Outrage Du Jour: SEC Country Having Conniptions Over David Shaw's Comments on Satellite Camps

Submitted by VicTorious1 on

Stanford's coach, David Shaw, made a comment about satellite camps and how Stanford didn't have any plans to start doing them due to their eligibility standards. I'm not sure if he was taking a dig at the SEC, making a joke or not specifically talking about the SEC, but folks in SEC country are not happy.  Below are his comments:

"I have no opinion. [Satellite camps have] never affected us. People do them, and people don't do them. We've got great attendance at the camps we have here -- we get a lot of guys we want to come....But I didn't like the way that a lot of people have put this as the SEC against Jim Harbaugh. That's not what this has been about. Conference by conference, this has been going on for three plus years, since Jim was with the 49ers. This has been a battle. As a conference, we had a long discussion three years ago about what we were going to do about satellite camps....I'm great with whatever college football says, because it doesn't affect us. It doesn't make sense for us to go hold a camp some place where there might be one person in the entire state that's eligible to get into Stanford."  http://www.ruleoftree.com/2016/4/10/11400862/stanford-cardinal-football-2016-spring-game-roundup-david-shaw-quarterback-competition-burns-chryst

It's being reported that Coach Shaw took a shot at the intelligence of SEC country despite having approximately 20 players on his roster from states that have an SEC school.   From the context, it doesn't seem to me that he was denigrating the South, but Finebaum and the rest of Southern talk radio have picked it up and run with it.

1VaBlue1

April 12th, 2016 at 10:18 AM ^

I don't think he was picking on SEC standards, or the relative smartness of Southern' folk, at all.  Nor do I think he was taking a shot at Harbaugh.  All he said was that holding a camp at some distant location didn't necessarily work for Stanford.  Eligibility requirements being what they are, the 3-4 players that show up that are good enough for a top P5 team gets winnowed to 1, or maybe none, where Stanford is concerned.  I see that point and agree.

However, where Shaw failed in taking that stance is the benefit to the kids of being evaluated by lots of coaches.  He completely neglected that side of it in favor of his own self-interest.  I get his interest in taking care of his team, but he unintentionally aligned himself with the SEC by making it about him, while also alienating the SEC with the thoughtless eligibility comment.  With that statement, he wins the internet by aligning with, and alienating, the same group of people!

So far as the SEC apologists (Finnebaum and Co.) are concerned, they are going to latch on to whatever directs the heat away from the idiocy that is them.  They'll play up this comment until they're blue in the face in a vain attempt to push the attention somewhere else.

LSAClassOf2000

April 12th, 2016 at 11:03 AM ^

To be fair, some have push-button phones now, but they still have the problem of having to wait until Old Man Johnson's wife is through using the party line for squawking about the goings-on next door. By the way, if you want Stan Ford's number, it happens to be Vermont-23943. Gotta dial the right exchange, after all. 

Michigan4Life

April 12th, 2016 at 10:16 AM ^

Shaw have a point. Considering the educational level in the south, it would be a waste of time for Stanford to hold satellite camp because they have to be admitted as a student first while being good enough to play d1 level.



Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad

Michigan4Life

April 16th, 2016 at 10:14 PM ^

but the state education rankings in the south has been at the bottom half.  Even if they produce D1 football players, how many are qualified to play at Stanford? I would say about one per state if any at all. This is why it's a waste of time for Stanford to hold satelitte camp anywhere especially in the South.

Stanford is the hardest school to get admittance and you have to get admitted as a student then football player second.  Shaw rightfully has zero interest in holding satellite camp because the opportunity for the players to attend Stanford are slim to none.

ak47

April 12th, 2016 at 10:22 AM ^

By every objective measure of educational attainment the south fails pretty hard.  So maybe the south should stop worrying so much about what Shaw said and stop being the dumbest part of the country instead.  

