Neck Sharpies: Jet Motion RPO in Urban’s Face Comment Count

Seth

image

[Patrick Barron]

For many reasons I loved Harbaugh’s offensive game plan against Ohio State. He knew Ohio State well, knew his players better, and nearly made up an entire massive talent gap between the two teams with coaching alone. One minute they’d be in super-wide splits and running up the gut, the next play they’d be in super-packed goal line, fake a handoff to Hammerin Panda, and slip a TE for an easy touchdown. Next drive they come out in a split-backs right out of a Bill Walsh playbook, plus a bunch of spread.

Ohio State ran a pretty basic defense; at this point they’re just churning through five-stars Calipari-style, and giving them a basic Quarters/Cover 1 system with one or two checks based on alignment. But Michigan’s offense wasn’t anywhere near that level last year. So Harbaugh pulled plays from every offensive tree, whipsawing the OSU defense between dramatically different concepts until he found a few that the Buckeye checks made wrong. Was it complicated? Well yeah, they practiced this stuff all season and emptied the drawer for the Game. Did it work? Brilliantly.

--------------------------------

THE SETUP

One of those successful attacks was a packaged play they broke out to save a 1st and 17 in the shadow of their own endzone early in the 2nd quarter, then twice more during an important drive down 24-20 in the 4th. But before they broke out the big gun, they scouted it.

Prior to that play they ran a jet screen to Evans on the field side that converted a 3rd and 11 to 1st and goal by catching the cornerback in man waiting too long to react to the jet motion.

image

A little later Michigan ran their slot (Crawford) in jet motion from a 2x2 wide TE look, and noted how Ohio State reacted:

image

Both throws went to the jet man, and now Michigan has seen the two ways Ohio State plans to defend it: an under front against odd formations, an over front for even ones, and slanting the line in the direction of the jet.

--------------------------------

THE PLAY

Now it’s the 2nd quarter and Michigan comes out in a similar thing, except instead of a second tight end in the formation there are two running backs: Higdon standing next to O’Korn, and Evans opposite and behind. Evans jet motion to the field against an under front, pulling the LBs away from the boundary. But this time Michigan’s running a pin and pull in the other direction.

I am guessing he found this on some Auburn film because it’s got Malzahn’s fingerprints all over it: jet motion, backside reads, pin and pull. It worked all day, and I think it’s because Michigan noticed how Ohio State defends jet motion and planned to punish it, and OSU never got to change it up because there were a million other things Michigan was doing. Here it is later against an over:

There’s a lot going on here so let’s break down the components.

image

image

  1. Michigan aligns in a standard shotgun 3-wide formation with two receivers (SL and X) to the field, and the TE to the boundary.
  2. McDoom (13) goes in a jet motion, ball is snapped when McDoom passes the quarterback.
  3. The three receivers are running a bubble action, O’Korn reads the reaction of the receivers side (purple zone) and may have the option to throw the bubble if Michigan has numbers.
  4. Line call uses the old Vince Lombardi sweep rules on the frontside: pin what you can pin and pull what you can’t. Backside is zone blocking.
  5. Backside DE (orange zone) left unblocked, is optioned (QB keeps if end crashes down).

Granted those options could be entirely for show—Ohio State isn’t a naturally aggressive defense. Whether or not it’s a run-pass option, like any sound defense Ohio State had practiced how to take away the field side options and force it down to a running play on the boundary. It just so happened that’s exactly what Harbaugh was hoping for when he ran that…

[After the jump: the Jets]

--------------------------------

JET MOTION

image

The reason it works so well both times is because of how OSU adjusted their run fits to the jet motion. Almost every offense uses motion, especially jet motion, because it’s a great way to mess with the defense. Jet motion with an especially fast dude you don’t want to have the ball in space is even better because the idea is usually not to actually outflank the defense, just to make them think you’re going to outflank them.

When you see McDoom bolting, the first thing that comes to mind is “holy shit what if that guy gets all the way over there and I’m late to the edge!” Every defender who sees that is naturally already imagining the jet motion guy out there, even if by the snap he’s not even past the box.

