OT: What if every MLB team made the playoffs?

Submitted by Mr. Elbel on
http://www.espn.com/mlb/story/_/id/23244608/radical-ideas-series-every-… As a Tigers fan, this idea appeals to me given that the playoffs seem like a far-fetched dream that's at least years away. Normally teams don't go from 119 loses to the WS in 3 years so I'm not holding my breath. Anyway, an interesting idea that in no way is ever happening but would certainly make the end of the season fun and give me a reason beyond fan loyalty/love of the game to invest in the team for the back end of the season. What say you?

Winchester Wolverine

May 1st, 2018 at 12:38 AM ^

My Reds are decades from relevancy so it wouldn't matter much either way. I could just abandon ship and be a Cleveland fan or something but my loyalty just won't let me do it. Looks like my fantasy Reds franchise on The Show will have to do. For the rest of my life. I haz a sad.

SHub'68

May 1st, 2018 at 2:33 AM ^

They already play too deep into the fall as it is.  I guess I'm on the opposite side of this as there're things I'd like to see rolled back:

  • Interleague play
  • Some Teams
  • The Wild Card
  • The DH
  • Hell, the League Championship Series, too

In the past, the World Series started the first week of October, and was done by the second.  Of course, they didn't need all the playoff games they have today - because they had less teams and no interleague play and could actually pretty much decide the dominant teams during the season by playing everyone enough to leave little doubt (most years).

In 1950, the Tigers played each American League team 22 times.  In the 2017 season, they played their Central Division foes 19 times each, and the other American League teams just 7 (Bal, Bos, Hou, LAA, Sea, TB) and 6 times (NY, Oak, Tex, Tor).  That's a pretty big imbalance.  Playing a team that has your number (or vice-versa) an additional 15 or 16 times could make a big difference!

Meanwhile, they played 20 meaningless interleague games against National League opponents.

Yes, I'm old.  And Get Off My Lawn

bacon

May 1st, 2018 at 4:37 AM ^

How about a round robin style tournament where each team plays say 162 games and the winners progress to an elimination style tournament. The elimination tournament could have best of 5 or 7 game series ultimately culminating in a championship series to decide who represents the best team in the world.

Steve in PA

May 1st, 2018 at 9:08 AM ^

As mentioned above it will make the already far too long regular season useless and even more unwatchable. The 1st season I can recall with clarity is the 1980 season when Philadelphia won the championship. That season lasted April 9 to October 21. Last season was nearly a full month longer at April 2 to November 1. I'm also 99% certain that the World Series games start later now. The later start makes it impossible for young kids to watch the world series and be interested in baseball from a 1st hand perspective. Ditto the All-star Game.

uncle leo

May 1st, 2018 at 10:48 AM ^

Knows what it is doing. That's why the ratings are at an all-time high. They are embracing the demographic today, games moves quick (other than the last 5 minutes), and characters are allowed to be themselves.

In the 100+ years baseball has been played, the sport has evolved at a snail's pace. The younger generations just do not have the patience to sit through a slow, 3 plus hour game, for 162 games. There are very few personalities in the sport. 

I have always considered myself a fairly patient man. I can sit through conversations for hours and hold interest. But even I start to lose attention during a baseball game. I appreciate the chess match and the gradual build up of events, but it moves too damn slow. The unwritten rules kill the game. Mound visits, stepping away from the plate, taking an eternity to get the other team on the field between innings, letting new pitchers get 3-5 minutes to warm up even though they've been warming up in the bullpen for multiple innings before getting called.

If baseball does not change quickly, it will be in trouble.

OwenGoBlue

May 1st, 2018 at 11:44 AM ^

The sport’s finances are buoyed by the giant regional cable TV deals that won’t be nearly as lucrative in a decade. A large number of teams have attendance issues. The median fan age is 55. It’s not like the MLB is going to fold or anything but they need to adapt in a hurry. Pace of play, learning how to market their stars, better programs to get more youth players/attendees, etc.

ak47

May 1st, 2018 at 11:33 AM ^

Baseball literally exists as a sport so you can go drink outside for 4 hours on a nice summer evening or weekend. The winning or losing of any given game drives like 40% of fan interest in the games. Baseball isn't a sport where the majority of fans really care about the meaningfullness of an individual game. Of course if a team is really bad for a period of years that will hurt fan interest, but being in the playoffs every few years is enough to keep most fans around for baseball.

g_reaper3

May 1st, 2018 at 11:57 AM ^

Fans love watching playoff games and fans love watching the drive to make the playoffs. 

