Michigan -9.5 at Purdue

Submitted by Bigku22 on

For my fellow gambling degenerates. 

Michigan is currently -9.5 at Purdue. The line has bounced back and forth between 8-10. Purdue is 2-1 and more importantly for some 3-0 ATS. 

For value purposes, I have a bet from preseason on this game of Purdue +22, so quite the dramatic shift in 3 weeks. 

Michigan also 3-0, but only 1-2 ATS. 

Purdue is off to a great start but will have major disadvantages in the trenches on both sides of the ball (they only have 1 sack on the year). So who's laying the points this weekend?

Also of interest:

Notre Dame -3.5 at MSU

UNLV +39 at Ohio State

EDIT: Updated Purdue's record, they are 2-1* but 3-0 ATS

TrueBlue2003

September 18th, 2017 at 12:11 AM ^

above terrible passer this year.  And our first road game (where we really haven't been very good under Harbaugh).

I think we win, I even think we'll cover but it is crazy and somewhat depressing how far this line (justifiably) has moved since the start of the season. 

For a game that was projected at about a 95 percent chance win before the season, we're probably down to about 75 percent, which is enough for me to be nervous.

DrMantisToboggan

September 18th, 2017 at 7:17 AM ^

Feleipe Franks is a much better passer than either of Purdue's QBs. Passing offense, play call, yada yada be damned, Franks is better than Blough and Sindelar. Now will Purdue's offense be better coached? Yeah, probably. But they're still at a major step down talent-wise from Florida's QB and Florida's skill players and Florida's OL.

Esterhaus

September 17th, 2017 at 9:45 PM ^

But 9.257 or below means our season is doomed. Nordin had better supply the nearly 0.25 point difference or else we need to replace the entire program or something. (cough)

Esterhaus

September 17th, 2017 at 9:54 PM ^

Surprisingly magical events occur in their stadium. I win no matter what because schadenfreude for the team that loses it. Still, it's better that Staee wins because B1G, same state, artificial confidence on their part, Douchetonio promises for our game, and October 7 when we win. And we don't play the domers this regular season. Let the stakes be B1G.

Mike Damone

September 17th, 2017 at 11:26 PM ^

out of MSU this year whether they are confident or not.  They are depleted on defense.  If we can't beat Sparty this year - I am not looking forward to the back half of the season.

They beat ND last year - how did that work out for them?

Screw Sparty, and to hell with Notre Dame.  I am hoping for 4 overtimes caused by inept play, with both sides inflicting a lot of pain and some non-serious injuries.

 

doggdetroit

September 18th, 2017 at 7:48 AM ^

Because MSU is much better than last year and will be at home. ND will also be unable to exploit MSU 's biggest weakness (pass defense). In general, I ignore the consensus from MGoBlog, which is incapable of providing an unbiased take on MSU. The vast majority here predicted Western Michigan to beat MSU. Instead, MSU handled them by two TDs.

bacon

September 17th, 2017 at 9:51 PM ^

We will win this game, but it won't be comfortable. The fact is that Michigan fans got used to watching upperclassmen on defense over the past two years, and expect lights out defense will be the norm. It's a young team and they're learning. On offense, Speight is what he is: solid, but mistake prone. He can step up to lead the team down the field for a couple drives a game, but the rest is hit or miss. If he cuts down on the turnovers, that's about the best we can hope for. The running game is ok, but needs more experience on the line and backs who make cutbacks. Srill, they have moments. So we're a team that's going to get points on half our drives, eventually we'll start scoring TDs in the red zone, and we'll keep beating lesser opponents by closer than we'd like. I'm not sure how that will translate to when we play better teams, but if the team keeps learning from their mistakes, we'll keep getting better.

bacon

September 18th, 2017 at 9:07 AM ^

I'm not saying they won't be (we haven't played any good offenses yet), but expecting to see the defense that we saw the last two years is asking to be disappointed. Those were the number 2 and 1 defenses in the country. We turned over a ton of guys. I think we're still great, but maybe won't be tops in the country this year. Offense wise this is true too, but moreso. Fact is that we're 3-0, and the wins have been by comfortable margins, but that took until the 3rd/4th quarter to resolve in all 3 games. I think we should expect that going forward.

Fieldy'sNuts

September 17th, 2017 at 9:51 PM ^

If we can just score more than 17 points (be it on O, D, or ST) we should win. Our D won't be any more forgiving in West Lafayette than they were in Arlington.

1VaBlue1

September 18th, 2017 at 8:54 AM ^

I'm gonna disagree on this.  They'll get 1 TD on a big play.  Other than that, they aren't going to sustain anything.  If they get a lot of FG's, it's because the offense is turning it over in thier zone.  Don Brown's defense is something that Brohm simply doesn't have the players to attack successfully.  The DL is going to make Purdue's OL look like a bunch of high schooler's and Hudson, Bush, and Metellus won't need help from the corners to stop the run.

Offensively, don't expect anything flashy.  We'll see a bunch of basic vanilla runs to emphasize OL blocking work, with some equally generic work in the passing game.  Harbaugh will seek to control the game, not necessarily blow out Purdue.

LSAClassOf2000

September 17th, 2017 at 10:24 PM ^

I'll go on the record and say that we're probably going to need about 30 or so to probably get a comfortable margin to work with. Purdue will probably score a couple times, and while I trust the defense to keep us in any game and special teams to keep doing what they do, I am far more interested in the vibe that comes from practice on offense this week. Purdue is a shot to get a couple things right, so we need to take advantage of it.