Anthony Treash, PFF's lead college analyst says Michigan is the best team in the NCAA

Submitted by MaizenBlue93 on September 20th, 2022 at 11:51 PM

I don't buy into that just yet, especially after last year's game versus Georgia. In his defense apparently he was very high on Michigan last year before anyone else. I just can't see it yet, but still eye opening to hear someone with no affiliation to the program or the Big Ten saying this. 

 

Skip to 21: 05 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XnqAouvpDhs

WichitanWolverine

September 20th, 2022 at 11:56 PM ^

Yeah we’re not quite there but I’m having trouble tempering my expectations. I know we’ve played the snackiest snackeycakes probably ever in our non-con, but we’ve completely dominated each game in all three phases on almost every single meaningful drive. I don’t recall seeing a Michigan team do that before through 3 games. 

flashOverride

September 21st, 2022 at 1:13 PM ^

I'm feeling the same. Trying very much to remain both grounded in expectations and objective in analysis. I realize how weak the opponents have been, possibly the weakest non-conference slate since well before Harbaugh. But, as someone who's been a fan nearly 35 years, it's hard not to notice the scores thus far and remember how, occasional game like the 63-3 win over Hawaii in 2016 notwithstanding, previous iterations of Michigan football, when they did win these games decisively (and of course, there have been plenty of scares that had no business happening, to say nothing of even a couple losses), often did so by limp-ish, not-super-confidence-inspiring scores like 35-10.

FB Dive

September 21st, 2022 at 12:07 AM ^

I suspect we're a top 4 team, but let's defer judgment until we play better teams. The OL play and the pass rush (only 1 sack against Hawaii, 0 against UConn) are my biggest concerns right now

FB Dive

September 21st, 2022 at 12:33 AM ^

But it's not just the sacks. Our defensive pressure rate on QB dropbacks is 28.4% so far, compared to 33.7% last year (full disclosure, I have no idea where those numbers come from, but they're in an Athletic article, so I'm assuming they're legit). Maybe that number is deflated by our starters sitting out the second halves, but the dropoff is still concerning. Definitely needs to improve as the season goes on.

FB Dive

September 21st, 2022 at 1:18 AM ^

Ok, but attributing the dropoff in pressure rate to screens/quick throws would mean that our opponents are throwing more screens/quick throws than they did last year. It's possible, but dubious -- you would think that opponents would have gameplanned around Hutch/Ojabo more than than this year's (comparatively) unproven pass rushers. For what it's worth, I haven't noticed an unusually high number of screens by opposing offenses this year, but maybe I'm just not noticing it.

I'm not panicked about our pass rush, I just think there are signs that it's an area for improvement.

JonnyHintz

September 21st, 2022 at 5:39 AM ^

You’re just not noticing it. Hawaii and UConn specifically design their offenses specifically around the short throws/screens. This isn’t an opponent uncharacteristically throwing a few more screens per game to avoid HutchJabo, this was two teams that are doing this on virtually every pass play because that’s just how they intend to move the ball. 
 

Id agree that there’s still room for improvement, but that’s more of an observation on the abilities of the individuals doing the pass rushing than it is looking at production against two teams who don’t let their QBs hold onto the ball long enough for pressure to occur. 

denverblue

September 21st, 2022 at 12:49 AM ^

I would love to see more sacks/pressure as the season goes on too, and:

1) I'm sure our starters sitting out the second half has an impact there, but I'd say losing Hutchinson and Ojabo, the best DE tandem M has ever had, is the real answer here.

2) It's hard to have a sense of scale/impact/magnitude with those percentages. Yes, more seems better, but how much of a difference is that 5.3%? Those numbers are nearly meaningless without context. The only context here is compared to last year's team and losing the aforementioned 2 first-rounders

outsidethebox

September 21st, 2022 at 6:25 AM ^

Not to pick on, only, this post but: FIVE for TWENTY for TWENTY-FOUR yards. Clearly this is a "pick your poison" matter. Oh! THIRTY-THREE carries for EIGHTY-SIX yards. There was not an opportunity for, even, a FG attempt. Blocked a punt...scored on a punt. Shame on our boys for not getting a safety! Over 100 players played for Michigan. What the hell...with the concern trolling. To call fans "insufferable" is being far too kind. 

outsidethebox

September 21st, 2022 at 1:58 PM ^

You now, I have strong beliefs and opinions about interscholastic athletics. But I very seldom stray outside of my direct personal experience of many years of playing, coaching and officiating-and being formally educated in this regard as well...I speak to what I know. I have no illusions or delusions that what I "know" is the best or that others who are well informed share the same learnings as I have and will arrive at the same positions as I have. And if this is offensive to you...so be it-that is your problem. 