JamieH

April 12th, 2016 at 10:28 AM ^

when he said "where there might be one person in the entire state that's eligible to get into Stanford" he was referring to elite level football players. So he's saying why camp in a state where, AMONG THE ELITE LEVEL FOOTBALL PLAYERS, there might only be one of them that can actually get into Stanford. I don't think he was actually referring to the entire population of the state. However, if he was, that's an epic troll job.

4godkingandwol…

April 12th, 2016 at 10:30 AM ^

There's money to be made in faux outrage. The sad part is the thing we should care about most, the student athletes, seem to be the furthest thing from people's minds. Guess it's because there is money to also be made by exploiting them too.

bronxblue

April 12th, 2016 at 10:45 AM ^

I mean, the context of his statement made sense, but yeah, most of these camps aren't going to feature athletes with the purported admission credentials needed for Stanford. And sure it's arrogant to say it, but if UM is viewed as arrogant then Stanford is a whole other stratosphere. But I also don't really think it's fair to say that Shaw won't go to these camps because it isn't worth it to him from a recruiting standpoint, as Stanford (like all major programs) will bend the admissions standards a bit to get kids in who are good at revenue sports like football. The issue here is that Shaw feels the marginal increase of exposure to under the radar recruits isn't worth the effort.

charblue.

April 12th, 2016 at 10:46 AM ^

exactly a gateway academic entry institution and it didn't stop Harbaugh himself from taking a swipe at the school while he was coaching out West, but I don't see Shaw's comments as an educational attack on the SEC so much as a reality-check on whether satellite camps benefit schools like his own. And, of course, as he made clear that's apparently not the case.

It's kind of interesting that you have some schools wanting to protect their recruiting territory by banning satellite camps while others aren't really concerned about their status because they don't reguarly benefit directly from them.

But, this is why what Harbaugh has done in pushing this issue demonstrates his largely altruistic aims in holding them. Yeah, he wants to get the attention of the best athletes and he'll use any oppportunity to make that happen, camps, clinics, speaking engagements, special appearances and recruiting tactics to promote his program.

It's what Harbaugh is doing overall in advancing Michigan's program using its established brand and his celebrity that bothers ACC and SEC officials who don't want him stealing recruits from their area, a selfish and totally insecure backlash to a limited method of recruiting that offers more benefits to campers themselves than Michigan's football program.

I mean this is about stopping one school and coach and it damages the interests of so many others while hardly making a dent in the Michigan recruiting arsenal. I've repeatedly noted this in posts about this topic, but Harbaugh got involved in coaching at regional camps and clinics before his growing profile and his rise in coaching ranks turned his camp appearances into something more than perceived pr events and recruiting opportunities. He actually enjoys teaching football and helping raise the level of play and interest in the game, and he loves staying busy. He has a sign in his office that reads: Just coach your team. And that's what he's done since arriving in Ann Arbor.

And over his brief time here, he's turned the CF world on its head by forcing it to come to grips with what an enthusiasm for the game unknown to mankind can do when you really act on that enthusiasm. 

 

Lou MacAdoo

April 12th, 2016 at 10:48 AM ^

He's just speaking the truth. I guess the truth hurts. What he doesn't get is that a lot of those unqualified kids would greatly benefit from his staffs coaching. You know since he's a great coach from a prestigious school. He might even inspire some kids to try to do what it takes to get into Stanford. It's unfortunate that he can't see what a great opportunity he has, especially as a black man, to inspire and coach up underprivileged yutes. Harbaugh does. 

