SI Lead Story: Rich Rodriguez thriving at Arizona (writer talks some about Michigan)

Submitted by IvyLeague on

Article

Nothing new but thought others might find it of interest on a Thursday afternoon.

"Seemed like what was a Rodriguez problem in 2010 was actually a Michigan problem"

Quote by Rodriguez on Michigan "It's not like I dwell on it, but when people ask me about it, I say, yeah, it sitll bothres me. It still frustrates me because we'd like to hav eseen what we could do with another year or two."

Talks about how Arizona AD Greg Bryne who hired Dan Mullen at Mississippi State thought hiring Rich Rodriguez to Arizona was a no brainer.

EmilyOf84

October 30th, 2014 at 3:01 PM ^

Hm.  Confirming what many of us knew all along.  The problem wasn't Coach Rodriguez.  The problem lay with the University's incompetent and uncaring adminstration, along with the athletic department infighting. 

True Blue Grit

October 30th, 2014 at 3:27 PM ^

Jeff Casteel who was very successful with RR at WVU.  Instead, we got the 3 year shit show of Scott Shafer and Gerg.  Having Casteel would have made a big difference IMO.  Still, the big problem was recruiting.  RR and his staff were killing Michigan for the future by recruiting too many at some positions, not nearly enough at others, abandoning the State and letting MSU get the best players, and taking marginal kids. 

lilpenny1316

October 30th, 2014 at 4:26 PM ^

His classes were widely considered Top 10 or Top 15.  Combined with LC's last recruiting class, that turned into a BCS team.  Not bad.  

And I love the state of Michigan, but this has not exactly been a talent rich state for football, especially compared to the regions where RR was recruiting.  There's a reason why the B1G sucks: Less talent in the Midwest and the population shift down South and West sending more skilled and yes, faster, athletes to those parts.  And I still think he would have recruited the state better if the former players would have supported him and helped push kids to UM, not away from it. 

turd ferguson

October 30th, 2014 at 5:16 PM ^

That was true until 2010.  The 2010 class was not a good one.  Its national ranking was propped up a bit by its then-thought-to-be-large size (27), but it was a fringe top 25 class by average recruit rating.

And it's not like the recruiting services were wrong to doubt that group.  Here it is, in all of its glory:

Ash, Avery, Black, Christian, Dileo, Dorsey, Furman, Gardner, Hagerup, Hopkins, J. Jackson, C. Johnson, C. Jones, Kinard, R. Miller, Pace, Paskorz, J. Robinson, M. Robinson, D. Rogers, Ryan, Talbott, Talbott, Vinopal, A. White, Wilkins, Williamson

Sac Fly

October 30th, 2014 at 5:58 PM ^

RR's recruting was fools gold. His classes rocked the star rankings, but they were filled with tweeners. 5'9 slot receivers, defensive players too big for linebacker but too small for defensive end. Hybrid safety linebackers. They recruited 4* players who didn't have positions in college football.

Sac Fly

October 30th, 2014 at 6:22 PM ^

I didn't say players who were too small for the Big Ten. I said players too small or too big for their position like Ken Wilkins, Jordan Paskorz, Marvin Robinson, Josh Furman and many others that they tried to put in hybrid roles.

Nard Dogg

October 31st, 2014 at 12:37 AM ^

"His classes rocked the star rankings"

I think you're thinking of Hoke. We called RichRod's recruits the 3 Star Mafia for a reason right?

(Per Scout)
RR (3 classes):
5* - 4
4* - 29
3* - 36
2* - 5

BH (4 classes):
5* - 6
4* - 40
3* - 40
2* - 1

I look at those and don't exactly think "RR's classes rocked the star rankings." Not bad, but his guys won a BCS game.

ak47

October 30th, 2014 at 11:51 PM ^

Highly rated doesn't mean well put together, see lack of offensive lineman. You could have a class of 15 only 4 and 5 star players but if they are all bunched into a few positions it's still not a good recruiting class. Context is key and rich rod failed to bring in enough offensive or defensive line recruits while here.

snarling wolverine

October 30th, 2014 at 6:23 PM ^

Scott Shafer was a good DC everywhere he went except Michigan.  I don't think you can blame him for 2008.

RichRod couldn't get Casteel, but Shafer should have been as good - if not better - of a hire.  He had been Harbaugh's DC at Stanford, which tells you something.

The problem was RichRod's fixation with the 3-3-5.  Shafer couldn't run what he wanted and the result was a disaster.

 

 

Mabel Pines

October 30th, 2014 at 4:03 PM ^

I remember Casteel staying with WVU but I didn't know why.  $10 G's doesn't seem like that much.  Oh well, it's in the past now.  Too bad our crappy performance has made us all re hash this and fight with each other.  Hopefully next year RR and Hoke will both be long forgotten.

jlvanals

October 30th, 2014 at 3:30 PM ^

Jeff Casteel.  Casteel was RR's DC at WVU from 2002-end and RR tried to get him to come to Michigan with him.  Incredibly bright mind, prominent innovator of the 3-3-5. Stayed at WVU during Michigan years, re-hired by RR at AZ in 2013.  Results speak for themselves. It isn't certain Casteel would have left Morgantown, but offering him $1 million/year would have been a pretty damn good start instead of the ~$300,000 we ended up paying Shafer (who was then dumped for GERG).  

m1817

October 30th, 2014 at 4:35 PM ^

People can bitch all they want about Jeff Casteel not being offered enough money, but out of all the potential DC's in the world, it was RichRod that hired Scott Shafer and GERG.  If they didn't work out, the buck stops with RichRod.

blusage

October 30th, 2014 at 5:13 PM ^

I believe according to John Bacon in "Three and Out," WVU offered Casteel about $15k more and a multi-year contract, terms Michigan wouldn't match. (Casteel who is now with him in Arizona, btw.) So the answer is "yeah," there WAS someone RR wanted to hire and Michigan wouldn't pony up the dough.  Penny wise, pound foolish.

