Harbaugh: Discussions being had on return of yearly Michigan-ND game

Submitted by Wolverine Devotee on October 21st, 2019 at 7:54 PM

Just now on the Inside Michigan Football Radio Show.

This Saturday's game is the last scheduled meeting between Michigan and ND for the foreseeable future. Both teams schedules are loaded with marquee match ups with P5 opponents throughout 2020s. 

Jon Jansen asked Harbaugh about the possible return of the series on a yearly basis soon. 

I know you're down near Warde's office. There's been some discussions. We'll see what happens. I think it's good for college football. 

Michigan took a $4.6M bath cancelling the Arkansas series that was supposed to have taken place on Sept. 1, 2018 in Ann Arbor and August 31, 2019 in Fayetteville, AR.

Arkansas went 2-10 in 2018 and is currently 2-5 this season. 

Michigan cancelled the 2020-2021 home and home with Virginia Tech (also horrible this season), paying the $375,000 fee. We would've had two P5 non-conference opponents to go along with 9 B1G games so I can see why that was done.

But here's the thing: Michigan has a P5 non-conference opponent on the schedule every year from 2020-2027. Home and home series with Washington (2020-2021), UCLA (2022-2023), Texas (2024 & 2027) and Oklahoma (2025-2026). If those discussions become reality..........farewell to those exciting matchups. 

WallyWallace

October 21st, 2019 at 9:04 PM ^

How about UNC or Duke? Parlay the basketball rivalries to the gridiron plus exposure to the fertile recruiting in the Carolinas.  Also, credit for a P5 win in what are reasonably winnable games. Also, play YTM in the Orange Bowl and resurrect the short but entertaining rivalry from the 80s against Jimmy Johnson.

skegemogpoint

October 21st, 2019 at 9:24 PM ^

Not sure why people don’t understand that the old model doesn’t work in playoff era. Years past, you could schedule tough OOC games and still attain all team goals by winning B10 and going to Rose Bowl. No more. Now it’s about getting to CFB Playoff. So if you schedule more 50/50 games you geometrically reduce the probability of attaining that goal.  Each game should be a graduated step to the year-end climax with OSU. Yes, we need to schedule P5 teams but we should take care to schedule 60/40, 70/30 type teams.

Pay attention to what our peers do. WIS, PSU, MSU and OSU do not play near as difficult OOC schedules. It doesn’t cost them at all. Much better to crush the Pitts, Buffalos and Idaho’s of the world than lose. They get it. Warde Manual doesn’t. 

OSUtopia

October 21st, 2019 at 11:06 PM ^

Typically, OSU plays a tough Power 5 team each year. That didn't happen this year as TCU (which was scheduled when TCU was very good) reneged on the original agreement of a home & home. So the teams played one game only, last year at "neutral field" JerryWorld.

OSU has Oregon, Notre Dame, Washington, Texas over the next 7 years, with Tex/Wash together in 2025. This doesn't seem any different than what UM has done in the recent past. 

I think Wisconsin has played a pathetic OOC schedule in most years. I have heard that they have a H&H coming up against Bama which is hard to believe.

M-Dog

October 21st, 2019 at 11:59 PM ^

OSU's OOC schedule used to be crap, but it has gotten much better.

But the CFP committee is still all about number of wins, despite them saying otherwise.  Especially if you are a P5 school and go undefeated.  They will never leave you out, even if your OOC schedule sucks.

 

Haskin’s Bandaid

October 21st, 2019 at 9:29 PM ^

I work with a few ND fans. Every time I hear “Go Irish” I want to vomit out loud. It sounds like a wet elder queef. 

Pepper Brooks

October 21st, 2019 at 9:30 PM ^

OK, here's a REALLY unpopular opinion (I'll have to tighten my sphincter for this one)...

I would rather have a regular, marquee rivalry game like ND on the schedule every year, than schedule all OOC cupcakes to try to make the CFP but then be disappointed when we lose a conference game and not make it.  At least in this scenario we would have another big game to look forward to.