The thing is it could be either: the offense could be outflanking you with that jet guy, or they could be trying to get you bugging out to one side right before they change directions and attack the opposite edge. Or they’ll have a post-snap option to do either.

So you’ve got to have a plan to stay sound versus motion, and there are a few of them to pick from. For one-high defenses like Michigan’s if keeping your matchups is important to you, you can have everyone follow his man (Travel), or if you’ve got less specialized players it’s easier to just have everyone change jobs (Roll).

imageimage

imageimage

The latter is probably common response to jets because nobody gets stuck in traffic on the way and most teams don’t want to get stuck with their hybrid space player in the deep zone—Michigan has been known to do it against teams with less than spectacular deep passing games. Either way you haven’t really changed your run fits:

jet fits

And that’s important because you’re trying not to overreact to the jet and become unsound.

However when you jet against a Quarters defense it’s going to do a little more to them because their coverage expects to play the two defensive backs to each side against the two receiving threats to that side. How Quarters teams deal with this varies based on what they trust their personnel to do. Some bring down the backside safety and convert to Cover 3 over it. Other times they’ll treat the jet man as a player out of the backfield and let the Star (hybrid space player) deal with him, while the cornerback takes on a linebacker role.

Ohio State rolled the first time:

image

The second time they used a travel variant where they essentially leave the backside alone and put the boundary safety (B) in man against the motion guy while the CB converts to a safety. I say “essentially” because if the jet guy gets outside the slot receiver now the jet man is the #2 receiver and part of the Quarters match, while the motion safety converts to man on the slot.

image

The thing is all of these shifts are likely to mess with their run fits. Quarters’s selling point is you can play with a nine-man front, which can free up the linebackers to focus on interior running lanes. But watch what happens to the backside of this front when the Z motions:

jet unfitsNow your cornerback is the edge of your defense and the nearest linebacker is three gaps over. So Quarters defenses often teach the line to all slant toward any backfield motion that crosses them, entrusting the linebackers to stay home on the backside so the DL can still play their gaps aggressively.

image

That’s a much more sound way to play, keeping your linebacker outside and protecting them against those meaty linemen. Also the trap is set. Let’s watch Schiano step in it.

--------------------------------

PIN N PULL

Here’s the first play again:

With the “Z” actually Chris Evans starting like an H-back, Ohio State’s frontside has already rolled down before the snap. The SAM linebacker (#35 Chris Worley) runs up to the line of scrimmage outside of the tight end, and the cornerback, with no receiver to worry about to that side, is also up on the line. They still have a safety back there to help them, and a middle linebacker to clean up any messes.

Then comes the jet, and sure enough the line is slanting, turning moderately difficult downblocks into easy OL victories.

image

image

The nose slanted into perfect position for Bredeson to seal him; he’s dead. The SDE (Sam Hubbard) here was supposed to get into the B gap, but there is none, and because he’s slanting instead of heading directly upfield he’s got no chance to interfere with Kugler’s pull; guy is useless on this play.

Two guys have a chance to make an awesome play though. The backside tackle lined up inside of Juwann Bushell-Beatty and JBB can only ride a bit of shoulder toward the play—it’s enough. Also the SAM (Chris Worley) is supposed to win this—an under front against Trips is strong because a backside run puts you directly into that unblocked edge guy. But the slant made him into basically an SDE covering a C gap, and Worley is kind of a hybrid safety who get get pushed around when blocked, and McKeon can just seal him and ride—the guy still makes a valiant effort to get upfield but McKeon’s push is enough to get Higdon by.

Mason Cole caught the cornerback trying to set the edge. That’s a wee little dude against a left tackle, and wee little dude can only dive at air as Higdon scoots by.

Ruiz got to release downfield, and the jet action pulled the middle linebacker enough that Ruiz had a chance to harass there, but the freshman got hung up for no reason on Bredeson’s guy for a sec, so Kugler has to use himself up there. The playside safety took a false step from the jet action too, though, so Higdon can stiffarm that puppy to the ground and turn 10 yards into 35.

