OT: The Greatest Upsets in Sports

Submitted by stephenrjking on

We just witnessed sports history.

UMBC, a 16 seed, just beat Virginia, a 1 seed. We've all seen the stats since then: this is the first 16 seed to win in 136 tries. The remarkable 135-0 streak was one of the great streaks in sports.

And it makes this one of the great upsets of all time. This is a delight for every sports fan in the country tonight. I believe this is, easily, the upset of the century, in any sport.

What are others that rank with this? I can think of two that even rate, one of which is higher. What are upsets that approach this internationally, or in unusual sports?

We've seen history. Where does it rank?

maize-blue

March 17th, 2018 at 7:14 AM ^

Video of that 1954 Indiana state championship exists. The game represented in the movie actually is very similar to what really happened, including clutch free throws at the end and a near buzzer beater to win it. Milan had an enrollment of 161.

mi93

March 17th, 2018 at 10:19 AM ^

In the movie, they beat South Bend Central - a powerhouse in their day which produced a PG that played for Wooden. In real life, Milan beat Muncie Central, THE powerhouse in Indiana. They had the most state titles in the single, all-schools tournament era.

UMxWolverines

March 17th, 2018 at 1:34 AM ^

Am I gonna have to be the first to mention it? Come on. App State vs Us will be one of the biggest upsets to ever happen, and reason being we are a blue blood in football and were ranked in the top 5 at that. And it was no fluke just like tonight. App State had better athletes than we did. I hate that it happened, but it did and every team we have should be forced to watch it to know you can't ever go into a game expecting to win.

UMxWolverines

March 17th, 2018 at 2:35 AM ^

Our offense was out of sync all day and had a ton of 3 and outs. They sustained long ass drives, they outgained us by a bunch, and we had to make an 11 point comeback. Then they totally mismanaged the clock at the end, they could have run it to the end and won on their go ahead field goal but kicked it too early. Plus blocking two kicks is no fluke, that almost never happens.

Jasper

March 17th, 2018 at 10:49 AM ^

I similarly do not understand why some of the same fans truly believe Michigan was one ill-advised hit (Crable on Smith) from playing for (and, of course, winning, because we "matched up" with Florida better than OSU) the national championship in '06. They apparently didn't watch the Rose Bowl.

NittanyFan

March 17th, 2018 at 1:36 AM ^

whatever one considers the 5-10 biggest upsets in sports history are, this is the only one that comes in the social media era. 

Twitter technically existed for the 2007 college and pro football seasons (each of those seasons had candidates for the biggest upset list), but it was just at the nascent of its explosive growth.

That dynamic added to tonight --- people learned about it and tuned in and the experience BUILT.

DelhiWolverine

March 17th, 2018 at 1:36 AM ^

Although it’s not an upset per se, the Boston Red Sox coming back from 3 games and 8 2/3 innings down to beat the New York Yankees in 4 straight games and win the ALCS is a staggering feat. It’s possible for lightning to strike once, but for a team to do what Boston did is truly unprecedented.

ST3

March 17th, 2018 at 2:15 AM ^

UMBC was only 20 to 1 to win. I would have thought that would have been higher. Buster Douglas was 42 to 1 against Tyson. I remember watching ESPN report on the fight from the West Quad Adams House TV lounge. Everyone there was stunned. Tyson was larger than life. He was regularly destroying fools in the first round. And then Buster Douglas happened.

J.

March 17th, 2018 at 2:21 AM ^

What I remember most about it was the crowd being stunned silent.  I remember saying to my father, "If this had been in Vegas, the fans would have been going nuts."  I'm not sure if it was cultural or what, but the general atmosphere seemed to be one of confusion. :)

ST3

March 17th, 2018 at 1:37 PM ^

I lived on the same floor as Michael Talley and Tony Tolbert. They spent A LOT of time playing video games. Tolbert, a 30 ppg scorer in high school, called everyone "Chief." There was a guy on our floor who loved Metallica and wore high top basketball shoes that appeared to be 3 sizes too big. The year before I was also in Adams. A guy on our floor nicknamed his roommate "baboon" because he looked like a baboon and no one could argue with him. He would randomly yell out, "Bah-booooooon," and then go about his day. Odd, the things I remember from school.

J.

March 17th, 2018 at 1:52 AM ^

I'm normally the last person on the blog to mention soccer, but I'm led to understand that the 1950 US victory over England in the World Cup is often considered the most unlikely upset in sports history.

Yeoman

March 18th, 2018 at 1:14 AM ^

...but I think there's a lot of truth to it. The English in 1950 were sure that, as the originators of the game, they were superior to everyone else...but in reality they'd been left behind technically and tactically, something they didn't even begin to understand until the Hungarians took them apart three years later.

It was still a huge upset, but 500:1 was probably more a matter of English overestimation of their own strength. Those were the odds at London houses, after all.

