Luke Fickell accepts the L in the “Hudson Saga”

Submitted by MikeinTN on August 20th, 2019 at 2:09 PM

Fickell went on the sans-Bill C. PAPN podcast with noted MGo-Antagonist Steven Godfrey to discuss the transfer issue and started out by falsely stating that Harbaugh had “specifically singled out James Hudson” in his comments at Media Days presser. By 41:45 in the podcast he admits that his philosophy has changed and he agrees with what they’ve termed Harbaugh’s proposal as the “Mulligan Rule” allowing a one time transfer without penalty. 

I didn’t see this posted already, but that’s how these things usually go with the charge of misconduct or unfairness amplified by the peanut gallery media and the resolution slipping away quietly if it doesn’t align with the initial characterization. 

theyellowdart

August 20th, 2019 at 2:12 PM ^

I don't think agreeing with Harbaugh on having a "Mulligan Rule" is close at all to accepting the L on this situation.

Even moreso if he starts out with false claims about it.

Blau

August 20th, 2019 at 2:28 PM ^

Just because he seemed to agree with JH’s overall stance on transfers doesn’t mean he conceded anything to him regarding Hudson. I don’t see anywhere where Fick “took a loss” on the very specific Hudson case. At the most he was backtracking a little.

Reaching....

spider-sal

August 20th, 2019 at 2:40 PM ^

Unless Fickle says something like “Harbaugh lied about our conversation and he completely fabricated the story”, then I think he’s taking the loss here. If someone makes a false allegation against me, I guarantee I’m shouting from a mountaintop so the whole world can hear my side of the story. He’s staying away from what Harbaugh said and that speaks volumes.

SugarShane

August 20th, 2019 at 2:12 PM ^

Didn’t realize people still listen to PAPN after Connelly left. 

 

Are you that that interested in Godfrey’s retarded hot takes?

SugarShane

August 20th, 2019 at 2:31 PM ^

I meant no offense.

 

My comment was directed at Godfrey, using an accepted use of the word retarded that’s literally in the dictionary. 

 

https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/retarded

 

When I call someone a “mother %#*#er” my intention is not to offend incestuous children  

 

I can change the world to something you deem more acceptable at the moment, but then that word will carry the same connotation that bothers you 

 

bronxblue

August 20th, 2019 at 2:40 PM ^

Come on man, the line directly above the definition says "dated, now usually offensive".  There are a lot of words that are recognized as existing without needing to be used.

But yes, Godfrey has bad takes.  Now pull a Fickell and take the "L" on the word choice.

pescadero

August 20th, 2019 at 3:39 PM ^

I'm going to assume you never use moron, imbecile, or idiot as a pejorative then... seeing as how they are all former clinical terms in a psychological classification system for cognitive impairment...

 

...just like the "R" word is a former clinical terms in a psychological classification system for cognitive impairment.

See: The Euphemism Treadmill

Also:

Association of Medical Officers of American Institutions for Idiotic and Feeble-Minded Persons
->
American Association on Mental Retardation
->
American Association on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities.

 

 

DCAlum

August 20th, 2019 at 4:16 PM ^

I think this misses the point. Yes, the euphemism treadmill is a thing--language changes and words may mean one thing at one point in history and a different thing at another.

 

But we're at THIS point in time, and the word "retard" is undeniably offensive right now because it is used in offensive ways. It doesn't matter whether you personally don't find it offensive--it matters whether it is actually causing emotional harm to those who would be affected by its use (like, for instance, the poster you are responding to, with an intellectually disabled child). If s/he thinks it's harmful, s/he's got a much better perspective than an outside observer. 

Reggie Dunlop

August 20th, 2019 at 2:34 PM ^

PAPN = Podcast Aint Played Nobody

It's a college football podcast featuring Bill Connelly, the inventor of the S&P+ advanced metric.

The general consensus is that Bill Connelly is a level-headed smart guy who weighs teams even-handedly and is a pleasant person to listen to regarding college football, where his co-host Steven Godfrey is toolbox who does nothing but irritate listeners. PAPN was an SB Nation production, but now Connelly has gone to ESPN, so apparently the ass-end of the podcast (Godfrey) is still putting it on without his relevant half.

We all have time to listen to this shit if we shared the same priorities.