[Patrick Barron]

Preview: Michigan State 2022 Comment Count

Brian October 28th, 2022 at 2:23 PM

SPONSOR NOTE:  Two truths that are beyond reproach:

1) Rivalry games are better when spicier.
2) Weed is better at Winewood.

In a sea of corporate dispensaries, Winewood Organics is the sole Cannabis Microbusiness in Ann Arbor. Located across from Kroger on S. Maple, their small-batch flower, bubble hash, edibles, carts, dabs, and drops are all derived from plants grown with love in living soil.

MGoBlog readers receive $10 OFF your order when you mention this ad. New customers also get a 25% discount on their first order. Go Blue!

Essentials

WHAT #4 Michigan (7-0) vs Michigan State(3-4)  

0d8dcb5f-835c-459a-9b43-96f4b16efbf2.sized-1000x1000

WHERE Michigan Stadium
Ann Arbor, MI
WHEN 7:30 Eastern
THE LINE M –22.5
TELEVISION ABC (McDonough/Blackledge)
TICKETS From $221.
WEATHER

clear, 0% chance of rain
minimal wind
mid 50s dropping to 40 by 11 PM

Overview

Your author takes no pleasure in reporting this, but Michigan State is bad. So bad that Michigan has been installed as more than a three-touchdown favorite despite the recent history of the series. Before last week's double OT win over a flailing Wisconsin program, Michigan State had not been in anything resembling a competitive game against P5 opposition.

After a couple of MAC walkovers to open the season, here is Michigan State's season:

  • @ Washington: 39-28 loss that was 39-14 with 9 minutes left despite two different goal-line stands by MSU.
  • Minnesota: 34-7 loss in which total yards are 508-240.
  • @ Maryland: 27-13 loss featuring another goal-line stand; total yards are 489 to 321.
  • Ohio State: lol
  • @ Wisconsin: A win in which MSU actually outgains Wisconsin 389-283.

That is four hideous blowouts that are not as close as the scores indicate—even when those scores are lopsided—and then a competitive game against a Wisconsin team that just got its coach fired.

If you squint you can see some reason for MSU's improvement in that game: they got a couple of key defensive contributors back. But given all the other results that game feels like the "how bad is Wisconsin" moment.

So, like, gird thyself. Anything short of defeat without dignity is going to be annoying, and if there's a fluky half like Penn State game people are going to be watching from open windows, ready to plummet.

[After THE JUMP: Mel Tucker job approval rating tracks NFT prices]

Run Offense vs Michigan State

51642736760_df203146bf_k

woop [Fuller]

This is the spot where you might say "Michigan State has been respectable in this department, at least," but they have not been. Minnesota, Maryland, and Ohio State all bashed out five yards a carry. Moribund Wisconsin approached that number. Hell, once you account for the seven sacks WMU gave up the Broncos put up 5.6 YPC, which is easily their best performance on the year. Teams are more or less paving MSU.

Injury has a lot to do with this. MSU has been hit hard in the front seven. LB Darius Snow is out for the year. Star DT Jacob Slade, who gave Karsen Barnhart the business in last year's game, returned from injury against Wisconsin. Edges Khris Bogle and Jeff Pietrowski have also been out for most of the season. Slade is back and played well against Wisconsin; Bogle and Pietrowski were not dressed two weeks ago, FWIW.

If those guys aren't back—and probably even if they are—the prescription for Michigan is likely to be the same as it's been most of the season. Dump a boatload of tight ends on the field and challenge the edge guys do do something about it. MSU is no longer the Dantonio-era pro-style offense they once were; they are now almost exclusively a three-wide shotgun team. That means they aren't as drilled on weird run game stuff, and since they've got two or three solid DTs aside from Slade the weak points in the rush defense will be off tackle. Alex:

…in contrast to the DTs, the EDGE players are just guys. I liked Brandon Wright okay in this game, but he's not yet a difference maker. Maybe they'll get Khris Bogle or Jeff Pietrowski healthy for this one, but it's hard to know what sort of an impact they'd have. Zion Young may have promise as a youngster, but he's inexperienced and prone to getting sealed off.

MSU moved UNLV transfer and early-season PFF fave-rave Jacoby Windmon from DE to LB, probably to get former Michigan fullback Ben VanSumeren off the field, but that's trading one 250 pound guy who's not going to change direction fast enough for another one, and it weakens the DE spot. Windmon's likely to put his nose in the wrong gap from time to time.

