Michigan -9.5 at Purdue

Submitted by Bigku22 on

For my fellow gambling degenerates. 

Michigan is currently -9.5 at Purdue. The line has bounced back and forth between 8-10. Purdue is 2-1 and more importantly for some 3-0 ATS. 

For value purposes, I have a bet from preseason on this game of Purdue +22, so quite the dramatic shift in 3 weeks. 

Michigan also 3-0, but only 1-2 ATS. 

Purdue is off to a great start but will have major disadvantages in the trenches on both sides of the ball (they only have 1 sack on the year). So who's laying the points this weekend?

Also of interest:

Notre Dame -3.5 at MSU

UNLV +39 at Ohio State

EDIT: Updated Purdue's record, they are 2-1* but 3-0 ATS

Esterhaus

September 17th, 2017 at 11:05 PM ^

I watched the AF game a second time and beginning past midnight zulu. Gentry resembles a flamingo at times but damn if you aren't onto something. I think the kid is going to win games for us this season.

Mr Miggle

September 17th, 2017 at 10:36 PM ^

A few weeks ago, that's who everyone assumed would get most of the snaps and carries and it seemed like a good position group.

 It's time for another WR to step up. DPJ started doing that Saturday. As good as Isaac and Black have been, their replacements don't worry me. 

Scottwood

September 17th, 2017 at 10:36 PM ^

Purdue's yards per play numbers are fairly middling. I thought they'd be better based off their scores. Unlike the last two weeks, Michigan may be a good value bet here.

BALDA55ARRE

September 17th, 2017 at 11:08 PM ^

I think 30-10 UM even without Black, DPJ will fill in nicely. I'm worried about Isaac being injured but we have depth at RB also so no worries. Remember Harbaugh and Don Brown that's enough to beat Purdue

golfer

September 17th, 2017 at 11:42 PM ^

i thought michigan would kick msu ass big time. now i just hope they win. i just said HOPE, i do not like them in the red zone. better improve or they will get their ass kicked

1VaBlue1

September 18th, 2017 at 9:07 AM ^

LMAO!!  Okay, so you think MSU is going to kick Michigan's ass because UM has missed some redzone opportunities?  You do realize that Michigan is 3-0, and has outscored its opponents 98-44, despite being 1 for 10 in redzone TDs, right?

consultant22

September 18th, 2017 at 4:38 AM ^

Is this really a road game though? How many UM fans will be in the crowd for this one? 

I am very nervous about this game, just like I was nervous against Air Force. Purdue has a great offensive mind running the show now so I suspect the ball will be coming out fast from the QBs hand pretty much all game. We need to pay attention to wheel routes and screens (a combination of what Cinci and Air Force exposed), and ensure that's covered. It's pretty much impossible to hit a deep route on Michigan unless they catch us in one of the very few non-blitz looks.

I predict Purdue will hit two big plays for TDs in this game and it's up to the offense to be able to exceed that. 

WolverineHistorian

September 18th, 2017 at 8:29 AM ^

Before the season started, I would have said this game would be like pre-Joe Tiller, where there are tons of empty seats and a good turnout of Michigan fans.  But now I'm thinking the home crowd will show up in full force.

I'm a little nervous too.  Purdue playing so much better plus a team's natural habit of playing better when Michigan comes to town. 

 

umfan323

September 18th, 2017 at 4:49 AM ^

He will cost us a few games this year hopefully it’s not this one.. I would take the MLB instead of points

Goggles Paisano

September 18th, 2017 at 6:04 AM ^

Football is the ultimate team game.  One person rarely is the reason for a loss.  Speight has his moments but he was pretty steady Saturday.  The hate this guy gets from a large part of our fanbase is getting ridiculous.  

FlexUM

September 18th, 2017 at 7:54 AM ^

It's hard to tell if this game will really be close or not. It has the "feel" of a game that is going to be a big and tight game but that one team is going to physically come in and physically own the other. I believe that is what Michigan will do. I think their size adn speed on defense is going to freak out Purdue and they will react like many of the RR michigan teams did. 

That said, I like that it feels like it will be a tight game. Players don't live and die by point spreads but I've spent a lot of time in division 1 football programs (including purdue's) and players do know what is being said and what is expected and a 35 point spread or an 8 point spread does have an impact mentally on the guys. 

