[Patrick Barron]

The Gray Plain Of Reasonable Expectations Comment Count

Brian October 3rd, 2022 at 1:37 PM

10/1/2022 – Michigan 27, Iowa 14 – 5-0, 2-0 Big Ten

On the podcast this week we had a conversation about whether we were nervous. At any point, in a game against Iowa at Kinnick, did we feel the cold hand of death creep over us? Answers varied, with the Sklar Brothers on team "disaster may befall us at any moment" but the rest of the podcast crew fairly relaxed, with the occasional twinge of worry.

In Alex's case this is easily explained: he is twenty-three and has not had time in which to develop a truly deep-seated mania. A rat exposed to weird mistreatment may recover if negative external stimulus is replaced with fluffy rabbits in time. Alex was five when the Long Dark started, and presumably was more interested in fire trucks and ninja-kicking his (hypothetical?) sister than contemplating why the universe was an Akron teenager's NCAA Football save.

When Alex says the universe is not that and is instead an ever-expanding void filled with the occasional particle; when he says that events are not shaped around causing maximum misery to people who attended school in a particular bucolic Midwestern city; when he says that there is not a malevolent entity wholeheartedly dedicated to causing myself and people like me unreasonable pain… well, that is the naïveté of youth speaking. Hopeless, bountiful optimism. He is a child skipping through a field of dandelions, oblivious to life's cruel realities.

It is only we, his elders and betters, who know that all events are twisted around a fiendish core dedicated to nothing other than our mental dissolution and eventual destruction. So the question is: what is wrong with Seth and I?

---------------------------------

The story of the last 20 years of being a Michigan fan is gradually getting the arrogance beaten out of you. I remember being in the stands for that Northwestern game against Darnell Autry and the rest of those guys, the Rose Bowl Northwestern team. Northwestern had the lead, and I was irritated, because it would look bad for the voters on Monday. Northwestern still had the lead later, and there was the slight twinge of concern that if Michigan didn't get their butts in gear that they could actually lose. Then they lost, and it was incomprehensible.

Somehow that incomprehensibility-in-the-moment lasted and lasted and lasted even though Michigan kept playing games like this against their purported lessers. They had a special kink for losing 18-point leads under Carr. Michigan State started being a thing. Ohio State stopped being a Jon Cooper joint. And even through all that you thought to yourself "surely, this one can't be like that. This is Michigan."

But when things flipped, things flipped. That perpetual wave of ignorant optimism was replaced by a belief that as soon as one thing went wrong the avalanche was loosed. This space called it the Black Pit of Negative Expectations after a particularly dispiriting season-opening loss to Notre Dame:

The BPONE is a state of mind in which no part of a football game is enjoyable because it is merely a prelude to some pratfall made more embarrassing and or painful by whatever minimal, temporary successes are experienced prior to the pratfall. Thus a kick return touchdown—that rarest butterfly, one the game is steadily trying to erase—during which your author's only reaction was internal and, I quote, "whoop-de-damn-do." …

The flaw in BPONE operations is of course the impossibility of mining any enjoyment out of your experience. BPONE sufferers assume a football game is a negative emotional event and spread those negative emotions out more broadly. Only if the team should actually come back and win will any regret be felt, and pffffffffft. I'm in the pit, baby! I know for a stone cold fact that a punt snap will somehow lodge itself in the facemask of the punter. I feel it in my bones that the one time we jump a route in this game the ensuing interception will bang off the defensive back's hands and lodge itself in the facemask of the opposition 50 yards downfield.

Every season started with a guillotine at the end of it; the previous eleven games were merely a Cardassian trial where we discovered what the crimes that justified the sentence were.

And then, last year.

--------------------------------------------

Turns out it only takes one counter-example to flip that switch back. Maybe not all the way to considering the rest of the Big Ten to be useless peons, but back to watching a football game with some level of rationality. Back to watching Michigan fumble it backwards to their own two and thinking "wow, good thing Donovan Edwards was paying attention" instead of "oh God, here it comes."

Maybe this has to do with the density of mistakes prior. Michigan opened this game with an immaculate 10-play touchdown drive against SP+'s #1 defense, and prior to that event the only reason they hadn't scored on a drive against that defense was an offensive lineman stepping on the quarterback's foot. (Another event that could have caused a reality-breaking cascade in different circumstances.) Goobery pratfall type events were limited to that and one (1) delay of game penalty.

It may in fact be rational to expect Michigan to soldier through one mistake or three, because they no longer feel like a rickety wagon held together by the odd five-star, but rather a team that goes about its business efficiently. This is college football, so that feeling is an illusion that may well get blown up by, like, Illinois or something. But when this happens I will be surprised again, at long last.

