WestQuad

November 7th, 2023 at 7:51 AM ^

Personally I think there is misogyny in both terms and it is unbecoming to use either.  That said, I think the term douchebag has evolved to mean something beyond its original meaning.  See Hot Chicks with Douchebags.  NSFW/Bikinis   Jerk or Matt Gaetz doesn't quite capture the full meaning. 

I used to feel the same way about the term "p*ssy."   Vaginas are strong and one of my favorite things.  The colloquial meaning was perfect but the word it self was misogynistic.  Snowflake was the perfect replacement for it.   Soft is a close second.  I love that I can be condescendingly mean without being anti-woman.  

Don't be a douchebag and clean up your language.  (You said discuss.)

mGo Go Gadget Play

November 7th, 2023 at 11:11 AM ^

I used to listen to the Stuff Your Mom Never Told You podcast. At the time it was hosted by two women. After they did a podcast on douches (the literal devices) and cited lots of evidence that they were at best unnecessary and at worst harmful to women, they decided it was OK to keep using "douche" as a derogatory term. 

[Caveats: Two women on a podcast don't speak for all women. Just providing a different perspective; use your own judgment.]

M-Dog

November 6th, 2023 at 11:08 PM ^

They all do this.  They start with a narrative they want to push then they fill in pieces of a story to push it, overstating some things, and completely leaving out others.

There was a time that a "journalist" would never think of doing that, then it eroded to journalists that did it but would try to hide it, now we are at a state where they reflexively do it and don't even think it's not journalism.  

Wolverine 73

November 6th, 2023 at 8:35 PM ^

Good question.  Media is always interested in providing accurate and complete facts and not slanting a story to gather clicks and push the author’s agenda.  He must have forgotten the information in the crush of pumping out articles based on the latest “information” being fed to him by the investigative and PR firms. 

lhglrkwg

November 6th, 2023 at 8:38 PM ^

Lmao. The guys twitter handle doesn't exactly scream unbiased source but its plausible. Thamel is obviously hoping he's onto the crime of the century that is going to win him widespread acclaim. Inconvenient truths detract from that goal

blueheron

November 6th, 2023 at 8:38 PM ^

Interesting. If I'm sympathetic to Michigan and have any brains, Thamel is one of the last people I'm calling. He may share the information with Michigan's enemies. Maybe that wouldn't materially change anything, but it would give them a few days to prepare.

stephenrjking

November 6th, 2023 at 8:38 PM ^

I want to believe this, but I have no reason to believe that a random person who is apparently a big Michigan fan is the one person who is aware of what this anonymous staffer has done with the information.

This is probably just baseless rumor.

I'm more interested why ESPN, which has barely had any time in the last two weeks without a headline about this story on its front page story list, has not said anything about the AP article regarding other teams conspiring to steal Michigan's signs. 

bronxblue

November 6th, 2023 at 8:51 PM ^

Sure, it's probably just a rumor but I do think it's telling that it was an AP writer who wound up publishing this despite ESPN/Yahoo/etc. going at this story full-bore for weeks.  I have to assume somebody reached out to them with additional info and either they didn't view it as credible or they didn't care.  Because while no news organization is perfect I do trust the AP more than those 2 other sites to check on the credibility of sources.

dbrhee

November 6th, 2023 at 8:44 PM ^

Nothing surprisingly who can't even get the report right on Teo's "girlfriend". He makes journalism look bad... No wonder being with ESPN is the right fit... Now, ESPN is going to look worse each day for even hiring and believing this click bait was going to last... 

Stupidity run a muck and now, he needs to answer to why he would hide one side but not the other.... 

bronxblue

November 6th, 2023 at 8:46 PM ^

I mean, does this surprise anyone?  Thamel getting shitcanned at some point because of his shitty reporting around this is low-key one of the more intriguing possibilities of this whole scandal.  It wouldn't be immediate but he looks bad doing TV, seems like an asshole when talking about college sports, and if he legitimately ignored additional information while cherry-picking from OSU-based sources that's a bad look for a "journalist".

dbrhee

November 6th, 2023 at 9:16 PM ^

So called journalist but his notoriety was the Manti Teo story. He is a more or less OSU homer onw but reported (in good light) of Urban (and OSU) for access.. That is what I know.

References: 

https://www.on3.com/teams/kentucky-wildcats/news/the-two-biggest-losers-of-manti-teo-story-pete-thamel-and-pat-forde/

https://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/erik-wemple/wp/2013/01/17/manti-teo-there-but-for-the-grace-of-god/

 

turtleboy

November 6th, 2023 at 9:10 PM ^

There are some good IJs out there who have extremely strong biases, but are able to push them to the side, and I respect them immensely for it, because they're so rare. 

DelhiWolverine

November 7th, 2023 at 7:24 AM ^

Shellenberger and Taibi come to mind. Both solidly left leaning journalists who worked to report on Twitter’s actions that arguably showed significant bias toward the Democratic candidates in the 2020 election. 

bostonsix

November 6th, 2023 at 9:10 PM ^

Because everyone is being paid so Ohio can win, that's the only way ohio knows how to win. Pay for play, pay for the downfall of your competitors.