Michigan and OSU versus common opponents - some data
I thought it might be interesting to look at how Michigan and OSU have done against the seven common Big Ten opponents this year: Indiana, Maryland, Michigan State, Minnesota, Penn State, Purdue, and Rutgers.
I present the compiled info for information and perusal.
November 20th, 2023 at 8:10 AM ^
Simple formula needed … MH will get his yards just like 2021 when their trio of wrs got theirs … the key is to stop Henderson from running wild … plain and simple you stop the run control the line you WIN THE GAME !!!! BET
November 20th, 2023 at 8:28 AM ^
Thanks for the information! This was done on a weekly basis last year by BuckeyeChuck. All data seemed to point towards OSU in The Game. We all know how that turned out. I think data is always important and valuable, but The Game may be one of the only matches where stats, numbers, and few times even talent is thrown out the window. I believe for the first time in a long time, we have the better team and if both teams play their best game, we will win (especially playing at home), but this OSU team is very talented and are out for blood. I love Sherrone Moore, but not having Harbaugh does give me some concerns, but I do believe we have outstanding senior leadership that should be enough to pull out a victory. Go Blue!
November 20th, 2023 at 8:50 AM ^
I feel like OSU was in a lot of close games, and they kept their starters in and pulled away late. Most of the points we allowed (with the exception of MD) were against largely 2nd and 3rd team players.
If both teams were fully healthy (and had their coaches) I think we win by a sizeable margin. With us dinged up at a lot of key positions, I think it is closer, but we still win.
November 20th, 2023 at 8:54 AM ^
I like where your head is at BTT. It is amazing how we can go from one week being very healthy to the next week being a bit banged up. Let's hope Sherrone Moore brings his A game with the players because it could be the difference. Go Blue!
November 20th, 2023 at 9:30 AM ^
Most of the points we allowed (with the exception of MD) were against largely 2nd and 3rd team players.
Goes both ways. Point totals of OSU's B1G opponents through 3 quarters:
- Indiana 3
- Maryland 17
- Purdue 0
- PSU 6
- Wisconsin 10
- Rutgers 9
- MSU 3
- Minnesota 0
*One* TD in the first 3 quarters of B1G play ("with the exception of MD").
With us dinged up at a lot of key positions, I think it is closer, but we still win.
OSU is the more dinged-up team. Egbuka, Miyan Williams, Stover, two safeties (Ransom & Proctor), Eichenberg, Denzel Burke, an offensive guard (Jones), and starting DT (Hall) have all missed games the past 1-2 weeks. Williams & a safety are the only two that for sure will not play, the others are all key players who are either questionable to play or will play hurt. This is 8th game in 8 straight weeks.
November 20th, 2023 at 9:44 AM ^
It’ll be fascinating to see the number of possessions this game. Michigan has put up more points with fewer possessions than OSU, but OSU has given up near equal/less points on more possessions.
November 20th, 2023 at 10:08 AM ^
I suspect a relatively low number of possessions in this game. Though that could go up with a few extra 3-&-outs.
November 20th, 2023 at 8:29 AM ^
At face value this looks pretty even. But there are a few high leverage areas where the difference is meaningful:
3rd down conversion: 50% for MI vs. 38% for Ohio State
4th down conversion: 90% for MI vs. 50% for Ohio State
Interceptions: either 8 or 10 for MI vs. 4 for Ohio State
Michigan's run-pass selection is heavily skewed toward run, 62/38
We are better at staying on the field and keeping drives alive than Ohio State, in general. We are better at stealing possessions via interceptions. These are two huge benefits in an otherwise evenly matched contest, and if Michigan is able to keep those rates in this game, we should win.
On the other hand, Michigan's penchant for running in unusual scenarios, and just for running very often, could bite us in this game, and I hope we come with a strong game plan for the passing attack to take advantage of what Ohio State gives through the air.
November 20th, 2023 at 8:46 AM ^
It's 10. Those didn't sum properly due to operator error:
November 20th, 2023 at 8:47 AM ^
Ok well that's all interesting but a bit misleading, I think you have filter out (1) the effect of UM having teams' signs for the first half of the season, (2) the impact of not having or not having JMFH on the sidelines, and (3) the factoid if your best out of conference opponent only pays 10 defenders on the critical game-winning play which proves your "toughness"?
November 20th, 2023 at 8:48 AM ^
I was looking at it yesterday, not as deeply as this, just comparing performances against common opponents, taking into account home or away, and margin of victory. I'll give them a tiny nod for the hardly dominating Notre Dame road win, but that's literally it. The idea that they have some dramatically better resume than Michigan is ludicrous, and is being hyped to pre-justify backing them, once again, into the Playoff following a loss to Michigan, should that happen.
November 20th, 2023 at 8:52 AM ^
Yeah, they jumped over us in the polls because they beat MSU and MN by smaller margins than we did, lol.
November 20th, 2023 at 8:49 AM ^
Thank you for this! My takeaways:
1. We're a cleaner team. Fewer mistakes, higher efficiency, more benefits from opponent mistakes.
2. Despite not feeling like our RBs are quite as dominant as they were last year, they're a clear asset- more YPP on more plays than the bad guys.
3. They're strongest early in the count- only 26% of their 1st downs came from 3rd or 4th down, v. 36% of ours. Make them grind it out and we've got this.
4. Fuck 'em.
November 20th, 2023 at 8:50 AM ^
Thanks for this week, which I was about to do myself this morning.
one important anomaly within this analysis: against common opponents, OSU played three on the road — PU, RU and IU. Michigan common opps were scheduled in complete opposite of this with four on the road against MSU, PSU, MN and MD.
