Per ESPN, UM has retained Williams & Connolly

Submitted by drz1111 on November 8th, 2023 at 10:21 AM

Surprised this hasn't been linked yet on the forum.  ESPN is reporting that UM has retained Williams & Connolly for the litigation against the B1G.  As any of the Mgolawyers will tell you, you can infer the following from that:

(1) W&C is a big and expensive gun, UM is not kidding around about a nasty legal fight

(2) UM's own investigation probably concluded they have colorable legal arguments: W&C doesn't take on dead-loser cases and nor would you use them if you were going to be throwing hail marys

(3) this is likely (but not certain) to be fought in federal court. 

UM2LosAngeles

November 8th, 2023 at 10:28 AM ^

The commissioner should just get on a conference call with the Presidents, AD and HC and just chew into everyone .. They have played him like a instrument all because OSU was no longer the top football school.. 

MAN-AT-ARMS

November 8th, 2023 at 10:28 AM ^

Michigan just put the Big Ten on notice that they are willing to spend millions defending this as long and far as it goes. I have no doubt donors will step forward if necessary to help out. Money Cannon vs. Big Ten. Getting the popcorn ready.  

Amazinblu

November 8th, 2023 at 10:37 AM ^

I think you captured / shared a pic of a few ADs that are complaining - or, maybe they are the three known colluders who shared / accepted Michigan’s signs before the 2022 B1G CCG.

Then again, it may be those giving advice and counsel to the B1G leadership.

It’s hard to tell the difference.

Bo Harbaugh

November 8th, 2023 at 10:30 AM ^

Hello Williams

Hello Connolly

 

Hearing great pad level and explosiveness for Williams

Connolly is a playmaker, elite quickness and speed and can play multiple skill positions.

ThadMattasagoblin

November 8th, 2023 at 10:33 AM ^

Michigan has a top notch law school and tons of great lawyers around the Midwest and country on speed dial. The Ohio State, Rutgers, Purdue thing was a warning shot. Now, you are going to start hearing unsavory details about Urban Meyer and Ryan Day that will make signgate look like child's play imo. Drip drip drip

Colt Burgess

November 8th, 2023 at 10:40 AM ^

"There's not a lot of precedent for a conference stepping up to discipline a coach or a team before there's been an investigation by the NCAA," said Gabe Feldman, director of the Tulane Sports Law program and one of the nation's leading experts on college sports legal issues. "It's just a question of relatively new leadership in the Big Ten, new members coming into the Big Ten and some uncertainty as to the severity of the offense, whether the conference wants to set a precedent."

Feldman thinks Michigan would have an uphill battle in court. Injunctions and temporary restraining orders aren't handed out very often, and courts generally don't want to interfere in the ability of a governing body -- in this case, the Big Ten -- to discipline its own members.

According to Feldman, Michigan would have to establish that a suspension for Harbaugh would cause "irreparable harm" if the injunction or temporary restraining order isn't granted. Given the proximity to the Big Ten championship game and the College Football Playoff, Michigan might have an easier time convincing a judge of Harbaugh's value on the sideline.

Romeo50

November 8th, 2023 at 10:39 AM ^

Can UM  through the legal process or simply as an accused member force the NCAA to divulge the outside entity accuser and whether information was lawfully obtained?

Then other...ahem...investigations can more thoroughly proceed to understand who might initiate said investigation and for what possibly beneficial reason.

Yeoman

November 8th, 2023 at 11:17 AM ^

I think they already know the entity and I'm guessing that'll drop soon. A name was rumored here last night and it jives with other rumors, even those coming from the OSU camp.

It may just be an intermediary (the NCAA knows who provided them information but they wouldn't know how they got it), but it's juicy enough on its own.

Yeoman

November 8th, 2023 at 12:35 PM ^

And if that turns out to be true I think it's worth recalling this. It's from the OSU-connected guy Brian quoted a while back who claimed to know who the PI was. I haven't taken time to look into the firm since we got a name but I'm assuming he knew what he was talking about.

It is a PI that has done work with NFL, SEC and other programs outside of the Big Ten

Think about that a minute. This looks to be a person who's a major national player in the investigation of possible NCAA violations...and he's an old high school friend of the Days?

LSA91

November 8th, 2023 at 10:43 AM ^

I think this quote from Gabe Feldman is a fair summary of the other coaches' case, but it also shows how crazy it is.

"We know the NCAA will act slowly," Feldman said. "They may not act in time for there to be a meaningful discipline for the parties that are involved. The idea is it gave them an unfair competitive advantage this year, so you're allowing a team that cheated to maintain that advantage. Should the Big Ten have to wait for a process they know won't play out quickly enough?"

Ok, I agree that Stalions is guilty of NCAA rule violations and there should be some punishment, unless ErikInDayton's analysis wins out, but what unfair competitive advantage did UM have this year?

Even if Stalions' signs analysis accounted for 3 touchdowns a game this year, we'd still be 9-0, and after suspending him, that means we are playing MSU, Purdue, PSU, MD, and OSU without even the legal portion of our signs program, while they get to play us with their signs programs fully intact (and in at least some cases, with the advantage of scouting other games through sign collusion!) How is that possibly a relevant competitive advantage?

 

Blinkin

November 8th, 2023 at 10:54 AM ^

In addition to the competitive advantage being trivial (if it exists at all), it disappeared when this stuff was made public before the MSU game.  BUT given existing reporting, it sounds like teams were 1) already aware and 2) already countering with limited effect.  

Ed Shuttlesworth

November 8th, 2023 at 10:46 AM ^

All W&C cares about is whether its bills get paid and the University of Michigan is a dependable bill payer.

In terms of the legalities, it's a very rare situation where Michigan will move for a TRO and then preliminary injunction needing to show the likelihood of irreparable harm, but then the counterparty can itself show irreparable harm giving the fact that the sign-stealing is providing an immediate current benefit.

Not the typical posture.