Brandon's Lasting Lessons: A Review of 'Endzone' by John U. Bacon Comment Count

Seth

endzone_0

Since Brian is in the story, it (again) fell to me to write this site's official review of John U. Bacon's latest book, Endzone: The Rise, Fall and Return of Michigan Football.

We'll get the Amazonian recommendation bit out of the way first: You should read it. If you are a Michigan fan, you should read it. If you are a rival fan, you should read it. If you are part of any organization that has customers and/or employees, you should read it. If you are a fan of a college football team you should read it, then try to get your athletic director to read it. If you're a fan of Texas you should just throw copies of it at Steve Patterson. Except this hardcover is over 450 pages, so that might hurt him. Do not throw copies of this book at Steve Patterson. Read it.

Since you are reading MGoBlog right this minute, either you already own the book, are going to follow this link to buy the book (hardcover/kindle) right this second, or else you're just here because you heard we are a purveyor of Blake O'Neill photographs (here you go). If you're not done with the book yet, you are invited to leave this tab open and come back when you are, since this review is going to spoiler the hell out of it. I will give you the same bit of advice that Brian did when he handed it to me:

"This book is going to blow your mind."

[After the jump: We with the broken bits of brain matter and skull on the floor try to piece that back together long enough to find a theme. (Spoiler alert) Michigan contracts a disease, but its immune system wins]

Why Not Brandon's Lasting Lessons?

20899358858_2d43b2c851_z

John U. Bacon's unamused face [Eric Upchurch]

At the Literati release event at Rackham Auditorium last week somebody made a comment to me that Bacon doesn't really like it when we call the book "Brandon's Lasting Lessons." For the (probably) none of you who missed the reference, it's a play on Bacon's first hugely successful book, Bo's Lasting Lessons. The reason given for Bacon's attitude toward "BLL" was that this book isn't just about Dave Brandon.

That is true; David Brandon's administration at Michigan is only a part of a story that's really about the organism of Michigan. It is kind of a large part, though. Many tales of it are included. Like:

  • "Firing Fridays"
  • how we lost Notre Dame and how that led to the worst schedule ever
  • what he did to the tennis coach for seemingly no reason
  • what he did to the past lettermen and their traditions
  • the sharp contrast between how he treated student athlete Will Hagerup like a son, while treating the students' elected representatives like pariahs.

Had Brandon been the only real agent in this story, Bacon's book would be one more cautionary tale about empty suits. He's not, and it's not.*

This is Michigan's story, not Dave's. Bacon got some extraordinary people to go on the record about what the hell was going on in there. But the book also carefully autopsies every safeguard torn down that could have prevented one bad scion from setting the estate on fire. More importantly, it details the actions and motivations of student leaders, university leaders, thought leaders, and football captains in rescuing the enterprise from the flames.

Why Brandon's Lasting Lessons?

You remember November 2013, after the Iowa sludgefart, when the nature of Brandon was established, the trajectory of Hoke was manifest, and Brian said we are The Dude. Michigan was crumbling before our eyes. What could we do but yell "What the fuck, Walter?!" and metaphorically go bowling? The following week Devin Gardner tried, throwing the broken bits of his body against Ohio State in the single greatest performance by a Michigan athlete in history that no one will remember in ten years. He still lost, because one man is not enough. We literally went bowling.

The lasting lesson of Endzone is that one man can't do anything, but many can. There's student co-presidents Bobby Dishell and Michael Proppe, dismantling Hunter Lochmann's rationale for foisting general admission on the students. There's the professor who oversees M-Hacks, and multiple regents. There's Daily writer Alejandro Zuniga, who checked out the two Cokes deal, and Brian and Ace who checked out the emails, and all the readers who sent those in. There's the people who organized the Fire Brandon rally, and the alumni from various eras who pressured the school for change. There's new president Mark Schlissel, who walked into a crisis and did right, and Jim Hackett who stepped out of retirement "for God and Country." And of course there are the lettermen who organized and participated in a massive, coordinated grass roots effort to bring back Jim Harbaugh, for love. For MICHIGAN!

THIS is Michigan, fergdosakes

It is that ineffable thing that stars. Dave Brandon could not understand that what made Michigan "MICHIGAN" for over a century was far more than the world on the right side of his golden rope.