MSU's deficiencies in the secondary means that it'll be hard for them to truly go bonkers against the run. They are mostly a cover three team and they play a soft shell. It is possible that they radically change their approach given that it's a rivalry game and everyone's coming off a bye week—Iowa spent much of the OSU game running cover zero(!)—but that might not even matter that much if Michigan's optioning off a guy with McCarthy's legs and a dude playing a new position isn't in the right spot.

Still, I'd bet on MSU trying to load up early in the hopes of getting Michigan to burn some downs.

KEY MATCHUP: MICHIGAN TIGHT ENDS vs JUST GUYS. Gonna be a lot of tight end block opportunities; Michigan will hope for a better performance from Bredeson in that H-back role.

Pass Offense vs Michigan State

51642736295_025b1e55f7_k

this was the Andrel Anthony game last year [Fuller]

It turns out that when touted defensive backs wash out of power programs it's for a reason. MSU has imported the huddled masses yearning to breathe free and all it's gotten them is 10 YPA allowed against people not named Graham "Smertz" Mertz. MSU passing defense against P5 teams:

  • Washington: 24/40, 397 yards, 9.9 YPA.
  • Minnesota: 23/26, 268 yards, 10.3 YPA
  • Maryland: 32/41, 314 yards, 7.7 YPA
  • OSU: 23/28, 377 yards, 13.5 YPA
  • Wisconsin: 14/24, 131 yards, 5.5 YPA.

MSU has five sacks across this period, three of which were given up by Wisconsin. That is brutal, and follows on from last year's miserable performance. MSU is actually much worse this time around; they're dead last in the conference in YPA allowed at 8.2. They have just two interceptions on the season (Michigan is second to last in the Big Ten with four, FWIW.)

So it's no surprise that Alex issued the cyan circles to both starting cornerbacks, their box safety, and the nickel corner. The other two guys are a true freshman and returning star safety Xavier Henderson, who played significant snaps for the first time against Wisconsin. Said nickel corner is a D-II transfer, and we saw what happened when there's a D-II transfer in a unit of five guys when the Indiana offensive line took on Mike Morris and company. This is the same kind of matchup. Alex:

The problems are primarily that everyone is open on every play.

Ah. Care to elaborate?

In some ways, the MSU pass defense is one of the least interesting things I've had to cover at FFFF because there isn't much to say. Ameer Speed and Charles Brantley are the starting corners but are they any different than Ronald Williams or Chester Kimbrough? Not really. There are no particularly weak points or great guys in coverage to point out. Everyone is bad and they're all about equally as bad. Receivers are open on every play and if you have a QB who knows how to survey the field or throw the football accurately, you will likely dice them up. End of story.

Ah.

This will be more Iowa than PSU/Indiana. Michigan State plays soft. Butter soft. They've given up 87 passing plays of 10+ yards, worst in the conference, but they're quite good at limiting longer plays given the context. They will give you the underneath stuff all day every day and hope you get down to the one yard line, whereupon the MSU defense turns into the '85 Bears.

This fits quite neatly with what JJ McCarthy has been asked to do to date. McCarthy's completing approximately 90% of his throws under ten yards. If MSU is going to load up against the run and play soft behind it, the Spartans are unlikely to get bailed out by Michigan dorfs. Michigan has driven the field metronomically against Iowa and Penn State, which are far better defenses. They have kicked a lot of field goals against those teams, though, and bend-but-don't-break may well be Michigan State's best approach here.

KEY MATCHUP: OL vs BLITZ PICKUP. Keep McCarthy clean and he will find one of the various open guys. With no edge dudes extant for MSU it'll be more about organization than one on one pass rush matchups.

Run Defense vs Michigan State

51641890201_569521717f_k

ROBBED [Fuller]

Kenneth Walker should have won four Heismans last year. It was obvious that Walker was carrying the MSU run offense then and it's even more obvious now. Football Outsiders line stats on the 2021 Spartans weren't pretty—85th in line yards, 78th in opportunity rate, 83rd in stuff rate—and that somehow translated into the Doak Walker winner. Hell, rename the award after Kenneth: dude put up 6.2 YPC last year. My man is the king of chicken salad.

