Brandon's Lasting Lessons: A Review of 'Endzone' by John U. Bacon Comment Count

Seth

endzone_0

Since Brian is in the story, it (again) fell to me to write this site's official review of John U. Bacon's latest book, Endzone: The Rise, Fall and Return of Michigan Football.

We'll get the Amazonian recommendation bit out of the way first: You should read it. If you are a Michigan fan, you should read it. If you are a rival fan, you should read it. If you are part of any organization that has customers and/or employees, you should read it. If you are a fan of a college football team you should read it, then try to get your athletic director to read it. If you're a fan of Texas you should just throw copies of it at Steve Patterson. Except this hardcover is over 450 pages, so that might hurt him. Do not throw copies of this book at Steve Patterson. Read it.

Since you are reading MGoBlog right this minute, either you already own the book, are going to follow this link to buy the book (hardcover/kindle) right this second, or else you're just here because you heard we are a purveyor of Blake O'Neill photographs (here you go). If you're not done with the book yet, you are invited to leave this tab open and come back when you are, since this review is going to spoiler the hell out of it. I will give you the same bit of advice that Brian did when he handed it to me:

"This book is going to blow your mind."

[After the jump: We with the broken bits of brain matter and skull on the floor try to piece that back together long enough to find a theme. (Spoiler alert) Michigan contracts a disease, but its immune system wins]

Why Not Brandon's Lasting Lessons?

20899358858_2d43b2c851_z

John U. Bacon's unamused face [Eric Upchurch]

At the Literati release event at Rackham Auditorium last week somebody made a comment to me that Bacon doesn't really like it when we call the book "Brandon's Lasting Lessons." For the (probably) none of you who missed the reference, it's a play on Bacon's first hugely successful book, Bo's Lasting Lessons. The reason given for Bacon's attitude toward "BLL" was that this book isn't just about Dave Brandon.

That is true; David Brandon's administration at Michigan is only a part of a story that's really about the organism of Michigan. It is kind of a large part, though. Many tales of it are included. Like:

  • "Firing Fridays"
  • how we lost Notre Dame and how that led to the worst schedule ever
  • what he did to the tennis coach for seemingly no reason
  • what he did to the past lettermen and their traditions
  • the sharp contrast between how he treated student athlete Will Hagerup like a son, while treating the students' elected representatives like pariahs.

Had Brandon been the only real agent in this story, Bacon's book would be one more cautionary tale about empty suits. He's not, and it's not.*

This is Michigan's story, not Dave's. Bacon got some extraordinary people to go on the record about what the hell was going on in there. But the book also carefully autopsies every safeguard torn down that could have prevented one bad scion from setting the estate on fire. More importantly, it details the actions and motivations of student leaders, university leaders, thought leaders, and football captains in rescuing the enterprise from the flames.

Why Brandon's Lasting Lessons?

You remember November 2013, after the Iowa sludgefart, when the nature of Brandon was established, the trajectory of Hoke was manifest, and Brian said we are The Dude. Michigan was crumbling before our eyes. What could we do but yell "What the fuck, Walter?!" and metaphorically go bowling? The following week Devin Gardner tried, throwing the broken bits of his body against Ohio State in the single greatest performance by a Michigan athlete in history that no one will remember in ten years. He still lost, because one man is not enough. We literally went bowling.

The lasting lesson of Endzone is that one man can't do anything, but many can. There's student co-presidents Bobby Dishell and Michael Proppe, dismantling Hunter Lochmann's rationale for foisting general admission on the students. There's the professor who oversees M-Hacks, and multiple regents. There's Daily writer Alejandro Zuniga, who checked out the two Cokes deal, and Brian and Ace who checked out the emails, and all the readers who sent those in. There's the people who organized the Fire Brandon rally, and the alumni from various eras who pressured the school for change. There's new president Mark Schlissel, who walked into a crisis and did right, and Jim Hackett who stepped out of retirement "for God and Country." And of course there are the lettermen who organized and participated in a massive, coordinated grass roots effort to bring back Jim Harbaugh, for love. For MICHIGAN!

THIS is Michigan, fergdosakes

It is that ineffable thing that stars. Dave Brandon could not understand that what made Michigan "MICHIGAN" for over a century was far more than the world on the right side of his golden rope.

There's a contrast Bacon makes between Bo's Michigan and Brandon's. Brandon was "kicked off the team" by Bo. It happened to a lot of guys—Harbaugh twice—because this was one of Bo's Jedi mind tricks. The lesson was about love: you don't know how much Michigan means to you until it's suddenly taken away. The lesson Brandon took from it was "don't screw up even once, or you'll be on the other side of the rope."

