Neck Sharpies: Jet Motion RPO in Urban’s Face Comment Count

Seth

image

[Patrick Barron]

For many reasons I loved Harbaugh’s offensive game plan against Ohio State. He knew Ohio State well, knew his players better, and nearly made up an entire massive talent gap between the two teams with coaching alone. One minute they’d be in super-wide splits and running up the gut, the next play they’d be in super-packed goal line, fake a handoff to Hammerin Panda, and slip a TE for an easy touchdown. Next drive they come out in a split-backs right out of a Bill Walsh playbook, plus a bunch of spread.

Ohio State ran a pretty basic defense; at this point they’re just churning through five-stars Calipari-style, and giving them a basic Quarters/Cover 1 system with one or two checks based on alignment. But Michigan’s offense wasn’t anywhere near that level last year. So Harbaugh pulled plays from every offensive tree, whipsawing the OSU defense between dramatically different concepts until he found a few that the Buckeye checks made wrong. Was it complicated? Well yeah, they practiced this stuff all season and emptied the drawer for the Game. Did it work? Brilliantly.

--------------------------------

THE SETUP

One of those successful attacks was a packaged play they broke out to save a 1st and 17 in the shadow of their own endzone early in the 2nd quarter, then twice more during an important drive down 24-20 in the 4th. But before they broke out the big gun, they scouted it.

Prior to that play they ran a jet screen to Evans on the field side that converted a 3rd and 11 to 1st and goal by catching the cornerback in man waiting too long to react to the jet motion.

image

A little later Michigan ran their slot (Crawford) in jet motion from a 2x2 wide TE look, and noted how Ohio State reacted:

image

Both throws went to the jet man, and now Michigan has seen the two ways Ohio State plans to defend it: an under front against odd formations, an over front for even ones, and slanting the line in the direction of the jet.

--------------------------------

THE PLAY

Now it’s the 2nd quarter and Michigan comes out in a similar thing, except instead of a second tight end in the formation there are two running backs: Higdon standing next to O’Korn, and Evans opposite and behind. Evans jet motion to the field against an under front, pulling the LBs away from the boundary. But this time Michigan’s running a pin and pull in the other direction.

I am guessing he found this on some Auburn film because it’s got Malzahn’s fingerprints all over it: jet motion, backside reads, pin and pull. It worked all day, and I think it’s because Michigan noticed how Ohio State defends jet motion and planned to punish it, and OSU never got to change it up because there were a million other things Michigan was doing. Here it is later against an over:

There’s a lot going on here so let’s break down the components.

image

image

  1. Michigan aligns in a standard shotgun 3-wide formation with two receivers (SL and X) to the field, and the TE to the boundary.
  2. McDoom (13) goes in a jet motion, ball is snapped when McDoom passes the quarterback.
  3. The three receivers are running a bubble action, O’Korn reads the reaction of the receivers side (purple zone) and may have the option to throw the bubble if Michigan has numbers.
  4. Line call uses the old Vince Lombardi sweep rules on the frontside: pin what you can pin and pull what you can’t. Backside is zone blocking.
  5. Backside DE (orange zone) left unblocked, is optioned (QB keeps if end crashes down).

Granted those options could be entirely for show—Ohio State isn’t a naturally aggressive defense. Whether or not it’s a run-pass option, like any sound defense Ohio State had practiced how to take away the field side options and force it down to a running play on the boundary. It just so happened that’s exactly what Harbaugh was hoping for when he ran that…

[After the jump: the Jets]

--------------------------------

JET MOTION

image

The reason it works so well both times is because of how OSU adjusted their run fits to the jet motion. Almost every offense uses motion, especially jet motion, because it’s a great way to mess with the defense. Jet motion with an especially fast dude you don’t want to have the ball in space is even better because the idea is usually not to actually outflank the defense, just to make them think you’re going to outflank them.

When you see McDoom bolting, the first thing that comes to mind is “holy shit what if that guy gets all the way over there and I’m late to the edge!” Every defender who sees that is naturally already imagining the jet motion guy out there, even if by the snap he’s not even past the box.

The thing is it could be either: the offense could be outflanking you with that jet guy, or they could be trying to get you bugging out to one side right before they change directions and attack the opposite edge. Or they’ll have a post-snap option to do either.

