Should Patterson have Even Played Today?

Submitted by MGoBlue96 on September 7th, 2019 at 3:55 PM

So first off this is not a critique on Patterson or a bench him thread, but given the fact that he was clearly instructed to hand it off on reads because of his injuru why even play him today? He was grimancing and wincing frequently. They bailed Army out by not making them have to respect the edge and the keep and allowed them to plug the middle. The playcalling and the decision to play him both seemed idiotic today.

MGoBlue96

September 7th, 2019 at 4:01 PM ^

Did you the miss part where I said it was not a thread to criticize Patterson? It was a question of if the coaches should have sat him because reads are supposed to be the whole crux of the new offense and his injury caused them to run non existent run reads

BayWolves

September 7th, 2019 at 3:58 PM ^

The edge was there multiple times.  This was a fail by the coaches. Dylan could have shredded these guys on the edge but he didn’t run there either for the couple times he was in.

DrDVO

September 7th, 2019 at 4:03 PM ^

He should not have played. I said the same thing to my wife when I heard towards the end that he had an oblique issue..."Army is supposed to be a cake game... yeah, we might still lose but going in to it, this is the kind of game we would cover and is a good game for him to rest, leading in to the bye."

 

Hindsight.. crap game, almost lost, blah blah...

But leading in to it, he should've sat if he was injured... And it was apparent given the play calls.

 

Whatever whatever. A win is a win... ish.

PutDaTeamOnMyBack

September 7th, 2019 at 4:05 PM ^

Acres of space on nearly every play if the ball was kept.

On one hand, perhaps the coaches instructed him not to keep. But there were also a smattering of designed runs for him, which pokes a hole in that theory. I'm a staunch Shea supporter, but if he is not making the right reads, it's on the coaches to bring it to his attention. If he continues to make mistakes, the coaches need to make a change.

Not to be all doom and gloom, but the cynic in me thinks that the unwillingness to switch to Dylan in spite of Shea's performance/potentially injury may be signal that the coaches may not trust Dylan's ability to throw the ball. 

Anyway, a win is a win. Get healthy, regroup, improve.

shags

September 7th, 2019 at 4:11 PM ^

I think you're right on McCaffrey.  I don't think the coaches trust McCaffrey to throw the ball, and believe that even an injured Patterson who can't run is better than McCaffrey.

That doesn't excuse the fumbles though.

Thank goodness for an early Labor Day and a late Thanksgiving, which gives every college football team two bye weeks.  Michigan desperately needs one.

B-Nut-GoBlue

September 7th, 2019 at 4:41 PM ^

If Dylan isnt ready then holy hell...2+ years in now.  When will he be ready/trustworthy?  Rhetorical questions and you guys may be right but we're never going to fucking have an elite offense if it takes Aaron Rodgers level of sitting behind Favre to finally be ready to play.

Harbaugh's Lef…

September 7th, 2019 at 4:07 PM ^

In the type of offense they want to run, if Shea is unable to run the full playbook (or what is ready to this point) because of injury, then the next best and healthy QB needs to play. They're calling option reads where he is always handing it off where Army was just sitting on it because he either can't take the hit on a run or is doing everything he can to avoid it.

If he's not healthy enough for Wisconsin, then McCaffrey need to start.

AdamBomb

September 7th, 2019 at 4:07 PM ^

I honestly don't know what to think. The bottom line is Harbaugh and Co. have not lived up to their football genius "moniker".

I am disappointed overall.

AdamBomb

September 7th, 2019 at 4:07 PM ^

I honestly don't know what to think. The bottom line is Harbaugh and Co. have not lived up to their football genius "moniker".

I am disappointed overall.

UMfan21

September 7th, 2019 at 4:11 PM ^

He was just "off" in all facets of the game today.  This was supposed to be the offense he excels at.  He is not excelling.  I think it's very questionable why he is put in position to do read options if he is zero threat to pull (whether by design or injury).  

To his defense, if he has a pulled oblique, I can relate.  2 weeks ago I broke my rib and strained an oblique.  Granted, I am 40 years old, and overweight rather than a college athlete, but I'm still maybe 50%.  I can feel the pain in my oblique just about any time I move, even as simple as standing from a chair or turning over in bed. Coughing or sneezing causes me to double over in a fit of curse words.

This injury i dealing with is the 2nd most painful thing I have felt, just after passing a kidney stone.  So if this is what She has, I totally empathize.

gopoohgo

September 7th, 2019 at 4:13 PM ^

Was pissed we had a bye in week 3 when the schedule was announced.  

Not now.  LT looked rough without Runyan.  Patterson had problems throwing to the right.  We desperately need DPJ.  Our interior DL looks sketchy without Dwumfur.  

Yay bye week!

 

 

JonnyHintz

September 7th, 2019 at 4:18 PM ^

Army isn’t a good gauge of our interior DL. Their run game is predicated on submarining that DL and diving for those 3-4 yard gains. It’s hard to gauge our interior with Jeter and Dwumfour missing MTSU (with the exception of a couple snaps for Dwumfour) and playing this Army team in game 2.

Jordan2323

September 7th, 2019 at 4:13 PM ^

I think both qbs were instructed to hand off or there are major issues with reading defenses, which I dont think is correct. Because Patterson is hurt they dont want to run McCaffrey either. My only issue is that it is a pointless offense to run a read option if the qb hands off every time  

MFanWM

September 7th, 2019 at 11:51 PM ^

It is not only bad play-calling, it is also likely to get a RB hurt too as the emphasis is to put an unblocked defensive player in limbo trying to decide who to pursue.  In this case they were not only unblocked but simply crashed on the RB, good thing it didnt also lead to losing the RB.

MFanWM

September 7th, 2019 at 11:51 PM ^

It is not only bad play-calling, it is also likely to get a RB hurt too as the emphasis is to put an unblocked defensive player in limbo trying to decide who to pursue.  In this case they were not only unblocked but simply crashed on the RB, good thing it didnt also lead to losing the RB.

JonnyHintz

September 7th, 2019 at 4:15 PM ^

yes, I think you absolutely play him. He was, for the most part, unaffected by his injury. 

In regards to him running, you have to question the play-calling when you’re running read-option with a QB who has been instructed to avoid running it. But that’s a coaching issue, not a player issue. 

There is a plethora of plays available that don’t include a designed QB run option that the team can go to. Including a large number of RPOs. 

Shea is the better option on about 95% of the QB duties than McCaffrey. You simply have to call the right offense for the situation in terms of your personnel and your injury status. 

B-Nut-GoBlue

September 7th, 2019 at 4:22 PM ^

I said as much in the pointless game thread.   But yea. Leaving free yards on the field running plays designed get those yards....is so fucking backwards.  What is this programs issue, good lord.

* I'm on team whoever wins us the most and biggest games.  Right now we dont know who that truly is but if it isnt Shea then get Dylan in there