BlueAggie

June 13th, 2010 at 11:16 PM ^

That seemed like Heupel was cracking a joke and the TV station ran with it to me.  Everything I've heard today strongly indicates that OU is going to the Pac-10, so that would be both a huge shock and very strange way for the news to break.

BlueAggie

June 13th, 2010 at 11:13 PM ^

TexAgs is still mum on it, and it's my opinion that they have better sources than AggieYell or OrangeBloods, but it is definitely trending that way.  Over the weekend it's gone from 90-10 to the Pac-10 to 50-50.

Either way, official confirmation is going to take a while.  Texas law says that 72 hours notice is needed to hold a meeting of the Board of Regents, and one hasn't been announced yet.  I suspect we'll have a pretty firm idea Monday or Tuesday, but nothing will be set in stone until Thursday or Friday.

pee on freep

June 13th, 2010 at 11:22 PM ^

so if Okla. and A&M go to the SEC, does that increase the odds of Texas to the B10?

Obviously this would be the final nail in coffin for the Big 12.  I do not get the impression Texas would go to the Pac-10 without Okla. or A&M (or both).  So considering the compatibility, would this not bode well for Texas and the Big 10 to hook'em up?  

BlueAggie

June 14th, 2010 at 12:01 AM ^

I think they might have to offer Tech and OSU as well.  I'm beginning to strongly suspect that Texas doesn't see Tech as a problem; just the opposite.  They really want to be a conference along with a block of votes that they can count on.  Hence their strong desire to go to the Pac-10 and take OU, Tech, OSU and A&M or Kansas with them.

DoubleB

June 14th, 2010 at 1:15 AM ^

It's not just the "block of votes" thing. It's also schedule related. They want a Big XII South schedule. They're making arguments for a 7-game conference schedule to move to the Big Ten. In short, Texas wants the Big Ten/Pac-10 brand so to speak without, you know, playing Big Ten or Pac-10 teams.

This is why Kansas just moved ahead of Utah in the pecking order should A&M bolt to the SEC.

France719

June 14th, 2010 at 6:41 AM ^

What has come to fruition from this guy besides Nebraska being on a deadline? 

He said CU wouldn't get an invite to the Pac-10 unless UT was coming with....incorrect

He said that the Big 12 South would jump to the Pac-10 the moment that Nebraska left...incorrect

He said that UT has not had ANY contact with the Big 10...Seriously?  Anyone who thinks that the Big 10 either forgot or ignored the most valuable college football brand in the country in their expansion process is a complete fool.

I'm not saying that A&M won't end up in the SEC, but this guy is not the golden source of expansion info that everyone is making him out to be.  I personally believe that after he correctly reported the Nebraska deadline that UT and company started using him to leak information they wanted leaked...but that debate is for another day.

Edit:  Also, he tweeted yesterday to refute the story posted by the OP.  http://twitter.com/ChipBrownOB/status/16103773967

Wolverine318

June 14th, 2010 at 7:18 AM ^

exactly. Chip is completely being used by the UT admin and Big XII administration, even if doesn't realize it. Purplebookcat at northwestern's rival site, before he was cut off by the big ten, has on the ball much more than chip. 

FreetheFabFive

June 14th, 2010 at 7:39 AM ^

I completely agree.  To a certain extent, he's been on, but I agree with Frank the Tank in that the information he is being given is largely a smoke screen fed to him via Texas. 

It has been widely known that the Pac 10 was going to go after Colorado and Utah.  Colorado is going, and guess what team is popping up to take one of the "5" teams spot if one of them doesn't go?  Utah.

Texas A&M has discussed a move to the SEC for awhile now too, and has been brought up even before Chip was reporting it.

I DO think he is getting his information from Texas, but I think he's just being taken for a ride.  I don't think he really minds either since he's getting tons of national media attention in the process.  Personally, I take what he says with a grain of salt.

Don

June 14th, 2010 at 12:44 PM ^

Me too.

I know there are non-financial reasons for Nebraska and CU to leave, and for Mizzou to be unhappy with things, but at the end of the day I think this comes down to Texas having the preeminent financial position in the conference, and the unequal distribution of revenue really stuck in the craw of most of the other members, regardless of whatever the dollar difference was.

I just can't believe that there would have been any impediment to establishing a Big 12 TV network along the lines of what the Big Ten has done, except for UT's disinterest in sharing the loot equally. I guess the Texans consider doing that socialist or communist, but it's one of the crucial factors in keeping everybody in the Big Ten reasonably happy. The B12's combined media markets may not have matched the B10's, but the combination of the huge TX market with those of Denver, Kansas City, St. Louis, and everything else in OK, NEB aren't chopped liver.

coldnjl

June 14th, 2010 at 9:54 AM ^

Rivalries aren't that important when it comes to making money and putting your school in the best position to succeed in the future