Jim McElwain Did a Really Nice Thing

Submitted by Caesar on

Bit of fluff, though a very nice story, and it's the offseason. Looks like McElwain took a pretty sizeable hit on his home's sale price so that a family with disabled kids could afford the place, which is well-suited for their needs (link). 

 

KungFury

April 6th, 2018 at 11:56 AM ^

Who cares if the family has money? Like that makes it mean less? They’re doing EXACTLY what you would hope someone with money would do. They encountered adversity and are growing from it. They’re raising awareness about a disease 99.9% of us didn’t know existed. They’re using their money to try to make their kids lives as happy as possible. They started a foundation and use their wealth to host events. Even this entire story is in the news because they came out and were upset to see a guy get shit in for doing a nice thing.
If you earn money you should enjoy it, and it’s great that people out there exists who care enough to try to make a difference for other people.

Reader71

April 6th, 2018 at 12:31 PM ^

It does mean less. The buyers have enough money to still buy a huge house. If McElwain didn’t give them such a good price, they had the means to still get a great home. Also important, and which no one has mentioned, is that the sellers have enough money to afford to take a $400k hit on a house, because he still has a high-paying job and enough assets to make it feasible. I don’t see anyone saying it doesn’t mean anything, nor that people with money shouldn’t be able to enjoy it. Some of us are just not interested in giving this any more importance than we think it deserves. I’d be more impressed if McElwain was a high school coach who sold his $300k home for $230k (same proportion) for the same reasons. It would be more of a sacrifice.

dragonchild

April 6th, 2018 at 1:17 PM ^

Saying we shouldn't quantify deeds is simply imposing your own valuation, that they're all equal.  That's gonna rankle with some people.  In my case, I've had the honor of meeting some folks who not only teach me humility for the extent of their compassion and generosity, but wouldn't dare say so on account of true modesty.  While I'm perfectly happy to say this is pretty darn neat, and my opinion of McElwain has changed for the better, I've met some examples of give-'til-it-hurts that compel me to put this in perspective, and say so.  In a generosity sense it's a scrappy play, which is great and deserves the cheers, but then again I've had the pleasure of seeing a Mo Hurst thundersack so no, you're not going to convince me the two are the same.

Reader71

April 6th, 2018 at 1:37 PM ^

Why we have to quantify and qualify is a very interesting question. I suppose it has something to do with the way our brains evolved. But make no mistake, we do have to. It’s automatic. You would not feel the same way about this is McElwain wrote a check for $400k and donated it to the kid, even though the result would be very, very similar. All sorts of factors go into the way we quantify or qualify. This is a nice deed, and it is nice that people do good deeds. That does not mean that all good deeds are equal, or else we shouldn’t feel any more impressed if he gave them the house for free.

Reader71

April 6th, 2018 at 4:31 PM ^

I have not. That has nothing at all to do with anything, however. I could be a murderer, and that would have no bearing on the value of my claims. They are either good or bad, right or wrong. Why won’t you engage with them instead of my character? For a nonjudgmental guy, your post was quite judgmental. To be fair, neither of us has been snarky, so I’m not sure why you included that.

marmot

April 6th, 2018 at 1:25 PM ^

To some extent, yes.  The dfference is this thread is about a guy leaving a ton of money on the table in an act of kindness, and you still have reprehensible comments and posters belittling his charity on something he didn't even bring up himself.  This isn't a typical football thread.  

Reader71

April 6th, 2018 at 1:52 PM ^

You think it’s venomous to have discussions about morality and levels of charity? You and I probably don’t value McElwain’s deed equally, but I don’t think discussing our valuations is venomous. He did a good thing. Would it be more interesting to see a hundred versions of “He did a good thing,” in the comments section, or to have an interesting conversation about how good that thing was?

bronxblue

April 6th, 2018 at 1:30 PM ^

I can only hope that by 2020, only the dumbest people will keep referring to him as a shark humper.  This is a really cool thing he did, and while it won't necessarily make his success at UM a given or that he'll be a perfect fit, does give further evidence that perhaps working at UF makes you look a bit worse than you are as a person.

StephenRKass

April 6th, 2018 at 3:05 PM ^

This was a generous gesture from both McElwain and his wife Karen. I am a bit disappointed at some of the negative comments on this board, but then, they're to be expected. However, a few observations.

  1. From what I can tell, Jim didn't do this for publicity, or credit, or PR. Sure, they can afford it, and sure, the new family could still afford an expensive house. But please don't bash McElwain as if he was trying to milk this. It was a private transaction, and they declined to commment for the story. Jim and Karen were kind, thoughtful and generous in what they chose to do privately. End of story.
  2. Some criticized the tone of the article, as if it was too positive and credited the McElwain family too much. I think the author said more than once that McElwain had received quite a few cheap "loser" shots and jibes as a result of the sale price. This was what bugged the author.
  3. There are more than a few coaches who choose to do charitable and generous things privately. Harbaugh and Beilein would be among such coaches. Articles about this generally aren't linked here, for various reasons. First, the snarkiness of the board doesn't deal well with it. Second, coaches choose to do such things privately, and there is at least some respect for that privacy. Third, often such gestures are tied to religious beliefs, and as such, they are deemed not appropriate, because they're not directly about sports.
  4. There are a lot of interesting articles out there about giving and generosity. Let's just say that in general, wealthy people are less likely to give than those with less. Note that this is proportionate to total income, and doesn't really take into account disposable income. In other words, a millionaire can more easily give away $100,000 than someone makeing $25,000 a year can give away $2500. But the wealthy are far less likely to give. I guess once they have a pile of money, they obsess about it, and don't want to see it decrease.
  5. Changing topics, apart from what you think about McElwain, it is good to think about being generous to those in need. And for the record, as much as I'm a Michigan fan, I'm not talking about giving to Michigan sports! Find something you can get behind and support it. If you're religious, be generous with your church, synagogue, mosque, etc. But you don't have to be religious. Bill Gates has done and continues to do marvelous things. If you're atheist or agnostic, get behind Chad Tough, your local food bank, or some other non-religious organization that serves those in need.
  6. Last comment. Being generous is a habit you can cultivate when you are young, and when you don't have much money. Again, be generous proportionate to what you have, not what you don't have. Be generous with your time, and your mind and your gifts. Research seems to indicate that if you wait until you are successful to be generous, odds are much less likely you will ever be generous.

slimj091

April 6th, 2018 at 7:30 PM ^

I was hoping the nice thing was going to be that he decided not to be a coach at Michigan. Now I have tears in my eyes and feel like a shark's asshole.