--------------------------------

Now let’s watch the second play, with Ohio State in an Over formation and rolling just two guys instead of their entire back seven:

The secondary’s reaction this time is again fine: they have 3 on 3 for the McDoom jet action. Also the 4-3 front and using the cornerback as their overhang safety has fixed the issue with the wasted DE, while not moving the linebackers means there are two able to help on the backside of the play.

image

But still the slanting reaction to the jet motion is winning all-important battles up front, allowing the pullers to get out in front and get square on the linebackers reading them. Michigan has blockers for everybody until the cornerback, who’s 20 yards deep and still a teeny guy. Two blockers for two guys is a win for the offense, and it’s only kept down because the MLB (Tuf Borland) ably took Kugler’s cut attempt, and Bredeson’s kickout attempt on Worley had to be converted to a seal on the other side, making Higdon cut around it and giving time for Borland to close and the rest of the defense to rally. It’s still 7 or 8 yards on 1st and 10.

--------------------------------

So…try it again? Sure.

This is back to the Evans look, and Ohio State is back to the Under front. The bubble now is creaking open…

image

…as OSU was much more careful about their shuffle, keeping the boundary safety on his hash and only moving the MLB a little bit (the Star still moved to overhang Crawford in the slot with the field safety moving with the jet motion).

But the under front also means it’s once again that wee cornerback (Denzel Ward) and SAM (Worley) meeting the pullers after the slants come and the downblocks seal them. Worley is still checking that TE gap that Hubbard is slanting into though, Ward is backing up a bit as if he too is expecting to chase down a run that goes inside. So it doesn’t, and Cole blasts Worley out of the play right before Kugler arrives to escort Ward to the Michigan sideline, and there’s again a huge gap. Worley falls at Cole’s feet and manages to grab at Higdon’s after a 9-yard gain that was about to meet a safety at the first down marker anyway.

Note the timestamp: Michigan was running this just two plays after the last one. And even though Ohio State had seen it already, they’d seen so many other things that day that they never adjusted how they defend it. (Note: Penn State did).

There’s been a lot of complaining, some justified, that his offense is too “complicated,” a sort of false slider that someone wishing to find fault can turn to because it’s hard to argue without diagrams and such. In this game Michigan’s players didn’t seem to have any problem keeping up—their biggest problem until the last interception was the quarterback missing wide open targets he was throwing to. But Ohio State’s all-star defensive coaches never got this fixed, and it very nearly cost them The Game.

Comments

yossarians tree

May 16th, 2018 at 1:48 PM ^

The last two seasons I've been saying Michigan would be a very, very good team with just an average quarterback. Would have beaten Molest U last year and OSU both years with competent quarterback play. Which is why I'm very confident with the program going forward. 

DoubleB

May 16th, 2018 at 12:33 PM ^

a few weeks again. There's a lot of man coverage run by Ohio State in this game. I didn't chart it and I certainly may have exaggerated the 75%. And I get that my comment doesn't touch on the gist of your article regarding jet motion.

The top 3 clips all show motion ending with a lone TE which might be Ohio State's base coverage in this type of set. 

DoubleB

May 16th, 2018 at 12:27 PM ^

other than Speight wins this game.

We saw Peters against the same coverage against a much worse team in South Carolina.

I get the O'Korn hatred. There were 5-7 plays that were just mind-numbingly bad--mainly missing wide open guys, particularly early in the game. But people seem to have forgotten he also threw some bullets in the game into tight windows. That 3rd and 11 flare screen, mentioned at the very top of this article (that seems easy) was absolutely perfect and if it's not, Michigan settles for a FG on that drive. Of course he missed a wide open wheel a few plays earlier for a walk-in TD that was also preceded by an absolute seed on 3rd and 8 to the TE in Cover 3 two plays prior.

There's a real tendency to just "Cliffs Notes" everything regarding this football team--"the OL sucks, Michigan beats OSU with any other QB, etc." For a blog readership that touts its knowledge, it would be great to acknowledge that there's a lot more nuance than that.

Harbaugh's Lef…

May 16th, 2018 at 12:48 PM ^

To keep this brief because getting back into this does nothing. I don't hate JOK but he never progressed in three years at Michigan. His best days at QB were played during his Freshman year at Houston. 