AWARDS

Known Friends and Trusted Agents Of The Week

52396931177_0a97028ab5_k

mmm flat person [Barron]

you're the man now, dog-2535ac8789d1b499[1]

#1 Mike Morris. An important part of a Michigan defense that strangled the Iowa ground game and despite limited opportunities turned in an eye-popping pass-rush line with two sacks and two QB hurries, three of them generated by beating blockers—just one stunt loop. A palpable blip as Michigan looks for organic pass rush in the back half of the season.

#2 Blake Corum. 29 carries, 133 yards, one All-American linebacker dusted and done on one of the few opportunities he had to do something without Iowa's passive umbrella of a defense coming down to prevent fancy long runs. Added to short-yardage/YAC reel considerably. Also caught a couple of passes.

#3 The offensive line. The steady drumbeat of advancement was made possible by Michigan controlling, and sometimes crumpling, a veteran, very good Iowa defensive line. Aside from a couple of what looked like Trente Jones missed assignments the pass protection was excellent, as well.

Honorable mention: Eyabi Okie was the other half of Michigan's obliterating pass rush on the four-and-out Iowa desperation drive; he also turned in a couple plays against the run earlier in the game. JJ McCarthy didn't put up big numbers but didn't put anything in harm's way and made the occasional capital-P Play. Mazi Smith, Kris Jenkins, and Mason Graham won pretty decisively against the Iowa IOL. Luke Schoonmaker was again Michigan's leading receiver and continued his string of excellent blocking performances.

KFaTAotW Standings.

(points: #1: 8, #2: 5, #3: 3, HMs one each. Ties result in somewhat arbitrary assignments.)

23: Blake Corum (#2 CSU, #2 Hawaii, HM UConn, #1 Maryland, #2 Iowa)
15: JJ McCarthy (#1 Hawaii, #2 UConn, HM Maryland, HM Iowa)
12: Mazi Smith (#1 CSU, T3 Hawaii, HM Maryland, HM Iowa)
11: Mike Morris (T3 Hawaii, HM Maryland, #1 Iowa)
10: Ronnie Bell (HM CSU, HM Hawaii, #1 UConn)
6: Gemon Green (HM UConn, T2 Maryland), Kris Jenkins (#3 UConn, T3 Hawaii, HM Iowa)
5: DJ Turner (T2 Maryland)
4: Junior Colson (#3 CSU, HM UConn)
3: Luke Schoonmaker (T3 Maryland, HM Iowa), The Offensive Line (#3 Iowa).
2: Roman Wilson (HM CSU, HM Hawaii), Max Bredeson (T3 Maryland), Joel Honigford (T3 Maryland), Eyabi Okie (HM CSU, HM Iowa), Mason Graham (HM Hawaii, HM Iowa)
1: Braiden McGregor (HM CSU), Derrick Moore (HM CSU), Jaylen Harrell (HM CSU), Rod Moore (HM CSU), Makari Paige (HM Hawaii), Rayshaun Benny (HM Hawaii), Cornelius Johnson (HM Hawaii), Donovan Edwards (HM Hawaii), AJ Henning (HM UConn),  Caden Kolesar (HM UConn), Mike Sainristil (HM Maryland), RJ Moten (HM Maryland).

Who's Got It Better Than Us(?) Of The Week

Michigan's first drive is a clockwork marvel of bending and then breaking the Iowa defense.

Honorable mention: Iowa's last meaningful drive is two sacks and two not-quite sacks. Blake Corum dusts Iowa's star MLB for a cherry-on-top touchdown.

image?MARCUS HALL EPIC DOUBLE BIRD OF THE WEEK.

A missed assignment from Jones gets McCarthy lit up and causes a backward pass that 1) is Iowa's most threatening play of the game at that point and 2) sets up a failed drive and short punt that puts Iowa on the field in plus territory and sets up the touchdown drive that puts us in too-close-to-gloat territory.

Honorable mention: Zinter steps on McCarthy's foot to hamstring Michigan's second drive. Caden Kolesar gets hurt covering a punt. Mike Sainristil gets lost on third and twenty-two.

[After THE JUMP: methodical]
 

OFFENSE

52397941778_bdb8002e77_k

made a play [Barron]

Obligatory McCarthy fretting/hope/overanalysis. I mean… pretty good, right? Iowa asked Michigan to drive the field most of the game and McCarthy said "ok." They did not have a drive shorter than eight plays until there were five minutes left in the third quarter, at which point going maximum turtle was 1) wildly frustrating and 2) indisputably the correct approach. McCarthy did not put a single pass in a spot where an Iowa defender could deflect it, let alone intercept it. His biggest sins were missing Wilson by a yard on the one deep shot they took and being a hair late on a couple of throws.

