OT: Talking Cars Tuesday - It's electric

Submitted by JeepinBen on

Better late than never!

Anyway - on to our topic for the week. The big Auto news (somewhat befuddling to me) is the Tesla Model 3 and how excited folks are for it. So - electrics. Do you think you'd buy one? What would it take to get you to buy electric? Are you waiting for something? I'll answer in the comments as per normal...

Blue In NC

April 5th, 2016 at 2:23 PM ^

I am fully on board with this technology.  Full disclosure - I have a deposit in on a Model 3.  Having driven the Model S several times over the years and I am a full believer.  Sure, the technology needs to keep improving and getting cheaper but right now the Model S beats most of its competitors on most measures other than re-fueling convenience (and that is tipping closer to neutral).  The performance and looks of the new models are compelling.  I see a shift coming in the next 5-10 years with full electrics will be a significant share of the market.  Obviously, the vast decline of fuel prices are slowing down adoption right now but if prices go back up, I feel the technology will be there to support a paradigm shift.

xtramelanin

April 5th, 2016 at 2:31 PM ^

but he has a limited commute and i think for the foreseeable future electric cars are niche vehicles.  nice concept, great if they can go further for cheaper, with much faster re-charge. 

also, the not-so-secret secret is that the batteries at some point have to be replaced, and getting rid of the old ones make for a significant environemental problem (mercury, lead, etc.) that most don't take into account.  and those are big batteries.

we run diesels and since i can make the fuel from cooking oil in the barn, i'm not worried about running out or hurting the enviroment. 

xtramelanin

April 5th, 2016 at 6:43 PM ^

they leave the jugs outside the back door and i drive by and put them in the back of the truck.  

and yeah, it does smell amazingly good when burning and it makes the diesels run quieter b/c of the much greater lubricity that the ULSD lacks.   better mileage too.   the only hang up is that i don't like to run it in the winter weather b/c the biodiesel has a higher gel point and it won't do me any good to have a tank full of crisco, waiting to thaw. 

sadeto

April 5th, 2016 at 3:23 PM ^

Tesla's batteries use lithium-ion technology, they don't contain mercury or lead. It's true that recycling will present a challenge since it currently makes no economic sense, but we're not there yet. When we get there, there will be a solution. That's years away. 

Biodeisel still has a carbon impact, it's just offset by growing vegetable matter to make the oil. I guess I buy that argument but I'd rather see the carbon stay trapped in the fat and have the energy generated in another way. 

Hail-Storm

April 6th, 2016 at 12:36 AM ^

Or Mercury. There is a possibility that Europe could do a complete lead ban in 2025 if lithium starter batteries are viable alternatives. Lithium batteries are designed to last for 8-10 years with 80% capacity life using the highest drive cycle and highest temperature environment they may be used in. Heat is what kills battery life. In Michigan I don't see why you couldn't get 15 years out of a battery. At end of life there is a lot of recycling to recover the materials.

Bronco648

April 5th, 2016 at 2:35 PM ^

As someone with a motorcycle classification on his license, I think I'll try an electric bike first. Whether it be a scooter, dual sport or trials bike, I haven't yet decided.

Detwolverine2009

April 5th, 2016 at 2:40 PM ^

Question for those who know, I am a different kind of engineer... Am I wrong in thinking that it is currently "dirtier" to produce an equivalent amount of energy via electricity than just straight burning/combusting of fossil fuels? Im wondering if everyone went electric in the next 10-15 years if our technology for producing enough electricity for that level of consumption would have any net benefit on amount of fossil fuels being used. Sorry if wording is confusing, couldn't figure out a better way of stating.

Gallagher

April 5th, 2016 at 2:52 PM ^

Electric cars are greener than their gasoline counterparts, still taking everything into account. I think I read somewhere that three average electric cars are as "green" as one average gasoline car. Don't take that as gospel though, and I could very well be proven wrong.

