OT: Terrell Owens doesn't make NFL HoF again...

Submitted by BursleyBaitsBus on

Downright disrespectful at this point. 

 

LaDanian Tomlinson, Kurt Warner, Jerry Jones, Terrell Davis, Jason Taylor and Morten Anderson made it in. 

 

So the writers thought that Morten Anderson, a kicker, deserved to get in before TO? Just ridiculous. 

 

I know he was a douche as a player, but that has nothing to do with his credentials for the hall. 

Blueblood2991

February 4th, 2017 at 8:48 PM ^

Pretty ridiculous. The guy's numbers speak for themselves. Yeah, he was a douchebag, but never failed a drug test, was never arrested, etc....

I'm more upset that Ty Law didn't get in this round. A kicker over Ty Law. Come on.

Goggles Paisano

February 5th, 2017 at 7:30 AM ^

I have a bigger problem with TD getting in over TO.  TD was good while he played, but he didn't play that long.  He played 4 full seasons and then 17 games in his last 3 seasons.  To be a HOF'er you need longevity to go along with the greatness IMO.  

At least Morten Anderson was one of the best kickers every year for a long long time. Shit he played for 23 seasons - that is crazy.  He is not as deserving as TO but way more deserving than TD.  

TB12

February 4th, 2017 at 8:54 PM ^

I would pick Owens over Terrell Davis. Davis only had three "great" seasons and that was while playing with Elway and a Denver team that had a great offensive line. 

Rhino77

February 4th, 2017 at 9:04 PM ^

There are greater tragedies in life. He will get in. Maybe this will be an example to others not to be a clown. There are repercussions for your actions in life.

coldnjl

February 4th, 2017 at 9:11 PM ^

That is wonderful and all, but the facts are that is second all time in receiving yards (15,934) and third all time in touchdowns (153). He also played through a major injury in the super bowl and would have won the MVP in that game if the Eagles won. If you are to judge if he belongs, those numbers speak for themselves, at least to logical voters

Perkis-Size Me

February 4th, 2017 at 9:05 PM ^

He was a good receiver, no doubt, but I'll never remember him for being anything more than a diva who cried like a baby who got his toy taken away when it seemed like the spotlight wasn't on him.

If he makes the HoF, fine. He has great numbers. But if he doesn't, I don't really care. He's as self centered as it gets.

SWFLWolverine

February 4th, 2017 at 10:32 PM ^

That is my thought, he played 7 seasons, after the 4th where he rushed for 2000 yards, he played a total of 17 games and rushed for 1200 yards and 4 TDs. Essentially he got in based upon 1 exceptional year and the fact that his career was cut short due to injury. He gets in, and an all-time top 3 numbers wise does not. That is a joke.

stephenrjking

February 4th, 2017 at 9:32 PM ^

Morton Anderson's induction means that Adam Viniatieri just went from "good chance he's the first kicker in forever to get in" to "stone cold lead pipe mortal lock." Which I am ok with.

Warner and Davis getting in together is appropriate, if it can be said Davis belongs there at all (I personally don't think so, but Davis was successful at a time in the career of Barry Sanders and a time of my life in which I am completely, utterly, and totally irrationally biased against him and cannot render an objective opinion. But Olandis Gary and Mike Anderson both had huge seasons behind that OL after Davis got hurt and their zone-blocking philosophy completely took over football, and he had John Elway and Shannon Sharpe and Ed McCaffrey and Rod Smith on the same offense, so maybe Davis was just in the right place at the right time and oh man I'm doing it again sorry). 

Both Warner and Davis had smaller windows in which their production was HOF worthy, but they were astonishingly productive in those windows. I was a huge Warner fan from the moment that SI "Who Is This Guy?" cover dropped in 1999, so if Davis getting in is the trade I have to make, I will take it. 

But the HOF committee, which I generally respect and think does things well, has a serious receiver problem. Davis might deserve entry, but not over Owens. And the NFL is increasingly becoming a passing-dominated league, and there are already a ton of great receivers coming down the pike. And guys like Owens were on the forefront of it. They need to induct these guys.

 

Goggles Paisano

February 5th, 2017 at 7:37 AM ^

I agree that Viniatieri gets in no doubt.  Eddie Murray and Jason Hanson were two of the best kickers also for the Lions and were in place for most of my lifetime.  Benny Ricardo was the kicker when I was 6 years old followed by Murray and Hanson.  Hanson retired when I was 42.  Those two won't get in, but they would be on the next tier of the greatest kickers of all time IMO.  Just wanted to throw a little love their way as they often get forgotten.   