He was able to make up for the lateness on the first drive by throwing a quasi-back-shoulder pass to Wilson…

…and the results of the second late throw weren't horrible. Luke Schoonmaker took a hit from a safety as the ball arrived and it was incomplete. No Iowa player touched it.

When McCarthy did get pressure he had one instance where he avoided it and improvised a touchdown and a second where he got annihilated and ended up throwing a backwards pass. The latter instance was obviously very damaging but I don't know if there was anything he could have done better there. His arm was going forward so if the ball doesn't actually go backwards it's incomplete, and he's coming off a read opposite the DE who is crunching him unblocked.

Bend but don't break. Iowa took this maxim to the extreme in this game. If you were baffled at the ease at which Michigan ripped off good—but never great—gains, look no further than Iowa's formations. Until circumstances demanded it in the second half Iowa vastly preferred letting Michigan run against even boxes. This is a five man box on second and six on Michigan's opening drive:

In the circumstances Michigan just had to get stalemates along the OL and provide one crack anywhere, because there was no free hitter.

52398760023_3f2722b94d_k

OOB [Barron]

McCarthy bubble wrapped. There were three incidents in this game where McCarthy had the ball in his hands with a run in the offing. Two saw him prioritize getting out of bounds to a seemingly ludicrous extent and the third was the speed option everyone hated. Here's the first McCarthy run event in an image:

image

This ended up going outside of Luke Schoonmaker. Michigan got six yards. If McCarthy runs straight upfield they're getting at least double that and maybe more because McCarthy is going direct to the safety who is the last line of defense. 

Meanwhile, that speed option:

image

Look at the inclination of the MLB. He is tearing right for the running back, and the whole Iowa defense is out there. If you actually option this guy this play is "cash money," as the kids say. McCarthy does not attempt to draw in or fool the MLB at all. One of two things is true: 1) this is not a real option and is therefore a terrible play and RPS –3, or 2) McCarthy is supposed to fake this pitch and then go direct to safety.

This inevitably descends into philosophical debates about whether you should expose your quarterback to hits. Some people want to put McCarthy in bubble wrap until the Ohio State game. I don't. This is the first half of a game against a real team and a great defense. The leverage of this play is huge—put up another TD on this drive and you're a long way towards winning. And if you really insist on safety first your QB can get down before the safety gets to him.

Combined with a couple of missed reads against Maryland this feels like McCarthy is being coached to not expose himself to a tackle instead of coached to make the right decision. On one level this makes some sense, but on another level Blake Corum is probably just as critical to the season and he has 59 carries the past two weeks.

Ruck time. Yes I expect to be struck down by the malevolent entities mentioned above the fold whenever I reference this but I mean woot woot all aboard the Hart but fast train:

Blake Corum spent the offseason squatting until he went through rhabdo and came out the other side.

52397705193_d6cfa6d7e7_k

[Barron]

Backstreet's back all right. Michigan's yo-yo end around from the Hawaii game reappeared to get Bell the first touchdown of the day, and Lord was that easy:

It looks like power, you're obviously keying on split flow from the tight end, and then your eyes go to which OL is coming out on you as Schoonmaker goes zip-zap-zonk out the other side. Delectable.

One ping only. Michigan took very few shots downfield largely because they didn't have to. I did enjoy the one hole shot taken by McCarthy:

52397877225_9db277c0aa_k (1)

[Barron]

Not sure his fake to the flat did a whole lot to confuse the Iowa cornerback but he laid that in perfectly. Big chunk play to the field, on a line, in the right spot to keep things away from the zone. Yee-haw.

DEFENSE

52397751117_9dfd73b106_k

[Barron]

Things were done. This is not the end of the world. Iowa's offense is so bad that it is somewhat legitimate to question whether seven points off a short field before garbage time qualifies as an acceptable performance. Every time Spencer Petras hit a tight end or Iowa managed to rip off a chunk it felt disproportionately bad.

I am of two minds here. One is that no football team without a Artur Sitkowski-level disaster at quarterback is actually as bad at offense as Iowa's first few games implied. (Say what you want about Petras, but he's nowhere close to a worst-case scenario.) I mention this on the Friday podcast: Iowa will get some things, they will move the ball a bit, it is a football game.

The flipside is that this was a game that seemed to expose at least one hole in the defense, and maybe a couple more. It seems clear this is not the kind of D that is going to throttle the opposition. It has some pieces, it does not have a single dominant player who can clean up for a lot of messes elsewhere.