Regardless, in the next five years you're going to see some great advancement in this area of automotive. I work at an auto company so I know what's coming soon, and it'll be exciting. I'm strongly considering buying one in 5 years if it all pans out, from my company or elsewhere.



Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad

Detwolverine2009

April 5th, 2016 at 3:00 PM ^

Good to know more, sometimes I know just enough to be dangerous. Seemed for a while to be something being pushed just so people could feel good they are doing something, even if the comparables weren't logical with everything taken into account. Will be interesting to see where it goes. Hopefully we come up with better ideas than wind farms.

Gallagher

April 5th, 2016 at 6:09 PM ^

I know where you're coming from. The tech wasn't there before, but it is and will continue to be even better down the road. I don't know much about energy, but wind/solar won't be able to hold the demand. Nuclear fusion is eventually where we want to end up, but nuclear plants probably should be put up. No one wants them though, because of the disastrous consequences if something goes wrong. Understandable.



Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad

blue in dc

April 5th, 2016 at 10:08 PM ^

Last year we built more new wind in the US than any other type of power generation. As we see continued advancement in energy management (both storage and the ability to move load) projections for how much we can depend on intermitent sources of electricity like wind and solar. When you combine that with non-intermittant renewable resources like hydro, geothermal, bio-mass and opportunities to use waste heat (e.g. Cogeneration) from industrial sources, the need for multibillion dollar centralized electricity only coal and nuclear plants becomes smaller and smaller.

SHub'68

April 5th, 2016 at 9:33 PM ^

There were a lot of concerns about the capacity of the electric grid a few years ago.  I haven't been hearing much about that lately, but it can't have just gone away.  Seems that we'd need to solve this if we put additional strain on it by adding the charging of millions of cars.  What I've heard discussed about that is most electric vehicle charging is done at night, when demand for everything else is lower.  Makes sense, though I'm not sure if this would hold up as more and more charging moves to public places versus at home - ie, more likely to happen during the day.

blue in dc

April 6th, 2016 at 11:30 AM ^

Leaks at a natual gas storage facility are driving concerns about natural gas availability this summer. http://www.latimes.com/local/lanow/la-me-ln-aliso-canyon-blackouts-2016…. With regards to the bigger question, in general, low natual gas prices and low renewable prices are leading to increases in capacity from those sources even as coal unots retire. Our growing ability to manage electric load is also helping. Further, EVs are a potential mechanism to help manage this load. At a minimum, charging rates can be varied to adjust to minute to minute load changes, but they could also potentially be used to incrrase supply by draining batteries. I"ve always wondered about the feasibility of this even though many suggest it. It seems unclear that car owners would be excited about extra charging/re-charging cycles that could reduce battery life for charging.

Wendyk5

April 5th, 2016 at 2:45 PM ^

I've never driven one but I am, I guess, undeservedly biased against them. While I like the idea of an environmentally friendly vehicle, I also have an old school idea of driving enjoyment: I drive a manual. I just read a review of the Tesla 3 and they said it really isn't a driver's car. Power windows and a back up camera are about as high tech as I want to get. When the car does everything for you, the fun is lost.

Blue In NC

April 5th, 2016 at 2:59 PM ^

I am not sure what "driver" would have a hands-on review since the Model 3 was just "released" and no one was allowed to drive one (only ride alongs).  Hard to say it's not a driver's car when the reviewer has not driven it.

And you really need to drive one before deciding that.  The Tesla Model S is plenty of a "driver's car" although admittedly its not as jerky or loud as a traditional sports car.  But it does put you into the back of the seat and because the battery pack is located at the floor, the center of gravity is very low and allows for good, responsive handling.

JFW

April 5th, 2016 at 4:20 PM ^

Where does he get all the rare earth metals for the battery pack? 

In going electric around here, I'm putting my power generation from my efficient, very emission controlled motor and putting it on a coal plant that's 50 years old or more. 

