Indiana Snowflakes: The Offense

Submitted by LSAClassOf2000 on October 9th, 2022 at 4:00 AM

This will be the thread for hot takes regarding the offense and offensive playcalling. 

bamf_16

October 8th, 2022 at 4:29 PM ^

Seriously.

 

I can’t tell how much of the first half was the shock of seeing a coach carted off vs. simple poor execution.

 

The second half was almost surgical.

 

Though we’ll (I’ll) bitch all week about yet another short yardage situation where pre-snap it was clear the running play that was called had zero chance of success. Gotta clean that up.

wolverine1987

October 8th, 2022 at 5:28 PM ^

You're right. but it's also right that there were serious problems with the offense against a bad defense-not average, bad. Just to choose one-the repeated 100% runs out of the pistol, which anyone can see and key on. The super restrictive play-calling is another that takes actually playmakers and limits them. Lastly, the apparent inability of our WR's to get separation from mediocre DB's. Lots to fix. But it was a good win and you can never look great every game, so there's that too. 

Bill22

October 9th, 2022 at 12:14 PM ^

Why was it “atrocious?”  The refs were blowing up every Michigan big play.  I am actually happy with the first half play calling.  When you are in a hostile environment, against an inferior team and the refs/momentum aren’t in your favor you need to be conservative.

The second half was what we thought it would be.

VintageRandy

October 8th, 2022 at 8:47 PM ^

There certainly seem to be some bugs so far. Big question for Brian on the UFR: Joel Klatt pointed out that we are heavily tipping our hand towards run when we motion pre-snap; do the numbers back this up? Are some of these notion plays actually RPOs that have the slider turned towards run? 
 

It seems like Klatt’s observation was on point in real time, but it would be interesting to see any analysis on this from season numbers to date. 

bamf_16

October 8th, 2022 at 4:32 PM ^

Right before the blocked FG, it seemed if Henning runs through the catch rather than committing to some BS looking half lunge, it’s a TD. 

 

I like Bell in the short passing game much more than downfield. Curious the one downfield shot was to him rather than one of the better deep threats, and the pick in the end zone doesn’t happen with a bit more separation.

 

But man, Klatt was right about him on that TD pass where he was blocking on the outside. What an incredible player and leader on this team. 

swalburn

October 8th, 2022 at 3:49 PM ^

It was nice to see JJ get 300 yards passing.  Offense seemed predictable.  I think we were saving things for next week.  I'm not going to complain when we absolutely dominated them the way we did in the second half.   We will open it up next week.

swalburn

October 8th, 2022 at 3:57 PM ^

I honestly do.  Harbaugh knows PSU has a bye.  If he has a trick or a gimmick he is going to save it.  He always saves stuff for OSU.  I thought the year we lost with O'Korn he called one of the greatest games I've ever seen.  We have new coordinators this year. I'm sure there is stuff we are not showing.

stephenrjking

October 8th, 2022 at 5:21 PM ^

Yes. Michigan does this a lot.

Examples:

The zone arc read that Shea pulled out against Wisconsin after setting it up most of the leadup in 2018. 

The WR screen-and-go feint they threw to DPJ. That one was very frustrating, because they set it up for a couple of games and then pulled it out against.. I think SMU? Or some other weak opponent. 

Various end-arounds, blocking combinations, etc.

Harbaugh offenses have done this for a long time. Yes, Jabrill never passed, but in most of these other cases (including a number of situations in 2016) stuff that was shown for a week or two or three set something else up for a later week.

And, to be honest, it frustrates me at times, but it is definitely real. 

mackbru

October 8th, 2022 at 9:21 PM ^

I think there's a big difference between having 2 or 3 new plays per game, which pretty much every team does, and saving a larger schematic approach for a certain game. When people talking about "saving something" or "holding something back," they mean the latter, not a few specific plays designed for x opponent.

stephenrjking

October 9th, 2022 at 12:54 AM ^

What do you mean by "larger schematic approach?" It seems like this is a moving target. Do you mean wholly different running schemes? Say, transitioning from zone blocking to gap blocking? Michigan did that in 2017. Or do you mean different types of formations? Say, transitioning from three-receiver sets to sets that have two and three TEs to abuse undersized defensive fronts? That's what Michigan did against Maryland. 

To some extent a team's offense is what it is. Installing entirely new schemes has a lot of costs associated with it, and you don't get as good with them. Al Borges installed a bunch of new stuff every week and developed some intriguing game scripts and the occasional great game and a lot of clunkers. 

The critique starting all of this was Jabrill Peppers not throwing out of the Pepcat, which... is a couple of plays. A "larger schematic approach" sounds interesting but one really needs to establish what that means before it can be held against the coaching staff for not doing that. It seems a particularly weird critique of the Michigan staff, which isn't perfect but also runs a pretty wide diversity of plays and formations.