Eyes emoji. Iowa spent the whole game doing Iowa things, which means avoiding obvious dropbacks as much as possible. As soon as they got forced into obvious dropbacks, Michigan got two sacks and two near-sacks. The second sack was wild because Eyabi Okie is lined up in an insanely wide spot presnap and dips around the corner like peak Uche:

Ok. Expectations have been revised upwards. Okie also made a couple plays against the run here and seems like the guy out of the McGregor/Okie/Moore trio who's emerging fastest, despite being the oldest guy.

The bracket. Michigan did a great job of anticipating throws to LaPorta and deleting them. Iowa's first third down saw Eyabi Okie drop into a passing lane for a quick out; later Makari Paige jumped an in route to disrupt any chance of a conversion. You kind of feel for Petras here as he has five guys in this route and approximately zero of them are open:

Also Mazi Smith runs him over. That is high on my list of things to avoid in 2022.

52398714948_3664ef1f07_k

Petras missed a chunk play here with Colson way out of the picture [Barron]

In the middle. I think we've got enough evidence to declare the linebacker level a problem. Junior Colson, the one clear starter, had a rough game. That chunk hit to the TE was Colson sucking up on not-at-all convincing play action and then covering grass instead of a player:

MLB #25

Colson was also the most likely culprit on the chunk play to the fullback out of the backfield. He then got lost on the drag route that got Iowa inside the ten but got bailed out by a personal foul.

Meanwhile waggle frustrations were spread out across the LB corps and often resulted in that little flat route being a good option. Barrett, Colson, and Mullings were alternately victimized.

Our perfect position-switch punctured. Mike Sainristil had a bit of a rough outing. It's very strange that he was completely fine covering Rakim Jarrett but had a couple issues dealing with Iowa's wide receivers, most notably on the third and twenty-two that got converted:

Woof, gotta know where your help is.

52398506574_f0c9cb0f08_k

hiccups at the safety level too [Barron]

Not a linebacker. RJ Moten had a number of issues in run support; he got stuck in the endzone on the first Iowa TD instead of coming up to contain the edge, and on the subsequent Iowa drive he buried himself in the LOS instead of waiting for the Iowa RB to pick a gap, allowing the Hawkeyes to convert third and seven on the ground. In his defense on the second, he is not a linebacker.

Argh, almost. Another key moment that didn't quite go Michigan's way: DJ Turner jumps an out route and is this close to a pick-six, but alas. That was actually trap coverage, a Don Brown favorite that looks like man until you try to hit that exact route against it and get it jumped.

In which I offer a tepid defense of Brian Ferentz. I know, I know, but: that fourth and two play everyone derided for being short of the sticks would have converted and probably scored if Petras hadn't turfed a throw in the flat. Still would have come back for OPI, about which more later, but hitting your best player two yards downfield on fourth and two is not the worst idea in the world. It's just that Petras is not good and is bad. Those are the two things that are the problem on that play.

SPECIAL TEAMS

Oddly for a Michigan-Iowa game, not consequential. Tory Taylor outdid Brad Robbins in gross yardage but put a punt in the endzone and gave back some of that advantage on a 13-yard AJ Henning return—pretty close to a push. Moody hit both his field goals from reasonable range. Kickoffs didn't matter. The end.

MISCELLANEOUS

Obligatory photo of an Iowa fan stanning the punter. This has a Hawkeye logo on it! It is official merchandise!

52396697007_cbfbd8138e_k

[Barron]

WHAT ARE YOU DOING BRIAN (NOT THE COMPETENT BRIAN (WHO, TO BE CLEAR, IS ME))? Iowa's whiz-bang trick play in this one was a fake kneel(?) at the end of the first half that gained seven yards:

The Mathlete pointed out that Tulane managed to get a field goal out of a fake kneel in 2019, but that play 1) came with 18 seconds on the clock, and 2) was something other than a general slodge towards the first down sticks.

52397207781_07cc47c727_k

get flagged you boner [Barron]

An officiating evaluation. There were a large number of critical calls in this game, and Joel Klatt made them a talking point. After going over things:

  • Holding on Rod Moore for watching a guy fall down. Refs –2. Outrageous! Not that big of a deal since Iowa punted shortly thereafter.
  • Holding brings back a long Iowa zone stretch run. My brother in Christ, you had your arms on the outside of Rayshaun Benny's shoulder pads as he lunged at the ballcarrier, barely missing him. Eat a bag of flags.
  • That clipping call. Uhhhhh, refs +3.
  • Pass interference on the Bell slant. Obvious. Dude had both arms wrapped around the receiver. Klatt owes us all an abject apology. Repent, sinner!
  • Personal foul on OL burying Mike Sainristil. Ball is gone downfield and that OL rode Sainristil about ten yards across the field before jumping on him as the WR was being tackled near the goal line. Really looked like the back judge was yelling at said OL to stop. Frustrating for Iowa since it was irrelevant to the outcome of the play. Still probably correct?
  • OPI on the fourth down. Extremely tenuous. The WR is shoving the DB back but the DB is engaged with him, does he not have a right to fight through that? He didn't even impact the play.