In the courting of Harbaugh you start to get an appreciation for how far from the rope line the program truly extends, from a dishwasher at Pizza House to a renowned statistics professor, the state capitol, and several million alumni and fans who did something to right this ship.

So all jokes aside, Endzone really is Brandon's Lasting Lessons. Among the core Bacon books, Bo's Lasting Lessons is the heart, Three & Out is a spin-off, Fourth & Long a companion piece, and Endzone is the sequel. It shows the difference between trying to stage Bo's lasting lessons (e.g. getting a commitment from Hoke before talking money) and embodying them (e.g. Hackett's handshake agreement and its 8-hour ordeal).

It teaches that loyalty out of love is greater than loyalty out of fear and that either is a weak substitute for morality. It teaches that candor is virtue, that authenticity is recognizable, and that a person or a program's aspirations are every bit as important as their accomplishments.

It shows what Brandon did wrong, but also, to paraphrase Bacon's favorite Yost quote, how the "enthusiasm that makes it second nature for Michigan Men to spread the gospel of their university to the world's distant outposts" can also come back.

-----------------------------

*[If it was, the publisher would have had  time to fix the unfortunately common copy errors that were the tradeoff for having this in our hands before kickoff. Focusing on them does a disservice to the enormous amount of fact-checking and research and doubling back and "are you SURE you can share this?"-ing put into it.

As long as we're in the critic brackets I'll note that Bacon forgot Fred Jackson survived all the coaching changes, and I think almost all of the relevant decisions in Domino's "we acknowledge our pizza sucks and we're changing it" about-face occurred in the last half-year of Brandon's stewardship. That it had gotten so bad before an attempted about-face rings familiar anyway.]

[Update: So I learned today that "novel" means fiction.]

Comments

Roanman

September 8th, 2015 at 6:31 PM ^

Because it made me so mad about every three pages that I would put it down and walk away.

It is my expectation that I will pick up Endzone and will subsequently accomplish not one other thing until I have finished it.

fergusg

September 8th, 2015 at 7:04 PM ^

Having now finished the book, I think I have a fundamental different take away than JUB and Ace.

The problem wasn't Dave Brandon. In fact the one constant throughout the book was the consistency of approach and personality of Dave Brandon (arrogant, abrasive, insular, student-athlete focused, business orientated above everything else).

The problem was he was never the right person for the job. He is a CEO used to working with Private Equity companies to turn around underperforming companies.

Having worked in this field for a long time, there are many companies that can benefit from authoritative, consensus breaking leadership like his. But UM was never one of them. It didn't need a turn around CEO. It needed someone who could tweak things to incrementally improve while hanging onto the traditions that make UM what it is.

No, the blame for the recent fiasco lies not with DB, who did what he thought he was hired to do, but President Coleman and the Regents.

The Regents openly admit DB was 4/4 on the short list for the job, but they rubber stamped his appointment anyway. Is that the action of a Michigan Man?

Is President Coleman rough-riding her board and putting them in that position the action of a Michigan Man?

My answer to the last 2 questions are no. Dave was a terrible AD because he should never have been appointed AD in the first place.

Blame needs to be assigned appropriately in my opinion.

Blue_sophie

September 8th, 2015 at 7:37 PM ^

But as Bacon frequently points out (and as we saw played out with the Harbaugh hiring), it is ultimately the President's call to hire somebody. As Bacon describes it, Coleman convening  a search committee was mearly a legitimizing instrument for the inevitable Brandon hire—not unlike the farce of Hoke accepting the coaching job without discussing his salary.

Coleman was doing great things in all other facets of the university, and it would have knee-capped her at the end of her tenure for the Regents to push back against a candidate she was obviously going to push through to the bitter end. I can't really absolve them of all responsibility, but I can understand why they would go against their better instincts here.

I am definitely more puzzled as to why Coleman was so devoted to Dave. Her character and motivations are not closely explored in this book (which is fair given the in-depth analysis throughout the long volume as well as the fact that Coleman declined to be interviewed).

Michigan Arrogance

September 8th, 2015 at 7:42 PM ^

this is the major point that is missing in the book (no fault of Bacon;s - MSC declined comment). The Regents should have gone to MSC and said they wouldn't approve of that hiring. why more Regents didn't more strongly exhibit any pushback is beyond me.

I was really happy with MSC as president until the RR and DB hires (in hindsight).

