Question on "Ohio State and other Big Ten teams" collusion

Submitted by WestQuad on November 8th, 2023 at 12:33 PM

From the Columbus dispatch (10/26)

 Ahead of its College Football Playoff semifinal matchup against Michigan in December, TCU was warned by Ohio State and other Big Ten teams about "Michigan's elaborate sign-stealing scheme," according to a Yahoo Sports report.

Pure speculation on my part, but I want to know* if anyone has seen anything else. 

  • Are these the same teams that were colluding to steal Michigan's signs?   
  • Is there any evidence that they shared Michigan's signs while they were warning TCU?   Seems like their loyalties aren't with the B1G.

Evidently there is no additional payout to the conference for a team making the National Championship game.

My memory of the TCU game is a bit fuzzy but I remember a lot of broken plays by that red headed QB being the difference.  Sign stealing wouldn't influence that.

 

*I've been spending 4-5 hours a day on this while looking for a job and haven't seen it discussed, so be nice to me.

CFraser

November 8th, 2023 at 12:42 PM ^

Yea but they didn’t buy tickets I guess? Idk this is so crazy. Everyone is suspended or nobody is. These talking heads are out of their minds. Stephen A. And Paul Dweeb are on a ban Michigan from the playoffs rant. Absolute morons that have no idea what they’re talking about. Never played. Again, absolutely batshit

Vasav

November 8th, 2023 at 12:43 PM ^

If they had our signs it really shouldn't matter because we beat OSU by 3 TDs and change and they had our signs.

We lost that game because JJ threw 2 pick 6s, we had the ball 3 times inside the 2 and came away with 3 points, and the defense busted mutliple times. From a practical standpoint, they don't matter.

From a NARRATIVE standpoint, it would further that literally everyone does this. But as TCU hasn't been trying to get us penalized, I'm not sure we should blow any smoke their way. OSU, Purdue and RU gaslit the big ten with crocodile tears - don't know exactly who else did too but all of them deserve all the smoke. Let's keep TCU clean in case we jet to the Big 12.

Steve-a-wolverine-o

November 8th, 2023 at 12:44 PM ^

Loyalties are to themselves. Imagine how much it will hurt trying to recruit against our rivals if they are bringing in Natties. Or if they make it to the finals, who would they rather play. Seems to make sense. 

Blau

November 8th, 2023 at 12:44 PM ^

The TCU game is a great example of what adjustments can be made in the 2nd half regardless whether a team knows your signals or not. Its obvious some of UM’s yearly conference opponents are not as privy to this earth-shattering concept as others.

Also - If you’re spending up to 5 hours a day going over this situation, I hope you’re considering a job in research or organizational policy. I would add your recent work under the “Other Skills/Talents” section. 

kyeblue

November 8th, 2023 at 12:48 PM ^

Now it is clear that Ohio State is the ring leader and Rutgers its lackey. Other Big Ten teams, even if they are currently in the ring, should be aware that they could be the target too. 

Colt Burgess

November 8th, 2023 at 12:56 PM ^

Other teams joining Ohio State in this dog-pile will find out that OSU is still going to run up the score on them in future games. So you hate that Jim Harbaugh is beating you to a pulp. Crippling Michigan only hands Big Ten dominance to OSU. So what, member school, do you really gain? 

meeashagin

November 8th, 2023 at 12:50 PM ^

"seems like their loyalties aren't with the B1G"

Not sure if this is sarcasm. No Ohio State doesn't care about Michigan or the B1G.

They only care about their cult fan base...like the 35 year old kid who tapes himself watching every game while wearing batting gloves.

Clarence Beeks

November 8th, 2023 at 12:50 PM ^

It’s funny (not funny, truly) that a common narrative about the TCU game when this first broke out in the media was “that was a game unlike any other that Michigan played last year” as if that was because Michigan didn’t have TCU’s signs. There were absolutely articles and talking heads that said that. But what IF it was a game unlike any other Michigan played because TCU had Michigan’s signals. I think that is absolutely plausible.

goblu330

November 8th, 2023 at 12:51 PM ^

Yes, TCU probably had a good share of Michigan's signs as sign stealing is extremely prevalent and commonplace.

No, we don't care because we are not standing on 3rd base with a big pack of Charmin.

No, it isn't why Michigan lost.  TCU outplayed Michigan and Michigan made too many mistakes to win a football game. 

blueinbeantown

November 8th, 2023 at 12:57 PM ^

The FUCK YOU list

1. ESPN.  With the exception of Des, don't come to AA on 11/25!

2. NCAA.  Double for you Charlie Baker.

3. OSU and Ryan Day.

4. Paul Finebaum aka (Dick with Ears!)

5. Big 10

LSA91

November 8th, 2023 at 1:04 PM ^

Seth and Brian have said that when they do the play by play analysis for UFR, they can usually tell when a team is decisively winning the play call RPS in a way that indicates they may have the other side's signs and it's making a noticeable impact. 

They haven't called out TCU as one of those games, so my guess is that any signs UM or TCU had didn't make much of a difference.

