Mr. Yost

September 3rd, 2017 at 4:52 PM ^

I didn't finish this thought:

I didn't see anyone on Florida at RB, WR, TE/Eubanks, DT, SDE, ILB that can match what Michigan has...and because we play a VIPER over a 3rd LB (we win their two...almost by default).

 

...I mean in terms of athleticism...that's why I mentioned Eubanks. Who looked very Funchess like out there.

 

Edit #2: That team above is a LT (serious loss - would love to see us plug in a grad transfer) and DT (can probably find something between Solomon/Marshall/Dwumfour/Jeter) away from a SERIOUS playoff team. Gil/Anthony/Ross/Furbush should be able to replace some McCray without toooo much dropoff and Bush Jr. is there to replace in terms of leadership.

Oh by the way we get to add Ekiyor, Sims, Reese, McGrone, Hutchinson, Hayes, Mayfield and co.!

Elwood

September 3rd, 2017 at 4:39 PM ^

"And had Wilton Speight even played average, this would have been at least a 40 point defeat." I was really hoping Speight would silence the critics in this game. Instead, he's created more. He was a weakness on offense yesterday. I hate to say it.

mikegros

September 3rd, 2017 at 5:27 PM ^

because he missed that block on Hill, they messed up. That was clearly a designed CB blitz and Toney had no prayer of making that block other than a pretty blatent block in the back.

Toney did the right thing to go block Kinnel and hope someone else, probably Perine making a play as the RB, deals with Hill. If he goes and blocks Hill in the back, he both likely draws a flag, and has Kinnell unblocked cleaning up behind Hill, likely holding the run to minimal gain excluding the obvious flag. 

The Man Down T…

September 3rd, 2017 at 6:14 PM ^

is fast as hell.  Look at the second video, the screen pass.  No one expected it but look how many players reacted from the middle of the line to be there on the outside to make that tackle if the receiver breaks the first one.  Look at how fast they get by the line on the videos further down.  This isn't some mid major here.  This is Florida and even their second string players are decent.  We made them look slow.   Good God our defense...  The more I watch it, the scarier it gets.  Just stay healthy boys.  Please just stay healthy.

Stauskasforthree63

September 3rd, 2017 at 5:54 PM ^

It's just that these plays would have worked if Michigan wasn't better" is all I got from this. Great film breakdown, but still making excuses and failing to admit that Michigan was physically superior.

UNCWolverine

September 3rd, 2017 at 5:55 PM ^

I do enjoy these types of articles. But that guy is smoking crack if he thinks the RB in the second play has a TD if Hurst doesn't make the tackle. McCray is there for a ~4-5 yard gain or we have a safety rolling over to stop him for 8-10 yards. Guy is clearly drinking some Gator-Aid with most of his analysis. 

Also, we are both faster and stronger, don't try to candy coat it to make yourself feel better, pal.

lhglrkwg

September 3rd, 2017 at 8:11 PM ^

He's trying to force the narrative too much with "that would've been a TD if only...". McCray, Winovich, or the safety likely gets him down for 10 yards if Hurst wasn't there. The real story is Michigan is more talented and a chess match between Don Brown ans Doug Nussmeier is only going to end one way. They were hammered decisively for 60 minutes

FL_Steve

September 3rd, 2017 at 5:58 PM ^

Found and read this earlier; good breakdown I thought. I Urban really fucked the program over and spent a good protion of last night discussing that with my drunk UF friends (they weren't surprised though). Hopefully UF doesn't comlpetely fall apart in confrence play. Would be nice to have this win continue to be meaningful! Maybe getting those 10 players back will help, how much... we'll see.

MMB 82

September 3rd, 2017 at 6:06 PM ^

Aside from it being a reasonable-ish analysis, I liked that they showed several examples of plays, and that each one would start looping automatically once you scrolled down to the video. That was pretty cool, and very useful; any way this can be done here?

yossarians tree

September 4th, 2017 at 11:29 AM ^

Michigan plays faster because they are better prepared. Our coaches play chess while Florida's coaches are playing checkers. And he did get it right that if Speight was just average we would have won by a lot more.

What worries me with Speight is that he appears to regress badly in pressure games. He'll look great in the next month against bad teams, but how does he look in Happy Valley. That's a game I believe we will win if Speight gives an average performance and takes care of the ball like it's his child. If he can't find that and keep it this season he will not be the starter next year for sure. The Peters or McCaffrey era will begin.

bacon

September 3rd, 2017 at 11:00 PM ^

Excellent article and I think they're right about the talent gap not being that big between Michigan and Florida. Past 4 recruiting classes for Michigan (247): 5, 8, 37, 20. Florida: 11, 12, 21, 9. That's not that different. Certainly not a match for the apparent differential we saw on Saturday. The difference was coaching, and there's no question about it. If we swapped rosters with Florida, the outcome would be similar. McElwain is a bad coach and Harbaugh has exposed him twice now.

Apureidiot

September 4th, 2017 at 2:01 AM ^

are asking for Mac and Nuss's head. If some embedders are willing to embed a few Florida Gators tweets... well... just for the LOLs.

Anyway, Eubanks needs to step up his game more in the blocking department and by being bulkier and faster (not really a need, but who wouldn't want OJ Howard with the blocking abilities of a guard? LOL). But seriously, Asiasi left big shoes to fill.

Fnrmerse

September 4th, 2017 at 9:15 AM ^

Actually this is a pretty good review of what happened. The only other thing I would add besides the fact that the coaching staff had trust in our players is that they were actually prepared. Florida was not.

gruden

September 4th, 2017 at 7:31 PM ^

I wonder a bit of some of that unpreparedness was due in part to being unsettled at the QB position.  Following some of the UF chatter prior to the game it seemed like they took a long time to figure out what to do with the QB situation, that basically none of them really seemed dominant.  Seems like they just should've gone with Franks the whole way and just use Zaire situationally.  It's like they couldn't really make up their minds.

That and the suspensions was probably a huge distraction for the coaches trying to deal with that.

M just seemed more focused and had their act together a bit better on offense, for the most part.