Rushing Stats 2022 v 2021

Submitted by Koop on November 14th, 2022 at 4:48 PM

Like many Michigan fans (hopefully, unlike the players), I can't help thinking ahead two weeks to the OSU matchup. And, like many fans here on MGoBlog, I can't help voraciously consuming every fact and statistic that might help predict that game.

I'm not a long-time statistics maven, but there's been enough chatter about whether Michigan's ground-and-pound rushing attack will be "enough" to "keep up" with OSU's offense that I took a little sojourn around the Interwebs to see what I could learn. Here are a few tidbits:

1. It's not your imagination (part 1). Michigan's rushing attack is significantly better in 2022 than 2021.

Here's a chart that illustrates that point well:

Not only is Michigan #3 nationally in rushing yards per game (according to this chart, ahead of service academies Army and Navy over 10 games), but its 2022 average is significantly ahead of 2021. Michigan's 2021 average of 214.4 rushing yards per game would rank it currently #14 nationally, one place ahead of #15 Minnesota (211.7) and two places ahead of #16 Ohio State (207.9).

2. It's not your imagination (part 2). Michigan's time of possession is striking, but maybe not that significant on its own.

There is some debate on this board (and likely elsewhere) about the significance of Michigan's time of possession statistics. I think this chart shows both the strengths and drawbacks of TOP as a meaningful statistic:

Michigan is #3 nationally in Time of Possession. That said, the teams at the top of the Time of Possession chart are a mixed bag--surely, Michigan fans can take some comfort to see Georgia at #5, but few of the others at the top of this list are programs a casual fan would think of as world-beaters (those of us in the DMV know James Madison is a true FCS behemoth, however).

IMHO, this chart tends to support the contention (h/t @DragonChild, among others), that time of possession is not, by itself, determinative of success. Yet, a 35.1 minute average TOP (over 10 games) is certainly helpful when coupled with some other statistics, as follows.

3. Michigan's scoring defense is Elite.

Hard to argue with this chart:

That's some good company to keep--#1 nationally, ahead of #2 Georgia, #3 Illinois (granted, playing in the B1G West), #4 Minnesota (same), #5 Iowa (same), and--oh, look--#7 Ohio State, #15 Alabama, and #16 Penn St. 

IMHO, this is where TOP figures into the picture. Michigan, Georgia, and Illinois aren't just good at defense (although they certainly are)--they're also not giving opposing teams that many opportunities to score. Teams know that they have to convert their possessions because they won't see that many of them, which is what leads to things like Penn State going for 4th-and-longs early in the game against Michigan, or teams being forced into more predictable passing downs.*

* (Michigan is also #1 nationally in rushing defense, ahead of #2 FCS powerhouse James Madison, #3 Notre Dame slayer Marshall, and #4 Georgia; Ohio State is #18, behind such teams as #11 Tennessee, #13 Minnesota, #15 Oregon St., #16 Wisconsin, and #17 Oregon.)

All of that still might not mean much if all that time of possession doesn't lead to scoring (again, h/t @DragonChild and others)--but in Michigan's case, it does:

4. Michigan's scoring offense is also Elite.

I recognize that people are going to believe what they want to believe, but, IMHO, this largely negates all the hand-wringing about bUt tHE pAsSinG gAMe:

Michigan is #5 nationally in scoring offense despite not having the downfield passing attacks of Tennessee, Ohio State, USC, or Oregon (and who are those three teams right behind Michigan in the standings?).

Returning to the issue identified by @DragonChild and others in other posts: Time Of Possession doesn't mean much unless you score after possessing the ball for that length of time. The differentiating factor for Michigan (and Georgia) is that--unlike many of the other teams at or near the top of the TOP chart--Michigan does score after possessing the ball for an extended period of time, which places added pressure on both the opposing offense and defense.

What does this mean for that game in two weeks? Will Michigan's pass defense hold up against OSU's NFL-caliber QB and WRs? Will Michigan's rush defense still function as efficiently against a 5-star caliber front seven?

Thanks for reading this far! Comments welcomed.

Koop

November 14th, 2022 at 6:22 PM ^

BlueKoj, I agree with you that “there are lies, damned lies, and statistics.” But I think the statistic you’ve highlighted proves the point. 

OSU’s rushing offense is good but hardly elite, currently ranking at #22 nationally, and that’s even if Williams and Henderson were both fully healthy, which they aren’t. But, hey—if you think OSU should come into the Shoe and rush 35 times against Michigan’s rush defense in two weeks, I would gladly pay good money to see that happen. (Can I pay good money to see that happen?)

Casey Thompson of Nebraska has more Yards Per Attempt than Stetson Bennett and Will Levis. That does not make Nebraska a more potent passing offense than Georgia or Kentucky. 

IMHO, the aggregate team season stats ten games in are more reliable overall than picking one stat out of the bunch. That’s why I wouldn’t lean on just one statistic, but (IMHO) the collective tend to paint a pretty good picture. 