Electric is good in theory, but I think you get a much better environmental bang for your buck with hybrids. It would be better, if that's your cup of tea, to go diesel/electric. 

Needs

April 6th, 2016 at 11:34 AM ^

And it really depends where you are in the country. If you're in Phoenix, which relies on old dirty coal plants located up on the Navajo Reservation for a lot of electrical generation, then an electric car is going to be less green. If you're in the Pacific Northwest, which relies on hydro, it's going to be greener. Michigan's largely a mix of coal, nuke and natural gas, but has seen a boom in wind over the past 6-7 years.

Here's Michigan's energy map and profile

 

http://www.eia.gov/state/?sid=MI#tabs-4

wolverine in jp

April 5th, 2016 at 2:46 PM ^

I do not see pure electric vehicles taking a large share of the passenger vehicle market. I do see, however, mild hybridization becoming standard in some vehicles. this allows for a major downsize in engine and great decreases in fuel consumption and emissions (electric superchargers, regen braking, high egr levels etc).

LSBlue

April 5th, 2016 at 2:46 PM ^

I have always kept an eye on the all electric market. Until the Tesla Model 3, the price and visual appeal have never married up for me to consider anything seriously. I will be watching this closely. I am very curious what the base cost of $35k will get you, what the options are, and where the final price will land for one I'd consider buying. That may push it out for me in reality. At minimum, I hope the Model 3 release will encourage other automakers to make an all electric more affordable AND more visually appealing. The BMW and Volt are hideous.

MaizeAndBlueWahoo

April 5th, 2016 at 2:51 PM ^

TBH I can't see the appeal in the looks of the Model 3.  I think it's ugly.  Not even the lack of grille, just the shape and lines.  On the other hand I always liked the Volt, and the ELR is excellent and looks way more like a futuristic sci-fi car - like something you'd see anime artists conceive - than anything Tesla builds.

MaizeAndBlueWahoo

April 5th, 2016 at 4:31 PM ^

Not likely to happen.  The $7500 tax credit phases out 12 months after Tesla sells their 200,000th vehicle.  The Model 3 is coming out, according to Tesla, late 2017, but then Tesla has missed 100% of their stated delivery deadlines.  They've sold about 73,000 in their lifetime so far and in two years when the Model 3 is actually ready, they'll be up to about 125,000.  So at most 75,000 of them, plus 12 months of deliveries (and during that 12 months, the tax credit shrinks), will get the credit.  But fewer than that, because they're not going to stop selling Model S and X.

And then there's the fact that Tesla is reserving the first Model 3s for current Tesla owners, in other words, rich people who don't need the credit and will load up on options.

So it would be a surprise to me if Tesla ever sells a sub-$30K Model 3.  Oh, and the closer you are to California, the sooner you'll get one, so the East Coast won't see them for like four years.

(This is to say nothing of the fact that a $7500 tax credit is not a $7500 tax refund.  It's just the IRS deciding you made $7500 less than you did and deducting that from your taxable income.  You're still forking out $35K for the car, you're just not counting part of that on your income.)

Joby

April 5th, 2016 at 8:11 PM ^

Your broader point is still valid. The available credits are likely to go to existing owners, who are less likely to need them. I'm deciding between a Model 3 and a Volt for my next vehicle and it's the tax credit issue (Volts with a certain low-emissions package are also eligible for the credit) that pushes me more toward the Volt. Plus, the Volt is already available.

MaizeAndBlueWahoo

April 5th, 2016 at 8:28 PM ^

So far, in the whole universe of electrified cars since the EV1, the Volt is the only one that I've ever seriously considered being an early adopter of.  GM deserves more credit than they get, IMO.  I'm looking forward to when PHEVs are more ubiquitous.  I think about three years and you'll start to see them become fairly ubiquitous on dealer lots, to the extent that there'll be real choice in the market.  Right now you're choosing between an EV and a PHEV - by 2019, 2020, we'll be saying, I want a PHEV (or HEV or EV), which one should I get?