Oh, boy... be gentle...

Trader Jack

October 21st, 2019 at 9:32 PM ^

Your “exciting matchups” are my “unnecessarily difficult non-conference games.” No reason to play them when the ultimate goal is to make the playoff.

MichiganStan

October 21st, 2019 at 10:11 PM ^

I would rather play as easy of a schedule as possible and have our "Marquee game" be in the playoffs than against a Notre Dame or Oklahoma in the regular season

Nothing like getting your ass kicked 3 games into the season and already being in a hole while still having to face PSU, OSU, MSU, and Wisconsin. That's just great -_-

Pepper Brooks

October 21st, 2019 at 10:42 PM ^

You see, in your scenario there is no guarantee there will be a playoff marquee game or any additional marquee game, and I really like to watch Michigan play in premier games.  I expect most fans do.  Besides, if the team can't beat quality teams during the season do you think the team will make the playoff? 

The OSU game is the playoff threshold for our team.  If we don't beat them we don't get in.  But a 1 loss B1G Champion who beat OSU and only lost to ND, does that team get in?  In 2018 the 1 loss UM team was ranked #4 in the CFP rankings before the OSU game.  The only loss was to ND.

clarkiefromcanada

October 21st, 2019 at 11:42 PM ^

If I'm buying 4 season tickets now (and I am as of next fall) I would prefer the team play quality teams (as opposed to 4 weeks of MAC/Sunbelt teams to begin the year. At the current price of Michigan tickets (plus donation, plus seat cushions etc.) you need to make some solid OOC matchups work in order to justify the ridiculous ticket price for just average or worse teams. This is really the conundrum that AD's face nationally in a time of 4k TV and half empty stadiums elsewhere.

It doesn't need to be ND but it does need to be a credible opponent. It would be nice to see the Stanford's of the world in Ann Arbor. As a Temple alum I'd be very happy to see my Owls in Ann Arbor (Michigan could get a 2 for 1 with them like Oklahoma probably) given that Penn State is too chickenshit to schedule them til late in the next decade.

AMazinBlue

October 21st, 2019 at 9:37 PM ^

I wish we would never play them again.  They don't deserve to play any great competition until they are forced to join a conference.  They don't deserve special treatment.

Rams

October 21st, 2019 at 9:39 PM ^

No thank you.

I’m tired of B1G teams catering to Notre Dame. They aren’t going to join the B1G....it’s time to move on. I would much rather see home and home series with a variety of other schools, like they have set up with UCLA, Washington, Texas, Oklahoma. I was looking forward to finally seeing an SEC school besides Vandy come north (oh well). 

AlbanyBlue

October 21st, 2019 at 10:04 PM ^

Forget the impact on the CFP chances for a minute - we're a long way from that with the B10 East the way it is. 

Playing easy games in the OOC lets you work on things, keeps your starters rested, and get your backups needed PT - if you are good enough, that is. Besides, fuck ND for dictating terms to us. Warde is an idiot for letting them have two home games in a row and then scheduling next week's game at this point in the season, after their bye week. Utter stupidity.

we don't have to have the hardest schedule in the country just because. Let's make it easier on ourselves.

MichiganStan

October 21st, 2019 at 10:09 PM ^

Michigan vs Washington, Texas, and Oklahoma would be exciting

If were going to handicap ourselves by scheduling tough OOC games at least make them exciting matchups. 

We already have enough rivalries as it is with Ohio State and Michigan State. Tell me another fucking P5 program that plays 3 legitimate rivalry games like Michigan tries to do? Nobody because its fucking dumb

MoCarrBo

October 21st, 2019 at 10:12 PM ^

CTE Harbaugh. Well its not all his fault.

 

 

All Michigan cares about is money. Want those big ND bucks rolling. Who cares about winning.

