Michigan under Harbaugh: 1-8 when allowing 30+ points

Submitted by Bambi on September 23rd, 2019 at 12:16 PM

The only win was a 48-41 2OT win in 2015 vs Indiana. There was also a 45-28 win over Colorado in 2016 that almost counted but even then 14 of our points were special teams TDs and one of the TDs given up was defensive TD.

The point being in 4+ seasons under Harbaugh (55 games) our offense has definitively won us one game? And even that one required 2 OTs and a game tying TD as time expired to break 30. Obviously the more points you give up the harder it is to win but shouldn't we expect our offense to be able to bail our defense out even 2% of the time? 

CMHCFB

September 23rd, 2019 at 7:57 PM ^

John Cooper is a Hall of Fame coach with more 11 win seasons at OSU than Harbaugh has had in his career.  And when he regressed they met him go.   It was also 20 years ago so put some context with it.  Harbaugh is Purdue without the W over OSU. Stop it already. 

Wolverine91

September 23rd, 2019 at 12:18 PM ^

Yikes. I'm over it. The team is lost and Jim has lost his players and prolly his coaches. Find something better to do with your time. The season is shot...

JBone4217

September 23rd, 2019 at 1:50 PM ^

I still don’t understand this. I don’t see how getting blazed the night before has any affect as opposed to getting hambone drunk. I thought I had heard certain players were blazing up before the game. Not the night before. But I’m just a guy on a message board that is a lettuce advocate.

DearbornAlum

September 23rd, 2019 at 12:37 PM ^

So no division championship? No conference championship? But another feel good story that we can hang our hats on? We haven’t become the service academies yet and we aren’t Stanford or a Group 5 program. That was 12 years and 3 coaches ago. 
 

Edit: Also doesn’t change the fact that that ‘07 team was disappointing and underachieved. 

Bambi

September 23rd, 2019 at 12:48 PM ^

In the same time frame, James Franklin is 5-8.

Kirk Ferentz is 4-7.

So 2 coaches we shit on all the time with significantly better winning percentages in such games in the same time frame. Part of that is worse defenses giving up more points to worse teams to fit the criteria, but:

Franklin's 2016 B1G title win fits this criteria.

Ferentz beat his 8-5 in state rival on the road in a game that fits this criteria.

We have a win over Indiana in Harbaugh's first year.

Bambi

September 23rd, 2019 at 12:35 PM ^

I looked for that stat but can't find it. However I will say this:

There are 130 FBS teams. The 65th team (the 50th percentile team) averages 27.5 PPG. So is 30 a lot? 30 is slightly more than average. So under Harbaugh if our defense is anywhere slightly below average, we lose.

So knowing that I would guess in modern football, no, 30 points does not equal losing record. 30 is average nowadays. And even if teams do have losing records, they win probably at a higher clip than 11% of the time.

J.

September 23rd, 2019 at 12:59 PM ^

So... much... bad... math!

Seriously, from your "2% of the time" number (1 of 9 is 11%) to pulling out non-pace-adjusted, non-opposition-adjusted, median numbers... you're not making a compelling argument at all.  (Hint: they don't average 27.5 points per game against Power 5 teams).

Anyway, this is what I can't figure out about this fanbase.  So many people complained about the offense last year -- mostly because of a single game that they lost wherein they scored 39 points.  Last year's offense was fine.  It wasn't the greatest offense in the history of college football, but you don't get double credit for wins if you score 50+, or if you run up to the line really quickly.


This year's offense will be fine, if it's given the chance to develop.  It won't be great, because you don't bring in a new system and expect it to be great in year one.  But, the worst possible thing that you can do, both for this season and for next season, is to overreact and change everything again.

Yeoman

September 23rd, 2019 at 12:53 PM ^

People throw stats like this around without any context. Drives me nuts.

Some records of other teams when giving up 30+ (note that these, like presumably the OP, include OT games where the opponent was held under 30 in regulation):

  • OSU under Mayer 13-7
  • Michigan under Hoke: 5-9
  • Michigan under Carr: 9-19
  • OSU under Tressel: 3-8
  • Michigan under Rodriguez: 5-17
  • Michigan under Schembechler: 1-4 ('88 OSU of course)
  • Wisconsin under Alvarez: 5-33

It helps of course if you play at a really fast tempo and have a bad defense: then you can get games against Illinois and Indiana and UMass into this category and it's easier to win a few.

Bo must have been a terrible coach--his first 19 seasons at Michigan his offense didn't bail him out even once and overall he only managed it .3% of the time.

Mgoczar

September 23rd, 2019 at 12:22 PM ^

Look pal,

I tend to look on bright side because why be depressed. Previous offenses couldn't catch up. This offense has a chance - see 4th quarter. Lets give this a try can we as fan base? What if the last few minutes of game is our turning point? Shea actually throwing to the receivers on long plays? If that is the sort of offense we can get consistently then we can start boat racing teams. Lets be honest, Clemson boat raced Bama in championship. May be now M gets comfy throwing to receivers ...

Glass half full and all. 

Mgoczar

September 23rd, 2019 at 12:38 PM ^

I mean did Wisconsin stop blitzing? that corner doing PI on Black looked plenty caring/feisty. 

Look, you may be right but heck I am looking for positives and Shea ACTUALLY staying in the pocket to hitting the receiver 40 yards down in face of rush gotta give him some confidence no? and if so I'll take it. Baby steps. 

And before someone comes in and reminds me of "hey this is Michigan, we are waiting for baby steps! FU etc etc" - again, lets atleast enjoy these kids play, learn, and try to improve. We didn't lose to a MAC team here. 

1VaBlue1

September 23rd, 2019 at 12:26 PM ^

I like the tone of your post.  I mean, Harbaugh isn't going anywhere right now - whether anyone likes it, or not, is irrelevant.  Harbaugh will not be fired during this season, so we may as well buckle up and hope for the best.

But dude, starting out with "look, pal..." is only going to get you negged.  And deservedly so!  'Pal' is not a nice term on the internet.  You basically said 'look, asshole...'

Yeoman

September 23rd, 2019 at 1:26 PM ^

Is it? Clemson's done it eleven times over the same period. Alabama's given up 30+ eight times and they don't even play all that fast. MSU has 12. So far the smallest number I've found is Wisconsin's 7. Nine is pretty good (to the extent that good/bad even applies to tempo- and context-free numbers like this).

Don

September 23rd, 2019 at 12:24 PM ^

Considering that Harbaugh came in with a perhaps undeserved reputation as an offensive brain guy, it's odd that his offenses are so clearly not up to the task in so many games.

bacon1431

September 23rd, 2019 at 12:26 PM ^

His record when scoring under 30 points is also 12-13. So basically we have a very good chance of winning if the defense plays well. If the defense is only ok, we're about a .500 team. 

carolina blue

September 23rd, 2019 at 12:26 PM ^

on the flip side, Michigan is 10-0 when allowing 7 points or less (I made up the record but you get the point) I mean, come the fuck on with these kinds of statistics. news flash, giving up lots of points means you probably lose. 

buddha

September 23rd, 2019 at 1:04 PM ^

Conversely, when we score more than 30 points, our record is pretty damn good. Harbaugh is around 26-2 when his teams score more than 30 (I may be a few off on the win column. I left my computer glasses at home today and not seeing super well!). The two losses I can count are at OSU last year and FSU in the bowl game. Granted, the majority of these wins aren't exactly against powerhouses; however, there were a few PSU, Wisconsin, and Nebraska wins in there...