The clip was real bad. Other than that, things seemed about even.

About the turtling. Michigan plays by drive: 11, 8, 13, 13, 10, 3, 3, 3, 3. The first three and out was the fumble and short punt, so when Michigan got the ball back it was 20-7 at the beginning of the fourth quarter. Iowa showed pure zero coverage on third and one and stuffed Blake Corum on short yardage. Running directly into the teeth of the defense was probably the right call, even if the way it played out was extremely frustrating. Iowa was not going to drive the field twice in that amount of time. Sometimes Lloydball is the right way to play—when your opponent is terrible on offense. I sincerely hope we don't see the same approach the rest of the year, though.

HERE

GIFs:

Best and Worst:

Michigan’s win probability never dropped below 91% in the second half because even when Iowa did score they had still ceded 20 points and nearly 300 yards of total offense.  Iowa’s offensive “explosion” relied heavily on Petras completing a 28-yard throw in 3rd-and-22 that required a UM defender to fall down 4 yard before the sticks, a 34-yard completion to Luke Lachey as Junior Colson was draped over him, a 9-yard run on 3rd-and-6 that required 3 broken tackles including both DTs, and various other chicanery.  That isn’t to say Iowa didn’t perform well during those drives but it looked like a phenomenon we’ve seen especially playing West division teams wherein they are inefficient holistically on offense but can bunch together their bouts of productivity to maximal effect – latter years Paul Crist Wisconsin jumps to mind.  On the day Iowa had 11 plays that went over 9 yards from scrimmage…and 5 of them occurred during that briefly-annoying stretch in the 4th quarter and 3 more occurred on the utterly meaningless last TD drive.

State of our Open Threads:

Overall, there were 136 fucks given, which is down somewhat from the 153 given against Maryland. Last year, the second conference game was Wisconsin, and fucks given actually increased from 176 against Rutgers to 190 that week, so it's a reversal of last season's trend so far, although two data points isn't exactly a trend (the season is short, however, so be fair, right?). There were also 93 shits given, down from Maryland's 118, which is also a reversal of what happened from the first to second conference game last year.

It is interesting to note that these have trended with each other so far, in a way that they really haven't in the past, now that I think about it, although I should probably go through the historical data to confirm that suspicion.

Comments

gbdub

October 3rd, 2022 at 9:18 PM ^

Were you not a fan yet in 2011 or 2016? That’s the only way I can imagine you weren’t feeling a little twinge of concern with Iowa running plays inside the 10. 

Not saying it’s rational, but Michigan has absolutely pissed away better positions against worse teams and turned them into losses.

AWAS

October 3rd, 2022 at 3:45 PM ^

Michigan owned both sides of the line of scrimmage.  Decisively.  I'm hard pressed to think of a game where there was line domination and anyone yacked up a victory.  It's the one area where all the adjustments in the world won't stem the tide.  This game was over after Michigan's first possession of the second half.

gbdub

October 3rd, 2022 at 4:12 PM ^

It would not have been out of character, no. Or if not “full turtle” then maybe the “run run incomplete punt” that we actually got on Michigan’s possession. Coaches seemed spooked by the JJ fumble. Or even just “Iowa plays good defense and Michigan goes first down and out”. 

Iowa scores there and it feels like a pretty good chance Iowa is going to have a possession with a chance to take the lead late. 

the Bray

October 3rd, 2022 at 4:22 PM ^

The turfed thrown on 4th and 2 was snapped with 5:45 left in the 4th (and Iowa only had 2 TOs left).

Had they converted and eventually scored - it was not 20-14 with half a quarter or 8 minutes to play... closer to 5 at that point. With Iowa's offense, 3 minutes is a big deal.

Hannibal.

October 3rd, 2022 at 2:32 PM ^

It's probably going to take me at least five years of sustained success for me to take a few steps away from the edge of the BPONE.  At least a couple more victories over OSU in the next half decade, a B1G championship or two, and a couple of big bowl wins is what it will take for me to spend hope and enthusiasm on the program again.  20 years ago I would have been really excited watching Michigan march down the field against Iowa's defense.  Yesterday I kinda just shrugged my shoulders.  