There's a contrast Bacon makes between Bo's Michigan and Brandon's. Brandon was "kicked off the team" by Bo. It happened to a lot of guys—Harbaugh twice—because this was one of Bo's Jedi mind tricks. The lesson was about love: you don't know how much Michigan means to you until it's suddenly taken away. The lesson Brandon took from it was "don't screw up even once, or you'll be on the other side of the rope."

In the courting of Harbaugh you start to get an appreciation for how far from the rope line the program truly extends, from a dishwasher at Pizza House to a renowned statistics professor, the state capitol, and several million alumni and fans who did something to right this ship.

So all jokes aside, Endzone really is Brandon's Lasting Lessons. Among the core Bacon books, Bo's Lasting Lessons is the heart, Three & Out is a spin-off, Fourth & Long a companion piece, and Endzone is the sequel. It shows the difference between trying to stage Bo's lasting lessons (e.g. getting a commitment from Hoke before talking money) and embodying them (e.g. Hackett's handshake agreement and its 8-hour ordeal).

It teaches that loyalty out of love is greater than loyalty out of fear and that either is a weak substitute for morality. It teaches that candor is virtue, that authenticity is recognizable, and that a person or a program's aspirations are every bit as important as their accomplishments.

It shows what Brandon did wrong, but also, to paraphrase Bacon's favorite Yost quote, how the "enthusiasm that makes it second nature for Michigan Men to spread the gospel of their university to the world's distant outposts" can also come back.

-----------------------------

*[If it was, the publisher would have had  time to fix the unfortunately common copy errors that were the tradeoff for having this in our hands before kickoff. Focusing on them does a disservice to the enormous amount of fact-checking and research and doubling back and "are you SURE you can share this?"-ing put into it.

As long as we're in the critic brackets I'll note that Bacon forgot Fred Jackson survived all the coaching changes, and I think almost all of the relevant decisions in Domino's "we acknowledge our pizza sucks and we're changing it" about-face occurred in the last half-year of Brandon's stewardship. That it had gotten so bad before an attempted about-face rings familiar anyway.]

[Update: So I learned today that "novel" means fiction.]

Comments

Blue Durham

September 8th, 2015 at 8:47 PM ^

that Truman Capote is full of crap. If you are not familiar with the dish Beef Wellington, it is a prime piece of meat that is smeared with pate, wrapped in pastry, and baked. It is expensive, elite, and incredibly presumptuous. But is is also edible. But you take that same piece of prime beef and smear it with shit, wrap it with the pastry, bake it, and you end up with shit. Its still expensive, its still incredibly presumptuous, but it is no longer edible. None of it. Nobody will peal off the pastry and eat it; nobody will scrape off all of the crap and eat the prime beef. Nobody knows where the shit ends and the beef or pastry begins. NOBODY give a shit how immaculately it is prepared, it is all contaminated. No historian or researcher is ever going to give any credence to any "historical fiction," it is all contaminated and is no different from fiction in a historical setting, which is most fiction.

Blue_sophie

September 8th, 2015 at 9:22 PM ^

Wait, I think the only time I've had beef Wellington was back in college when my roommates paranoid dad filled out closet with surplus MRE's. We ate that caloric gruel only when extremely drunk and it may have vaguely resembled what you describe. Anywhoo, I certainly would not write a scholarly dissertation as a nonfiction novel. And we could probably classify In Cold Blood as simply an accomplished example of "true crime" fiction. Even so, I think the "genre" has merit as a thought exercise or perhaps as a guiding sensibility. Just as Hemmingway's efforts at journalism shaped his terse literary style, my own nonfiction writing has been shaped by novelists and, more importantly, historians who also draw their sensibilities from fiction.

