Technical Flyover: Gameplanning around limitations Comment Count

Ian Boyd October 12th, 2021 at 3:01 PM

"A man's got to know his limitations."

-"Dirty" Harry Callahan (Clint Eastwood)

Michigan's perfect season continued with a tough road win over a pretty underrated Scott Frost Nebraska team. The Cornhuskers have four losses now, but three of them were single-possession defeats against currently undefeated teams while the fourth was the super public humiliation in Week Zero against Illinois when Nebraska clearly just wasn't ready to play yet.

The Wolverines' own limitations are pretty clear every week, yet their different strengths and superior gameplanning continue to put them over the top.

For all the national talk about Jim Harbaugh as a past-his-prime head coach who never maximizes this squad, this team sure is good at scheming good matchups which allows them to control games. For all the local talk about how Michigan lacks the higher end talent necessary to compete for championships, this team sure does seem to have a lot of NFL players on the roster playing big time football in key moments.

The field-side combination of Aidan Hutchinson and Daxton Hill came up big again in this game, several linemen on either side had good games, and the running back tandem of Hassan Haskins and Blake Corum continue to carry the offense.

The winning gameplan against Nebraska was an interesting one and revealed once more the matchup-conscious mind of Harbaugh and his staff as well as why Cade McNamara continues to get the nod at quarterback.

[AFTER THE JUMP, DETAILS ON THE GAMEPLAN]

Attacking the alleys

Nebraska may have been the best defense Michigan has faced yet this season. One indicator such is the case would be the Michigan offensive gameplan, which was pretty elaborate and often fixated on a single point on the field.

The Huskers have a really good interior on defense this season, a good trio of safeties if you count JoJo Domann (and you should), and know what they're doing at linebacker as well.

They have a tendency in their different schemes to "cover down" with Domann over slot receivers, having the versatile linebacker/safety hybrid manhandle the slots as they try to get out in their routes and play some man coverage out wide. With Domann out wide getting hands on the slot receivers and the safeties often playing in two-deep coverages, this means there's a fair amount of space in between the defensive end/edge players and the nickel or corner.

Michigan routinely attacked this space, looking to hit the ball into the alley. They ran several different versions of what you could summarize as "D-gap power."

Here was a small sampling:

Michigan really took aim for the D-gap against Nebraska. pic.twitter.com/I9BeOjXdUK

— Asst to the Minister of Culture (@Ian_A_Boyd) October 12, 2021

pic.twitter.com/G7Fo5U2kvk

— Asst to the Minister of Culture (@Ian_A_Boyd) October 12, 2021

They'd run counter to either side of the formation but often to a side with an inline tight end blocking down on a defensive end/edge player so the guard would kick out an outside linebacker or defensive back trying to set the edge. They also ran power, GT counter, and split zone plays to the tight end side all with the intention of kicking out a linebacker or defensive back rather than one of Nebraska's big, powerful defensive ends.

Results were steady. I was struck more by the intentionality from Michigan in trying to scheme those matchups than the success, which was consistent if not terribly explosive.

Some of their better run plays which did the most damage included the sweep above, some J.J. McCarthy zone-bluff pulls...

I knew JJ McCarthy could scoot a little but this one caught me by surprise. pic.twitter.com/UMOYuBnvRG

— Asst to the Minister of Culture (@Ian_A_Boyd) October 11, 2021

...and the third down run to Blake Corum which was an iso/lead draw play that caught Nebraska thinking pass on 3rd-and-10.

The sweep above is a scheme they've used several times this season. They love to flex Erick All into the boundary slot so he can run routes on a linebacker out there or else draw in a safety who then can't be used to defend something else. His positioning out wide also allows him to block down on a linebacker when they run a sweep to Corum. The scheme is technically an inverted zone-read, with the quarterback hypothetically running the inside zone path and the running back taking the wide path the quarterback would normally take on a keeper.

I'm pretty sure it's always predetermined, Michigan ain't trying to run Cade McNamara in the A-gaps, but it's very effective as a change-up and to make sure the unblocked ends don't get nosy in the backfield.

It also served as another way to hit the ball into the alley and avoid executing crucial blocks against the Nebraska defensive linemen.