Last year was hugely theraputic in this regard, although we did still manage to blow a 16 point lead to MSU -- in retrospect, that cost us a chance to play Cincy in the semifinal and appear in the NC game.  The win over OSU was huge but so was the win at Wisconsin.  This year appears to have opened the conference season with the same pattern -- piss poor victory in Game #4, followed by a decisive win in Game #5 in a place that is historically really tough for us to play in.

Good win overall.  We should be very heavily favored in every game before OSU, other than Penn State.  This might be our easiest schedule since I have been following Michigan football.  I'm wracking my brain and I can't really think of an easier one.  

patrickdolan

October 3rd, 2022 at 2:33 PM ^

There a ton of UM fans in my section. Shoutout to the guy behind me who said, “He’s got him, throw it,” just before McCarthy hit Edwards in the end zone and, “Jesus, he smoked him,” after Okie hit Petras on the fourth down play.

We were just above where the DL was after that sequence. They were a happy group of guys.

In other news, Hy Vee was nearly out of Vernors yesterday. A lot of people made the drive, I guess.

CincyBlue

October 3rd, 2022 at 2:34 PM ^

Sorry the double bird of the week, is the 3rd and 22 conversion on Sainristil to the 1 yard line to set up Iowa's first TD.   That play could have changed the game.

Z

October 3rd, 2022 at 2:41 PM ^

His arm was going forward so if the ball doesn't actually go backwards it's incomplete
 

ok I'm coming in again for my negs to stand on a soap box and say this shouldn't have been called a fumble.

from the nfl rule book:

(a) If the passer is attempting to throw a forward pass, but contact by an opponent materially affects him, causing the ball to go backward, it is a forward pass, regardless of where the ball strikes the ground, a player, an official, or anything else

on this play his arm was coming forward (as Brian said) and before JJ is hit the arm is pointing in the direction of Edwards 4 yards upfield.

unless the college rule is different (I didn't spend a lot of time trying to find the ncaa rule) this should have been called an incomplete pass even though the ball traveled backwards.

UPDATE: ncaa rule book says the same thing

b. When a Team A player is holding the ball to pass it forward toward the neutral zone, any intentional forward movement of the passer’s hand with the ball firmly in their control starts the forward pass unless the player clearly starts to bring the ball back with firm control to the passer’s body. If a Team B player contacts the passer or ball after  forward movement begins and the ball leaves the passer’s hand, a forward pass is ruled regardless of where the ball strikes the ground or a player (A.R. 2-19-2-I).

umfan83

October 3rd, 2022 at 2:43 PM ^

RE: JJ bubble wrap

I don't want to put JJ in bubble wrap at all, but I also think its fair to want to limit the number of times he is hit until Cade is healthy.  QB depth is there but I'd still prefer to not have to go to Warren mid-game if we can avoid it.

Yinka Double Dare

October 3rd, 2022 at 2:53 PM ^

The OPI was a classic "you didn't even pretend to try to run a route, you were blocking all the way" call on a pass that was past the line of scrimmage. Totally valid. 

"and on the subsequent Iowa drive he buried himself in the LOS instead of waiting for the Iowa RB to pick a gap, allowing the Hawkeyes to convert third and seven on the ground. In his defense on the second, he is not a linebacker."

I just watched former Alabama star Eddie Jackson do the same goddamned thing Sunday, so pass to Moten.

Carpetbagger

October 3rd, 2022 at 4:25 PM ^

Linebacking is hard. Moten isn't one, but he's playing like one on this play.

Colson making 5 or 6 mistakes we all see and lament is normal for even the best linebackers. We don't notice the 20 times he made the right play, or had the athleticism to make himself right. He had a bad game to us because the significant events were small and he was a large part of them.

I think they've all been fine so far this year given the lack of experience.

Lou MacAdoo

October 3rd, 2022 at 2:56 PM ^

What an awesome summary. So damn good that I was laughing aloud in the office. Thank you for perfectly stating the way I felt for 15 years and the bizarre way it went away after one successful season. Now when will Buckeye fans have to go through that? Did they already serve their time in the early 1900's and have a pass for this century?

MadMatt

October 3rd, 2022 at 3:02 PM ^

Only one teeny little complaint: WT actual F with NHG?! We're over one third of the way through the season; our best LB hasn't played a down; LB is the only clear weakness on the defense, and we've heard less than nothing about his status!

I'm all for protecting his privacy and leaving the opposition guessing, but the staff really should say something, in vague and general terms, about what's the issue and a rough guesstimate of when they think he'll play.

Engin77

October 3rd, 2022 at 3:03 PM ^

"losing 18-point leads"

I thought I was the only person who can be uncomfortable with a 28-10 lead before halftime.  But lost games in West Lafayette and Chicago left a mark.

Nice writeup!

