Notre Dame Snowflakes: The Offense

Submitted by LSAClassOf2000 on October 27th, 2019 at 3:00 PM

This will be your thread for snowflakes and hot takes regarding the offense and offensive performance in our game against Notre Dame. 

JPC

October 26th, 2019 at 11:47 PM ^

Great win for sure. 

The OL seems to have gelled after whatever disturbed them early

The RBs look very good to great at least two deep

The WRs were making hard contested catches

I saw some speed in space working like they've been trying to get it to do all season

That PSU loss really turned the corner for the team. I said I'd be happy if we don't lose another game we shouldn't and beat one of ND, MSU, and OSU. It's looking likely we win at least 2/3. 

FLwolvfan22

October 26th, 2019 at 11:16 PM ^

The single biggest difference (IMO) is that Shea now stands in the pocket  to find his receiver, even pump faking without getting scared and having happy feet. Just stand in the pocket come what may, you may get up from a play or two looking through the ear hole but eventually you'll hit so many receivers that they'll have to soften up their blitz to better cover the receivers.

The Pharaoh of Filth

October 26th, 2019 at 11:37 PM ^

Well, the single biggest thing then is up for debate.

I think it is the fact that the offensive line is playing much, much better and Michigan is also running the ball capably.

You know, kinda makes the QB better when he has time to throw and the running game takes the pressure off.

FLwolvfan22

October 26th, 2019 at 11:39 PM ^

I knew they would have a good outing today because of the confidence I could see Shea had developed in the second half last week. Is it better protection he's getting that's giving him the confidence? I hope so but it's good to see him not do the skittish water bug thing.

A_Maized

October 26th, 2019 at 11:57 PM ^

Shea is still doing She things, we just didn’t lose because of it today.   Fumble in the red zone,  throw-away that went backwards that was almost a disaster.   He was 6/12 for 100 yards and 2 TD.   Our run game and defense won the game.  Shea just didn’t lose it for them.   

Jason80

October 27th, 2019 at 10:26 AM ^

Senior experienced starter leads the team to a blowout win over a top 10 rival and we are gonna bench him? Uh, ok. You risk losing the team while they are feeling great and coming off their best win in a long time for the prospect of the future. I can see the rest of the seniors mentally checking out if that were to happen.

Shea is who we are riding with.

JPC

October 27th, 2019 at 12:18 AM ^

He was 6/12 for 100 yards and 2 TD. 

 

You can't drop Shea's stats as if they showed up in isolation. He wasn't anywhere near perfect, but he made some good plays/choices and that stat line was played in total SHIT weather. 

JPC

October 27th, 2019 at 10:41 AM ^

Shea also seemed to improve as the game wore on. He had a couple shit throws early, got some happy feet, and made some mistakes. However, he settled pretty quickly and made some good throws. He's definitely trending to "last year Shea."

GOMBLOG

October 27th, 2019 at 2:41 AM ^

And Book was 8/25 for 73 yards.  Cut the shit.  When all you do is look to bitch and find mistakes then that’s all you will see.  Never the good, only the bad with Shea.   

Fields was missing open receivers all day and nobody Fromm OSU cares because OSU wins and their fans support the team. 

Durham Blue

October 27th, 2019 at 11:18 AM ^

I watched most of the OSU Wisconsin game and it didn't look like it was raining as hard there as it was at Michigan.  IDK, maybe the lights made the rain seem worse.  Fields made some really good throws but also had bad misses.  Bottom line, it was the defensive efforts that made things easy for the team and allowed both Michigan and OSU to roll yesterday.

901 P

October 27th, 2019 at 7:34 AM ^

I’m not very knowledgeable about football, but one thing that I noticed on McCaffrey’s series: he seemed to play at a different pace. I don’t mean his foot speed—I mean he would take the snap, run the play action, and then make a throw, all very quickly. It just seemed to happen with the sort of rhythm that I see when I watch other effective QBs/offenses. I don’t know if this is a real thing, or if it has been discussed ad nauseum in some of these threads. And I’m NOT saying McCaffrey should get the next start. It’s just a little contrast that I thought stood out, and it did seem that it was part of McCaffrey’s effectiveness on the few drives that he played yesterday. Not sure if anyone else more knowledgeable can comment. 

bamf_16

October 27th, 2019 at 8:43 AM ^

McCaffrey seems to have a better skill set than does Patterson, but that’s only part of the package.

 

Was anyone else seriously wondering if the game were tight and the weather remained crappy that if Patterson legitimately could not hold onto the wet football they would make the quarterback change?

 

Kept thinking about Henne in 2007 against OSU and Carr refused to go with Mallett.

fishgoblue1

October 27th, 2019 at 10:14 AM ^

It also doesn't hurt that he was facing 2nd and 3rd string defense because UM was up 38-7 when he entered the game.

 

Shea made 2 plays in this game that will earn him tons of respect from the entire team.

 

1.  Delivering the pass to DPJ while taking a huge hit.

2.  Running down field to block for Tru on his TD run.

SWFLWolverine

October 27th, 2019 at 3:45 PM ^

This is the second comment on Dylan facing the second or third string D....and to be fair I wasn't paying that much attention at that point, but the ND player that got hurt on the Sainristil TD was a starter. Going back and looking at that series, it appears that the front 4 were 2nd team on the depth chart, but the remaining 7 were starters. I don't know how ND rotates their DL so I won't comment on that. I will say that Dylan got the ball out quickly enough that I don't think it mattered if the DL was 1st or 2nd team given the performance in the rest of the game. I am not saying start Dylan at this point, but lets not knock his brief performance to support starting Shea. It is nice to have a competent backup.

FLwolvfan22

October 27th, 2019 at 12:40 AM ^

that's it, I agree, since last week second half he's not as scared to stand in there, that's huge progress as without that we're losing to Wisconsin badly. Not perfect, not great, still mistakes (in slop weather) but getting there, improvement. THAT's what I'm talking about, if anyone can't see that they need to put on their glasses.

rs207200

October 27th, 2019 at 12:15 AM ^

What in the world are you talking about?

Shea fumbled at the goal line, threw a left handed backward pass, overthrew Ronnie Bell by about 3 ft and the ball should have been intercepted (not to mention Bell got injured trying to adjust to the poor pass), had 11 carries for 2 yards and completed 6 passes. 

I have no idea what you saw that said he played well. 
 

EDIT: Look, I’m not trying to be negative. The weather was horrendous and Michigan absolutely blasted a top 10 Notre Dame. But you cannot watch that game and say Shea played great and showed huge improvement. You’re only saying that because the game was 45-14. If the ground game wasn’t working, would you be happy with 23 rushes/passes for 102 yards?

Mongo

October 27th, 2019 at 12:43 PM ^

Performance is relative.  Shea was way better than Ian Book who is really good QB.  Look at the stats and the way each played in horrific weather.   Have you ever played QB in that kind of weather ?  That right their was a heroic effort ... Shea is a competitor.  Glad we have him. 

CHUKA

October 26th, 2019 at 11:17 PM ^

Great game. Nothing to really complain about other than a few spot plays. I guess if anything it’d be the lack of that home run threat RB. Charbonnet and Haskins have been great though - just hoping for a Saquon like improvement in speed in the future (Saquon went from 4.66 in high school to 4.40 at the NFL combine). It’d be nice to have someone who doesn’t get caught. It didn’t matter today but it would help immensely in the future.