Blue Durham

September 8th, 2015 at 9:44 PM ^

Yeah, I hate nonfiction novels (or historical novels). My father, whom I respect immensely, is a highly respected retired doctor, loves them. I don't get it, and he probably (no probably there, really) doesn't understand all of the very dry, nonfiction stuff I only read. Nonfiction is tough to do as the writer is limited to what has been supported through historical or scientific research. The rest is left up to conjecture - something a lot of people are uncomfortable with as they want to know the answer (I am very much OK with ambiguity). Nonfiction novels are much more readable (no argument here) and fill in the interstitial areas, but I just prefer to read what is. A real issue I have is that very few nonfiction books/documentaries make a distinction between what is known/generally accepted versus what is really unexplained. I just think that the truth is much more compelling, and as the cliche goes, "stranger than fiction" and "can't make this stuff up" kind of thing.

Needs

September 8th, 2015 at 10:12 PM ^

Capote was talking about something different than historical fiction, though. He was talking about the kind of creative non-fiction that he helped to pioneer with In Cold Blood, where the author utilizes the tools of fiction writing, particularly conveying the interiority of characters (ie, their inner thoughts) based on the author's best guess of what they would have been. That's kind of the opposite of Bacon's practice.

And I still don't think it's a novel.

 

Blue Durham

September 8th, 2015 at 10:39 PM ^

"Creative nonfiction" to me is an oxymoron. No one but the author knows where the "nonfiction" ends and the "creative" begins. It could be postulated that all novels have some kind of element of nonfiction in it (it is all a matter of degrees and incrementalism), to the extent that someone could actually rationalize that the Dan Brown (as some do) and ultimately the Harry Potter novels are creative nonfiction. Or we could jump to the issue of what is actually "fact" versus interpretation, but there the issue is a difference in intent (with the author of "creative nonfiction" knowing and conceding that stuff is fabricated).

Blue_sophie

September 8th, 2015 at 10:51 PM ^

In the Q&A post I asked a somewhat pedantic question about his use of architecture as a literary trope: Is Brandon's house a metaphor for his leadership or are his architectural preferences and leadership methods both symptomatic of his personality in some way? Bacon is ambiguous on this point, which I think is a good thing! For me this architectural parallel was provocative and it drew me into the narrative; I don't need Bacon to be resolute (edit: I always need bacon to be resolute).

I agree. It is not a novel. 

charblue.

September 9th, 2015 at 11:34 AM ^

isn't a creation of Truman Capote alone. Other authors who have written in different genres have adapted historical context, settings, actual people and events to present their version of a good story. 

And perhaps one of the most effective novelists to adopt this style was EL Doctorow, author of Billy Bathgate and Ragtime, both of which became films, with Ragtime now being produced as a Broadway musical. 

Michael Sharra also adopted this style of writing to produce his Pulitzer winning novel, Killer Angels, which is better known as Gettysburg, the movie produced from it. Sharra, by the way, is also the author of For Love of the Game, a fictional account of a perfect game pitched by a Detroit Tiger pitcher who was played in the movie by Kevin Costner; one of the best baseball films ever made -- in my opinion. 

The use of this writing style gives an author the license to create within the confines of historical reference and journalistic record in order to fill in the blanks that a writer cannot otherwise offer his readers because he doesn't have the capability of exploring the intimate thoughts, knowledge and conversations of his subjects and characters. 

Whether you like this style of writing or not, it is less aggregious than claiming to write something autobiographical or historically accurate, and then discovering that it's not because the auhor invented certain parts of his story to better convey the story he is telling. 

RoxyMtnHiM

September 8th, 2015 at 10:08 PM ^

But I'm not a college instructor at very good university, or any university at all.

(You'd be surprised how often seemingly well-educated people make this same grammatical mistake, as with PE Guy above writing, "Having worked in this field for a long time, there are many companies that can benefit from authoritative, consensus breaking leadership like his." Having spoken English my whole life, I don't get it.)

RoxyMtnHiM

September 9th, 2015 at 8:52 AM ^

No, it's not. The implied subject is all fucked up. You seee this shit all the f'in time, from instructors at very good universities and on. 

JClay

September 8th, 2015 at 6:46 PM ^

I am glad you commented on the book being rushed which might have lead to the copy errors. I was stunned at the sheer number of misspelled words (take a drink every time it's spelled "Michingan") and sentences where words were clearly omitted. Not that any of that is Bacon's fault.



Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad

evenyoubrutus

September 8th, 2015 at 10:52 PM ^

Read "The Stand" by Stephen King. I think that book averages a copy error on seemingly every page (nearly 1,100 of them). My understanding is that King actually requested that his publisher not correct the errors when they rereleased it.

club_med

September 9th, 2015 at 12:30 AM ^

There's a ton. Even on a relatively quick read during flights this past weekend, my count got up to a dozen in the print version - everything from missing punctuation and spelling errors to repeated sentences.

Jgruss42

September 8th, 2015 at 6:49 PM ^

I can't read part of a book and put it down. I almost always have to read something straight through. There are a few exceptions (really long books, think GRRMartin), but generally I have to plan which books I am going to buy because once I start, I dont get to sleep.

It's a pretty ruthless compulsion of mine that I am not fond of.

While I usually try to plan out and schedule when I am going to read a book, I downloaded this one to the Nook launch day. The subsequent lack of sleep was totally worth it.

Kudos Mr. Bacon. Another job well done.

VicVal

September 8th, 2015 at 7:05 PM ^

I have had to remind myself, constantly, that throwing my kindle across the room is not the same as throwing a book across the room. The results would be suboptimal.

But I get so angry all over again, every time I read about the truly horrible and wretched and unforgiveably stupid stunts Brandon pulled.  And I get angry all over again at the search committee that signed off on his hire, after finding him the least qualified candidate. 

Yes, Messrs. Hackett and Harbaugh have already improved the tone and substance of the department.  Some of the damage, though, may never be repaired. Can never be repaired.

Sort of like my kindle, if I get overwhelmed again and throw it across the room after all.

True Blue in CO

September 8th, 2015 at 6:58 PM ^

Read over the weekend. While many of us lived the story through MGoBlog, the details of Brandon's decision making make me angry and sad at the same time. Hopefully the administration of the University of Michigan can learn from these lessons and never let one individual do this much damage ever again. Hope that Jim Hackett and his successors at AD can restore the spirit of family, teamwork, and open dialog within the Athletic Department. Great review and message for all of us and many others to read this fine work by Mr. Bacon.



Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad

bronxblue

September 8th, 2015 at 7:01 PM ^

It's a fine read and I've found most of it compelling, but my one complaint is that it reads at times like UM is naturally infallible and that they make bad decisions or have poor results due to some disturbance in the force of college athletics. I don't buy that completely, especially on the football front, given how bad multiple ADs have handled changes in the CFB landscape. Brandon was a bad hire and screwed over the program, but the decline we saw was longer in the works than when he showed up. He just made it more pronounced.

bronxblue

September 8th, 2015 at 9:26 PM ^

The PR blunders were bad, but UM's athletic department was breaking well before Brandon arrived; witness the debacle with the RR hiring and his first couple of years.  Hell, I was at UM when they had a halo around the stadium, and that was the last 90s.  The basketball team was downright unwatchable for a couple of years, and both Ellerbe and Amaker turned out to be mediocre-to-bad hires depending on who you talk to.  Those aren't on Brandon, and while I think he was a terrible AD overall, the whitewashing of some of the positives he did do (especially around here, where an echo chamber can kick in) isn't fair from an objectivity standpoint.  Brandon can hang himself on his own missteps, but he deserves credit for improvements to the facilities for non-revenue sports and some of the educational programs and resources made available to athletes.

My issue has more to do with Bacon (and others) sometimes unintentionally painting Brandon as a bad guy instead of just a bad AD.  I think he's a competent businessman who loved UM and tried his best; his best was just misdirected and failed.  I think the book does a better job at making that distinction, but he came into an AD with some lingering problems that he exasperated and also introduced some of his own; he didn't run roughshod over a pristine department.

UMgradMSUdad

September 8th, 2015 at 11:15 PM ^

That makes it sound almost like a form of extortion: let me interview you or else.  I'm guessing  that's not what you mean.  