Wolfman

April 13th, 2016 at 6:14 AM ^

I believe prior to Charlie taking the TX job he and Chalie were viewed as possibly the best wo african-americans in cfb with Sumlim not being far behind. Young men respect him, and whether he likes it or not, he a role model for them. And at Stanford, he carried even more weight. I don't think it's right of him, any more than I do the SEC coaches who stated, "Jim isn't getting any of the young men we want." I think they have someone brought this down to a Harbaugh against the world thing where Shaw points out its beein going of for three years and Jim just came along at the right time to start the fricking fire. We ceraintly  can't convince them their actions are greedy and wrong. If they think they've won somethng by getting Emmert to back them and act as what amount to their spokemen, they have given nothing but proof of the importance of fising time. And I don't know if Shaw fishes, but he more than anyone, knows the  challenges the black youth face and as you said, as I've said,  and probably many more, he can influence a whole hell of a lot of them in a positive manner.

One thing that Emmert could have done, the one thing he  should have done is say, "Look we all understand the importance of affording they young laies and men every opportunity we can in making cetain they end up in college. And common sense tells us more future college football players receive this opportunity by attending these camps. Whatever is pointed out as somehint they need to work on in camp no. 1, could be corrected by time camp no. 2 rolls around and chances of somemone else offerning him increase. As of right now, we have two conferences that are on record as opposing these actual opportunities that have been the start for many. Instead of forcing those conferences that are willing to do what is right, I think it makes a whole lot more sense and will involve less work, just to reach out to their respective commissioners and inform them, in the future, they will both offer and host these camps. That could only be accomplished if he truly believed such, and would further remove all doubt his former status as an LSU employee is, in no way clouding his judgment;  eliminating once and for all he's returning a favor.

OlafThe5Star

April 12th, 2016 at 10:48 AM ^

If he is trying to bash the South, that's pretty dumb (see below). Now, Rhode Island, on the other hand, that is a state where no one goes to Stanford (literally, at least, in the latest freshman class. It was the only state that didn't send anyone to Stanford undergrad).

From Stanford's website:

 

Class of 2016 by the numbers

The largest group of incoming students – 38.1 percent – graduated from California high schools.

The next top five regions represented in the class are the South (15.1 percent); international students and U.S. students who completed high school studying abroad (9.7 percent); the Mid-Atlantic (9.2 percent); Far West – Oregon, Washington, Alaska and Hawaii (8 percent); and the Mid-West (7.8 percent). The other regions are Mountain States (6.3 percent); New England (3.7 percent); and the Great Plains (1.8 percent).

Eye of the Tiger

April 12th, 2016 at 11:03 AM ^

I'm from RI. There are maybe 8 of us who have ever lived there and, yes, we are all related.

But seriously, the reason why there aren't many Rhode Islanders at Stanford is that, in general, we are a mighty provincial bunch. People looked at me like I was crazy when I decided to go to Michigan, like I was going to the moon for college or something.



Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad

The Mad Hatter

April 12th, 2016 at 12:39 PM ^

A rich friend used to live there and he randomly sent me first-class plane tickets for a trip out there a couple of times when he got lonely/homesick/needed a wingman.

Great guy.  The only person on this earth I'd truly call a friend.  He lives in CA now so the flight is a lot longer and we don't hang out that much anymore.

ldevon1

April 12th, 2016 at 11:01 AM ^

Or is Paul Finebaum trying to create interest on his show by making something out of nothing. Although, David Shaw could have taken a little dig, or is he saying the kids we want, and the ones that can get in, actually come to our camps, so we don't have to go there to find the gems. 

Wolfman

April 13th, 2016 at 5:39 AM ^

and that is evident in his promotions for the shows. The guest he uses most freqeuntly are Phyllis the Tide that basicaly needs nothing more than questioning where or not the Tide is going to win another one before their dynasty ends and another female, this one an Auiburn fan that here husband proably loves to hear her on his show because she repeatedly says, "And I will will withhold my wifely duties- or some such shit - unti Auburn wins againg. So I don't think Faul is really that dumb, just wants to placate his loyalf followers and makes sure they know he's got their back.

However, I do believe you are correct in stating that Shaws believes those young men that visit his camp, if they want the Stanford offer, attend realing they are qualified, and if in their soph, jr. years are already taknig steps to make certain it will not be a last minute problem.