The difference in quality of road opponents is significant. I think Michigan did quite a bit better with that context added.
November 20th, 2023 at 9:02 AM ^
Just score more points than those bastards!
November 20th, 2023 at 9:13 AM ^
Turnovers really jump off the page. Thanks for putting this together!
November 20th, 2023 at 9:22 AM ^
Let's get some takeaways this weekend!
November 20th, 2023 at 9:23 AM ^
Very close stats
November 20th, 2023 at 9:28 AM ^
Cyan Day: no team is tougher than us
Maury Povich: your third down efficiency says that’s a lie
November 20th, 2023 at 9:31 AM ^
Beat Ohio
November 20th, 2023 at 9:33 AM ^
Oddity in the data?
Yards per play - they outgain us by .1. But, we outgain them in yards per attempt and yards per rush. Is yards per play factoring in some external thing that isnt just the sum of yards per rush and yards per pass? Like punting? I assume sacks and turnovers etc are all factored in... so how are they outgaining us on a per play basis. What's the other data point that they win so significantly to outdo our advantage on the ground (.2) and by air (.7)?
November 20th, 2023 at 9:54 AM ^
Because they pass more, their higher yards per pass gets weighted more in the overall average.
November 21st, 2023 at 12:27 PM ^
We have a higher yards per pass. Our rate is better on both. Volume can't make up for the higher rate
November 20th, 2023 at 9:34 AM ^
I am glad we are at home (I am glad we have Corum this time)
We will win if we get pressure on McCord and stop their run (I know, thanks captain obvious)
I figure Harrison is going to have his moments and we just need a couple moments of our own (Hope #2 brings his A Game)
I have a feeling this game will be decided in last few minutes (X-factor= JJ McCarty running the ball is the reason we win)
November 20th, 2023 at 9:34 AM ^
The penalty numbers above + B1G conspiracy against Michigan = does not compute.
November 20th, 2023 at 9:53 AM ^
game week. negging all you posts even though I like you.
November 20th, 2023 at 10:10 AM ^
Fair enough. Here's another opportunity. ;-)
November 20th, 2023 at 9:53 AM ^
I hate you ohio state
November 20th, 2023 at 9:54 AM ^
This is good stuff. Bottom line is whoever's oline is better Saturday will be the winner.
November 20th, 2023 at 2:12 PM ^
Agree - I was a lot more confident going into this game before 1) seeing Barnhart get torched by PSU 2) seeing more OL get dinged up and 3) seeing Barnhart get torched by Maryland
November 20th, 2023 at 9:58 AM ^
We are +10 on the turnover battle against common opponents vs break-even for Osu. This game should be very tight given the strength of the defenses. Whoever wins the turnover battle, likely wins this game. I expect it to be much closer than the prior two.
November 20th, 2023 at 10:01 AM ^
The numbers show what I would have suspected from the eye test. It's close, very close. From a recency bias perspective, OSU has looked like world beaters against MSU and Minnesota the last 2 weeks, while Michigan had to work harder with PSU and Maryland in the same timeframe. But a month ago, the situations were reversed; Michigan was hammering MSU and Minnesota while OSU was sweating it out against Maryland and PSU.
November 20th, 2023 at 10:16 AM ^
maryland always plays Michigan tough, and it was their senior day as well.
Last year Michigan only beat Maryland by 7 last year
November 20th, 2023 at 10:22 AM ^
The 2022 score is deceptive because that was a 2 TD game when it quit mattering. Maryland had a garbage time drive for a TD + 2 pt conversion which was extremely annoying but not impactful because Michigan just kneeled it out afterward.
Much like BOTH of OSU and Michigan's performances against PSU this year, come to think of it.
November 20th, 2023 at 10:28 AM ^
Bottom line is oline play. If we can't block them and give jj time, we will lose. If we can't get to their qb or stop run, we aren't going to win. If we can do both, I think we can win by 7-14 points. Oline HAS to be better.
November 20th, 2023 at 10:16 AM ^
One looks markedly better than the other. Go Blue
November 20th, 2023 at 10:24 AM ^
I remember when OSU posted on twitter that they scored 35 points against Rutgers and Michigan only scored 31 neglecting the fact that OSU also gave up 16 against Rutgers while Michigan gave up only 7 that came on the first drive of the game. They also neglected the fact that the win margin for Michigan was +5 against Rutgers compared to OSU's.
November 20th, 2023 at 10:27 AM ^
Even Rutgers had eerily similar vibes for both teams. Both games were uncomfortably close at halftime (albeit OSU was losing) and both games were broken open early in the 2nd half with pick-sixes.
November 20th, 2023 at 10:30 AM ^
Interesting and suggests closely matched teams. But when you play a team seems to matter a lot. Teams get hot and cool off. Michigan was rolling for awhile mid-season, and seems less dominant lately with all the distractions. Ohio’s defense seems to have improved as the season has progressed. Hoping the team can put aside the noise and deliver an emphatic “take your PI firm and performative outrage and stick it up Daylily’s ass.”
November 20th, 2023 at 2:16 PM ^
Appreciate you pulling this data. But none of this means shit for Saturday.
November 20th, 2023 at 2:41 PM ^
The score begins as 0 – 0 and that's the only stat that matters.
November 20th, 2023 at 3:48 PM ^
This will come down to turnovers. With that being said, Fuck bitch ass day. Fuck ohio. Fuck the big ten. Let’s bring home the win
November 20th, 2023 at 6:36 PM ^
Remember also Michigan took JJ and many starters out early in many games.
November 20th, 2023 at 7:40 PM ^
Small fix: Ohio State allowed 61 points, not 68