Brhino

November 14th, 2022 at 5:15 PM ^

Keys for a good scoring defense:

1. Play in the Big 10 West

2. If unable to play in the Big 10 West, alternately consider scheduling as many games against the Big 10 West as possible

3. If unable to schedule any games against the Big 10 West... I dunno, be Georgia?

treetown

November 14th, 2022 at 5:17 PM ^

Using the UM stats available on the UM site, another statistic is the standard deviation of the running game. In 2021 the std. dev was  ~101.6 yard - whereas in 2022, the std dev. is 72.6. 

Koop

November 14th, 2022 at 8:13 PM ^

treetown,

I had to read this post three times, and think about for a while, to grasp (or at least think I grasp) its significance. 

On other words, you’re pointing out that Michigan’s rush offense in 2022 is *consistently* better—and therefore not opponent-dependent—than it was in 2021. 

See, this is why I was an LSA philosophy major—and why my Engineering ‘23 son takes philosophy classes as his “blow-off” classes; smart@$$.

kejamder

November 14th, 2022 at 5:25 PM ^

Appreciate the digging, but I don't think any of this should give fans any feelings whatsoever about how the Game is going to go. I remember when 7-4 UM was within a 2pt conversion of beating #3 OSU. I also remember more recent, better teams racking up all of the necessary stats during the season only to suffer not-close letdowns that obliterated the season averages. Also, these stats aren't opponent-adjusted. 

For me, the stats don't really matter until the season is over - they're just talking points. You seem to come to that conclusion at the end of your post anyway, though, I guess? I do worry about things like the fact that MD put together drives against us while PSU shut them down (and out, 30-0). I worry that OSU has had a year to better prepare Stroud for how to deal with pressure, etc.

ChiBlueBoy

November 14th, 2022 at 6:03 PM ^

I don't think he was making a statement about how The Game would go. The stats also seem to show us as very competitive when adjusted for opponent as well.

As far as worrying about MD drives, etc., all that gets evened out in the stats, some of which place us in good stead against anyone else in the B1G. If I was OSU, I'd have similar concerns about performances against PSU and NW. In other words, there isn't a fanbase out there that couldn't find something to worry about should they so choose. No need to be overly pessimistic. I think there are reasons for optimism, but OSU is a helluva team as well. It should be a great game.

NeverPunt

November 14th, 2022 at 8:09 PM ^

What is relevant here is that if we can ground and pound it limits the time OSU has the ball. What’s particular nasty about our run game is the ability to get 4+ yards most of the time. Keep moving the chains, keep taking time off the clock. We were very good at this last year in the Game AND finished drives with touchdowns. That is still a winning formula. If OSU only get 7-8 drives for the game, they are going to have to be ruthlessly efficient to score enough.  That said, getting stopped on 4th downs, turning it over, or kicking field goals instead of TDs on offense will mean it’s a long day for Michigan. OSU is going to get about 30 points, let’s take that as a given. If we can grind for 6 on our drives, we can keep pace again

FoCoManiax

November 14th, 2022 at 5:32 PM ^

James Madison WAS an FCS powerhouse - they moved up this season and are part of the SunBelt conference.

Other than that, thanks for compiling and sharing this!

MRunner73

November 14th, 2022 at 5:46 PM ^

This proves that Michigan is the most complete team in the nation. Only one more game to prove it and then prove it again down at the Shoe.

Go Blue!

Ezekiels Creatures

November 14th, 2022 at 6:06 PM ^

The blaring difference from last year is the defense. The defensive line had been like a sieve at times up until this year. The interior would get run right over on some plays. But that isn't happening this year. Mike Elston has make a big difference for the team.

My concern is the passing game.

I was just at TouchTheBanner (Thunder/Magnus) and saw some talk about the passing game. Something struck me in a comment. There has been so little RPO this year. There was so much talk about how RPO was going to be a significant part of JJ McCarthy starting.

The passing game has been such a head scratcher this year. But it will pick up soon, right?

bhughes81

November 14th, 2022 at 6:08 PM ^

I'd be more interested in just factoring in like opponents and see how 2021 and 2022 stack up with each other. Passing and rushing. 

abolden05

November 14th, 2022 at 6:20 PM ^

Also with all of the talk of osu’s improved defense, if you subtract the 3 elite rush offenses from last year, (Oregon, UM, and Utah) their rush defense was actually better last year. They haven’t played anyone to test whether they’re really better or not. 

Hoek

November 14th, 2022 at 7:40 PM ^

Bull shit Kirk, Michigan also played in the weather, and he just admitted that OSU can only beat Michigan in good weather. He also should know a team should be built and diverse enough to play in all conditions!! 
 

 

The Mayor

November 14th, 2022 at 9:43 PM ^

Point differential between scoring offense/defense:

osu- 46.8-15.6=31.2

Mich- 41.4-11.2=30.2

I’d say we are pretty evenly matched and looking for a great game next week. Was surprised that OSU is only out scoring us by a little over 5 a game. Feeling much better about our chances.