Uof〽️ #6

Submitted by lebriarjr on November 9th, 2021 at 9:31 PM

College Football Playoff 

Indy Pete - Go Blue

November 9th, 2021 at 9:39 PM ^

The entire announcement of the top 25 centered around the placement of Michigan and Michigan state before, during, and after all of the rankings were revealed. And I still get people taking shots at me saying that Michigan isn’t relevant! (granted the people taking shots at my team are very insecure IU and Purdue fans)

MaizeBlueA2

November 9th, 2021 at 9:38 PM ^

I've never heard anyone call the talking heads on ESPN "experts" except the people who want to throw shade at ESPN.  It's the strangest thing.

Literally no one in their right mind considers these guys experts, they're just former players with jobs.

You all sound like me when I was 7 and thought to be the President, you had to be the smartest person in the country. That's just not how it works.

MaizeBlueA2

November 9th, 2021 at 9:41 PM ^

Rece isn't anti-Michigan at all.  He's just pro-SEC (he's open about his alma mater, Bama).

Pollack is just a meathead type, just because you don't agree, doesn't mean he's a douche.

 

FACTS, if Michigan beat MSU and was behind them, this board would be going nuts.

Also FACTS, former LB types, are always going to have the "head-to-head" take. This board loves Chris Spielman, he would've said the EXACT same thing. It's just how those guys are built.

CWood2

November 9th, 2021 at 11:16 PM ^

The thing is, it may not be sorted out. I know it’s a long shot, but if Michigan and Michigan State win their last 3 games, it may come into play. But I guess at that point, MSU gets the nod to play in the Big 10 championship game. Long shot, I know, but it is possible both win out. 

outsidethebox

November 10th, 2021 at 7:50 AM ^

If Michigan and MSU both win out MSU is the #3 seed  and Michigan is the #4 seed in the CFP. It is interesting that this reality is sliding under the radar. 

The committee has, justifiably, built in protections/space to maneuver around the many different scenarios that will likely develop over the next month. The biggest question for them is what to do if Georgia beats Alabama-do they really drop Alabama to #5???...I think most likely all the way to an inconsequential #3   :(

This committee is not comprised of a bunch of dummies. Not only do they know football but they know how to work the system-because they are the system.

ak47

November 9th, 2021 at 11:41 PM ^

Imagine lacking the critical thinking skill to realize its logically consistent to argue head to head should be a tie breaker between two similar resumes but not an end all point. So comparing a team with three losses to the team they are the only loss for is a different situation than comparing teams with the same number of losses against a similar strength of schedule

Newton Gimmick

November 10th, 2021 at 12:17 AM ^

According to this system, if hypothetically Michigan had lost to Northwestern 49-0 then beat MSU 10-9, and the game was at home, with some clutch bad calls in their favor, they should still be ranked ahead of MSU? 

The "same number of losses + head-to-head" is just too simplistic -- though I get that casual fans are used to the AP ranking teams with that heuristic.  But schedules and performances can vary greatly and give us a lot of information beyond those two data points.

Qmatic

November 9th, 2021 at 9:35 PM ^

Wtf is up with Pollack? Dude is having a tantrum about us jumping Sparty. “Purdue is ranked now!” Yeah dude but they were a 5-3 team that never trailed to MSU and the committee knows Michigan is a better team.

The committee’s job is to find the best 4 teams.

NJblue2

November 9th, 2021 at 9:38 PM ^

The bitching was incredible, especially when Galloway of all people, ask him if he actually felt like MSU was better in that game. Ranking doesn't really mean shit since we all know it's about winning out and blowing up the Death Star, but still funny to see him get so upset.

Billy Seamonster

November 9th, 2021 at 10:06 PM ^

Does no one really get these guys are all paid to get ratings and thus gets money? The Michigan MSU thing was really the only issue for this show, so they argued about it. Pollock just took one way, Galloway the other and they argue. Same exact thing every other ESPN show is. Take everything they say with a grain of salt. It’s all to create argument, click, ratings. 

NittanyFan

November 9th, 2021 at 10:29 PM ^

Yep.  Next week they will find some other "controversy" and then bleat on for hours on end about that.

My prediction as to that "controversy?"  Oklahoma beats Baylor and jumps all the way to #4, because they now finally have a quality victory on their resume, on the road no less.

The week after that, it'll once again be something else (perhaps OSU jumping Oregon once they have a win over MSU on their resume). 

Et cetera until the end.