, as you point out. What I'm talking about is developing social programs to get these people back on their feet and into the workforce. I'm not advocating giving this money to charities. I'm saying there are ways to combat homelessness and hunger and that money in the right peoples hands could go a long way in doing that. 

MichiganWolverine'14

July 13th, 2015 at 12:41 PM ^

I agree that one giving back to the university is a fantastic thing. That being said, Ross and the majority of its students don't need another $60 million. Give this money to the university as a whole and let it allocate to those who need it most (i.e., a sizable number of LSA students).



Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad

MichiganWolverine'14

July 13th, 2015 at 3:20 PM ^

Sorry, but I have no idea where you are coming from with that comment. I graduated last year, and everyone one of my friends in LSA (and myself) have come out of college either with high paying jobs or enrollment at a top graduate school. A well-rounded education is more valuable today than it ever has been. 

wahooverine

July 13th, 2015 at 4:18 PM ^

That point of a gift like that isn't so an evil, monocle wearing fat cat can shower money on equally evil/greedy, monocle-wearing future fat cats. This is meant to be a catalyzing investment which creates companies and seeds future industries, which will go a long way toward revitalizing the economy of Michigan and the Detroit area.  As a grad I can definitely say that Ross places a lot of emphasis, and may even lead the country in, social entreprenuership and encouraging ventures which create outcomes that benefit more than just shareholder value. I'm not sure what the other $50M is for but even if it builds fancier facilities, attracts notable professors or goes toward scholarships it will still go a long way in helping Ross and Michigan attract the type of entreprenuerial difference makers that Michigan needs.  Who's to say that funneling that money to LSA students who "need" it more will produce higher or better social outcomes in the long run?

MichiganWolverine'14

July 13th, 2015 at 6:21 PM ^

Where did I imply that the money fuels evil or greed? That's great ornamentation on your part, but has nothing to do with my initial comment. Also, I am not placing benefit that's weighed by a "social output". I'm simply talking about providing opportunity. Let's be real, I would wager my yearly salary that the average income of a Ross student far outweighs that of a LSA student. This isn't me blindly saying this; I was an RA in a freshman dorm and see the types of students that occupy these different programs. So why do we continually throw millions upon millions of dollars at a program that educates students of higher income in a brand new building when there are students and infrastructure in LSA that could very much use the support. The university in its entirety is a community. Maybe we should start treating it as such.



Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad

MAccLA

July 13th, 2015 at 1:04 PM ^

In 2007 while I was in the MAcc program at Ross, I had the chance to see Sam Zell speak at the business school about entrepreneurship and share his personal story. I recall him walking into the room with gold bracelets on both wrists plus a pretty heavy looking gold chain necklace--which I found interesting...especially given his emphasis on having liquid wealth. 

 

My friend and I tried to get a word with him after he was done speaking but he literally ran out the door and got into a black Chevy Suburban, which zoomed away just after he got in the car. I wondered why he would be in such a rush to leave. Shortly thereafter, the EOP sale to Blackstone was announced--and it all made sense. What a great call that was to sell at the peak.

Marvin

July 13th, 2015 at 1:06 PM ^

Sometimes reading this board/blog makes me proud to be a Michigan alum. I am serious. We all obviously love Michigan football, but its cool that everyone is so informed about other aspects of life as well. And we can argue civilly about things like the demise of print culture, the ethics of people like Zell etc.

 

Just think how this contrasts with, say, the Paul Finebaum show.

814 East U

July 13th, 2015 at 1:42 PM ^

Zell withdraws donation...donates to the Syracuse bball program.

6 moths later: SU loses $60 million donation.

12 months later: 10 5*s commit to SU.

too soon?

bluebyyou

July 13th, 2015 at 1:56 PM ^

It's great to have billionaires as alums, and we have several.  

I wonder when Larry Page, the Google founder, will cast his blessings upon Michigan. Page and his parents went to Michigan, so there is a very strong linkage to the University.  Page is supposedly worth about 30 billion.

 

Ronnie Kaye

July 13th, 2015 at 2:18 PM ^

I remember the Ann Arbor Google office was originally supposed to employ over 1,000 people. It's turned out to be just a couple hundred, mostly working in sales. The whole venture has just been a way for Ann Arbor SPARK to promote themselves as making way more of a difference in the community than the really have.