TMI no longer on YouTube?

Submitted by MgoFunk on December 19th, 2021 at 6:48 PM

I was scrolling through my Twitter feed and saw former friend of the site Ant ask what was going on with Sam Webb and Devin Gardner.  So I decided to look and of course the only person with something to say was that one guy who must not be named.  All I can figure out is it has something to do with Devin using the All-22 film on MMQB.

Has anyone seen any real information on this?  TMI’s account has been pulled fromYouTube, that is true.

Magnus

December 19th, 2021 at 6:58 PM ^

They've supposedly had some licensing issues. I think somebody (or somebodies) flagged them for using unlicensed video when it comes to their game breakdowns.

JonnyHintz

December 19th, 2021 at 7:31 PM ^

James Yoder, chatsports being the two clues above. 
 

Yoder is a piece of garbage human being and the University was forced to release a statement making clear that he has no ties or contacts to the school. He’s notable for arguing with players and their parents on Twitter but has a weird group of fans who worship the ground he walks on because he passes along paid site info as his own to seem like an insider. Chatsports was his business endeavor that has quite a bit of controversy surrounding it. 

He’s, very deservedly, not supposed to be mentioned or used as a source here. 

FanNamedOzzy

December 20th, 2021 at 12:55 PM ^

Yeah, I've never received a channel strike on any of the channels I've uploaded my analysis to, but it's hit or miss on the copyright claim. Basketball highlight videos, more often than not, will get dinged, but football has usually went untouched.

My guess is that the use of the All-22 is what got somebody's feathers ruffled, plus the TMI analysis with Gardner gets a fair amount more attention than my personal analysis, just to be frank.

Gonna be interesting to watch, now, for that channel, since I'm guessing they'll now have to do some sort of licensing for any footage, All-22 or broadcast.

grumbler

December 19th, 2021 at 8:38 PM ^

It certainly seems like fair use under the transformative principal (it's copyrighted material being used to create something new and different that does not compete with the original use) and the very limited use of copyrighted video by the show.

However, YouTube would almost certainly pull the program while investigating allegations of misuse.  I wouldn't count on the disappearance to be permanent unless it persists.

bsand2053

December 19th, 2021 at 7:00 PM ^

Goddamn that sucks.  Sam has mentioned that he’s been getting copyright dings lately.

Frankly, not sure why it’s a problem when this here site hosts hundreds of clips of the broadcasts on YouTube for ufr.  Maybe it’s because of the all 22 but if Devin is providing it then it seems like there’s a left hand and a right hand unaware of what the other is doing.  Doubt Devin would risk his career by illicitly giving Sam footage that Fox doesn’t want him to share 

Seth

December 19th, 2021 at 7:07 PM ^

UFR clips were moved to Gfycat for this reason. YouTube allows companies to make blanket automatic claims in clear violation of Fair Use law. YouTube recently changed some definitions to absolve themselves and put the legal exposure on their partners, but what they are doing is breaking the law, and those of us affected intend to prosecute them. Richard Hoeg did a Virtual Legality on it recently. 

steve sharik

December 19th, 2021 at 7:55 PM ^

Maybe they don't want all that self scouting by Borges, Gardner, Miller, and Bedford out there for consumption by interested 3rd parties still on the schedule. Then again, don't know why that would crater the whole channel instead of just those particular videos.

Chris of Dange…

December 19th, 2021 at 11:33 PM ^

As another data point, FWIW, all my parkinggod highlight reels get copyright-claimed within seconds of publishing, but the only practical effect to me is that I can't monetize them (big whoop, not why I'm doing them).

What I've heard from people who post full-game film on YT (even Unlisted or Private), is that they're copyright-claimed immediately and then blocked completely after a manual review, usually within 12-24 hours. And the weird thing (so I'm told) is that the cited sections are either commercials (due to the music, I would guess) or individual plays that are highlight-worthy.