You made the point why I think everyone any other QB wins that game. JOK continually made bad throws and would sometimes bail himself out with an impressive one but that was too few and far in between. No other QB made as many poor decisions, per throw, as JOK did all season and he did when it mattered the most in this game and that's why he essentially got benched twice.

DoubleB

May 17th, 2018 at 7:19 AM ^

"JOK continually made bad throws and would sometimes bail himself out with an impressive one but that was too few and far in between."

And what would Peters have done? Based on the South Carolina game, hold onto the ball and never throw it to the open guy! And then 3/4 of the readership would blame the OL. 

Both QBs aren't good, but they aren't good for completely different reasons.

corundum

May 16th, 2018 at 12:50 PM ^

Disagree completely. Peters could have at least hit a wide open Wheatley down the seam on the double fake screen play in the first quarter. He also could have made the 5 yard checkdown pass to Evans to convert late in the fourth quarter. Either one of those most likely wins the game.

stephenrjking

May 16th, 2018 at 1:16 PM ^

He might make those passes, but it's quite possible that the gameplan has to be severely reduced in order for him to have been able to run it. There's no evidence that Peters was able to even approach running the full playbook at any point last season, including a bowl game for which he had weeks to prepare. 

That's not to say he won't have learned by this fall--I hope he has!--but Peters was given a crash course last fall and the offense was extremely basic with him under center. 

In other words, he could make the pass to Wheatley, but Michigan might not be able to install the double-fake screen with Peters in the game. Or they do, but then this entire series Seth discusses has to be scrapped because Peters isn't ready to run it.

trueblueintexas

May 16th, 2018 at 3:30 PM ^

I agree with you about Peters not being able to execute the whole playbook. That really does put the focus on the coaches though. 

For a guy who was in the system for almost two years, why would he still struggle to execute the majority of the playbook?

- Is it too complicated?

- Poor development by the coaches?

- Poor identiifcation of capability in recruiting?

- Lack of ability to adapt to what you have and make it work?

Peter's could have responsibility in this as well. Maybe he changed his work level or focus once he got to college. Who knows.

The point is, there are now enough examples every year of freshman who play competently due to their amazing ability to adapt and/or their coaches ability to find the right fit and adjust the game plan to make them successful. Michigan had two guys (O'Korn & Peters) who despite their time on campus, did not play competently consistently. Hopefully the issue was identified in letting Drevno go. Hopefully we get a good answer this year.

stephenrjking

May 16th, 2018 at 4:43 PM ^

There are any number of possible reasons. Perhaps it's on the coaches, perhaps it's on Peters. There was a fair amount of scuttlebut suggesting that he checked out for the first half of fall, after all. A playbook like that needs to be studied, and if he wasn't really into it...

Anyway, when you're looking at one data point, it's waaaay premature to pin the answer on one singular issue. Some guys don't have it. Other guys take a while to learn. Some guys pick things up quickly, and then 90% of the other teams ask why their guy can't pick things up just as quickly when it's really a rare trait.

Let's remember that this guy was a redshirt freshman who was not expected to start any games last season. People can say "but but but Jake Fromm!" but Jake Fromm is not every quarterback. Some guys need time. Some guys aren't mature. Some guys, it turns out, aren't as good as they were supposed to be. Even Alabama recruits guys like that. 

The guy will be, again, a redshirt sophomore this fall. It's still early in his career. Prior to All Or Nothing coming out, many people were convinced Pep Hamilton was the problem, and dozens changed their mind simply by hearing him talk and realize that he actually was, hey, not stupid. It turns out that we don't know as much as we think we do.

Reader71

May 16th, 2018 at 8:54 PM ^

Added to this, it’s not likely that Peters didn’t know the playbook in the simplest sense of “know”. I’m sure he could run any play they called. It’s much more likely he didn’t “know” the intricacies of things like route concepts, protections, or how a certain play is tailored to a certain defense. It’s knowledge in a deeper sense. As to why a guy in his class still didn’t have that knowledge — he was third on the depth chart. There are only so many reps to go around. People point out that we see freshmen excel every year. This is true, but it’s the wrong comparison to make. He was third on the depth chart. Compared to other 3rd stringers, he did pretty well. Had Speight not played well in 2016, maybe Peters is rushed along, getting more reps, maybe even some starts as a freshman.

