WIS v UM: Every year thru 2021

Submitted by skegemogpoint on

Badgers on UM schedule every year from 2015-2021. Can someone explain this to me? The imbalance of the BigTen divisions is a farce but it's exacerbated by our ongoing games versus Wisconsin. 

Its hard for me to believe this kind of chicanery would go down with a strong leader/advocate at the helm, like Don Canham. 

Moisturize

July 28th, 2018 at 11:12 AM ^

Parity based scheduling.  Every East team was matched up (based on historical record) with a West counterpart.  Those teams would meet 4 times in a six year stretch.  The other 2 was just a cycling phenomenon.

Yostal

July 28th, 2018 at 11:17 AM ^

Wholly correct.
It also makes up for the fact that Michigan did NOT play them from 2010-2015.

I believe I saw something (which may have just been speculation) that Michigan is slotted to get Minnesota as its parity partner in the next six-year cycle, but this could be disrupted by an end to the nine conference games thesis.

UM Fan from Sydney

July 28th, 2018 at 12:56 PM ^

Seriously. Without Rich Rod, Dantonio likely doesn’t have nearly the amount of success he does now against UM. That guy is a good coach, but man has he had a lot of luck and fortune go his way while helming MSU.

jabberwock

July 28th, 2018 at 2:24 PM ^

That's a load of crap.  

"foot in the door" to start building a program?

Sure.

Blaming Rich Rod because Jim Mutherfucking Harbaugh is 1-2 ten years later?

Pathetic.

Maybe you should look up MSU's record against OSU for the last 10 years.

UNCWolverine

July 28th, 2018 at 3:01 PM ^

A few days after they won the Rose Bowl a few Wisky players were at my local bar. I spoke to one of their starting OLineman over beers for a while. A few things:

1. He told me that he grew up a big Michigan fan and was bummed when he never got an offer.

2. Said that he actually felt a little sad for our defense when they just ran the ball down our throats. While growing up he loved how good Michigan was in the trenches so it was odd to him how soft we were that season. 

wildbackdunesman

July 28th, 2018 at 3:15 PM ^

I don't fully comprehend the parity based claim of the BigTen unless they are adding something else to the mix.

Wisconsin has been the #1 team in the West Division.  Ohio State has been the #1 team in the East Division and they get Nebraska, MSU gets Northwestern, and PSU gets Iowa.

It feels like we got the raw end of that deal.

butuka21

July 28th, 2018 at 11:17 AM ^

I like it with the new format. The more tough opponents the better in my opinion, you can get away with a loss or two and it’s quality.  Plus Wisconsin is pretty much going to be the West champion 4 out of 5 years shot for a potential rematch

Indy Pete - Go Blue

July 28th, 2018 at 11:21 AM ^

Complaining about Warde’s leadership?  Actual reason is below, but you assume a stronger leader would not let his happen - that is weak. Manuel has been excellent in his leadership.  I challenge you to name an AD in the B1G off he top of your head that you would take over him. 

aaamichfan

July 28th, 2018 at 11:24 AM ^

I love playing Wisconsin every year, because it's a great place to travel to for games. Harbaugh's style matches up well against them, and I expect Michigan to win most of these games. They would have won this year without the Peters injury.

I Just Blue Myself

July 28th, 2018 at 8:52 PM ^

We would have won if Peters didn't get hurt? Peters got hurt on a 3rd down pass that went incomplete, we punt the ball to Wisconsin and they promptly score to go up 21-10. What exactly have you seen from Peters that makes you think he would have led an 11 point comeback against an undefeated Wisconsin on the road?

NittanyFan

July 28th, 2018 at 11:40 AM ^

This answer to this question should really be a "sticky."  This question gets asked all the time.

Group 1 East: Michigan, OSU, PSU

Group 1 West: Iowa, Nebraska, Wisconsin.

Each team in each group plays one of the other group 1 teams 6 consecutive years.  Rotate for the 6 years that follow, and the next 6 years.

The first cycle (2016-2021), the teams appear to have been paired off based on their strength in 2012 (the 2016 schedule was released in spring 2013):

OSU was 8-0 in B1G play in 2012, Michigan 6-2 in 2012, PSU 6-2 in 2012 (but w/ active NCAA sanctions).

Nebraska 7-1 in 2012, Wisconsin 4-4 in 2012, Iowa 2-6 in 2012.

OwenGoBlue

July 28th, 2018 at 12:11 PM ^

Appreciate the elaboration.

It seems players would be better served by a format that made sure the Group 1 East players got home and homes with each of the West Group 1 teams over any 4 year period. Maybe I'm still adjusting to the giant conferences, but that seems a more quintessential B1G experience to me. 

I like playing Wisconsin because I'm a fan of good matchups but would prefer to play them, say, every other year consistently rather than on/off cycling that lasts entire player careers. 

justbread

July 28th, 2018 at 12:10 PM ^

2008 vs Wisconsin was my first Michigan game, the most exciting game I have ever been to and the reason I am a Michigan fan. Never take them off the schedule!!

4th phase

July 28th, 2018 at 12:34 PM ^

The idea was to pair teams to kind of give them a cross division rival and have them play constantly over a 6 period. The idea isn't terrible but I think 6 year rotations are too long. Theoretically we could get stuck with playing Illinois 6 years in a row...  

umbig11

July 28th, 2018 at 12:50 PM ^

The B1G is going back to an 8 game conference schedule in 2022. Preliminary discussions have us slotted against Minnesota frequently.

stephenrjking

July 28th, 2018 at 11:52 PM ^

Not thrilled about this, but if the SEC can do it and get two teams in, and the B1G gets frozen out for playing a harder schedule, go for it.

Honestly, as much as people talked about the playoff increasing the motive for scheduling more tough games, I've never seen it. I'm glad teams have tried to do it, but a team with an extra loss is a team that's got a serious handicap, no matter who the loss is to. Until a two-loss team jumps a one-loss team because the two-loss team lost to LSU or USC with that extra game, the incentive will remain to get through the season unscathed, and easy games are the way to do it.

I have confidence in our team this season, and I don't think our schedule should be an excuse to lose another three or four regular season games, but people who argue this do have one good point: Hard schedules tend to produce more losses. We play a lot of teams that are capable of beating us.

outsidethebox

July 28th, 2018 at 1:36 PM ^

I guarantee you that the players are not complaining...at least the good ones...and the teams are not either. At this level, the good players and teams want to compete against the best.

DMill2782

July 28th, 2018 at 1:49 PM ^

I wish they were scheduled through 3031. I love playing Wisky. Their fans are typically great visitors and a boost to hang with in A2. Plus, I'd rather play the best team in the West as opposed to some chump  

JWG Wolverine

July 28th, 2018 at 2:01 PM ^

I don't mind having them on our schedule tbh.

If there is anything schedule-wise that's due for correction, it's balancing out our rivalry schedule home/away. Just total BS we have to play all three of them on the road this year.

Billy Ray Valentine

July 28th, 2018 at 2:01 PM ^

To be the best, you must beat the best.   Madison is the BEST B1G road venue,  imo. 

 

I love this.  I'll miss Wisconsin when they're off our schedule. 

 

Signed, 

Class of '98 guy, married to Wisconsin grad

UMxWolverines

July 28th, 2018 at 3:51 PM ^

Why are you bitching about playing Wisconsin every year when we went 6 years without playing them before? In fact, why are you bitching at all? Some of this fanbase is insufferable with how much they bitch how "it's not fair, everyone's out to get us because they hate us".