Explosive runs ended up being hard to come by, but this focus did allow Haskins to pick up several big conversions with tough running on the perimeter. On the day, the two backs combined for 33 carries which yielded 212 yards at 6.4 ypc and three rushing touchdowns.

Oklahoma ran the ball as a team 35 times against Nebraska for 194 yards (also facing a lot of Cover 2) while Michigan State managed 71 yards on 30 carries.

Michigan continues to have one of the most consistent and efficient rushing attacks in the country and a big factor is their ability to run a variety of different power schemes each weak targeting different points along the front from different personnel packages and formations.

Harbaugh also got up to a lot of his traditional tricks in the passing game, throwing a lot of unique empty formations at Nebraska.

Hit a few options from this look. pic.twitter.com/eMb38vYjpJ

— Asst to the Minister of Culture (@Ian_A_Boyd) October 12, 2021

The first example was a play they used twice to pick up 3rd-and-long, each time the tight end slipped out of the protection late and was hit wide open for a conversion.

The more traditional set they used to hit Daylen Baldwin on the quick out a few times and Blake Corum on the hunt route over the middle a couple more.

Any time you can create a quick read and throw in open space to your most dangerous skill player (Blake Corum), that's a win.

These sets are a major reason why Cade McNamara beat Rutgers last year and why he's the starting quarterback now. He may not hit a lot of RPOs, play-action, or quarterback keepers to punish defenses for how they play Michigan's power run game...but the Wolverines don't necessarily need him to. As demonstrated above, they have a million different formations and personnel packages to use in scheming up matchups and angles for the run game without needing a strong quarterback constraint dimension.

What McNamara does bring is steady decision-making in the dropback passing game. In particular he has a knack for making quick decisions and getting the ball out in Harbaugh's empty game. Harbaugh has always thrived at scheming matchups in empty formations for his best receivers and McNamara has made his career dating back to high school out of distributing the ball efficiently in spread passing sets.

The interception was a rare exception, although he simply threw tight end further inside than he was sitting against the zone, so the error may not have been egregious. The window was there to throw a dig route, although it doesn't seem the dig route was the call.

Between Michigan's ability to scheme up the power run game against any given opponent and McNamara's timely bus-driving in the dropback passing game, this team has most everything they need on offense to move the ball and put points on the board. There isn't a situation where they don't have answers.

Load the box? They'll bring in extra blockers or find angles due to the multiplicity of their scheme. Short-yardage? Same situation. Passing downs? They can get into empty sets and hunt matchups and are also willing and able to mix in runs to pick up big gains if you get into exotic pass defenses.

J.J. McCarthy continues to show some fascinating upside as an athlete but games like this reveal why McNamara continues to hold the job.

Nebraska shenanigans

Scott Frost has built a physical team in Nebraska following a pretty sensible formula for winning games. I was skeptical of their efforts against Illinois, like everyone else, but since then they've revealed a much more versatile offense, a wildly improved Adrian Martinez, and a smart defensive philosophy.

This defense plays a lot of conservative calls in coverage and dares you to trade body shots in the run game and come out ahead. It just so happens trading body shots in the run game is more or less Harbaugh's exact preference.

Frost had some other ideas for how to win a hard-nosed slog in the trenches though and some of them were the football equivalent of "throw dirt in his eyes!"

One such example would be the "disconcerting signals" Nebraska was called for once and should have been called for a few other times. You're not allowed to mimic the offense's cadence in order to try and draw them into false starts. It's obviously unsporting but for that reason it's also illegal.

Nebraska also got away with an illegal formation on a touchdown which helped shift the momentum in their favor.

If you recall, we talked about unbalanced formations in this column a few weeks back after the Rutgers game. The trick with unbalanced formations is you end up with an ineligible receiver...unless you don't.

Someone here for Nebraska should be on the line of scrimmage, rules require you have seven players on the line and Nebraska has six. They ended up slipping the H-back up the field on a pop pass and Michigan didn't pick him up, resulting in a long touchdown. I'm guessing the guy on bottom should have been on the line of scrimmage because he didn't pass the line but instead stayed back and presented a target for a perimeter screen.

