Numbness to GameDay misogyny

Submitted by 950_Blue on

While at a bar watching Gameday before the Cincinnati game, a female friend of mine commented on the requisite 'Ann Arbor is a whore' sign bobbing up and down in the background. As an 18 year old freshman male, I must confess I found these signs and t-shirts fairly funny, and figured Michigan must be doing something right to get so much attention. In turn, I bought a few of my own that jabbed at the usual suspects while en route to Michigan Stadium and Crisler, and was easily acculturated to yelling about how it was 'all their fault' at Yost.

As a 36 year old, I'm ashamed to say the misogynistic quality of that sign, though similar to several others each week televised on national television, was still lost on me. Male sporting events are no doubt a remaining bastion for easy bigotry and sexism, but they can also be a place for Michigan to lead by example. These signs, t-shirts, and chants aren't ironic, they're not witty, and here's hoping the next generation of Michigan Men and Women uphold a more advanced sense of social awareness than mine did. Perhaps we can listen more closely to the lyrics of another common ritual at every game and show how we really are the Leaders and Best.

HHW

September 11th, 2017 at 8:35 AM ^

She allows over a hundred thousand people to penetrate her 6 to 7 times a year and makes a lot of money from it. Let's not even think about how many times she does it for basketball, hockey and the Olympic sports.

Thread Jack

September 11th, 2017 at 11:45 AM ^

I don't think it's quite correct.  I think it's more about being ill-mannered ("no better than a dog"), than promiscuous -- but definitely still female and derogatory.  Could be your points still stand, but I generally think of the male analog as "asshole" or "dick" -- words that are generally (in my experience) not applied to women.

Winchester Wolverine

September 11th, 2017 at 8:48 AM ^

While I care greatly for women's rights, rape culture, and equal pay, I do believe there is a difference between social banter and straight up discriminatory language. I dunno. Terms like "bitch" lie within somewhat of a gray area that many people find offensive and misogynistic. I get that. However, this is football. This is also a football blog, 98% of which is occupied by men. We hurl insults at one another and sexualize woman. We're men. It's just what men do. You'll see a lot of that on a football blog. I'm a self proclaimed liberal and even I don't delve too deep into words like "pussy" or "bitch". They're not relegated to this one sub-culture. And they're not exactly being used in direct association with the degradation of womenkind. Or maybe they are. The point is, it exists here, just like everywhere else. Keep in mind, most of us are brainless dickheads without our wives and/or girlfriends behind us. Ironically, respect for women is prevalent here, as is banter deemed misogynistic. It is what it is.

bronxblue

September 11th, 2017 at 9:05 AM ^

To me, saying we are men because we call other men bitch, whore, slut, whatever because that is some core part of masculinity and it's how we express ourselves is assinine. It's loaded language with the intent to belittle someone based on the assumption that females are weaker. If it wasn't, you would call them something else. It used to be fag, queer, gay, whatever, until we all realized that was offensive. Or how the n word is thrown about casually online. My general rule is would I be comfortable wearing a shirt that says "I think X is a Y". If so, then by all means say it. But if the idea of the public knowing it bothers you, then maybe rethink it.

bronxblue

September 11th, 2017 at 10:57 AM ^

Then call them weak.  Call them feeble.  Call them literally any other word that actually says what you are meaning, not a term that you cast a referring to physical weakness but is gendered and historically offensive and derogatory.  Also, whore doesn't even refer to a woman's physical strength; call them a "girly man" because even though that's thoughtless and offensive, at least it's relevant to your point.

And to me, saying "look at that white boy dance" isn't probably going to offend said white person as much as saying "look at X, he's such a bitch."  And the reason I know this is guys get into fights when you call them a bitch, but I've never seen two people throw down because someone said he is a bad dancer.

ScooterTooter

September 11th, 2017 at 11:15 AM ^

I mean, we've obviously moved beyond the main topic here throughout this thread. 

In the world of sports, referring to your competitors with derogatory terms is gendered because its true. So why should it be off limits? 

BTW, as someone who played basketball on predominantly black teams growing up, white terms were used very derogatively (and also as backhanded compliments as I was pretty athletic - though not very tall!). It never really bothered me because it was essentially true. I fail to see the difference here. 

If your answer is "because people's reactions!" (which it is) maybe its the people reacting who have the problem and we should stop treating them with kids gloves. At least until the U.S. women's national soccer team can stop losing to U-15 boys club teams. 

bronxblue

September 11th, 2017 at 11:34 AM ^

Yeah, this isn't going to be a debate.  Your argument is the basic "I'm not offended when someone else uses a term I could find offensive to me" as a blanket absolution of all such uses in every other context.  I could point out that it wasn't all that long ago when it was socially acceptable to call people you didn't like a faggot, that you could call people derogatory terms of black, hispanic, chinese, etc. and we all sorta laughed because isn't there a "kernel of truth in X"?

It's also unique that you are super hung-up on the fact you can call someone a bitch because women can be beaten by men in sports.  Like, the idea of simply calling someone weak or bad at something doesn't drive the point home, so you have to question their manhood via referring to them as something you apparently feel is physically inferior to men.  But that's you man, and you can live your life and say what you want.  But if the crux of your argument to me to, I don't know, accept your decisions is because you women are smaller than men is a losing battle.

ScooterTooter

September 11th, 2017 at 11:58 AM ^

And what's your argument? That you're offended by reality? 

Would you be white knighting if we were talking about agist terms? If someone said "Wilton Speight moves like an old man", would you be up in arms about that? You're only offended about this because you've been told to be offended. The rest of the world shouldn't have to curtail the truth because of your delicate sensibilities. 

