I Like Burgers

February 2nd, 2017 at 10:09 PM ^

Harbaugh: “Size, strength and there could be more,” he said. “We need them. We’ve had offense and defensive linemen graduate, seven starters. We need starter-caliber guys on both sides of the line. So there may be a fifth-year, may be a transfer, we’ll see, we don’t know.” Sounds like he knows something, but nothing definitive.

I Like Burgers

February 3rd, 2017 at 11:10 AM ^

That's pretty much exactly how I interpretted it.  To me it sounded like they know of some guys that are looking to transfer, have maybe kicked the tires on them a bit, but just have to wait to see if there is enough mutual interest for the kid to transfer.

chatster

February 2nd, 2017 at 10:12 PM ^

In announcing his departure from Cal, he said, “On the field, it has been an honor to compete against the best and brightest in the College of Champions.” LINK

Has he seen the new sign in Berkeley yet? Those Who Take A Graduate-Transfer Year At The University Of Michigan Will Be Champions!

Mr. Yost

February 2nd, 2017 at 10:02 PM ^

But wait, I thought all grad transfers suck because they don't start at their school or they're flameout highly touted prospects who never panned out?

/s

I hope that discussion never takes place again. It's not often, but there are many instances of guys who start or contibute in a big way who grad transfer. It's not every single time, but it's not impossible either.

This kid won't be the only one we should take a strong look at. I hope there are some safety options as well.

JonnyHintz

February 2nd, 2017 at 10:30 PM ^

Yes. You found the rare exception to the rule. There are (rare) legitimate cases where family issues requires a player to transfer closer to home or a legitimate academic interest that isn't provided at the current school. But there's little incentive for a starter or major contributor to transfer to another school. So it "doesn't happen." That doesn't mean absolutely 0% of the time it happens, it's just not a realistic thing.

reshp1

February 2nd, 2017 at 11:56 PM ^

I mean it worked out pretty well for everyone, but at the time Countess had looked pretty bad 2 years running. Turns out that was a coaching /scheme issue but you really didn't know that at the time and he was legitimately getting passed by younger guys. I think his point about exceptions to the rule are valid.

TrueBlue2003

February 3rd, 2017 at 12:57 AM ^

it is a rare exception.  And it is rare that a non-QB grad transfer to a P5 school contributes to a top 15ish or better team because a guy who isn't NFL ready after four years is unlikely to significantly positively impact a good team.

Countess wasn't the usual case, because he grad transferred after only three years and he moved to a system he was recruited for (zone) after a coaching change put him in a bad fit.

I do think this guy could be a great fit as a player (hopefully) just outside of NFL caliber that is looking to go to a program better suited to get him there after a coaching change.  He could provide depth for sure, and marginal improvement over the current options. Academics are obviously a great fit.

JonnyHintz

February 3rd, 2017 at 3:06 AM ^

Once again. RARE exception. Rare means that there are instances where it happens. It is FAR from common, but it is slightly higher than 0%. With Countess, you had a player coming off of a bad year, new coaching staff, and he didn't fit the press scheme that Michigan corners were going to play. He's a zone corner. Certain circumstances made his transfer an exception to the rule. Same with Ryan Mallett. There's no doubt he was the starter for Michigan after Henne graduated...until we brought in a spread option coach that is.

Leaders And Best

February 2nd, 2017 at 10:04 PM ^

He didn't make the All-Pac 12 team, but teams with losing records usually don't always get a lot of postseason recognition.

He was a 3-star recruit who chose Cal over Nebraska & Oklahoma in 2013. No Michigan offer. http://247sports.com/Player/Aaron-Cochran-12598?Institution=7825

Based on his recent Twitter follows, my guess is he is looking at Big 12 schools (Oklahoma St & Texas Tech).

In reply to by AmayzNblue

McDoomButt

February 3rd, 2017 at 9:11 AM ^

Way too ambitious.

I mean it's possible, and crazier things have happened, but I think Michigan will struggle to stay in Big Ten championship contention, much less make the playoffs.

We'll see, maybe all the young guys will put it together faster than normal!

 

Yooper

February 2nd, 2017 at 10:57 PM ^

we can't count on Newsome next year. Bring in a quality guy as a transition, okay. Look we are not getting an all american-if he was that good he would be declaring for the draft-but you can compare him with what we have and given his record make a pretty good judgment as to whether he is an upgrade. Not a game changer but maybe an upgrade. Okay by me

alum96

February 2nd, 2017 at 10:25 PM ^

The 6-foot-8, 350-pounder played in 28 games, making 16 starts the past three seasons.

I need to check the math but that's 16 more starts than the vaporware we have slated to start at tackle.

If he is a poor man's Ben Braden, I'll accept at this point.  Hell the Wayne Lyons of tackles...will accept.

Unfortunately as someone else said his recent follows are Texas Tech and OK State guys.

Hopefully Hotel Putingrad can hack his account and have him follow Pep.

politejr

February 2nd, 2017 at 11:14 PM ^

Was just looking at the roster. All players capable of even possibly playing tackle this spring are 1. Mason Cole who you would rather keep at center 2. Bredeson who is a better guard, but could be a right tackle 3. JBB which, is what it is 4. Nolan Ulizio which could be fine 5. JaRaymond Hall. Freshman. 6. Spanellis. Who is even more of a guard than Bredeson. Adding a grad transfer is pretty necessary