I'm not sure if Michigan stops this play even if the formation is legal, what really caught them was the H-back releasing upfield after showing a lead block inside. Nevertheless, a penalty here probably buries Nebraska in this game and forestalls the comeback which necessitated late game playmaking by the Wolverines.

The game ultimately ended with Nebraska trying a slot fade on Daxton Hill which he broke up on 4th-and-10. The Husker offense in this game came almost entirely by play-calling, such as the pop pass or a reverse orbit screen to Levi Falck the Wolverines lost, their traditional offensive plays fell victim to challenges like trying to beat Hill in coverage.

Looking ahead, the Wolverines should get a bit of a breather against a badly overmatched Northwestern team in the Big House before going on the road against Sparty. Provided the Northwestern game is as uninteresting as it should be, perhaps this space next week will feature an advanced scout of the rivalry game matchups.

Comments

unWavering

October 12th, 2021 at 3:25 PM ^

It's nice to read something that actually credits the coaching staff and players of this team, rather than picking at flaws and having a generally pessimistic view.

LDNfan

October 12th, 2021 at 7:08 PM ^

Man, this is so true. 

This coaching staff has done a remarkable job this year and its across the board. Often seems that Gattis is left out when praise is offered re the teams performance..but the playcalling has been really strong this year..not perfect but much more than solid. 

gary3

October 13th, 2021 at 12:20 PM ^

I'm elated with our season, and I agree -- we focus too much on the bad. We didn't get to 6 - 0 by mistake, and we should celebrate it

I do understand why the naysayers aren't satisfied, though: we still haven't beaten OSU and won the Big Ten, and that used to be on the table every single year. That was the Michigan standard.

I think we self flagellate too much -- and the fact that this is the top comment here shows that -- but I will caveat my agreeability by pointing out that those who are down have very legit reasons to still be down 

canzior

October 13th, 2021 at 1:09 PM ^

it's typical.  I watched the M Football tweeted video of the Wisconsin game, and the announcers were saying something about this is the day we find out if Michigan is for real this year.  And then watching the Nebraska game, the announcers said the exact same thing.  Most of the national guys that talk about Michigan do it in passing...Solid Verbal spent the entire segment talking about Nebraska...most articles bring up MSU in the same breath and gush over what Tucker has done.  

I think it's just come down to OSU and nothing else.

JHumich

October 12th, 2021 at 3:31 PM ^

Nice write-up as always. I always learn something from this column. One concern caught my eye, though.

Between Michigan's ability to scheme up the power run game against any given opponent and McNamara's timely bus-driving in the dropback passing game, this team has most everything they need on offense to move the ball and put points on the board. There isn't a situation where they don't have answers.

Maybe against a team that's going to score about as much as Nebraska. But, if the opposing offense has a pulse, we're going to need more than this to stay ahead of them.

 

nperna12

October 12th, 2021 at 4:24 PM ^

But PSUs offense is more traditional than Nebraska and for this Michigan defense, that gives them an edge. I think our defense is very good to great vs more traditional offenses, where we aren’t significantly out talented. Which would be the case with OSU. I think PSU offensively is less scary in my eyes than Nebraska simply cuz they won’t have our players/coaches heads spinning when they get rolling. 
 

 

The Homie J

October 12th, 2021 at 4:42 PM ^

Exactly, Nebraska scared me because of all the weird frippery or "college crappe" that's stresses every bit of your run defense.  More traditional offenses play into this defense's hands.  Penn State and Michigan State basically run normal offenses but with elite wideouts (Jayden Reed, Jalen Nailor, Jahan Dotson).  Michigan State relies on breaking massively big plays (they are ridiculously good at 50+ yard touchdown passes).  But their run games (while quite good with Kenneth Walker III) has been shut down by good defenses (Nebraska).  Penn State actually doesn't run the ball all that well, but Sean Clifford has been playing lights out this year and Jahan Dotson and Parker Washington are tough to stop, and if you do cover them, Clifford is great at making you pay with his legs.

Still though, we played Penn State close in 2019 and 2020 with virtually the same players, so I'm actually less worried about them than Sparty, who's gonna bust some big plays and generally be a pain in the ass because they always are.