LKLIII

May 17th, 2018 at 11:01 PM ^

Plus didn’t he run the scout team his true freshman year? I’m not privy to how teams are run, but if a guy spends his time running the scout squad mimicking an opposing offense for our team’s defense to practice against, doesn’t that rob him of the ability to really throw himself into learning how to run our own playbook?

Kevin13

May 16th, 2018 at 1:14 PM ^

we win with Speight playing. Did you not see the last 5-6 games he was the QB?  We need a serious upgrade at QB over anything we saw last year. If it is Peters he needs to improve his play a lot for us to have the QB play we need to be a very good football team.

I am confident we will see much improved play this year from that position, but no QB played well enough last year to win the game. Our QB play hurt us all season long.

Fezzik

May 17th, 2018 at 2:25 AM ^

Here are his stats from his last 7 starts...

99 - 181 for a completion percentage of 55.

6 TDs and 6 Interceptions and 5 fumbles.

1066 passing yards with a whopping 5.89 yards/attempt. For comparison purposes this would have tied him for 103rd out of 110 ranked QBs in yards/attempt for 2017.

In 2017, right up until Speight got hurt we were ranked 129th out of 130 FBS teams in red zone TD%. We were 1 for 10. Without Speight we climbed from 10% to 52%.

He hit his ceiling against Maryland in 2016 and regressed since. Nothing about his last 7 outings showed a guy who was going to win us games. Purdue had a good chance to beat us if Speight played the whole game.

 

 

Reader71

May 17th, 2018 at 9:00 AM ^

I agree. Speight was not playing well, and there’s no guarantee he would turn it around. But we’ve seen that Speight is capable of playing well, whereas we never saw that from OKorn and haven’t seen it yet from Peters. I’m of the belief that there was a chance that Speight would have kicked into gear, much like he did the year before and how Rudock did in 2015. Could be wrong, of course, but it’s not unreasonable to expect improvement during the season, especially from a guy who had displayed the ability to play better.

Fezzik

May 17th, 2018 at 12:11 PM ^

Not playing well is an understatement. The stats he was producing in his last 7 starts were among the worst in the entire country for starters. This is simply fact.

The only time Speight looked pretty good for a few games was when he was surrounded by NFL ready talent. In 2016 his TE was the best in the entire country, His starting wide outs were 2nd and 4th round NFL picks. His RT, Magnuson might be your day 1 starter at OG for the 49ers this year and had a couple starts for them last year. He had Cole playing his better position at OC. This one I'll admit boggles me but even his RG Kalis has had 2 NFL starts although I beleive he is back on a practice squad. Also Jed Fisch is greater than Pep Hamilton.

Rudock had minimal time in our system and around our players. This is why it took him half the season to find his groove. Rudock is also just a better QB. After Jake found that groove his last 5 game stat totals are...

14 passing TDs to 2 Ints, 67% completion rate, and 9.15 yards/attempt. 4 of these 5 games were against bowl teams.

I'd argue Wilton peaking against Maryland just to suck the next week against Iowa, pre-injury, as not kicking it into gear as you mentioned. Speight was a redshirt junior who spent his entire college career in our system and around our players. Why after all that time and with less talent around him and after showing obvious regression would you suddenly expect him to play great? 

That is similar logic as saying O'Korn will be great any day now becuase he had a 3,100 yard 28-10 TD to Int season. Both are statements of blind hope not logic.

Reader71

May 17th, 2018 at 9:57 PM ^

Not playing well is an understatement, by design. I'm not big on trashing Michigan players. Not playing well is strictly accurate and does not include any personal knock. Why would I expect him to play great? I wouldn't. I think he could have played better than OKorn and Peters. Not a particularly high bar. And why would I expect that? Because he had already shown the ability to play at that level, both in his starts in 2016 and in his winning the job over both of them in 2017. Regarding the similarity of the logic: not similar. OKorn had some success, but in a different system. He also lost his job. Speight had success in the same system, and did not lose his job. He also beat OKorn out twice. I take your point, and your position is reasonable. But your arguments are way overstated and/or strawmen and/or uncharitable readings of my post and/or wrong.