Jevablue

October 21st, 2019 at 10:34 PM ^

As a card carrying SEC hater I was genuinely pissed when we cancelled the Arkansas games for the ND series.  Especially with one of the ND games landing in the middle of the conference season.  Total stupidity. IMHO

azuofmwolverine

October 21st, 2019 at 11:16 PM ^

I don’t mind it, as long as it’s not in the middle of the conference schedule again.

I grew up on looking forward to the early fall annual (and on occasion first game of the year) match against ND.  Ideally it wouldn’t ever be first game of the year for either team, so some kinks can be worked out resulting in a better football game.  But I do agree that it would be good for college football.  
 

And for the record, I hate ND.  But I wouldn’t mind having the chance to beat them every year.

M-Dog

October 21st, 2019 at 11:26 PM ^

Harbaugh has insisted on all-white away unis and Notre Dame every year.

The least he could do it give us a Big Ten Championship in return.

 

Indiana Blue

October 21st, 2019 at 11:37 PM ^

I am so sick of the B1G kissing Notre Dame's ass.  Throw them out of the conference for hockey, do not play them in ANY sport, period. (is that redundant?)

Why the fuck does the ACC let them play conference basketball ?  Until they man up and join any conference for ALL sports let them stand on an island.  They treat every conference like a whore ... just throw them some money and do what they say.  I cannot believe no one has the guts to stand up to these pompous asses !!!

Go Blue!

Carcajou

October 22nd, 2019 at 1:07 AM ^

I like the Texas '24 and ;27 matchups. I would rather see each of these P5 opponents on a similar three year interval (maybe including ND. That would mean more variety of opponents for the players and fans.

lhglrkwg

October 22nd, 2019 at 6:09 AM ^

Bleh. Why? With 9 game conference schedules we only get 1 big OOC match up. I am bored of Notre Dame games.

I am going to be so mad if we cancel Texas or OU for more Notre Dame games.

saveferris

October 22nd, 2019 at 7:10 AM ^

You know what else might be good for college football?  Michigan vs. Texas.  Michigan vs. Georgia.  Michigan vs. Alabama.  Michigan vs. Stanford.  Michigan vs. UCLA.

I'd love to see home and homes with all those teams.  Setting up an annual game with Notre Dame is giving them the same kind honorary conference membership that they get with their deal with the ACC.  I really don't understand why we would seek to help them keep their competitive profile high when we routinely compete for the same recruits.

This series was good for Michigan back in the 70's and 80's.  I don't think it's good for us now.

GoBlueTal

October 22nd, 2019 at 9:49 AM ^

In the early 90s, this series was good from a tradition perspective.  Then ND started adding cupcakes during an early game so they could shake the rust off, and broke the spirit of this being the first game of the year for both teams.  Since then, ND has seemingly gone out of its way to spit on the series and treat M like a hangers-on ND's coat tails.  ND has spurned the B1G with it's bullshit holier-than-thou (used deliberately) independence lie before effectively taking its wishy washy deal with the ACC.  

When M beats green, the national viewers shrug because we're supposed to win, and when M doesn't beat green, the world gasps as though miracles have happened.  ND feels very similar, without even the benefit of a league win.  M has very little to gain by this series.  I understand why Harbaugh likes it from a tradition standpoint, and, if ND were to respect the rivalry AS a rivalry, and give it proper respect as the two winningest programs in college football colliding each year, then by all means, let's have at it.  But - since ND has shown not a single whiff of interest in respecting this game as anything but an add-on to their schedule, and given ND's treatment of the B1G in general, the entire league should boycott them until they as a program put on some big boy pants and act like respectful adults.  