I love the athletic endeavor...it is/can be/should be a terrific life experience for the youngsters involved. 

It was a beautiful morning for walking 18 holes with my wife and a friend. It was 100+ degrees yesterday...low 90s today...might get up to 60 tomorrow-will walk 18 in the afternoon.

tsabesi

September 21st, 2022 at 7:49 AM ^

That's fair though, the assessment makes sense if you're trying to plant an early season stake. Alabama has deficiencies on offense with their receivers. OSU hasn't shown they're significantly different than last year's team. It's reasonable at this point to think Michigan's offense is quite a bit better with JJ and maybe a smaller step back without Ojabo and Hutchinson. 

WestQuad

September 21st, 2022 at 8:14 AM ^

When you lose an Ojabo and Hutchinson (and Dax) you take more than a small step back.  I think the rest of the defense is generally improved, but Minter has his work cut out for him.  With Hawaii and UConn passing so quickly I don’t think we actually know how good are DEs are. Mazi and the d-backs might be so good that the DEs might get sacks on QBs who don’t throw in under 1.5 seconds.  We’re not better than last year on paper, but things could fall in place.

Maizinator

September 21st, 2022 at 12:24 AM ^

That's a bold statement.   

Love our team and they will compete with anybody, but it would be a significant upset for Michigan to climb to the top of the hill this year.

redjugador24

September 21st, 2022 at 12:43 AM ^

This is fun and all, but let's cool our jets on "rankings" until at least November rolls around.  They honestly don't mean anything until the last week of the regular season and there is no way to get a true evaluation based on the opponents we've played so far.  Just win. The rest will fall into place. 

Frank Chuck

September 21st, 2022 at 1:45 AM ^

While plausible, I think Georgia is the best team in college football so far through 3 games. Believe it not, 2022 Georgia is statistically superior to 2021 Georgia up to this point in the season.

But this is a long season. And some teams grow/develop while others become less frightening as weaknesses are exposed by opponents.

Next 2 weeks will tell us a lot about where we truly are.

MGoClimb

September 21st, 2022 at 2:19 AM ^

Agreed. Hard to not have Georgia at the top, especially since they’ve played at least one solid team, Oregon, and thoroughly dismantled them. 

These next two weeks are going to give us a lot of information. Maryland will test our defense, especially the pass rush and secondary.  Iowa will challenge JJs relative inexperience and decision making on the road. If Michigan puts up strong performances in those games I think the hype train picks up serious momentum. 

Frank Chuck

September 21st, 2022 at 3:40 AM ^

Yep. In updated FEI rankings:

Michigan is 4th overall (9th in offense, 7th in defense).

Maryland is 46th overall (27th in offense, 63rd in defense).

Iowa is 15th overall (86th in offense, 2nd in defense).

And looking around the corner, Penn State will be quite the challenge. PSU is now 6th overall (16th in offense, 6th in defense). And annoyingly, Penn State will have a BYE week before playing us. Last year Penn State finished 7-6 but those of who watched that team closely felt that it should've been a 10+ win team. (PSU was never quite entirely the same after Clifford suffered an injury at Iowa.)

In short, October will tell us a lot about Michigan.

MGoClimb

September 21st, 2022 at 5:31 AM ^

Yeah that Penn State matchup is looking more and more like a potential season-defining game. Penn State, barring a colossal upset, will be undefeated and ranked in the top 10 by the time October 15 rolls around. Maryland and Iowa, in different ways, will help Michigan prepare for that game. Against Penn State they’ll have to put all of the pieces together. Having a game like Penn State may be the best preparation for Ohio State, so hopefully Michigan rises to the challenge. 

WesternWolverine96

September 21st, 2022 at 1:53 AM ^

After the last 20 years of pain, I have to pinch myself.... are we really this good?

My eyes say this is the best team since Lloyd coached.  I think JJ takes us to a level even beyond last year.

Got to win that Game in Columbus.  

 

 

JHumich

September 21st, 2022 at 3:20 AM ^

He's right, as PFF people tend to be. And we'll prove it on the field. I don't think we're really grasping the difference made by a fully weaponized and operational JJ.

That, with another year of development for the D (especially at linebacker), more than draws us even with Georgia.

You know what's more than even?

Winning.