So you’ve got to have a plan to stay sound versus motion, and there are a few of them to pick from. For one-high defenses like Michigan’s if keeping your matchups is important to you, you can have everyone follow his man (Travel), or if you’ve got less specialized players it’s easier to just have everyone change jobs (Roll).

imageimage

imageimage

The latter is probably common response to jets because nobody gets stuck in traffic on the way and most teams don’t want to get stuck with their hybrid space player in the deep zone—Michigan has been known to do it against teams with less than spectacular deep passing games. Either way you haven’t really changed your run fits:

jet fits

And that’s important because you’re trying not to overreact to the jet and become unsound.

However when you jet against a Quarters defense it’s going to do a little more to them because their coverage expects to play the two defensive backs to each side against the two receiving threats to that side. How Quarters teams deal with this varies based on what they trust their personnel to do. Some bring down the backside safety and convert to Cover 3 over it. Other times they’ll treat the jet man as a player out of the backfield and let the Star (hybrid space player) deal with him, while the cornerback takes on a linebacker role.

Ohio State rolled the first time:

image

The second time they used a travel variant where they essentially leave the backside alone and put the boundary safety (B) in man against the motion guy while the CB converts to a safety. I say “essentially” because if the jet guy gets outside the slot receiver now the jet man is the #2 receiver and part of the Quarters match, while the motion safety converts to man on the slot.

image

The thing is all of these shifts are likely to mess with their run fits. Quarters’s selling point is you can play with a nine-man front, which can free up the linebackers to focus on interior running lanes. But watch what happens to the backside of this front when the Z motions:

jet unfitsNow your cornerback is the edge of your defense and the nearest linebacker is three gaps over. So Quarters defenses often teach the line to all slant toward any backfield motion that crosses them, entrusting the linebackers to stay home on the backside so the DL can still play their gaps aggressively.

image

That’s a much more sound way to play, keeping your linebacker outside and protecting them against those meaty linemen. Also the trap is set. Let’s watch Schiano step in it.

--------------------------------

PIN N PULL

Here’s the first play again:

With the “Z” actually Chris Evans starting like an H-back, Ohio State’s frontside has already rolled down before the snap. The SAM linebacker (#35 Chris Worley) runs up to the line of scrimmage outside of the tight end, and the cornerback, with no receiver to worry about to that side, is also up on the line. They still have a safety back there to help them, and a middle linebacker to clean up any messes.

Then comes the jet, and sure enough the line is slanting, turning moderately difficult downblocks into easy OL victories.

image

image

The nose slanted into perfect position for Bredeson to seal him; he’s dead. The SDE (Sam Hubbard) here was supposed to get into the B gap, but there is none, and because he’s slanting instead of heading directly upfield he’s got no chance to interfere with Kugler’s pull; guy is useless on this play.

Two guys have a chance to make an awesome play though. The backside tackle lined up inside of Juwann Bushell-Beatty and JBB can only ride a bit of shoulder toward the play—it’s enough. Also the SAM (Chris Worley) is supposed to win this—an under front against Trips is strong because a backside run puts you directly into that unblocked edge guy. But the slant made him into basically an SDE covering a C gap, and Worley is kind of a hybrid safety who get get pushed around when blocked, and McKeon can just seal him and ride—the guy still makes a valiant effort to get upfield but McKeon’s push is enough to get Higdon by.

Mason Cole caught the cornerback trying to set the edge. That’s a wee little dude against a left tackle, and wee little dude can only dive at air as Higdon scoots by.

Ruiz got to release downfield, and the jet action pulled the middle linebacker enough that Ruiz had a chance to harass there, but the freshman got hung up for no reason on Bredeson’s guy for a sec, so Kugler has to use himself up there. The playside safety took a false step from the jet action too, though, so Higdon can stiffarm that puppy to the ground and turn 10 yards into 35.

--------------------------------

Now let’s watch the second play, with Ohio State in an Over formation and rolling just two guys instead of their entire back seven:

The secondary’s reaction this time is again fine: they have 3 on 3 for the McDoom jet action. Also the 4-3 front and using the cornerback as their overhang safety has fixed the issue with the wasted DE, while not moving the linebackers means there are two able to help on the backside of the play.

image

But still the slanting reaction to the jet motion is winning all-important battles up front, allowing the pullers to get out in front and get square on the linebackers reading them. Michigan has blockers for everybody until the cornerback, who’s 20 yards deep and still a teeny guy. Two blockers for two guys is a win for the offense, and it’s only kept down because the MLB (Tuf Borland) ably took Kugler’s cut attempt, and Bredeson’s kickout attempt on Worley had to be converted to a seal on the other side, making Higdon cut around it and giving time for Borland to close and the rest of the defense to rally. It’s still 7 or 8 yards on 1st and 10.

