September 24th, 2016 at 2:41 PM ^
September 24th, 2016 at 3:05 PM ^
Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad
September 24th, 2016 at 6:46 PM ^
Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad
September 24th, 2016 at 2:46 PM ^
Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad
September 24th, 2016 at 3:25 PM ^
Living in Madison, I've never heard the term "Wisky" used to refer to UW. The only place I ever hear it is mgoblog. That doesn't mean it's not a legit nickname, but I don't think it's one that badger fans use themselves. I actually like it, because it reminds me of an alcoholic drink. "UW" is used a lot, as well as 'Sconsin (and Wisconsonites are therefore Sconnies). Another thing - people often talk about going to the "badger game", which I find to be a curious bit of nomenclature. In Michigan, we never talked about going to the "wolverine game." Actually, it seems like Michigan doesn't lean on the "wolverine" mascot so hard compared to Wisconsin, where everything is badger this and badger that. Anyway, that's my two cents.
September 24th, 2016 at 5:24 PM ^
A lot of people outside of Wisonsin call them "Wiscy" - you see it on a lot of sites (non-UM)
September 24th, 2016 at 7:39 PM ^
Its a product of the internet age and lazy typists.
September 24th, 2016 at 7:40 PM ^
Its a product of the internet age and texting.
September 24th, 2016 at 7:13 PM ^
they may say 'Sconsin, but they pronounce it, "Skaaahnsin."
September 24th, 2016 at 9:17 PM ^
September 25th, 2016 at 4:17 AM ^
Glad to know that there is another kindred soul in Madtown. I would agree about "Sconnie" being the go to local slang. I have been seeing an uptick in Wiscy though in shirts worn around town and for sale on State Street. Seems to be a recent phenom as the first time I encountered the expression was on a coworkers shirt a couple of years ago.
Proof: wiscy.bigcartel.com
September 24th, 2016 at 4:37 PM ^
Wisconsin=Wiscy. It's all around me these days.
September 24th, 2016 at 2:36 PM ^
September 24th, 2016 at 2:36 PM ^
MSU is mediocre.
Wisconsin is fine.
We are much better than all of them.
Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad
September 24th, 2016 at 2:38 PM ^
September 24th, 2016 at 2:42 PM ^
Your kool aid is sweet and tasty sir I'll take another thank you
September 24th, 2016 at 5:27 PM ^
His ideas are intriguing to me, and I wish to subscribe to his newsletter.
September 24th, 2016 at 3:05 PM ^
September 24th, 2016 at 3:21 PM ^
Brief and accurate.
September 24th, 2016 at 5:23 PM ^
Wisconsin's O is meh but their D is legit, and Sparty's O isn't nearly as good as ND's leaky D made it look.
September 24th, 2016 at 11:41 PM ^
Sparty's O looked good only against ND "wholly" Defense.....
I'll see myself out now.......
September 24th, 2016 at 7:50 PM ^
The truest thing said in the internet today.
September 24th, 2016 at 2:36 PM ^
September 24th, 2016 at 2:37 PM ^
I'll take "neither" for the win Bob. Wisconsin has taken care of business this season. I'll give them that. D looks very good. O line is surprisingly ok despite youth and coaching changes. Pretty much the opposite of Michigan's O line over the last 10 years. I'm jelly.
September 24th, 2016 at 2:38 PM ^
September 24th, 2016 at 2:42 PM ^
September 24th, 2016 at 3:03 PM ^
he played well last week at ND. Granted they might have a bad defense, but he still did well
September 24th, 2016 at 3:15 PM ^
September 24th, 2016 at 2:46 PM ^
September 24th, 2016 at 2:53 PM ^
Nebraska may pose a challenge, but Wisconsin has far and away the best resume in the conference right now. Better than OSU, too.
Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad
September 24th, 2016 at 2:39 PM ^
Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad
September 24th, 2016 at 2:39 PM ^
uncharactistically error prone MSU is getting blown out. Wisconsin has a good defense, but they are not exactly playing an elite offense
A lot of inexperience for MSU at key positions. Do remember that MSU struggled with Furman. ND's defense just plain sucks.If they could stop the run MSU would have been in trouble.
Hornibrook has made some nice throws, but Wisconsin's offense lacks explosiveness.
Against teams that can pass the ball effectively and which can generate a pass rush consistently Wisconsin is going to be in trouble.
Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad
September 24th, 2016 at 3:04 PM ^
but I'm impressed with their QB's accuracy. However I think we can make him look worse than Sparty's defense can
September 24th, 2016 at 2:43 PM ^
Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad
September 24th, 2016 at 3:00 PM ^
September 24th, 2016 at 7:53 PM ^
September 24th, 2016 at 2:43 PM ^
September 24th, 2016 at 2:44 PM ^
State isn't as bad as they played today and I don't see Wisconsin marching up and down the field. 14 of the Badgers second half points are thanks to a dropped snap by the punter and a fumble return. If the game was 16-6 like it very well could be then this discussion would be different.
Don't get me wrong, watching State lose is great.
Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad
September 24th, 2016 at 2:44 PM ^
September 24th, 2016 at 2:44 PM ^
Up one week, down the next. Who the heck knows? But, I'll enjoy Sparty tears this week for sure. BTW, what's up with Iowa?
September 24th, 2016 at 2:48 PM ^
Regardless of what happens today, MSU is going to play like a team possessed when we come to town. Mark my words: they will play their best game of the year that day. That game for them will either be a desperation "winning this keeps up in the division race" or if they tank this season, that game will be a "this salvages our season if we win" kind of game.
Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad
September 24th, 2016 at 2:45 PM ^
In this case, the question does not matter. We know that MSU will play us with the fiercest intensity against Michigan and Wisconsin looks legit. If Michigan plays less than stellar against either team then they will lose.
September 24th, 2016 at 2:48 PM ^
Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad
September 24th, 2016 at 2:59 PM ^
He's not saying we're average. He's saying if we don't show up and match their intensity, we're going to lose. And that's a very reasonable conclusion. It's been bafflingly clear that most years, Dantonio's MSU has always wanted that game more than we did.
Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad
September 24th, 2016 at 3:05 PM ^
I made a typo in my original statement but you caught the message I was conveying.
Michigan needs to play at a top level versus both teams. MSU can have few victories and play at a much higher level versus Michigan. Wisconsin has fielded great teams for over a decade now. So in this case the op's question is irrelevant and Michigan will need to have a high energy level and great execution versus both teams to win.
September 24th, 2016 at 5:27 PM ^
Malarkey—you aren't in the heads of the players to know how much they want anything.
What we do know is that MSU has just been flat out better than we have almost every year since 2008, until last year.
September 25th, 2016 at 9:39 AM ^
You mean last year where they beat us at home, beat OSU in Columbus, beat Iowa in the B1G Championship and went to the playoffs last year?
If Michigan had been better, we wouldn'tt have been in a position to punt-for-the-win last year.
We lost, so they were better last year.
September 24th, 2016 at 9:54 PM ^
September 24th, 2016 at 10:26 PM ^
Urban will be looking to repay the favor from last year, especially after the arrogant celebrations by Sparty in Columbus. I don't like to count any chickens in CFB but MSU is shaping up to be a 3 loss team (maybe more) and cleanly out of any playoff considerations. Yes, we will be one of their losses... just sayin.
September 24th, 2016 at 2:45 PM ^
They passed on taking a QB for this year's junior class. Sound familiar? No Harbaugh to rescue them.