I don't really see why college students (many who are of course women themselves) chanting that the opposing qb is a bitch is a big deal. I don't see why players competing with one another using that language is a big deal. You should probably stop being such a...feeble weakling!

Qmatic

September 11th, 2017 at 8:57 AM ^

I believe the issue here is that some believe that the words "whore" and "bitch" are terms that directly reference someone to being a female, and thus less of a person in some way or another. We could have had this discussion 15-20 years ago about other words. When I was growing up it was common place to call people the F word, gay, etc. Smear the queer was a common game played in my neighborhood. When told that it was wrong, we used to think that "we're not calling them gay like homosexual, but just gay as in stupid." Looking back we can see that is where the connection was built in our mind that somehow gay=stupid/dumb/moronic/etc. Nowadays we know that it is not acceptable to call anyone that. Could perhaps we be experiencing a same shift where people are fed up with certain words being used as commonplace but having underlying connections to females being perceived as lesser? Perhaps we are.

We cannot minimize the feelings of someone who is offended by the acceptance and popularity of these words and their negative underlies. Yet, in the same breath we cannot make blanket statements that everyone who uses these words are inherently "misogynistic/horrible people"

I propese signs that say "Ann Arbor is a city that seeks the attention of anyone, and will do so at any costs"

Or after a 3rd down stop: "You are not very good. You did not have the strength or skill to gain 10 yards in 3 plays."

How's that sound?

PopeLando

September 11th, 2017 at 9:00 AM ^

Hadn't thought about it that way. Serious question: if the sign had said "Ann Arbor is a dick", would it be misandry (hatred/prejudice against men), and therefore equally odious?

Wendyk5

September 11th, 2017 at 9:07 AM ^

My first thought is, misogyny is so deeply ingrained in our culture that women have become immune to a lot of it. Every day we deal with it in big and small ways. A sign like that is fairly insignificant in the scheme of things. For me personally, it would be a waste of time to worry about this. We've got bigger misogynists to fry. 

Swayze Howell Sheen

September 11th, 2017 at 9:09 AM ^

I personally agree that there is a lot of (often subtle, perhaps unknowing) misogyny on this, and probably any, sports board.

That said, most people are well intentioned and don't mean harm. Thus, a tricky situation: telling people who are actually pretty decent that they are misogynists puts them on the defensive and escalates the matter.

So, what to do? I'm not sure. I do wish that people would stop using the feminine (e.g., pussy, bitch, nancy, etc.) as a substitute for a pejorative - that bugs the crap out of me. But even saying that will get some folks riled up. 

 

The Mad Hatter

September 11th, 2017 at 9:12 AM ^

so damn sensitive about every little thing?

It's like some people need to maintain an outrage boner all the time.  It's annoying and exhausting.

Also, Ann Arbor isn't a whore.  She's more of a tease.

BananaRepublic

September 11th, 2017 at 1:47 PM ^

The more we reward for being offended, the more of it we'll see; that's just the nature of incentives.  

 

I see now that Baker Mayfield has apologized for offending OSU fans. Hopefully, we'll soon be able to completely sterilize all of our rivalries so no one has to suffer through epic double birds and players striking Heisman poses in the faces of rivals when they clinch a B1G title for our team.

 

/s.. but i think you get it

bluesparkhitsy…

September 11th, 2017 at 9:54 AM ^

It's good practice generally to pay attention when someone is offended by something said to them, but it's also possible -- in my opinion -- to go too far in that direction.  With "Ann Arbor is a Whore," I see no obvious misogyny.  The "insult" is the use of a term that is always insulting, except when used ironically.  The fact that it's gender-specific obviously relates to "Ann."  Merely using a gender-specific insult in a gender-specific context doesn't equal misogyny, though it may be impolite or stupid.  Personally, I hate these shirts and others with profanity generally because I don't want a Michigan football game to be the reason I have to explain those concepts to my children.

"Pussy" and "bitch" come closer to misogyny.  While "pussy's" male counterpart, "dick," is used just about as often, the context is often different.  With "pussy," the typical use is to equate a man with a woman as though the woman's inherent characterictics are inferior.  That is equivilent to calling someone a "fag," which similarly implies that being gay is undesirable.  I would hope we could all agree that type of use is to be avoided.  On the other hand, "pussy" could be used as simple slang for the vagina, and can be a useful term that way.  (The recent use of "grab a woman by the pussy" is obviously misogynistic, though not because it uses that slang.) "Bitch" might be similarly unacceptable when it suggests that a characteristic such as assertiveness is undesirable when it emanates from a woman.  But that word, and especially "bitchy" have already evolved to describe both genders in many contexts.

Being a "whore," i.e., a prostitute, is always insulting.  By contrast with "pussy" and "bitch" that actually makes it less likely to be misogynistic.  My concern here is that we don't demonize those who might wear such a shirt but who do not intend the phrase to insult women generally (for this phrase, I'm guessing that describes most of the people who wear the shirt), and that we don't become so judgmental that we over-police this issue.  I'm not suggesting that OP and others are guilty of that; it's just something that can happen, and it can turn good people against each other.

Hardware Sushi

September 11th, 2017 at 10:04 AM ^

I don't get it...a shirt that other fanbases wear makes MGoBlog/Michigan tailgates misogynistic?

While I won't deny the other arguments happening in this thread, I'm not going to bear the cross for a shirt that literally no one in our fanbase wears.

And frankly, I've never thought that shirt was funny...just like the stupid Jim McElwain shark jokes weren't ever funny, just like "Much Fichigan", O$U, or many other dumb things aren't funny because they aren't clever enough to be funny.