VikingDiet

November 17th, 2023 at 9:30 PM ^

Maybe a synopsis for those of us who like to pretend we don't want to let the Chinese spy on us by avoiding one site while using anything and everything else manufactured there?

JHumich

November 17th, 2023 at 9:47 PM ^

It's a rant about how they ruin people's lives and combine authoritarianism run amok with sheer stupidity.

I don't disagree, but I can't stand the guy, and it was basically a show for the home (JMU) crowd who are pissed about being excluded from a bowl game.

Clarence Boddicker

November 18th, 2023 at 12:44 AM ^

They should investigate the fact that while Goofy and Pluto are both dogs, Goofy wears clothes (albeit crappy hobo clothes), walks on two legs, and can talk, while Pluto can do none of those things and has even been depicted as a pet Goofy owns. The crime against simple logic is far worse than anything Michigan has done.

lilpenny1316

November 17th, 2023 at 9:34 PM ^

For those who don't want to copy/paste and watch, Pat is going off (and jumping around a lot) criticizing the NCAA for not bending the rules for JMU to play in a bowl game.

Two things.

1. JMU agreed to this 2-year bowl ban as a part of their jump to FBS. So, they knew what they were signing up for.

2. McAfee is a clown show.

Blue@LSU

November 17th, 2023 at 9:46 PM ^

My understanding is that it was put in place to prevent teams from moving up to the Division I level before they are ready. But if they are able to make a bowl game two years in a row (let alone be ranked #18 in the AP), then that shows that they were ready to move up to Division I. In other words, the rule can only punish those teams that should not be punished by its own logic.

grumbler

November 17th, 2023 at 11:21 PM ^

One reason for the rule was to prevent teams about to move taking FBS players (who wouldn't have to sit out a year) and then bringing them into the FBS, bypassing the old "sit out a year" rule.  Obviously, that reason no longer applies.

A second reason is that the transition procedure allows the upgrading school those two years to meet the total scholarship and sport requirements.  But there's no reason to penalize schools like JMU and Jacksonville State who met all of the FBS scholarship/team numbers before they even moved up.

The logical rule would be that schools who are already at the FBS requirements for scholarships and teams should be bowl-eligible, while not allowing schools who haven't yet met the requirements to play in bowls.

BoFan

November 17th, 2023 at 9:47 PM ^

He is calling them out on everything including cheeseburger gate.  He doesn’t mention them all but he says “name a decision where you’re like, Yah, that’s a great decision”.   
 

He is being a populist for fans and he is annoying but I support the message. I don’t see any negative.  
 

The new guy at the NCAA is apparently a smart and decent guy. His only messaging has been around congressional NIL standards which is a positive.  Maybe he needs to lean in on the bs day to day operations.