I like how this game feels. Spread is somewhat tight, on the road, but a very winnable game. Great setup for a young team to game valuable experience. It's also 4pm so not a night game but the place will be rocking. 

WayOfTheRoad

September 18th, 2017 at 8:19 AM ^

We don't have a 4-5 wide set of monsters on the field once we hit the red zone?! Between Gentry, Wheatley, Eubanks, Black (until the end of AF) and a few more legit monsters, we throw fades to a (maybe) 6-1 Crawford. Sure, they've all been thrown into the stands anyway but I don't get why the 10 doesn't have an auto-monster set. I feel like any other pro-style team in America would. Throw 3 monsters, a good slot guy and a HB out there and let them cover 6-6 across the board. It doesn't seem like a hard thing to think of and I don't buy into the notion that this offense is "saving the good stuff". This is our offense and it's been confusing. What happend to the patented Butt deep-cross? We ran it to perfection 3x a game dor 2 years and now gone. Did Jedd own it? I dunno. It's Purdue. Brohm or not you beat Purdue with talent alone. I don't care about youth, if you lose to a Purdue QB not named Brees, something is wrong....and it feels like that line is high, atm.

1VaBlue1

September 18th, 2017 at 9:16 AM ^

By all means, send everyone into the endzone!  And leave the OL alone to pass block, because the right side has been so good at it...  Nothing like getting Speight killed, is there?!!?

That Butt deep cross?  I'd like to see it, but the TEs are staying in to help the OL most of the time.  And maybe all of those young TEs just can't run routes as well as Jake Butt could?

WayOfTheRoad

September 18th, 2017 at 10:35 AM ^

Because the HB I suggested keeping can't chip and it takes so long to run a fade from the 10. Yes, let's scrap that idea and keep fading to Crawford for nothing. I've been corrected. Less snarky, the TEs are definitely helping more but that's a money play when you get PA time and we've been getting as much as the last two years when we use it. We're just not using it as much and I'd assume due to not trusting the OL. A shot or two a game would be nice is all. As for that play, it doesn't require a great route runner. Most other Butt routes did but this is a simple, straight forward deep cross. Very little read or sell needed. Any TE we have now can run it and did in the FSU game (to not being seen by the QB).

WolverineHistorian

September 18th, 2017 at 8:34 AM ^

Evil vs. evil in East Lansing. 

When I was a kid, I would watch that game and go back and forth about 30 times over who to root for.  Being older and wiser, I know not to bother with that and just be happy knowing one of them will lose.

If recent history is any indication, you have to like Sparty's chances if the game is close in the 4th quarter.  But fuck both teams, obviously.  

darkstar

September 18th, 2017 at 9:45 AM ^

My former mother-in-law was at my house years ago when msu was at osu.  I believe it was the John L ~"the kicker is killing us" game.  She asked me who was playing.... (twice causing me to watch it in on a mini TV just to avoid being in the same room).  Then asked me who I wanted to win.  I said I hoped they would both lose.  She said that one team had to win.  I said I hoped whoever won would get sanctioned by the NCAA and have to forfeit the W.  Wasn't too far off.

So I concur.  F both teams.  But 'd rather beat the holy hell out of an overconfident msu team after listening to their fans talk about how they're back the next 2 weeks.

WolverineHistorian

September 18th, 2017 at 10:12 AM ^

My dad and I had just pulled off the State Street exit going to the big house for the Penn State game (Henne to Manningham on the final play) when they replayed the clip of John L.'s rant over the radio.  One of the funniest things I ever heard.

Perkis-Size Me

September 18th, 2017 at 8:48 AM ^

Not too concerned about the defense showing up and doing what it needs to do. Purdue's offensive issues seem to have been figured out to at least some degree, but this will easily be the best defense they've played thus far, and may be the best one they play all year. 

The question will be whether or not the offense can hold up it's end of the bargain. Answer to that is TBD. I don't know how good Purdue's defense is supposed to be, but they went on the road and held Mizzou to 3 points. That's impressive. And they didn't let Lamar Jackson run totally wild, so that's saying something too. If the offense continues to sputter in the red zone (or just sputter in general), I think there's only so much the defense is going to be able to do on it's own. Especially to a team that wants to go up-tempo and consistently attack our defense where it's weakest: through the air. 

At some point, unless drastic changes happen the offense will cost this team at least a game or two. I'd rather it be to another top-10 team like PSU or Wisconsin than effing Purdue......