Have 16 teams make it, do four rounds of 7 game series.  End the regular season Labor Day weekend which probably means a season has 140 games or so. 

This solves the season dilemna, next need to speed up the games. 

darkstar

May 1st, 2018 at 12:08 PM ^

except shortening any season will cost teams, owners, players, cities, retail, restaurants and entertainment establishments a lot of money and/or will result in increasing prices for everything to compensate for lost revenue.  Who signs up first?

uncle leo

May 1st, 2018 at 12:18 PM ^

Will be fine. 

Forgive me if I don't shed a tear for some guys who earn what I will make in my entire career in a single week. Same goes for owners. Those dudes wipe their ass with my salary. I think they would actually probably embrace playing 20-30 less games and losing 500k or whatever small cut they'd take.

The city isn't just going go dormant in the two-four weeks the season cuts off. In fact, those business will probably do BETTER because there will be major influx during the peak of the season and there will be a much higher demand, rather than Comerica showing out with 2,000 fans during a regular season game.

uncle leo

May 1st, 2018 at 3:52 PM ^

Would. The TV contract is still going to be massive regardless.

The opportunity for the players to cut out 30-40 games would be hard to turn down. They basically play baseball 24-7. It's an incredibly long season, and then they have like a month or two off and then start spring. It's endless. The other sports at least have a decent-sized gap.

InterM

May 1st, 2018 at 1:28 PM ^

I will now synthesize everyone's suggestions into one brilliant solution.  Change the rules of baseball so the sport is played with a big orange bouncy ball that the players throw through a hoop.  Cut the season in half to about 80 games or so.  Form a new league called the NBA (National Baseball Association).  I guarantee this will make the sport more popular.

uncle leo

May 1st, 2018 at 1:52 PM ^

I hope you understand why people like myself are saying they need to emulate the NBA more. 

NBA's popularity is going through the roof, and the ratings bear it out. It was an after-thought the NBA could catch the NFL; now, it's not that far-fetched.

The NBA has some of the most forward-thinking minds running the league, and MLB is stuck in place.

InterM

May 1st, 2018 at 2:29 PM ^

I'm predisposed to prefer baseball over basketball -- i.e., I'm old -- but the baseball leadership is doing nothing to address the many problems with their sport.  Every proposed change -- e.g., shortening the season to less than 12 months and 1,000 games -- is met with the objection that we won't be able to make apples-to-apples comparisons with statistics from games/seasons dating back to the last millenium.  Yet, every sport (including baseball) has endless arguments over players from different eras, so what is the problem exactly?

uncle leo

May 1st, 2018 at 2:37 PM ^

Sadly, is that the front offices and higher ups in baseballs are a lot of those classical-minded thinkers that do not want to push the sport forward.

It took a revolutionary guy to introduce small ball, it took organizations decades to embrace new metrics (WAR, etc), and some STILL won't embrace it; ultimately, baseball is very scared to try new things, out of fear they will lose that nucleus of fans (older generation).

I think in the short term, there are a lot of solutions that can fix the problem: shorter season, time between innings, time between reviews, pitching changes, but like everything else, it will take 5-10 big pushes before SOMETHING moves.

Vasav

May 1st, 2018 at 3:05 PM ^

While every team makes the playoffs, the best team in each league is automatically in the LCS - everyone else is basically in a "play-in" tournament.The end of the regular season for the top teams runs concurrently to the post season for the worst teams. It both values the regular season more than we currently do and makes a more bonkers post-season that makes tanking less appealing.

Vasav

May 1st, 2018 at 3:05 PM ^

While every team makes the playoffs, the best team in each league is automatically in the LCS - everyone else is basically in a "play-in" tournament.The end of the regular season for the top teams runs concurrently to the post season for the worst teams. It both values the regular season more than we currently do and makes a more bonkers post-season that makes tanking less appealing.

autodrip4-1968

May 1st, 2018 at 6:05 PM ^

May 1 to August 30.

Playoffs and World Series completed by end of September.

Night game's start at six. Including post season.

Weekend contests are all played in the afternoon. Including post season.

Reduce game's to 7 innings.

Get rid of designated hitter. ( especially the Tiger's dh ).

A car giveaway at every home game.

Kissing booths would be cool.

I have other ideas.

Veck.