This year? Not so much. Alex:

The problem was that these running lanes were not open often enough and when they weren't, I never saw an instance where any of these players displayed the vision and shiftiness that Walker possessed. I said about last year's Michigan-MSU game that if Ty Isaac were MSU's RB that the Wolverines likely win by two TDs. Well, these RBs show a lot of Ty Isaac in them. 

Without Walker popping in from the Wake Forest two-deep production has collapsed. The Michigan State offensive line is the Chinese real estate industry of college football: propped up by external factors for a brief, pleasant window, surrounded by bogus statistics, and imploding at a high rate of speed. Top backs Jalen Berger, who got kicked off a suddenly horrible Wisconsin rushing offense, and Jarek Broussard are both averaging under three yards a carry against FBS opponents. Elijah Collins, somehow still around, has been getting more playing time of late but in his first extended run against Wisconsin (14 carries) he barely crested 3 YPC himself.

What is MSU bad at? Everything. MSU's line stats—which generally describe what happens near the line of scrimmage—have dropped to 100th, 87th, 111th, and 92nd. Meanwhile they have just three runs of 20+ yards all season, which is worst in the Big Ten. IE, behind Iowa and Purdue. The only one of those to come against a P5 team was a 21-yard Payton Thorne scramble against Washington. They can't stay on schedule down-to-down. They can't get two yards when they need two yards. And they can't break off a big play. Other than that, Mrs. Lincoln?

None of this has filtered down into the mind of the Michigan State offensive coordinator. Against Wisconsin Alex charted a 30-19 run-pass split on first and second down. That is after the re-integration of a fully healthy Jayden Reed, about whom more in a second, and seems entirely unjustifiable.

Last year this matchup was incredibly frustrating, as Michigan would bottle up Walker and then he'd somehow manage to bounce outside of contain and rack up a chunk run. Without those MSU would have averaged about two yards a carry. That's the baseline expectation here, as M brings in a defense that's 13th in line yards and first nationally in 5+ yard runs allowed. Michigan does a superior job of preventing chunk runs. Combine that with the MSU offense and we're looking at a steady diet of 0-3 yard runs whenever MSU decides they need to keep the Michigan pass rush honest.

KEY MATCHUP: KENNETH WALKER vs AIDAN HUTCHINSON. Taking a cue from the Michigan State message boards here, as they've decided the most important thing going on this football season is the performance of two NFL rookies.

Pass Defense vs Michigan State

51641327582_1481b06675_k

***RECORD SCRATCH*** [Fuller]

Michigan's already passed the Maryland test here and probably won't quake at the prospect of a fully functional MSU passing offense, but this will be something of a test. The aforementioned Jayden Reed is back, Keon Coleman is a pretty interesting up-and-comer, and MSU has a couple of athletic tight ends. Reed missed (or was limited for) much of the season prior to the Wisconsin game, and his return was crucial:

Reed was targeted 9 times against Wisconsin to lead the team, and was targeted 7 times the week before, also the team lead. When Reed is healthy and functional, he's often the first read on a passing play. When it was time to go win the game against the Badgers, you knew who the ball was going to:

…Reed's good at making tough catches, he's fast enough to hit a big play, and he's agile enough to get yards after the catch. An easy choice this year.

If MSU gets down, or just decides that they're not going to set many downs on fire with the ground game, we're looking at an Aaron Burbridge level of targets. He famously had 19 in his Jourdan Lewis showdown. I'd set the over/under there.

Quarterback Payton Thorne is Sean Clifford before the universe broke him. He's relatively mobile, produces when in improvisation mode, and drops in some dimes:

On the downside his accuracy is questionable. Alex had multiple clips of balls that were just off, and a couple where his ability to read a defense resulted in near-INTs. It's noteworthy that Thorne's game against the Badgers was by far his best of the season relative to the opponent. He averaged around 5.5 YPA against Minnesota, Maryland, and OSU; his 7.7 YPA against Washington was heavily padded by garbage-time drives that led Michigan State back to Defeat With Dignity land. Is Reed's return that much of a season-changer for Thorne? Probably not.