bluepalooza

October 22nd, 2019 at 9:56 AM ^

It sucks that teams like Michigan load up on a non conference schedule and have almost no shot to go undefeated while the SEC and ACC play for the most part cupcakes in non conference. I think Army had more to do with Michigan's malaise at Wisconsin as anything. I will go out on a limb and say there is probably only one team in America that MIGHT go through Michigan's schedule undefeated this year and that would be Alabama. As long as there is only a 4 team playoff Michigan will likely never see it due to strength of schedule and unwillingness to play nefarious recruiting games. While I am on a rant, Clemson would lose at least 2 games this year with Michigan's schedule. Ohio State has played who exactly? The best team they have played to date is MSU at home.  They will get a Wisconsin team who just lost to Illinois at home and Penn State at home.  The one thing that will bring such joy, is the look on the OSU fans and players faces after their playoff dreams are smashed in Michigan stadium....Go Blue!

Mo Better Blues

October 22nd, 2019 at 9:56 AM ^

Sounds like I’m in the minority, but the Notre Dame rivalry has always occupied a special place in my heart. It was Desmond’s “The Catch” that injected UofM football into my bloodstream back in ‘91, in my neck of the woods growing up, the Irish were at least as popular as MSU as a rooting interest, and I met my future wife while stewing in my juices after our loss in 2012. I love the series and consider Notre Dame a true peer for their ability to maintain high academic standards while fielding great teams...but I also understand why some would see it phased out, as our schedules are plenty tough without it.

That said, I’d still like to see us continue to play them — but maybe a few years after we (non-ND-loving God willing) beat them this weekend. I’m too excited for the non-conference opponents we have lined up, and would hate to see those cancelled. 

Mpfnfu Ford

October 22nd, 2019 at 9:59 AM ^

Michigan/Notre Dame is a thing that's good for college football, it should continue to happen, and I don't care about Michigan giving up money to cancel games against Arkansas, a school nobody gives a shit about. One of the 019839723978 sins of Dave Brandon is the fact he lost the ND series because he thought a potential scheduling deal with the Pac 12 was better. 

I'd rather watch Michigan play and beat Notre Dame than watch Washington or UCLA or Texas or any of that. 

BlueMk1690

October 22nd, 2019 at 10:14 AM ^

If you think the ND series is special you are likely over 50 years of age and/or have some Irish catholic reference. Its those types who still think that associating ourselves with ND mystique somehow elevates Michigan.

ND moved itself into the old man ghetto years ago. Every year thousands of dudes who think ND is special die and are replaced by dudes who think nothing of it. Their network deal is like something out of the 80s, to younger people NBC is just one of like 100 names on a list. Its so easy to forget ND exists during CFB season...just don’t watch NBC which isnt all that difficult. They cut themselves out of all the narratives because they think they are big enough to be their own narrative. Less true every year. 

ND’s move to play 75% of an ACC schedule plus cherry picked games is clever in terms of ensuring a feasible path to the CFP, but it also means theres not much on the schedule to draw attention. It makes them even more invisible. 
 

Michigan can use marquee games, sure, the occasional big series vs a powerhouse is helpful, but the idea that it needs to be ND is silly. Youd do better just by perpetually rotating through the upper half of the SEC. Thats the narratIve you want to insert yourself into.

 

Tuebor

October 22nd, 2019 at 10:26 AM ^

Drop down to 8 conference games.

I'm sorry but losing one of Illinois, Iowa, or Wisconsin from the schedule doesn't really bother me all that much.

And dropping to 8 games you would have a home and home series with each team in the west every 7 years.  Is that ideal?  No, but if you want to play more often go schedule non-conference games...

SMH122

October 22nd, 2019 at 2:42 PM ^

I've always like the rivalry so, of course I want it to stay around. Having 3 rivalries including an out of conference one is not something to sneeze at imo. I'm pretty sure some Oklahoma fans still wish the Nebraska rivalry could continue and the Texas probably feels the same way with A&M. I understand those aren't apples to apples with ND/Michigan but I also think we shouldn't just throw away a rivalry. As much as I like the new matchups such as UCLA, Oklahoma and even Washington next year, it still won't be the same