M-Dog

October 3rd, 2022 at 3:03 PM ^

Please, please, please stop running from under center unless it is 3rd or 4th and very short.

It is not effective and the offense knows exactly what we are going to do.

It looks like one of those things where us fans start to think that Michigan is playing the long con and will throw deep on a flea flicker from that against Ohio State . . . but no, it just turns out to be a bad play call that Harbaugh has a blind spot about.

Watching From Afar

October 3rd, 2022 at 3:06 PM ^

Iowa showed pure zero coverage on third and one and stuffed Blake Corum on short yardage. Running directly into the teeth of the defense was probably the right call, even if the way it played out was extremely frustrating. Iowa was not going to drive the field twice in that amount of time. Sometimes Lloydball is the right way to play—when your opponent is terrible on offense. I sincerely hope we don't see the same approach the rest of the year, though.

There's a difference between running plays and actively trying to burn clock. You don't need to pull out a PA or a wacky triple option given that defensive alignment. BUT, walking up to the line and seeing that defense lined up and going "yeah, this is fine" is just... bad. It's bad. It's like last year when they would run up on 3rd/4th and short and run the no read zone read with the DE coming down hair on fire to hit Haskins 2 yards in the backfield (which he dragged forward 3 yards more often than not). Or the PSU 4th down play where the right side of the OL was outnumbered by like 2 guys and Haskins lost yards.

That's what's frustrating about that whole thing. You're essentially coming to the line with a 2% chance of success and saying "whatever, we'll just run it and punt." Not every play will be successful, but that situation required the entire OL and 2 TEs to win their block and even then it might not have worked.

Beaublue

October 3rd, 2022 at 3:52 PM ^

Disagree with your disagreement.

Iowa had not shown the ability to stop Corum on third and short from their base defense.

The play in question had Iowa in a 10 man front with the lone safety only a few yards back.

I don't have a problem with running but for Pete's sake do something other than blast your way into a wall.   You have an athletic QB try a QB bootleg against that front.  

gbdub

October 3rd, 2022 at 4:20 PM ^

Then take a knee and avoid even the chance of fumbling the handoff if you’re that scared of your own ability to execute. If you’re going to run a play, run a play with a real chance. 

Hell, even Brian Ferentz was bolder on 3rd and 1 and ran the little pass to the fullback that busted pretty big. 

King Tot

October 3rd, 2022 at 5:05 PM ^

This makes sense if:

A) we were not playing Iowa

B) you think Corum's running ability is equivalent to a QB kneel.

Corum had already converted multiple short yardage plays that game and housed one against Maryland last week. Iowa was not a serious threat to mount a comeback without making a mistake. Put the ball in your best players hand and let him try to make something happen. If not you punt to a hapless Iowa offense with more clock burned. 

The fact that you are praising Ferentz playcalling versus ours says a lot.

gbdub

October 3rd, 2022 at 9:33 PM ^

You seem to be actively trying to misunderstand what I’m saying. 

As the poster above said, “a Corum run” is not the same as “a Corum run straight into a 10 man line without even a hint of threatening anything else”.

“The fact that you are praising Ferentz playcalling versus ours says a lot.”

Don’t be an ass. I said that even Ferentz called a more creative play in a short yardage scenario. As in, I’m shocked and annoyed that IN THAT ONE PARTICULAR SCENARIO, the coaches got outschemed by Brian Ferentz. That you would take this as “praise” of Ferentz let alone imply that I think that they got out coached for the whole game is just trolling. 

King Tot

October 4th, 2022 at 7:34 AM ^

I would say comparing the play calling of a team on the road against a great defense/inept offense with a huge lead and the best RB in America versus coach who has to convert on 3rd and 1 to survive the game is equally being an ass. Situations are completely different. 

We didn't need to convert and Corum has proven capable of of converting in similar situations linked below. I am ok being risk adverse when turning it over is the only way your opponent comes back. If this was PSU or OSU I would be crying about this call too.

Watching From Afar

October 3rd, 2022 at 5:24 PM ^

As pointed out by others, that play was not a normal run against the base Iowa defense that has 2 deep safeties all day because a pass might be thrown. Iowa had 9 guys in the box, 8 of them on the LoS, essentially every gap was accounted for and then there was the free LB to follow Corum. Michigan had 7 blockers. You're not going to win that play with any regularity.

It would be like lining up for a 60 yard FG with Moody. Could he make it? Yeah, maybe. He's hit 55 yarders before that might have been good from 60. But this time you line up and there's a 25mph wind in his face. Maybe don't let him kick that? The chances of him making it are near 0 given the actual situation so don't be an idiot.

