MGoShorts

January 18th, 2020 at 6:28 PM ^

Pretty sure you just threw out every rap cliche in one post..

Em was his best when he was totally unhinged and freewheeling. Everything through Encore matched that description; everything after it was either him rapping held back, or him trying to reincarnate his old self and sounding corny. His latest album is no exception.

Go back, listen to 'Evil Deeds', 'Big Weenie', or 'Role Model', and try to convince me that's the same guy.

JonnyHintz

January 19th, 2020 at 10:17 AM ^

But that’s the thing. Eminem isn’t rapping like he was 10, 15, 20 years ago. Because he’s changed. The rap game has changed. He’s taken on a deeper, more serious message in a lot of his newer songs. Darkness was a song that theres just so much meaning in. 

Wolverheel

January 18th, 2020 at 9:52 PM ^

Same. Two minutes in and we’ve already had his staples on his last three albums and 5 or so projects: horrible production/mixes and incessant whining about critics.

I was pleased that he wasn’t doing that God awful rappity rap how fast can I go flow, but soon became annoyed by this new weird choppy flow that’s more like a cadence than true flow. 

TheCube

January 18th, 2020 at 6:27 PM ^

Recovery was pop rap garbage. Relapse was better. 

MMLP2 was better. Kamikaze was meh. 

This new album is good. Too bloated. But there are some fire tracks. 
 

The problem with Eminem is the same problem that plagues JayZ Nas Luda and every other big rapper from their generation. They’re rich, famous and don’t have anything else to say outside of being rich, hating on haters etc. 

 

Most fans will never be satisfied due to nostalgia and youth. Em n co will never reach those heights again. 
 

That being said they’re way better than these mumble rap mofos. 

CityOfKlompton

January 18th, 2020 at 4:54 PM ^

The lyric you mention is a reference to defeating everyone else in the rap game, which is a common motif in hip hop. It is not about actually blowing up an arena, rather it implies he is the greatest rapper in the industry. Keep in mind Eminem rose through the ranks by performing at (and often winning) rap battles, so this idea of combat especially makes sense within his material considering both his history and legacy in hip hop.

While the lyric may be in poor taste, you are taking it out of context and applying a meaning that simply isn't there, likely because of unfamiliarity with the genre.

Gucci Mane

January 18th, 2020 at 6:07 PM ^

Very bizarre we are so worried about mass shootings when it’s so incredibly unlikely to happen. We really talking about taking away fundamental rights because a minescule amount of people misuse guns ? It’s mind blowing.  

tomer

January 21st, 2020 at 8:06 PM ^

You ever been involved in a mass shooting? Because I was in Dayton when it happened here. Heard the gunshots. Saw people falling. Got evacuated out the back of the building.

Minuscule or not, it is a very serious issue, and shrugging it off is fucking insulting.

JonnyHintz

January 18th, 2020 at 6:02 PM ^

Australia had extremely low numbers of firearm related homicides BEFORE their ban. There’s no correlation to the ban and gun deaths there. It’s a culture issue. 
 

Socio-economic issues in the US are the cause of the high rate of violent crime. Not the weapon (if any) someone chooses to use. Address the root cause of the problem, not a symptom or a tool. 

blomeup2day

January 18th, 2020 at 7:14 PM ^

We had a record low number of hijackers before 9-11, did we not institute measures to mitigate future hijackings?  The lesson is you do something to minimize the harm.  We didn’t have a large number of people being killed by automatic weapons and rocket launchers yet we don’t allow civilians to own them.  

Gucci Mane

January 19th, 2020 at 4:24 AM ^

Western_ are you saying a small minority of people believe the planes destroyed the towers ? Because that’s not accurate at all. And multiple studies have confirmed the towers behaved exactly as would be expected if crashed into. Check into the Purdue study by their world class engineering department. 

blomeup2day

January 19th, 2020 at 6:43 AM ^

Who said anything about towers?  I only mentioned hi jacking of planes.  Do you dispute the planes were hi jacked?  Do we not have different procedures for boarding planes post 9-11?  You can believe whatever conspiracy theory your heart desires, but no one has ever argued the planes weren’t hi jacked.  

Tunneler

January 19th, 2020 at 10:27 AM ^

You post a 56 minute video claiming they said 3 seconds worth of words.  Ain't nobody got time for that.  Will not spend that amount of time to refute something that is so ridiculous.  In any case, the National Institute of Standards & Technology refutes it. 

You really think that a very small minority of people oppose your "view"?  Don't let conspiracy theories get the best of you.  The world can be a very fucked up place, but for the most part it is fucked up at face value.

JonnyHintz

January 19th, 2020 at 11:18 AM ^

You’re kinda highlighting my point. Was the issue hijackers? Or was the issue terrorist attacks? Sure, we addressed how easy it is for planes to be hijacked. All that did was change the method of terrorist attacks. You’re not addressing WHY we’re the target of terrorist attacks. 
 

With gun violence, in any given year 80%-85% of all mass shootings are a result of gang violence. What causes people to join gangs? What causes the violence and crime in those areas with high crime rates? Low income, lack of access to healthcare, lack of jobs, poverty.
 

If you take away guns (good luck with that), you’re not changing the cause of violent crime. Violent crime will continue. At best you’re changing the method of doing it. If you address the reasons people do things like that to begin with, then you’re actually addressing the issue and you’re making meaningful change.

blomeup2day

January 19th, 2020 at 2:49 PM ^

If I make it harder for guns to be accessed, I limit the opportunity for gun violence. Other countries have had liberal gun ownership like the US and then made it restrictive and what were the results?  If I can’t get a gun as easy as going to local Walmart, if I can’t buy the ammo, if I can’t publicly display a gun without fear of arrest....the opportunities for mass shootings goes down.  Gang gun violence decreases. 
 

you can never eliminate a problem, but you can make it harder for it to occur. Terrorists using airplanes on a regular basis would bring air travel to a halt and bankrupt the airline industry.  So it was a necessity to minimize that threat, we still ended up with the shoe bomber post 9-11.  We locked up the cockpit of planes instead of having kids visit the flight crew. We don’t sell weapons after the security checkpoint to make it easier to commit the act.   You can’t solve the misguided minds, but you can limit the ability of them to do harm instead of making it easier to commit the act.  

blomeup2day

January 19th, 2020 at 7:20 AM ^

So you think guns is the thing that would protect you from the government?  How did that work for the people of Waco?  You think the second amendment is going to save the people from the government?  How well did the constitution protect Japanese-Americans from internment camps during ww2?  No matter how well armed you or any group you associate with, is going to stop the government from being evil if it so chooses. Imagine a civil war today, if you lived in a state that seceded from the country for reasons of it being evil, you think you win that war?  You think you're winning a drone war with your guns?  Our government has been killing millions of people post 9-11 and a lot of them were armed with more sophisticated weapons than we possess as citizens of this country. There’s plenty of countries that exist currently that have stricter gun laws and haven’t started an extermination campaign against its citizens. 

Gucci Mane

January 19th, 2020 at 10:22 PM ^

Guns keep people safer from the government. I absolutely believe that. Gun violence just isn’t a big threat imo. We are murdering millions of babies in the womb, that a much bigger issue. 
I been pushing the idea that abolition is racist for a while now. It kills black and brown babies at a far higher rate. Abortions have taken so much potential power and influence away from black people.