--------------------------------

So…try it again? Sure.

This is back to the Evans look, and Ohio State is back to the Under front. The bubble now is creaking open…

image

…as OSU was much more careful about their shuffle, keeping the boundary safety on his hash and only moving the MLB a little bit (the Star still moved to overhang Crawford in the slot with the field safety moving with the jet motion).

But the under front also means it’s once again that wee cornerback (Denzel Ward) and SAM (Worley) meeting the pullers after the slants come and the downblocks seal them. Worley is still checking that TE gap that Hubbard is slanting into though, Ward is backing up a bit as if he too is expecting to chase down a run that goes inside. So it doesn’t, and Cole blasts Worley out of the play right before Kugler arrives to escort Ward to the Michigan sideline, and there’s again a huge gap. Worley falls at Cole’s feet and manages to grab at Higdon’s after a 9-yard gain that was about to meet a safety at the first down marker anyway.

Note the timestamp: Michigan was running this just two plays after the last one. And even though Ohio State had seen it already, they’d seen so many other things that day that they never adjusted how they defend it. (Note: Penn State did).

There’s been a lot of complaining, some justified, that his offense is too “complicated,” a sort of false slider that someone wishing to find fault can turn to because it’s hard to argue without diagrams and such. In this game Michigan’s players didn’t seem to have any problem keeping up—their biggest problem until the last interception was the quarterback missing wide open targets he was throwing to. But Ohio State’s all-star defensive coaches never got this fixed, and it very nearly cost them The Game.

Comments

UM Fan from Sydney

May 16th, 2018 at 12:22 PM ^

Too soon, man.

Yet another game against OSU that we should have won. There have been too many "should have won" games against them since 2001. Let's see...2001, 2004, (arguably) 2005, 2006, 2007, 2013, 2016, (arguably) 2017. Yeah. Anyone want to come with me to a tall bridge?

funkywolve

May 17th, 2018 at 10:52 AM ^

That's a maybe to me.  Tressell went 200% Tressell ball once OSU got the lead and they realized when Henne was passing he wasn't going to hit water if he fell out of boat.  I'm not saying UM loses no matter in that game, but OSU would have called a much different game offensively if they knew they needed to put more then 14 points on the board.

 

HChiti76

May 17th, 2018 at 12:16 PM ^

I was at that OSU game. Tressel (and 110,000 other folks) realized that hurt Henne and Michigan's offense were not going to be moving the ball so he basically dialed everything down and made sure all his team did was not turn the ball over. He knew Michigan would not score enough to win.

Same thing happened vs MSU last year. Once Dantonio had the lead and the weather got atrocious, he went into a shell and was only concerned about not turning the ball over.  He didn't care if MSU went 3 and out the rest of the game.  He was going to not turn it over and count on Michigan not being able to take the lead. 

Our coaches ran the ball successfully in the second half and got a couple of first downs and inexplicably started throwing again, resulting in turnovers.  Yes, JOK was terrible but given the weather conditions and with MSU not moving the ball, I thought we should run the ball, play field position, kick a couple field goals and win the game.  But, in the monsoon, our coaches thought we should throw it.  Go figure.

 

Seth

May 16th, 2018 at 2:42 PM ^

I think sometime next week? We didn't get it up before it was too close to when I left for Austin and I just got back yesterday. Gotta get the ads working and futz with some layout things then it's good. It's on us now really.

Ziff72

May 16th, 2018 at 12:57 PM ^

This is great content.   Too bad you made it all up.  Didn't you hear that the offense  was a mess because of too many cooks?   No way they could set anything up. 

mitchewr

May 16th, 2018 at 4:36 PM ^

Serious question then...

 

If last year's offensive coaching staff was so prolific, as some seem to believe, then why on earth did we only see ONE GAME that looked like they had a competent offensive game plan prepared??