Double-D

October 30th, 2014 at 3:47 PM ^

Until it ran into a tough defense. Defense is a word that he does not understand. Rich Rod was bad. That's it. I was a huge supporter of his but he is history and he should be because he could not get his shit straight. His sidelines were unorganized. His defense could not stop a juco team for fuck sake. Move on.

Double-D

October 30th, 2014 at 4:30 PM ^

If it wasn't we would all be happy and Hoke would still be in California. Stop making excuses for his failures. He was bad. Really really bad. Like never an adjustment getting your ass handed to you on the same play bad. Like who can't count to we have 7 scholarship lineman bad. He is bad history. Maybe even dunderheaded history.

WolvinLA2

October 30th, 2014 at 4:28 PM ^

I agree that bringing Casteel would have helped the defense.  But our offense sucked too, remember?  Everyone remembers the RR offense at Michigan being so great, but against good teams it was atrocious.  Even in the third year with Denard and Odoms and Gallon and good pieces, we couldn't do anything against the good teams on our schedule. 

RJMAC

October 30th, 2014 at 5:02 PM ^

Denard was young with RichRod's teams . The other QB was actually the better passer at the time, but he didn't stay on the team. A third and fourth year Denard running the spread would have done a lot better against the good teams. And a fifth and six year Devin...

jackw8542

October 30th, 2014 at 4:32 PM ^

RR never even had a QB at Michigan for 2 straight years.  First year was Threet/Sheridan, second year was Tate and third year was Denard.  If he had ever had a chance to work with a QB who had a little experience, maybe he would have been able to score against the better defenses just like he always did at WVU and has at Arizona (49 against Cal, 31 against Oregon and 26 against USC so far this year and with another freshman QB, at that).  My guess is that he would have gotten more out of Denard in 2011 than Borges/Hoke managed, but he never got the chance.

FWIW, he played defense in college.

ak47

October 30th, 2014 at 4:39 PM ^

He had two years with denard, just because he started tate over him didn't make denard vanish or not get to practice.  Not to mention everyone is mentioning how he is proving how great he is by winnng with a first year starter this year.  Can't have it both ways.

BornSinner

October 30th, 2014 at 4:47 PM ^

If you remember correctly Terelle Pryor was supposed to commit to WVU, but swapped to OSU when RR was hired at Michigan. He was the #1 commit in the country and was gonna commit to WVU, but RR couldn't bring him to Michigan with him... idk if that is cuz of academics or Tressel snake oiling methods... EIther way that screwed over a lot of stuff regarding QBs along with the transfers that followed. 

Blue Durham

October 30th, 2014 at 4:53 PM ^

During their freshman year, Tate Forcier was an early enrollee while Robinson was not. Because of this, by the time summer/fall camp rolled around, Tate was light-years ahead of Robinson. Give the fact the Tate was "more polished" and had received more coaching prior to Michigan, it is no surprise that Tate was the starter their first year even though Robinson had more potential for Rodriquez' offense. Regardless, it is a statement on the state of the program that Michigan/Rodriguez had no option but to start one of 2 true freshmen at the single most important position on the field.

Reader71

October 30th, 2014 at 4:59 PM ^

One caveat. Had we gone a pro-style offense in 2008, we might have had Mallet or have had use for Threet or Cone or whoever. It shouldn't come as a surprise that the QBs on the roster wouldn't be a good fit for the spread-to-run. So its partly an empty cupboard and partly the result of a radical transition.

Blue Durham

October 30th, 2014 at 7:18 PM ^

I do not know why people don't recall all of the issues Mallet had his freshman year.  By several accounts, he threatened to transfer on several occasions, to the point that Carr threw transfer papers at him and said "go ahead." 

By the end of the season he was alienated from Carr's staff and was disliked by his teammates. 

Vince Lombardi walking through the door was not going to keep Mallet in Ann Arbor.  In December, EVERYONE knew he was gone.

bjk

October 30th, 2014 at 9:24 PM ^

RR coached QB Shaun King to a 3495-passing-yard undefeated season at Tulane as OC and QB coach. Mallet was already out the door in any case, but Lloyd steered QB recruit Weinke to Iowa, where he ultimately ended up trying out for kicker. I don't know why both RR and Threet were so futile in 2008, but I see no reason to suppose RR didn't use Threet in accordance with whatever talents he might have shown. 2008 Michigan was destined to stink up whatever offensive system it attempted. Crumbling defense, recruiting weakness were already lurking in the background; Freepgate and a nonstop uphill recruiting climate and whatever else turned M's trajectory into a tsunami of shit. Maybe Schlissel is the change we really needed to finally get the ship rightside up again.