One reason it's not: MSU is clearly playing around their offensive line. The heavy run focus on early downs and extensive screen game is designed to keep Thorne from getting battered. Their sack rate drops from 30th on standard downs to 71st on passing downs, and Thorne is pretty good about mitigating pass rush. Guys are getting through on the regular. Not hard to see Mike Morris or Eyabi Okie replicating this:

Michigan is a much more effective pass rush defense on passing downs, too, so for MSU it'll be imperative to stay ahead of the chains and prevent Okie/Moore rush packages from teeing off. Given the rush offense that means a lot of safe dink-and-dunk on early downs.

KEY MATCHUP: MICHIGAN LINEBACKERS vs COVERING SOMETHING OTHER THAN GRASS. In re: dink and dunk, Michigan's LBs have not been very good in coverage this year and will likely be asked to look up Reed underneath quite a lot.

SPECIAL TEAMS

A tale of two cities here. If punter Bryce Baringer maintains his current pace he should win the Ray Guy award. MSU is #1 in FEI punting efficiency and #1 in Jared Lee's punting metrics. (Those metrics have Brad Robbins third and thus pass the "is this better than net average" sniff test.) He's a beast; he's averaging 51 yards a kick and opponents have a total of 88 return yards on 30 punts. That's nuts.

Everything else is rather bad. MSU is about average returning punts, and is in the 90s or worse in every other metric.

MSU has attempted just four field goals this year, and they've made one of them. Auburn transfer Ben Patton is the only guy with any track record after going 5/6 in 2021, but he's only attempted one FG this year, which he missed. Freshman Jack Stone has the other three attempts; he's made one. MSU was about to attempt a fifth field goal late in the Wisconsin game but was foiled by a bad snap. Stone has also missed an extra point. He kicks off and has only gotten eight touchbacks on 31 attempts, FWIW.

Kickoff returns have been a whole bunch of nothing. That's par for the course these days. Punt returns have also been meh, but a big chunk of that is the absence of Jayden Reed. Reed took two back last year and if he's fully healthy MSU will get him every touch available; punts will be his deal. That's unlikely to be a major factor during the Pax Robbinsica; I would not entirely discount the idea that MSU breaks something there.

KEY MATCHUP:  AHHHH YOU CONTINUE DOING EVERYTHING THE BEST

INTANGIBLES

6165f6bd63068b48ea589a19_Screenshot 2021-10-12 at 23.57.30

CHEAP THRILLS

Worry if…

  • We're Playing Michigan State Bullcrappe continues to happen.
  • PFF's OL grading is remotely accurate.
  • Jayden Reed is glowing ominously and is 7'6", 500 pounds by the third quarter.

Cackle with knowing glee if…

  • MSU is still running 60% of the time on early downs.
  • In Soviet Paul Bunyan Rivalry, Michigan July-drives you.
  • Michigan's scoring redzone touchdowns.

Fear/Paranoia Level: 3 (Baseline: 5; +1 for Recent History Of Series, +1 for Respekt, +1 for Rivalry Juju, –1 for 9 Ain't Walking Through That Door, –1 for Trenches Mismatch, –1 for Worst Pass Defense Ever, –1 for Can You Even Field Goal, –1 for Four Score Spread, +1 for Ye Gods That's A Punter, +1 for Getting Some Key Guys Back, –1 for Blake Corum, –1 for Oh You're Asking JJ McCarthy To Complete Short Throws To Open Guys?)

Desperate need to win level: 11 (Baseline: 5; +1 for TFGs, +1 for Championship Aspirations, +1 for Hashtag Containment Now, +1 for These Bozos, +1 for Oh God Could You Even Imagine, +1 for The END OF TIME)

Loss will cause me to… hahaha you guys I'm gonna set myself on fire

Win will cause me to… <microphone drops from the sky> IZZO! YOU'RRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRE NEXT <suplexes grandmother>

The strictures and conventions of sportswriting compel me to predict:

I mean, this is a very bad team playing a very good team and in the history of this rivalry when you get to the end of the season you look back and you see one of three things. One: MSU was better overall. That's always an MSU win. Two: Michigan was slightly better overall, say within about 10 fancystats points. Those are tossups. Three: Michigan was way better. Those are always Michigan wins. So there is something to the Throw Out The Records talk… just not with a matchup this lopsided.

MSU cannot consistently move the ball, ends up in lots of passing downs, and gets crunched. Michigan drives the field over and over again, kicks too many field goals, and eases away.