 

I'm sorry 1 game out of an entire season of garbage doesn't redeem this offensive staff. 

mitchewr

May 16th, 2018 at 6:50 PM ^

Me and just about every sports writer I’ve ever read on games from last year. Lots of people were consistently questioning the play calling throughout the season. And let’s not try to pretend that the team looked ready to go in that bowl game. Yes the OSU game plan was great and we should have won. But that’s the only game I ever hear anyone ever use as an example from last year. Where are all these other games where we had such a fantastic game plan and just suffered from unbelievably bad QB play? I’m just saying I think there’s a reason JH changed up the offensive staff so much in the off-season...

Seth

May 17th, 2018 at 9:29 AM ^

1. "Every sports writer"

2. "Lots of people were consistently questioning the play calling"

3. "I'm just saying"

You REALLY don't want anyone to take your argument seriously, do you/? 

There was one major instance when Michigan went into a game with a terrible gameplan, and that was they thought Florida would play a bunch of man coverage and Speight threw two pick sixes* into zones before they changed it up. There were other times when, even with limited player ability, they schemed their way to better offensive outcomes. Purdue they used a ton of pick plays to spring guys open. Wisconsin they schemed to abuse Wisconsin down the sideline and only a ton of defensive holding prevented that. Minnesota and Maryland they abused by overpowering the edges with the run game (the latter building a huge lead then shelving everything else), and Rutgers they punished the linebackers and NT all game by running off the backside of power.

Even in the losses the gameplans were smart. Penn State they used a lot of the same stuff as against Ohio State (including this play twice and its counter), and against MSU they routinely got TEs open downfield against those aggressive safeties. Those were all terrible games by O'Korn, and the pass protection wasn't good.

Also note it was the two OL coaches who left, not the main playcaller (that's Pep). The original sin of last year was no pass protection--the interior couldn't pick up stunts and right tackle was just plain beat all the time. They lost Frey because his alma mater called, and picked up the hottest new thing in Moore and a WRs coach because they didn't have one and they're allowed an extra assistant this year. If Pep's still around, so is the overall structure of the offensive staff--what's changed is the OL coaching, and that's a better clue as to what Harbaugh thought was wrong with the offense last year.

* one just bad luck but Fla dropped another so: wash

Fezzik

May 17th, 2018 at 1:20 PM ^

Isn't all the unsuccessful zone running we focused on the first half the year considered a massive fail with the game plan? It wasn't until we abandoned it that our running game greatly improved.

There is absolutely no way you can call the michigan state game a good game plan. O'Korn throwing 35 passes in monsoon weather is suicide. Especially when Higdon was running really good. 

Our offense as a whole was obviously depressing last year. It's the coaches jobs to put their players in the best possible situation to succeed. If all these gameplans were so good do you believe our players were put in their best chance to succeed? If so, then why so much suck on offense? We have talent. I feel like you are saying all we were missing was execution and Brady Hoke mysteriously just started clapping in Carolina.

If your pass blocking sucks and all your QBs are struggling then shouldn't you scheme around that? Why all the deep play action dropbacks? Why not more 3 step drops and quick passes? Why the long routes? 

FrozeMangoes

May 17th, 2018 at 4:38 PM ^

Thank you for responding.  I do not pretend to understand the game at your level and this is very helpful.

Where did you get that pep was the main play caller?  I have always understood it he called passes, Drevno called runs and Harbaugh could veto and/or call anything he wanted at any given time. 

I remember in Indy pass blocking was an issue when Pep was there and I remember reading an article (cant find it now) from someone who knew more than me blaming Pep's long developing pass plays for the protection issues.   This has always scared me about Pep. Again, I don't pretend to know a ton of X and O's but it amazed me all year that Evans wasn't used out of the backfield on short passes until The Game. 

 

Lastly, I remember reading that Jim Mc was going to be in charge of gameplanning this year. Does anyone know who was in charge of it last year?  I could be wrong on this.  I thought I recall Harbaugh saying that Jim M was in charge this year in a press conference.  I took that as an indication he was not happy with gameplanning.  Maybe I have overestimated Jim M's role.  I always took his hiring as an indication there was something beyond OL coaching Jim H wasn't happy with. 

 

These are asked with all the caveats of 'understanding  it was largely 3rd sting QB, poor OL coaching' and 'fully confident in Harbaugh'  I am just tryiing to understand the team/game I love better from someone who knows more. 

