NCAA dealt huge blow in federal court

Submitted by max8700 on November 4th, 2023 at 9:22 AM

Several athletes suing the NCAA were granted class certification yesterday:

"A federal judge granted class certification to three different groups of college athletes Friday in an ongoing antitrust case against the NCAA, a decision that significantly increases the potential financial penalties the NCAA could face if it continues its losing streak in federal court."

https://www.espn.com/college-sports/story/_/id/38813620/athletes-granted-class-certification-antitrust-case-vs-ncaa

IANAL but have been tracking the NCAA's string of losses in federal court the past decade with a certain amount of enjoyment (O'Bannon & Alston being the big cases). From what I can tell, this certification exponentially increases the leverage for plaintiffs and the liability risk to the NCAA.

The NCAA is dying. It just doesn't know it yet. 

JHumich

November 4th, 2023 at 9:25 AM ^

Michigan doesn't cheat but multiple interested parties needed dirt. Not just a penalty but damaging dirt. This was one of those parties, and probably the most financially interested. cui prodest? cui bono? 

St Joe Blues

November 4th, 2023 at 9:43 AM ^

This is half the reason why it seems like the NCAA is out to get Jim Harbaugh. The other half is how soft 3B Day is.

https://twitter.com/MJoeBean/status/1720656732114870563

 

bronxblue

November 4th, 2023 at 9:45 AM ^

Yeah, this has been inevitable for a while but my guess is we'll see the NCAA cease to exist as currently constituted in the next decade or so.  The leagues don't need them, the schools don't really need them, and the one thing they're supposed to be good at - setting consistent rules and administration - has been botched a lot.  

kyeblue

November 4th, 2023 at 9:56 AM ^

conferences may be dying too, at least the way we know it, and the demise of Pac-12 to prove it. I see a football super league with its own TV contract. 

Grampy

November 4th, 2023 at 10:02 AM ^

The NCAA is a monopolistic front for greedy-ass university presidents.  Start with that.  They only care about squeezing money out of college athletics and holding the athletes down is part of that equation.  They have no ethics or interest in athletics other than how it pertains to money.  They can't be launched into the Sun fast enough.

Harball sized HAIL

November 4th, 2023 at 10:08 AM ^

NCAA Rule 340 subsection 12.1.C

"Student athletes now have the potential to earn as much as $25million per school year.  Not by our design but by the SCOTUS.  We have no say in who will earn what amount of money.  But if you buy a recruit lunch we will bury you."

Don

November 4th, 2023 at 10:22 AM ^

"a decision that significantly increases the potential financial penalties the NCAA could face if it continues its losing streak in federal court."

Welp, that means that the NCAA has no choice but to pursue Jim Harbaugh for cheeseburgers, an impermissible Zoom call during a deadly pandemic, and for having an idiot staffer who thought he was conducting special ops.

AWAS

November 4th, 2023 at 11:10 AM ^

...and it's not just any federal judge who is hearing this case, it is one with a history of rulings in favor of the players.  From ESPN:

House vs. the NCAA is being heard in the Northern District of California by Judge Claudia Wilken, whose previous rulings in NCAA cases paved the way for college athletes to profit from their fame and for schools to direct more money into their hands.

turtleboy

November 4th, 2023 at 11:53 AM ^

Strange to see the NCAA getting the death penalty for rules violations. Would you say they engaged a "vast network" to rake in billions of dollars that legally belonged to other people? Think how many cheeseburgers you could buy with those impermissible benefits.