 

Also that drunken speach at the stadium, WTF Mary Sue

M-Dog

September 10th, 2015 at 1:39 AM ^

And yet, Hackett has done great.  On paper, Hackett and Brandon look pretty similar.

You never know 100% what you are going to get in a new hire for a key position.  That's why you need checks and balances on the position itself, and the willingness to take corrective action if the hire gies south.

Nobody thought the Brandon hire was going to turn out the way it did.  There were no waving red flags when he showed up (no he did not have AD experience, but that is commonplace now and is not an automatic cause for alarm.  Hackett was not an AD either).  

Mgobowl

September 8th, 2015 at 11:33 PM ^

While reading DBLL I couldn't help but wonder if DB and MSC had some kind of extra-curricular relationship. It just makes no sense as to why she of all people would put blind faith in DB. MSC kicked ass while president in almost all areas except athletics, it just does not make sense.

08mms

September 8th, 2015 at 7:36 PM ^

I took away the exact same perspective.  DB by many accounts was not a bad Regent, and if anything his cardinal sin was, after losing the Regent's election, using his power and influence as a connected donor to have him placed into a position where he didn't belong.   We have plenty of influential doctors or businessmen as alumni, but if a non-acaemic b-school alumn or doctor that was on the Board of Regents lost their election and immediately tried to install themself as Dean of the Medical School or Ross, there would hell to pay.  By many accounts (and credit to John U. Bacon for emphazing them) he was a prototypical Michigan Man (smart driven confident guy with incredibly hard work ethic and deep loyalty to Michigan) and, for all of his sins, was able to at least acknowledge and focus on one of the true cores of college athletics that often gets overlooked (i.e., the lives and college experience of the actual athletes).  If Brandon would have stayed an important booster and fan, I think he'd be a much happier guy, the rest of us alumni would generally celebrate him as opposed to revile him, and (hopefully) the University would have hired someone qualified for his position. 

Seth

September 8th, 2015 at 9:05 PM ^

I think the book pretty solidly proves Brandon didn't do what he was hired to do, even if he was hired to be PE CEO of Michigan (he wasn't). Michigan just reported a $7 million budget shortfall as a result of fans abandoning ship last year. They gave away an astounding ASTOUNDING number of tickets for the later games last year. Brandon fired or chased half the athletic department then tripled its size, hiring worse people for far more money than those who'd been run off. He blew up to $millions on utterly ridiculous things like the video board, and the cell towers. He destroyed generations of goodwill, ruined football's relationship with several classes of now-alumni, and sank Michigan's bargaining position in the league because other ADs couldn't stand him. Revenues increased primarily because of things that he had no part in: the Big Ten Network and the opening of the Skyboxes. Anything he brought in chintzy naming rights and jacking up ticket prices was more than offset by drying the well. If he wasn't cut when he was--if he was allowed to oversee the next football hire or preserve Hoke, the disaster would have been even greater.

If this was a private company DB was preparing for its IPO it would be the Wall Street Journal's favorite cautionary tale. Brandon failed in a lot of ways, but as a CEO he was an indisputable disaster.

Cali Wolverine

September 8th, 2015 at 10:28 PM ^

Am I watching the return now?...was it supposed to start last week?...does it happen next week?...did it happen after we fired Brandon?...after we hired Harbaugh? I just can't stand the title, it seems like a very un-Bacon like title. Maybe after we beat Oregon State, My stubbornness will fade away, and I will sit down and read it.

club_med

September 9th, 2015 at 12:27 AM ^

That's a bit dismissive of Brandon's responsibility in this. He is not just some automaton that got plugged in to do one thing and one thing only. He shouldn't get a pass just because he is a "turnaround CEO." As someone who has deep connections to the university and supposed extensive business experience, he should be able to recognize when a particular approach isn't working, and either adjust it, find advisors to help him, or step aside to someone who is suited for it.

According to the book, he seemed to recognize those things at the end, but his hubris and egomania - the repeated references to "his reputation" and legacy - suggest that he wasn't able to recognize his own limitations in this role and pressed his connections to get the appointment, and other people who made the decisions shrugged and assumed it would work out. Plenty of blame to go around.

Yo_Blue

September 9th, 2015 at 8:03 AM ^

Is ANYONE giving DB a pass?  I haven't seen it yet.  There are explanations for why he did what he did.  There are warning signs that indicated what he would do.  People are recognizing these things but no one is giving him a pass for nearly sinking our athletic department.

club_med

September 9th, 2015 at 9:12 AM ^

The problem wasn't Dave Brandon. In fact the one constant throughout the book was the consistency of approach and personality of Dave Brandon (arrogant, abrasive, insular, student-athlete focused, business orientated above everything else).