Victor Hale II

March 17th, 2018 at 5:16 AM ^

I may be alone in my belief that this UMBC win wasn’t really that big of an upset. Of course there is the history and the impeccable track record of 1 vs 16, but I’ve thought for a while that it’s just a matter of time before a 16 beats a 1. College basketball is a whole different game nowadays than it was maybe 20-25 years ago. Many of these “big” schools feature 1-2 year players who have their minds on the NBA, Smaller schools will often feature a veteran lineup with guys who are not only good players, but are really invested in these games, and play good team ball. To me, there are no “upsets” anymore. Nobody should be at all surprised when lower seeds beat higher seeds, or “no-name U” beats “pay for play U”.

J.

March 17th, 2018 at 5:30 AM ^

Yes, you're alone in this.  Penn over Kansas wouldn't have been unexpected.  "A 16" beats "a 1," sure.  But not this 1.  Virginia plays like the small school you're describing.  They played consistent, suffocating team basketball all year.

And they didn't just get upset -- they got run out of the gym in a way that nobody had done all year.  UMBC put up the best offensive efficiency that UVa allowed all season.  It's not just the fact that they lost, it's how they lost.

In reply to by J.

Sione For Prez

March 17th, 2018 at 7:41 AM ^

Not this 1 and also not this 16. Like you said, Penn was a popular pick to be the one to make it happen against a less dominant 1 seed. UMBC lost a game this year 83-39 (!) in late January to Albany.

HHW

March 17th, 2018 at 8:19 AM ^

This was t just a 1 seed. It was the overall #1 seed. It wasn’t like people were arguing that they shouldn’t be a 1 seed. They were the unanimous #1 and the only people to pick them for the win were people who know what a UMBC is and those who threw darts to pick their bracket.

In reply to by J.

Victor Hale II

March 17th, 2018 at 8:00 AM ^

To clarify, I didn’t mean UVA was a corrupt, “pay for play” school. Apologies to UVA folks on the board if it looked that way. Anyway, I’m just not at all surprised when the little guy beats the big guy in college basketball, especially this time of year.

LSAClassOf2000

March 17th, 2018 at 9:04 AM ^

While I agree with you that there seems to be instances of the David beating Goliath every year in the NCAA Tournament, the next level to that analysis is "which David" and "which Goliath". As mentioned above, Virginia was the #1 overall and had the #1 rated defense which it had used to suffocate teams - good teams - all year and that same defense was utterly dominated by a school few people had probably even heard of until Selection Sunday. Penn / Kansas - if it was going to happen at all this year - was probably the 1/16 upset that would have been at least sort of predictable - sort of. Last night's game? Not so much. 

Roanman

March 17th, 2018 at 6:43 AM ^

The very event that introduced a brand new definition for the word upset. As an aside, Man O War's jock, Johhny Loftus is widely believed to have been "got to" on this ride, an issue with horse racing at the time. Likely still if anybody cared about horse racing anymore.

 

Swayze Howell Sheen

March 17th, 2018 at 6:54 AM ^

No one thought Johnny could ever lose - thus making Daniel's crane kick a key part of the biggest upset in sports.

Interestingly, Bobby might have been able to beat Daniel in earlier rounds, but instead tried to take him out with an illegal kick. 

 

greymarch

March 17th, 2018 at 8:44 AM ^

Three greatest all-time sporting upsets:
 
1. US hockey team defeating Soviets in 1980 Olympics.  This isnt even close.  The Soviet team had just defeated the NHL all-star team!  Our team was made-up of college students.  Hate to use analogies for debating, but I am gonna do it anyhow: USA defeating the Soviets in hockey would be like Villanova's basketball team defeating LeBron James and an NBA team full of all-stars.  It simply cant happen.  IT'S IMPOSSIBLE...yet it did happen.
 
 
2. Buster Douglas defeating Mike Tyson.  Vegas casinos wouldnt even take this bet, because the odds were so high against Douglas.   A single, significant bet on Douglas could have bankrupted a casino.
 
 
3. UMBC defeating Virginia last night.  Not only had a #1 seed never lost in the opening round, Virginia was the #1 OVERALL SEED for the whole tournament.  Wow.  Simply...wow.  History was made last night.  I am glad to have witnessed it live.  However, let me go on a rant...
 
 
For the average fan, NCAA tournament upsets make for great drama and even better television. For the NCAA seeding committee, upsets are a disaster. If #1 seeds, and other high seeds lose more and more often, than the committee is not properly seeding the teams, nor even picking the correct teams to play in the tournament. If both cases are true, then the legitimacy of the tournament is in question. The committee needs to take a serious look at how it decides who makes the tournament and who gets each seed. As much as I love computers (I am a computer programmer for a very large tech company), I think the committee needs to rely more on the "eyeball test", and less on computer-metrics which cannot possibly notice the nuisances separating good teams from bad teams (ex. UMBC's Lyles shoots like Stephen Curry. No metric could have known that.)

1VaBlue1

March 17th, 2018 at 8:49 AM ^

The Miracle on Ice captured the entire world and made Lake Placid an instant recall location.  Even today, you hear 'Lake Placid' and you immediately think Miracle on Ice.  There is no question...