And Ohio State is just a different beast altogether with their infinity long line of NFL WR's and a QB who's rounding into another Dwayne Haskins/Justin Fields throw god (and another absurdly good RB in freshman TreVeyon Henderson because why can't they ever just suck like once, ffs)

Bleedin9Blue

October 12th, 2021 at 3:39 PM ^

As I wrote last week, unrelated to the content but an idea for Ian: I noticed this article and the previous "Technical Flyover" didn't have any tags on it.  I'd recommend going back to both of them and adding tags - makes it much easier if you want to find an old article to refresh yourself on something technical.

 

I know I've sometimes gone back to re-read Seth's breakdowns and it's a lot easier since I can just go to the Neck Sharpies tag and find all of them.

Spitfire

October 12th, 2021 at 3:55 PM ^

This team is showing a lot of guts this year and the coaches are usually putting the players in good positions to make plays. Just got to keep getting better on the execution phase of the game but lots to feel good about going forward. 

Blake Forum

October 12th, 2021 at 4:01 PM ^

Very nice analysis. Good to get a concrete sense of why this offense is working so well--and it is; Michigan doesn't often go on the road and put up 30+ on two quality defenses--despite some clear limitations

bringthewood

October 12th, 2021 at 4:04 PM ^

For a layman I really appreciate you information. It’s kind of a fact checker for me, I.e. the coaches are not idiots and McNamara isn’t terrible like many would like you to believe.

ian, what is your background?

The Homie J

October 12th, 2021 at 4:31 PM ^

Love the breakdown and the emphasis on Jim's ability to scheme good plays against even the tougher defenses.  There's really only 2 glaring issues with the offense that need addressed (and I imagine are being addressed).  

1. Finishing in the red zone.  The biggest reason why some people outside the program still doubt this team is that we're beating everybody, yes, but we're not burying B1G teams like Ohio State.  Now we're decisively beating these teams (Nebraska aside), but top ten teams, you'd like to see minor blowouts or two score margins on the regular (like vs Wisky).  The only reason this hasn't happened is settling for field goals versus touchdowns.  Now I'll say for Nebraska, we were basically snakebitten in this area (Cade's slightly long overthrow to Sainristil, Haskins not pointing the nose of the football over the line, Cade being stepped on during the handoff).  None of those are schematic issues, just individual issues that can't really be predicted.  Just have to be able to get touchdowns, not field goals against Ohio State and Penn State.

2.  2nd issue is the short yardage situations.  We are aggressive and also really good at setting up 3rd and short, and 4th and short plays.  But I feel we could be better at converting these.  Feel like this is where we really miss having a Ben Mason or Khalid Hill type short yardage back who can get you 1-2 yards every time, no matter what.  That may ultimately be Haskins (I certainly think this is how the staff wants to handle it), which is fine.  Though a better idea may be short passes which we pulled out a few times vs Nebby, trusting our WR's or TE's to a yard or two downfield versus running into a stacked box with only a RB.  Still though, we convert at a decent clip, but it would be nice to convert close to 75%, which would basically let us score some points on every single drive.

Spitfire

October 12th, 2021 at 7:02 PM ^

These are my two biggest beefs with the offense so far. We've left some points out there by having to settle for field goals and it hasn't cost us yet but we can't count on that luck continuing. On several short yardage plays we've gone into a pistol formation which can take too long for the ball carrier to get to the line and requires the whole team to hold their blocks longer. Not a fan. QB sneak in a couple of those situations would be a better call IMO.    

byrd390

October 12th, 2021 at 9:32 PM ^

Regarding goal line offense, I agree that we seem to fall short in that one category. Why not use a Very Large Human such as Jordan Whittley as a fullback or RB for short yardage plays? I'd like to think that formation would be called Thunder Beaver but I'll defer to the coaching staff on that one.

UMForLife

October 12th, 2021 at 5:30 PM ^

Great writeup. I felt that Cade did better in the underneath stuff this week. I wondered if his long ball suffered because they worked on different mechanics. I hope he puts it all together and light up MSU. 

Thank you explaining this so well.

SD Larry

October 12th, 2021 at 5:43 PM ^

Great write up.   Especially appreciate your points about Nebraska's "disconcerting signals".  Was complaining about that in my living room to wife when watching the game.  Validation is nice and you make a lot of good observations I had not noticed. 