This was from the comment I was replying to.

grumbler

September 9th, 2015 at 12:22 PM ^

That doesn't let Brandon off, it simply observes that he wasn't responsible for hiring an entirely inappropriate AD.  Brandon just brandoned.  Brandoning works when you need to tear down an organization and rebuild it, but it doesn't when you just want to tweak an organization.  Pit bulls are better at growling and snapping to defend a junkyard than they are at growling and snapping to defend a playground.  MSC brought a pit bull to defend a playground. Her decision, not the pit bull, was the problem.

True Blue Grit

September 9th, 2015 at 7:50 AM ^

I wouldn't let DB off that lightly.  Yes, he was ill-suited for the AD job and should never have been hired for it.  But that is no excuse for the shitty way he treated many subordinates, wrecked many long-standing Michigan traditions, put his reputation above most other more important goals, and showed no concern or respect for the vast numbers of students, fans, and supporters who enabled him to even have a job.  We can all agree that Rich Rod was a bad fit too.  But he was a good person IMO who genuinely cared about his players, coaches, and other people around him.  I can't say the same about DB, especially after reading this book.  

BlueCube

September 9th, 2015 at 9:55 PM ^

It was true that he was a different type of manager and, as someone else pointed out, that he was clearly not the best candidate. There were 3 people with Michigan backgrounds working in the athletic departments of other schools and doing well.

The one thing you can't forget no matter what is what ultimately sealed his fate. You can't tell people to find another team and say other nasty things late at night on twitter. This shows he had other character issues.

He had good points also like helping Hagerup.

He was definitely in over his head.

ElBictors

September 9th, 2015 at 12:13 PM ^

LOL, I came across my dusty copy of Three and Out while cleaning up my home office and the bookmark is on page 136.  I just stopped reading it and put it down.

Endzone is far more enjoyable a read, though I too have a few questions for Mr Bacon ...

1.  The Hoke hire ...and alleged disappointment that DB hadn't landed Harbaugh.  I heard from a very reliable source on the Stanford sideline for that Orange Bowl that Harbaugh informed UM he wasn't interested (to what extent he'd been shown any "love" seems at issue and I was told he was 'never offered') in the job and would almost certainly be the next coach of the 49'ers.  Michele Tafoya infamously shoved a mic in Harbaugh's face immediately after the game and asked about the MICHIGAN job to which Coach responded in very Harbaugh-like fashion and redirected Tafoya's attention to Andrew Luck and walked off...

2.  The different way in which Bill Martin is characterized from Three and Out to Endzone makes me wonder if some of what was immediately ascribed to Martin at the time, might in the end have been more circumstantial than anything.

 

And anyone who calls Bill Martin "Barnacle Bill" has obviously never met the man.

Maizen

September 8th, 2015 at 6:40 PM ^

The stories about all the firings where the toughest parts for me to read personally. So many families and lives affected by that. Then Brandon had the audacity to go on TV during the Shane Morris debacle and fire Brandon rally and say how all that circumstance was affecting his family. Hard to feel sorry for the guy.

Rabbit21

September 8th, 2015 at 7:05 PM ^

Private Equity firm went back to the well of someone who had worked in that capacity during a similar turnaround.  It doesn't make any sense to us, but for a PE firm finding someone who has worked in that kind of environment, done relatively okay at it and is willing to do so again(especially taking on a faded brand) is kind of difficult.  I don't know that Brandon was so much a hot commodity as a "guy who fits the list of criteria that we're looking for and didn't laugh in our face when we offered him the job."

Rabbit21

September 8th, 2015 at 7:02 PM ^

Plus a million on this, but living in the executive bubble like he does changes people and I am sure he really was hurt and concerned for his family while feeling like the people he had fired either A) deserved it or B) were given a chance to find something that suits them better.  It's the way a lot of turn and burn organizations like Private Equity work and I can see how that shaped his mindset.  

Drailok

September 9th, 2015 at 11:36 PM ^

I agree.

He treated the entire department as if it was a failing company facing its third bankruptcy. 

I remember coming across a story on this site about how he berated an employee for wearing a cheap suit.

All I could think about at that time, not knowing the employee, is that he has friends, family, maybe kids... and he has to go home & look at his wife or kids or mother & just feel like a total schmuck. I was also thinking that the guy probably wouldn't be employed much longer.