Fezzik

May 18th, 2018 at 11:18 AM ^

Our offense was bad last year. Stating that fact does not mean I am trashing the whole offense. Speight was literally playing at a really poor level his last 7 starts. Stating that is not trashing Speight. That is not a personal knock. Facts are facts. Hell, even his own girlfriend told him he wasn't playing great to his face.

I also believe Speight would have played better than O'Korn (minus Purdue) because that is a low bar. Peters, however, I doubt Speight would have outplayed. But that is just fan debate that can not be proven either way. Without everything I mentioned last post Speight has not proven he can succeed. His most recent play shows he would not have came close to 2016's first half season of play. Peters being 3rd on the depth chart behind O'Korn is a mysterious thing.

If Speight's play continued as it has his last 7 starts it was only a matter of time he lost his job. Even Brian began giving up on Speight, which I never thought I'd see that day. UCF, Illinois, and Maryland were the only 2016 games Speight played great, again surrounded by NFL talent and a better coach. 

Reader71

May 18th, 2018 at 3:41 PM ^

Didn't mean to imply you were trashing Speight. Only that "didn't play well" is my default negative comment. I don't want to go back and forth too much on Speight's hypothetical last half of the season, so I'll say again that your position is reasonable. He might not have been able to play as well as he did in 2016 because of the changes in personnel around him. But it's also reasonable to expect a senior to improve his own game over his junior self, and mitigate the losses of the skill guys. Maybe he would have, maybe not.

Kevin14

May 16th, 2018 at 1:27 PM ^

He made some critical mistakes, but realistically, it was a miracle he was even able to play in that game.  The only reason we even had a chance was him gutting it out.  He made several throws/decisions JOK could not have on the road against an elite defense.

WeimyWoodson

May 16th, 2018 at 1:48 PM ^

The week of the game everyone here was praying Speight would be able to play for OSU.  I remember seeing him come out on the field thinking "thank god we have a chance!".  And I've said it before but he played like a warrior that day.  Mistakes were made but he had a busted shoulder and did everything he could to win that game.  When he made that 4th down TD pass in OT, that was a great pass, then he puts up 2 fingers wanting to go for the win...just an absolute warrior that day, but you don't always get the win.

creelymonk10

May 16th, 2018 at 12:15 PM ^

That last Higdon run still stings. I remember thinking that was a huge hole and a first down pickup looked easy, but cut down suddenly. Then 3 plays later we turn it over on downs, one play being O’Korn tripping.

stephenrjking

May 16th, 2018 at 12:19 PM ^

Well, it turns out that you can coach well and be stuck with your third-best QB because the other two are hurt and it makes it hard to win football games.

We'll never know this for sure, but I believe that Michigan could not have run such a diverse gameplan if Brandon Peters was the QB against OSU. O'Korn knew the playbook, knew where people were supposed to line up, could handle the subtle changes in plays. His knowledge allowed Michigan to use every asset, and I don't think Peters could handle all of that.

But O'Korn couldn't execute the passes. 

Maybe some of that WAS because there was so much to know, but maybe not. Perhaps we'll learn more this year. 

It's notable though that this package really doesn't take that much to know once it's installed. There are a couple of plays that set it up, and then there's the bubble screen and the running play. Of course, that's partly why offenses like Malzahn's are attractive, because they provide such great diversity in a compact system. I hope we see more stuff like this on the regular. 

Great stuff here, Seth.

Kevin13

May 16th, 2018 at 1:20 PM ^

could not have run this with Peters or the concept he didn't know the playbook. He knew the playbook last year and ran it just fine. His problem was just catching up to speed of the college game and being able to go through his progressions faster, that is not a by product of not knowing the playbook, just more of playing the game at a higher and faster level.

Also the concept we used against them was not that complicated just well thought out from what we usually run and exploiting matchups within the frame work of our offense. We just needed a QB to be able to hit wide open receivers and JOK missed way too many all game long.