King Tot

October 3rd, 2022 at 6:36 PM ^

Iowa showed pure zero coverage on third and one and stuffed Blake Corum on short yardage. Running directly into the teeth of the defense was probably the right call, even if the way it played out was extremely frustrating. Iowa was not going to drive the field twice in that amount of time. Sometimes Lloydball is the right way to play—when your opponent is terrible on offense.

From this very article you are commenting on.

I could also clip multiple 3rd and 1s against loaded fronts Corum has already converted. 

Watching From Afar

October 3rd, 2022 at 9:25 PM ^

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RLhafQLvqFk

3rd & 1 (4:41) on the first drive at the Iowa 27 - Iowa had 2 deep Safeties and an 2 CBs away from the play on the edge of the formations.

3rd & 3 (24:37) at the Iowa 35 - LB pulled out of the box to cover the slot, a deep Safety, and a 5 man front. Didn't get it.

4th & 1 (25:29) at the Iowa 33 - loaded box but still only a 5 man front with 5 other defenders off the LoS at least 4 yards and Michigan matched numbers in the box going tight. They didn't split out a WR.

3rd & 4 (27:31) at the Iowa 24 - 4 man DL with a deep safety and CBs out covering WR.

I could go on. The point is not all loaded boxes are created equal. Going with a defender in every gap at the LoS with no deep safety is not the same thing as going 4-3 with a Safety in the box. Michigan came out and faced a brick wall and said screw it, we'll run into a brick wall.

 

King Tot

October 4th, 2022 at 7:27 AM ^

https://youtu.be/8Jh22IhQfH4

Corum runs for a TD against a loaded box

https://youtu.be/tp0deEK6T18

Corum converts into a loaded box.

And before you say Maryland is different than Iowa that is EXACTLY my point. You play the opponent. You do not need to risk anything (especially when that is the only way you lose this game) and Corum has proven to convert on loaded boxes. 

 

WolverineHistorian

October 3rd, 2022 at 3:11 PM ^

The turn the corner touchdown throw on the run by McCarthy to Donovan Edwards was a classic Harbaugh move when he was our QB in the 80’s.  He did that 2-3 times a game, always throwing right at the LOS.  That was really awesome.

I’m still very happy about this win.  We were up 20-0 when the majority of the Kinnick voodoo tried to show itself.  A little nerve wrecking for a bit but got the very satisfying W.  

mgobaran

October 3rd, 2022 at 3:28 PM ^

Watched until we got up 20-0 then had to go to a wedding. Felt like an insurmountable lead, and ended up being one. Saw the final score and was somewhat baffled to hear Michigan fans were at all worried during the game. Then I found out 7 of those points we're essentially garbage time...

A multi-score road win by Michigan over the Hawkeyes at Kinnick hasn't happened in Alex's lifetime; so we should be pumped up about that damn game! Bring on the Hoosiers!

Nickel

October 3rd, 2022 at 3:42 PM ^

Felt about the same. After seeing two drives it was clear Iowa had no sustainable path to putting up two scores barring one of those bizarro 6 interception type of games. Just a matter of running out the clock after that.

Beaublue

October 3rd, 2022 at 3:43 PM ^

Of course there was some reason to be worried as the 3rd quarter transitioned into the 4th.   IIRC we were up 20-7 when Michigan went for the turtle and now Iowa has the ball back and driving.   

Were you not worried when Iowa gets inside of our 10 yard line and is now 4th and 2?   A TD now makes the score 20-14 early in the 4th.    Don't know why you wouldn't be a little worried at that point in the game. 

J. Redux

October 3rd, 2022 at 3:55 PM ^

No, I was not, and I was sitting in the stands not only for this game but also in 2016.  If they had gone three-and-out again, and Iowa had been able to move the ball again, then I would have gotten worried around the 40 yard line.  Never happened, so I never worried. (And I was more worried than most pre-game.  As I said, I was there in 2016).

treetown

October 3rd, 2022 at 3:54 PM ^

Great entry!

Michigan played as expected - JJ McCarthy played well - good enough to win but wasn't the next GOAT which is what we should expect for him. No turnovers - close but nope.

Blake Corum was amazing and more than met expectations - he needs to get some rest - hope to see Edwards and a appropriated chastised CJ Stokes who must be have been carrying a football everywhere for the past 10 days (do they still do that? Or has Mike Hart got some new method)

The defense prevented any big plays and like a NFL defense didn't care how many yards were gotten here and there if few points resulted.

Iowa gets and deserves a lot of stick for their offense but really the game plan was sound. The longer the game is played the more the superior skill of the Wolverines will have a chance to break through. The key was to keep the game tight and reduce it down to one or two possessions and had that backward throw resulted in a scoop and score - making it 20-14 that would have been a nearly ideal circumstance.