WestQuad

November 8th, 2023 at 1:19 PM ^

To be clear I'm not saying TCU having or not having our signs made a difference.  I'm saying OSU and the other B1G schools not only shared our signs with each other, but most likely shared them with TCU, a team from another conference, in an effort to give them some sort of an advantage.  It is one thing to help IL or Purdue against Michigan, but to help TCU?!  I'm one of those weird people that want the B1G to do well to shut up those SEC folk.  I have friends and relatives that went to MSU, Northwestern, Purdue, Wisconsin, Indiana, Illinois, Iowa PSU and even OSU.  I root for those teams because it makes Michigan's victories better.  

Maybe I'm naïve, but I hope we didn't give OSU's signals to Georgia.  (We didn't.)

I don't think I can root for other B1G teams anymore which is disappointing.

MichiganFootball1313

November 8th, 2023 at 1:22 PM ^

Our D was absolutely abused and we threw 2 pick-6's...that is why we lost.  Stop talking like the rest of the people saying that the only reason why Michigan wins is because they know the plays.

Bo Harbaugh

November 8th, 2023 at 1:34 PM ^

No.  
if we’re shitting on 3rd base for being a whiny bitch about sign stealing and claiming it doesn’t change outcomes because everyone does it…

Then we can’t claim victimhood of claimed sign stealing as well.  Choose a lane.

Yes, the TCU game was closer than the last 2 depantsings of OSU by UM, but we lost to TCU due to

1) 2 pick 6’es

2) Overturned TD which became a turnover at the 1 yard line

3) Turnover on downs inside the 3 yard line.

A bunch of low probability shit for a team probably 14-17 points better on paper.  Shit happens.  It happened that day.  That’s why they play the games 

WestQuad

November 8th, 2023 at 2:05 PM ^

I agree with you.  I'm not complaining that we lost because of sign stealing, but that OSU (and others) have no loyalty to the B1G.   I'm not sure what an analogy is.  Maybe Mike Hart's direction.  You can fight with your brother, but if someone else tries to fight your brother you take your brother's side.  

Et Tu Brutus?

 

Amazinblu

November 8th, 2023 at 1:37 PM ^

Michigan lost to TCU, because of poor execution and an egregious call (or two).

OSU and Rutgers sharing their intelligence with Purdue prior to the B1G CCG is just teamwork - it’s not collusion - they were just working proactively together .. across divisions.. in a creative way to advance Sportsmanship.   Yeah, I think that’s how those three - and any others involved - will try to spin it.

Team 101

November 8th, 2023 at 1:51 PM ^

If they gave them to Purdue, then it is pretty save to assume they gave them to TCU.

I wouldn't expect them to want us to win, whether for conference pride or $$$.  We are more than happy when they lose.

We lost to TCU because natural grass puts us at a disadvantage, they were prepared, we were unprepared and we didn't execute.  Probably a couple of blown calls.

MGoBlue73

November 8th, 2023 at 2:18 PM ^

It wasn't lack of B1G loyalty that OSU cared about.  They were worried about maybe having to play Michigan again and getting their asses kicked for the second time in a season.

Amazinblu

November 8th, 2023 at 2:49 PM ^

From the article "According to ESPN, it’s unclear whether sharing signals violates NCAA rules."

Now - does this impact the Sportsmanship aspect of the B1G rules / guidelines?   How can it be "unclear" whether this violates NCAA rules?    This isn't new - it's been in the NCAA rules / guidelines for almost 30 years.   

How can the answer to a very basic question - be "unclear"?

Perhaps the guideline is - "Professional staffs and assistants with one team - can obtain an opponent's signs - and share them with future opponents of teams they have scouted.   However, amateurs cannot participate in this activity.   Teams can also work together - collude - to combine their findings and share those freely with other teams."

Shorty the Bea…

November 8th, 2023 at 3:28 PM ^

What's clear is Pettiti has paid too much attention to the mob to release a statement nationally about respecting due process to kill this story. 

Because he has not he has opened Pandora's box of shit kicking and mudslinging and things are getting uglier because he's a money guy not a LEADER.

BlueHenBlue

November 8th, 2023 at 3:51 PM ^

You have various B1G teams unsolicitedly calling TCU to warn them about Michigan stealing signs, and you're not going to assume they're sharing other info?

It's fucking sick, but it is what it is. Goading the B1G commissioner today to punish us based off no evidence is taking it to another level. Again, our opponents are showing how deep in the shit they're willing to go.

I'm all for scorching the earth, but this needs to be settled on the field.

cbs650

November 8th, 2023 at 3:54 PM ^

I mean if we wanted to complain we could say TCU knew which gaps were running through everytime and that is why we couldn't run inside zone but all that information can be learned by WATCHING MICHIGAN TAPE FROM THE SEASON LOL.

JonnyHintz

November 8th, 2023 at 5:14 PM ^

My memory of the TCU game is a bit fuzzy but I remember a lot of broken plays by that red headed QB being the difference.
 

Well we lost by 6. JJ threw two pick 6’s and we fumbled on the TCU 1 yard line following a play many believe Michigan should have been awarded a TD on. If we’re going to talk about “the difference” in that game, Duggan and broken plays aren’t what I’d go with