And I get where bronxblue is coming from.  From the threads on this blog about the book, it seems almost as if it's a morality play with Brandon set up as a force for evil with no redeeming qualities or actions and he and his stooges are responsible for leaving Michigan athletics all but a wasteland.

gbdub

September 8th, 2015 at 11:57 PM ^

JUB apparently sent Brandon a summary of quotes / stories he intended to publish, and a list of questions, and asked Brandon if he wanted to give his side of the story.That's kind of the opposite of extortion. Naturally, someone who gives their own side is going to come off more sympathetic... Brandon was given that opportunity and chose to decline it. Should JUB NOT publish his verified, on-the-record material just because Brandon wouldn't play ball?

bronxblue

September 9th, 2015 at 6:49 AM ^

I'm not saying Brandon didn't come across as a jerk because he didn't get to have his say in a book; the dude had years at the helm of UM's AD and screwed it up in innumerable ways.  That speaks volumes over a couple of quotes.  And let's be honest - him and Bacon are not on good terms, and I'd be surprised if quotes Brandon used wouldn't be characterized in a certain context given the rest of the book.

My issue remains taht people act like Brandon was the cause of numerous athletic department issues, not a symptom.  And when that first characterization occurs, it becomes more a statement on Brandon the human being than the AD, and I don't think (a) that's fair, or (b) particularly relevant, as by all accounts Brandon loved UM and did great things in other capacities (regent, fund-raising, etc.).

Its me Dave

September 9th, 2015 at 8:56 AM ^

Brandon ceased to be a sympton of "numerous athletic department issues" on Sept 8, when he started the job of freaking Director of the freaking Athletic Department.  With that position comes authority and responsibility which immediately disallow any characterization of him as "victim" or "symptom".  He was literally in charge of the AD!

imafreak1

September 9th, 2015 at 1:31 PM ^

Do you not recall in 3 and Out when JUB basically said, without actually saying it so he could say he never said it, that Lloyd Carr was actively undermining RichRod and telling players to transfer? And JUB did this without a single attributed quote--except a widely reported quote from a friend of Ryan Mallett's about what Mallett had told him.

When questioned about this JUB would simply respond  that Carr had refused repeated requests to be interviewed for the book.

So. I think Seth has probably, potentially unintentionally, given you the correct impression.

bronxblue

September 9th, 2015 at 6:55 AM ^

That's true, but I thought that Martin came across more sympathetic both here and in 3-and-out (despite some bad decisions), and has generally been treated as a genial businessman. 

My point is that Brandon was a terrible AD, but at times the book read as a referendum on him as a person and characterized him almost as a cancer, a foreign body that the UM immune system finally cast out.  While I love UM and think it has a better-than-average AD system, this "UM will always find a way to be the best" smacks of whitewashing and excessive homerism. 

Ty Butterfield

September 8th, 2015 at 11:01 PM ^

I remember the halo around the stadium. Just awful. A few years ago my fiancee's uncle gave me a model of Michigan Stadium. It was really cool except it actually had the halo! I kept it because it is so bizarre and not a lot of people remember the halo. It is a great conversation starter.

leu2500

September 8th, 2015 at 11:41 PM ^

you intend to fire 100 of them, it's a little understandable if you come off as a bad guy. 

Brandon gets kudos for how he handles stretchgate, for giving Hagerup one more chance, the student-athletes like him, there's a regent who still speaks highly of him, and I think it's his secretary who thinks he's a good guy.   Its just that there is so much negative stuff that outweighs that. 

Brandon had multiple chances to provide input to the book, and chose not too. 

JamieH

September 9th, 2015 at 3:45 AM ^

was explained in the book as not even being from the Athletic Department.  Apparently that was the pet project of President Bollinger who had some massive hard-on for the architectural firm that created it for some ridiculous reason.   Goss just took all the blame for it.   Or so sayeth JUB. 

bronxblue

September 9th, 2015 at 7:11 AM ^

No, I understand the halo was foisted upon the Goss, but one could argue that a stronger AD would have stood up to Bollinger.  And again, Bollinger comes across as a jerk at UM by Bacon, though I've heard he's reasonably well-respected at Columbia and did some good things for the University as the president.  So, again, Bacon's book sometimes comes across as filled with tiny little axes he's grinding down while also telling a compelling story.

OlafThe5Star

September 9th, 2015 at 7:26 AM ^

I think it is even more pronounced than that. I think JUB loses a lot of credibility on taking every little piece of potential evidence, however tentative, and reading it in the worst possible light about DB.