Finally, three opportunities for me to look stupid on Saturday:

  • It's not a stupid game. Michigan doesn't punt backwards, or fumble six times, or take 55 penalties. It's just a normal football game.
  • McCarthy 300+ yards at an 80% completion clip.
  • Cheapshot comin'.
  • Michigan, 29-10

Comments

PopeLando

October 28th, 2022 at 10:33 PM ^

Agreed that UM and OSU are the only "good" teams. 

But doesn't that make our experience MORE relevant? If you've seen what we do to bad teams, and tomorrow we're playing a bad team...we can sorta predict what will happen.

OSU will be the only test we face this year. And we'll be the only test they face this year. They win by lighting teams on fire and stuffing them in a fireworks tube. We win by grinding teams into a very fine powder.

AC1997

October 28th, 2022 at 3:12 PM ^

I am unnecessarily stressed about this game.  It shouldn't be close, it shouldn't matter if some bullcrap typical of this rivalry happens, and it shouldn't require a crazy effort from Michigan to pull it out.  BUT.....  we are a horrific 4-10 in our last 14 meetings and Mel Tucker's entire reputation is built on Kenneth Walker and two wins against Michigan.  WE HAVE TO WIN THIS ONE.  

I think it will be closer than we want it to, MSU will play better than they have to date, two things that make me want to poke my eyes out will happen, but we should still be able to pull away late.  

Perkis-Size Me

October 28th, 2022 at 3:40 PM ^

You're not the only one.

All the fancystats say that Michigan should win, and win comfortably. If our opponent tomorrow was wearing any other jersey, but had these same stats, I doubt there'd even be a quarter of the collective worry about this game that there is. But its MSU, and after the last 15 years we are just pre-conditioned to expect some BS to happen in this game. To expect some inexplicable lucky breaks for MSU that completely turn the tide of the game in their favor. 

There will be moments in this game that do want to make us want to throw a closed fist through the TV. Thorne will convert on 4th and 8 to keep a drive alive that ends in a TD that he just goes bombs away on to Reed. Michigan will probably burn at least a drive or two running into a brick wall on offense, but the trick is not to give Sparty so many of those opportunities that you start allowing them to believe they can actually win. Nothing more dangerous in football than a team with nothing to lose. 

If we get into the fourth quarter and its a one score game.....blegh....buckle up. Stats and metrics say it shouldn't happen, but MSU is the one game on the schedule where you completely disregard the things that "shouldn't happen," because the things that shouldn't happen in this game....tend to happen. 

MGoBlue96

October 28th, 2022 at 4:26 PM ^

The reality as Brian pointed out is that those wins came in years when MSU was flat out better or the teams were at least in shouting distance. MSU is 10-4 against UM in the last 14 largely on the back of Michigan making 2 bad coaching hires before Harbaugh and coinciding that with the best coaching hire in their history. I mean I get being a little nervous but we also need to realize as Brian said typically good or better UM teams against bad MSU teams have handled their business.

lhglrkwg

October 28th, 2022 at 3:16 PM ^

MSU is so terrible at everything and the ghost of Dantonio haunts me so to the point that I read this and fully expect a 20-14 game in the 3rd quarter 

OTOH, you look at what MSU lets other QBs do and you look at JJs completion percentage and it seems like JJs gonna finish the game like 30/35 for 350 and a few TDs

Meeechigan 45-18

Perkis-Size Me

October 28th, 2022 at 3:32 PM ^

I just want a clean, boring game. No stupid Sparty juju BS. No Panasiuk-esque cheap shots. No out of nowhere rain monsoons that completely negate MSU having to worry about its ass-tastic secondary. No Mel Tucker calling Dantonio and Narduzzi to make an impromptu trip to Ann Arbor to coach the defense that the Big Ten somehow manages to approve because of course it would. 

Just a nice, painless, uneventful, 49-3 beatdown. 

Cranky Dave

October 28th, 2022 at 3:34 PM ^

Every time I read about a player giving someone “the business “I think of Leave it to Beaver….seems like that was used at least once an episode.  
 

My brain says Michigan will win 42-10 but I can’t shake the feeling that tomorrow will be like 1H PSU

BlueTuesday

October 28th, 2022 at 4:10 PM ^

The “cheapshot coming’” worries me more than anything. I believe 100% that one of their players is going to go helmet to helmet at least once. It wouldn’t surprise in the slightest if one of their players tries rolling into kneecaps and what not.