 

Thanks 

Seth

May 17th, 2018 at 7:01 PM ^

I am about to wreck it with this answer so strap in for some awesomeness...

I got it from Jack Harbaugh (and other people) because Dr. Sap and I brought a Playstation 3 to Schembechler Hall last year to demonstrate our highly accurate historical NCAA 2014 Michigan teams for Jim Betts, who's the head of the M Club (yes the ones with the banner) in hopes he could approve our fair use of the players' likenesses for a charity event we wanted to do. As we were playing we attracted a crowd--Jack Harbaugh, Big Jon Falk for a minute, some of the Amazon crew. And I joked after I stuffed Sap's 4th down attempt "Tell Drevno not to call that one" and Jack said "You mean Pep."

DoubleB

May 17th, 2018 at 7:24 AM ^

A lot of man coverage by Ohio State that Michigan's offense has game planned around since the arrival of Don Brown. 

The game was a clinic in how to game plan man coverage by both teams. OSU ran the QB and got some timely scrambles. Michigan got guys open down the field with mesh type pickish plays. 

MGlobules

May 16th, 2018 at 2:05 PM ^

"There’s been a lot of complaining, some justified, that his offense is too 'complicated,' a sort of false slider that someone wishing to find fault can turn to because it’s hard to argue without diagrams and such."

Now explain the bowl game to me, though. All things being equal I have no problem with the rest of the season, but we looked like chihuahua sh*t in the bowl, and I'm still feeling the sting down here in SEC land. 

mitchewr

May 16th, 2018 at 4:40 PM ^

I'm sorry but when Warinner says that the offensive line plays, calls, reads, and overall schemes were so complicated that even HE wasn't sure what was supposed to happen, I tend to belive him. And the evidence on the field from every game except one game from last year corroborates this statement. Sure we had a great game plan for one game out of the season...that doesn't resolve the entire rest of the season from it's awfulness.  

MHWolverine

May 16th, 2018 at 2:51 PM ^

If only Peters didn't get hurt in the Wisconsin game...

I'm sooo ready for the 2018 season!! I love me some summer but hurry up fall!! 

Go Blue!! 

 

StirredNotShaken

May 16th, 2018 at 8:00 PM ^

against OSU quite like the fact that this blog wrote such a long post about a couple plays in a game to show how smart our staff was. I wish so bad we were on the other side of this thing.

Fezzik

May 17th, 2018 at 2:23 AM ^

Not sure but it appears to me the pass option is entirely decoy. The QB is reading the end to hand it off or run it himself. Our QB read option is essentially a sure hand-off and the qb keep portion has been for show. In the last 2 years how many times have our QBs kept it on a QB read option?... maybe 3-4?

The scheming was really good this game. The persistent use of misdirection was really fun to watch. It really makes you wonder what was going on against South Carolina. Best gameplan of the year followed up by a month's preperation resulting in poo.

I'm stoked to have actual football content on here. I can't wait to beat Notre Dame.

Fezzik

May 17th, 2018 at 12:47 PM ^

The osu gameplan was clearly different compared to every other game last year. Against South Carolina we looked pretty similar offensively as we did the rest of 2017. We did not focus so hard on all the misdirection this game. We were still often relying on pass blocking we didn't have for long developing pass plays. Our mesh drags still looked slow and sloppy. Our QB read lost its decoy speed motion wing to make it just an obvious hand off. We also had multiple receivers end their routes in close proximity to each other instead of spacing the defense out.

Peters did not play great but by no means was this an impressive gameplan on offense.

DoubleB

May 17th, 2018 at 2:28 PM ^

FIrst the game plan was different because there were different QBs starting each game. They have wildly different skill sets and frankly different issues as well.

What long developing plays are you talking about? Maybe a few play actions and 3rd and longs, but the pass protection, by the OL, was fine. Not great, maybe not good, but at worst fine. But when the QB holds onto the ball for a month it really doesn't matter does it? Michigan added some quick game against South Carolina and they were easy reads that either were missed or not thrown.

The other stuff you mention: mesh drags, WR routes ending together, etc. sound like execution issues to me. You can make a case the mesh drags were related to a GA coaching the WRs which isn't game plan related either. That's a staff model issue (which, in my opinion, is the clearest blame of the head coach related to the 2017 offense). 

The game plan was solid, especially given the QB that played. The execution by the QB was not.