DB was a pretty good CEO at Domino's. I once had a very senior partner (one of the four guys who ran the place) at Bain Capital tell me DB was his best CEO from a list of dozens of CEOs. JUB tried to take a bunch of business evidence and use it to portray DB as a moron pre-UM AD. In one example he cited the decline in the stock price. DB left in 2009 when the ENTIRE stock market was getting killed. Dominos was a highly levered entity, so it got worked over even more. And then many people give the credit for the pizza revamp to the subsequent CEO, when DB initiated it. All very sloppy, and, if you know enough to catch these things, damaging to JUB's credibility. The house naming thing is interesting and a little, let's say dorky instead of the more colorful terms that come to mind, but not that relevant, frankly. And then JUB just says that DB wanted to get involved with the alumni golf tourney, but doesn't say how (or, IIRC, his source) but says they just cancelled it and blames it on DB.

What I find confusing in all this is that there is so much GOOD (or even great) evidence that he was a terrible AD, why did JUB go outside his area of competent to try to paint DB as a bad AD? The book would have been better if he had been more balanced and just stuck to the obvious things that made him a bad AD. The bits about his focus on student athletes feels like a sop to those of us that wanted a well balanced view instead of a genuine attempt to review the pros and the cons.

DB was bad at being UM AD. JUB could have proved this without straining to include so much weak evidence.



Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad

sadeto

September 8th, 2015 at 7:07 PM ^

I understand the typos and other "common errors," but I have little tolerance for the uncited/unexplained references and assumptions of knowledge on the reader's part that really only apply to those who follow Michigan sports closely. This is true in the introductory chapters, is quite annoying and is the editor's fault. The book is a good read for anyone who follows college sports but there will be some minor confusion outside the fanbase. The book was clearly rushed, but that doesn't let the editor off the hook.

Michigan Arrogance

September 8th, 2015 at 7:48 PM ^

I assumed the target audiance was M fans. If not it could read as a very shallow history of M athletics in the 1st 20-25 chapters. I assume you can't have a no-page-limit situation for this kind of endevour.

 

As someone who has read every published (and some non-published) historical pieces on UM athletics, BLL was fine to me. I could see non-M fans could be confused by it tho

Moonlight Graham

September 8th, 2015 at 7:08 PM ^

When I read the title on my phone I thought it meant that JUB was a guest blogger for MGoBlog and reviewing his own book.

I'm looking forward to reading this and Falk's book, but I'll start with Falk's first. BLL isn't high on my list of ways I'd like to spend my free time, but I am curious to learn more about how Hoke failed and Hackett succeeded ... I really don't care much about Brandon.



Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad

Seth

September 8th, 2015 at 8:44 PM ^

That's next on my reading list. Or at least it's that or The Art of Smart Football which I'm halfway through. I also still owe everyone a review of the book by Rob Lytle's son, which I meant to read last year and then I just couldn't because it's still too soon. And Kryk's book, which I don't have a copy of yet. And The Game about the OSU-Michigan rivalry. And an MSU guy sent me a historical book about the M-MSU rivalry that I stopped reading because while the history seems solid the slant seems to be too whiny.

Year of Revenge II

September 8th, 2015 at 7:24 PM ^

Though I do not particularly care for what I consider to be a fairly workmanlike writing style without enough pizazz, Bacon is a superb journalist with a great story to tell, especially for any Michigan fan or alumnus.  

Bacon nailed the theme of the book---that the spirit of UM rose up to right a ship that was steered off the course of its main mission---to seek the truth---right on the head.  The metaphor was football, which unites UM fans and alumni worldwide, but the principle transcends mere football.  

I had the opportunity after Bacon's event in AA (visiting from Phoenix and staying for 1st home game) to have dinner, and then a drink afterwards, with three of the main players in the book, who are far too savvy to overly verbalize their disdain for Brandon should they have any (and how could they not?) . They were all very impressive people (my brother worked in AD), as I am sure Brandon was and is in his own misguided way.  

More impressive were the students, a dishwasher and his letterman friends, and of course, MGOBLOG, its leader, its staff, and its readers.  

It is in a way a very sad story, with redemption for the truth at the end.  Great Book.