BBQJeff

October 28th, 2022 at 4:13 PM ^

It will take a near perfect storm of a 3+ turnover win, a bunch of 50/50 ball wins, one-sided officiating and some fluky shit for MSU to win this game.   

Even in the absence of all of that they could make the game uncomfortably close, but I just don't see them hanging with UM for 60 minutes.   Too much disparity.  I could see a 31-23 type of game I can also see pure domination - a repeat of the PSU game.   I just don't envision a MSU victory - too many breaks would have to go their way.  

username03

October 28th, 2022 at 4:15 PM ^

I would love to see us throw the ball around early, get a big lead, and then run the ball till Jimmy cackles with running clock glee but I don’t think that’s going to happen. So can we just throw the ball some in the redzone, maybe even into the endzone?

Newton Gimmick

October 28th, 2022 at 4:18 PM ^

Nervous/paranoia level more like 7 for me.  MSU is not a "very bad team" (seems like Brian underestimates them every year) with their guys back.  They aren't a great or even very good team but maybe top 30 as they are.   This will not be a walkover. 

MGoBlue96

October 28th, 2022 at 4:34 PM ^

The guys they get back do not solve the fact that they are an atrocious pass defense, have a poor oline and just guys at Rb. Do they have some nice pieces, sure but as a whole healthy or not they are in fact a bad football team. Even before Slade's injury they were not exactly shutting down the run either. If this game is a nailbiter in the 4th it is because UM allowed them to stay in it either with very uncharacteristic play or a poor offensive gameplan.

bronxblue

October 28th, 2022 at 5:15 PM ^

I mean, if MSU plays like they did against Wisconsin we're still talking about an offense that averaged less than 3 yards a carry.  And Michigan even that Maryland game was a two-score beating covered up by an utterly meaningless final drive.  

Michigan would have to play worse than they have all year for MSU to only win by a score.

Newton Gimmick

October 28th, 2022 at 8:44 PM ^

The Maryland game was only a two score game for about 7-8 minutes out of 60.  It was mostly tight. 

(Healthy) MSU outgained Wisconsin by over 100 yards, and most power ratings I look at still view Wisconsin as a top 25 team (in the vicinity of Maryland).  I fully expect MSU to play their best game of the year, and dearly hope we don't play our worst/sloppiest (similar to too many past games)

 

Mr. Elbel

October 28th, 2022 at 4:20 PM ^

The entire Cheap Thrills section is always *chef's kiss* but this particularly got me laughing a little too loud at work:

 

Loss will cause me to… hahaha you guys I'm gonna set myself on fire

Win will cause me to… <microphone drops from the sky> IZZO! YOU'RRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRE NEXT <suplexes grandmother>

ih8losing

October 28th, 2022 at 4:20 PM ^

ugh I hate feeling this nervous about the game. Having gone to 2015 and 2017 games and seeing what last year brought, there;s just no taking this game for granted on my end. What worries me - dirty plays on JJ, penalty happy refereeing, phantom targeting calls, once in a lifetime dimes by Thorne, etc. 

still... Michigan, 30-27

steve sharik

October 28th, 2022 at 4:28 PM ^

Okay, so MSU has their D guys back. For the sake of argument, let's say they bow up and hold Michigan to 22 or so as Michigan goes up and down the field (they will) but red zone GRRRR 1 TD and 5 FGs plus a couple TOs.

MSU offense:

  • 2022 OL << 2021 OL (which was weak sauce)
  • 2022 RB <<< 2021 RB
  • 2022 QB = 2021 QB
  • 2022 WR > 2021 WR
  • 2022 TE > 2021 TE

But, for those last 3, if you can't protect the passer...?

tl;dr How on earth are they going to score? 

MGoBlue96

October 28th, 2022 at 4:29 PM ^

I just don't see a better UM offense at home only scoring 29 against a worse MSU defense than last year when they already scored more than that in last year's game. If UM only gets 29 their offensive gameplan was not good quite frankly.

Durham Blue

October 28th, 2022 at 4:39 PM ^

My heart wants to beat the tar out of MSU and lay down big bucks on -22.  My head is like "not so fast".  MSU is weird.  I will put my money on -22 but it will be small.  I kind of like the over/under at 55.  I am with a lot of others in thinking this game will go under.  Maybe 38-10 or 38-13.