AlbanyBlue

October 12th, 2021 at 6:24 PM ^

Thanks for the detailed write-up. It's these technical details I have trouble with, and this really made sense. I'm glad you're contributing here.

RE: short yardage: Maybe we should be integrating a package of plays for JJ here. His better arm strength can help out on the kind of throws that need to arrive quick -- we see this all the time in the NFL on 3rd and 2 or 3 -- and his running ability gives the offense more options. JJ's flexibility in executing a small subset of plays could be really effective.

 

charblue.

October 12th, 2021 at 9:51 PM ^

There was a Nebraska off-sides on the McNamara interception. He also threw an interception on an end zone toss for TD that was clearly an attempt to take advantage of another obvious off-sides call. So on two ostensible Nebraska penalties, one called, the other not, he was picked trying to make a big play on an opponent mistake. That is smart qb play. McNamara isn't responsible for what he can't control, whether an obvious penalty is called or not.

This point was never mentioned during the game broadcast. The fact that he threw into coverage making his first passing error has been well discussed. Every qb throws an interception. Brady lost his first two games as a starter at Michigan against Notre Dame and Syracuse. He blew a game against Illinois with his team ahead at the half.

McNamara is facing the same qb debate that gripped this program when the choice was Brady or Henson, and Michigan fans overwhelmingly favored Henson over Brady. This is not in dispute.

In Brady and McNamara's case, neither could run, which negated their ability in some minds as a dynamic winning quarterback when the real issue of that position is the ability to control circumstance and manage opportunity and make plays when available. McNamara seems to be a real smart player who recognizes his skills and limitations and responds accordingly. To that, this fan base ought to be appreciative. He does what is necessary and leads without ego. That positive cannot be underestimated.

We are being blessed with a special season. I know I never expected what this team is doing on the field. I have been a Michigan fan my entire life. But it was wonderful hearing Michigan players chant the chant that grew out of our perfect 1997 season so that all the world could hear on Saturday night on national TV.

Mgoczar

October 12th, 2021 at 10:35 PM ^

I am 100% of the same thought. People are taking his decision making for granted. This dude is smart af. I'm actually pretty impressed with Mcnamara. People forget Bell is not there. He is growing with green WRs here. Michigan is just GD snake bitten. We need Wilson back bad and want Baldwin and CJ to keep coming on. Unfortunately college season is so short. But once a reliable target (or two) emerge, I believe Mcnamara will sling in more like a boss that he is capable of. 

carolina blue

October 12th, 2021 at 9:54 PM ^

We have to appreciate the play Dax made on Nebraska final play. On replay, that play was terrifying. Dax could have easily gotten rubbed out of coverage and left the slot receiver wiiiiiide open. If you watch it again, he had to pass between the field corner and the WR. That was either great practice/communication and/or a great individual play by Dax. 

Michael Scarn

October 12th, 2021 at 11:26 PM ^

Michigan continues to have one of the most consistent and efficient rushing attacks in the country and a big factor is their ability to run a variety of different power schemes each weak targeting different points along the front from different personnel packages and formations.

***

These sets are a major reason why Cade McNamara beat Rutgers last year and why he's the starting quarterback now. He may not hit a lot of RPOs, play-action, or quarterback keepers to punish defenses for how they play Michigan's power run game...but the Wolverines don't necessarily need him to. As demonstrated above, they have a million different formations and personnel packages to use in scheming up matchups and angles for the run game without needing a strong quarterback constraint dimension.

THANK YOU!  I have been yelling at people all week that this rushing attack does not rely on the read option game, nor does it need to.  It is incredibly difficult as a defense to prepare for this many looks in the run game. Very easy to bust a run fit or leave the backside open for either of these great backs.

Ian Boyd

October 13th, 2021 at 11:05 AM ^

I thought that way earlier in the season but have changed my mind because I've seen how they can manufacture angles and matchups in the run game without needing the super-charge of a keeper dimension or play-action.

They're actually following the same formula as the 2020 Notre Dame playoff team. Steady quarterback, veteran offensive line and multiple tight ends who can execute a dozen run schemes and bring a different, elaborate gameplan every week, and then even the strong field side defense with Hutch and Hill instead of Jeremiah Owusu-Koromoah.