LSAClassOf2000

February 4th, 2017 at 9:34 PM ^

Yeah, I don't get this either - we can debate Terrell Owens the person all we want, but I don't think anything that he's been or done speaks louder than the numbers that he put up in his NFL career. That he can't seem to make it into the Hall Of Fame is just ridiculous at this point, in my own opinion.

Perkis-Size Me

February 4th, 2017 at 9:44 PM ^

A good receiver, but in my eyes he's nothing more than a diva who cried like a baby who got his toy taken away when the spotlight wasn't all on him.

Maybe his numbers warrant him getting in, and I won't debate his talent. But he's a self centered diva who made more headlines off the field than he did on the field. And he never won a Super Bowl.

Moving on.

Witz57

February 4th, 2017 at 10:03 PM ^

You could argue the that unprofessionalism and locker room cancer somewhat mitigate individual statistics in terms of wins and losses. Not saying that's for sure specifically true to him but it's worth looking accessing.

OwenGoBlue

February 4th, 2017 at 10:20 PM ^

Ok, Skip. Did his teams lose a game for every 100 situps in the driveway? 1,000?

He did snipe at McNabb a few times to be fair, but so did the Eagles (before McNabb handled all of the reputation damage himself late in his career). The worst thing about TO's behavior was the absurd moralizing by pundits.

Sllepy81

February 4th, 2017 at 10:17 PM ^

the most dominant receiver in the NFL in his prime that I ever saw in my life. He was a awful teammate and all but as an individual nobody took over at receiver like him.

Eastside Maize

February 4th, 2017 at 11:29 PM ^

He was a fierce competitor who produced on the field. There are 2 people on your team who don't harangue publicly, the QB and kicker. TO hurt his teams by undermining his QBs.

Perkis-Size Me

February 4th, 2017 at 11:30 PM ^

Talent is undeniable, but in my mind he'll be remembered more for his whining and his antics than he will for his actual on-field play. He was nothing more than a diva who whined like a baby who got his toy taken away whenever the spotlight wasn't all on him. And he never won a Super Bowl. Not saying he didn't have great talent. He sure did. But he could've been so much more. He was a self centered diva who thought that the world revolved around him.

OwenGoBlue

February 5th, 2017 at 1:00 AM ^

I spoke too soon above. This is the Skip take, down to including the opposite of this blog's white athlete jokes. Dude worked as hard as anyone, ate unbelievably well (I remember a story where he had never had pizza or something wild), didn't drink, never got into actual trouble and slept in a damn hyperbaric chamber. Went from Chattanooga to dominating for an incredibly long time by making football 100% of his focus. I'm a Giants fan so I never rooted for him (he haunted them from SF to Philly to Dallas) but a big ego is no reason to keep a guy out of the HOF.

ThereWillBeNoHugs

February 4th, 2017 at 11:47 PM ^

What happened to Dennis "the menace" Rodman with the NBA Hall of Fame. It was assumed they would never nominate him because of the things he did off the court (ex. dressing up in a wedding dress). People got so angry that he wasn't even considered over scrub hall of famers, that they put out petitions on his behalf (I signed one btw). From there, the media caught wind and had the commentary so many of you are having in this thread ("bad attitude, but great player that deserves to be in"). This pressure forced the NBA to finally cave. Owens was an absolute monster on the field. He should be in there despite his mental problems. Maybe his fans will start a petition too.

gobluerebirth

February 5th, 2017 at 1:58 AM ^

Anyone who thinks TO isn't a HOFer doesn't know anything. How can Moss be a first ballot and TO miss two straight years. This isn't baseball. You're judged BETWEEN the lines. Yes, he was a classic shitty teammate. But, the guy is Top 2-3 ALL TIME at his position. Fuck the voters. BURN THE COUCH. Sorry, he was my favorite player. :/

Swayze Howell Sheen

February 5th, 2017 at 2:50 AM ^

they make a story line for a player (either he's a good, hard workin' joe, or a bad me-first diva) and then every story revolves around that same stupid story line. like anyone here knows what kind of "teammate" he was. even so, it's not a 'best fucking teammate' hall, it's about production on the damn field. and TO was legend. worked damn hard and could ball. end of story. 

mGrowOld

February 5th, 2017 at 10:00 AM ^

The dude was a complete DICK his entire career to the very people who vote on the HOF and people wonder why they are sticking it to him now?  Election to the HOF is vote by people, people with emotions and memories, of who they "feel" deserves entry.  It's not empirical by any means (see the sheer number of Minnesota Vikings from the 70s not in versus the Steelers from the same era and compare their lifetime stats) and yes - personal agendas do play a role.

FWIW let Owens serve as a learning lesson to anyone still in college.  Once you start your career be nice to people on the way up cause you very well may pass them again on the way back down.