OT - Recast your favorite movie/tv show

Submitted by canzior on February 26th, 2019 at 11:56 AM

Stuck at home with a sick baby, watching the IMDB series on roles that were turned down. In Game of Thrones, Mark Strong, Gillian Anderson, Dominic West, and Brian Cox all turned down roles. Even Emilia Clarke wasn't the first Daenerys to be picked to play the role. Will Smith turned down the role of Neo in Matrix.

If you could recast your favorite movie/tv show, who would you replace?

 

  

saveferris

February 26th, 2019 at 12:42 PM ^

Not that I don't like William Shatner, but it's interesting to wonder how Star Trek would've been different had Jeffrey Hunter stayed on as Christopher Pike for the entire series run.

Boner Stabone

February 26th, 2019 at 12:47 PM ^

Hoosiers

Dennis Quaid: as Coach Norman Dale

Jessica Alba: as Myra Fleener

Gary Busey: as Shooter

Nik Stauskas: as Jimmy Chitwood

Duncan Robinson: as Rade

Zak Novak:   as Buddy

Spike Albrect:  as Merle

Stu Douglass:  as Everett

Tim Tebow: as Strap

Andrew Dakich: as Ollie

Tom Izzo:  as George 

Kate Upton: as Hickory cheerleader

 

 

DMill2782

February 27th, 2019 at 9:48 AM ^

People always want to call Kong racist, but to get to that point you have to ignore the context of why Kong was even created.

The creator, Merian Cooper, was fascinated by gorillas from the age of six. The intrigue started when he was given a book, "Explorations and Adventures in Equatorial Africa", by his uncle. The book chronicled the adventures of Paul Du Chaillu in Africa. Du Chaillu described one gorilla known for its extraordinary size that the natives described as invincible and the King of the African Forest. That planted the seed for Cooper's imagination and ultimate creation of the character King Kong. 

Cooper also had a dream about a giant ape that was destroying New York City and recorded it when he woke up. This was the basis for the classic King Kong, not racism. 

Yes, you can project racial undertones onto the movie but that is your own projection and not what the director ever intended. Kong was a story born out of his love and fascination of gorillas. 

You could just as easily project that Kong is actually about the cruelty of the circus and how they hunted and captured exotic animals to put on display and show for people. The only outsider not trying to harm Kong is the female lead and their bond grows out of that fact. Not that the movie is actually about that, but you can project those undertones if it is your goal. 

Heptarch

February 26th, 2019 at 12:52 PM ^

Not a huge fan of the main character casting in Outlander.  Jamie, Claire, Roger and Brianna all ring false to me. 

Funny thing is that they absolutely nailed the casting for more minor characters like Murtagh, Jenny and Old Ian.

saveferris

February 26th, 2019 at 1:02 PM ^

You're absolutely right about Sophie Skelton and Richard Rankin, they're very uneven with their performances show-to-show.  I don't mind Sam Heughan and Caitrona Balfe as Jamie and Claire, but the problem with the past season is their story got pushed to the background too much in favor of developing the Roger and Brianna arc.

You're dead-on about Duncan Lacroix as Murtagh though.  Murtagh is a pimp.  And Tobias Menzies was great as Jack Randall.

shoes

February 26th, 2019 at 1:02 PM ^

My answer is probably unconventional but I thought this at the time. Coming Home (1978) dealt with a paraplegic Viet Nam vet (Jon Voight) embittered from the hand dealt him, and recovering in a VA Hospital where he encounters a married nurse (Jane Fonda) who falls for him. A powerful anti-war picture that dealt with an important topic. Both leads are fine actors with impressive bodies of work over the course of their careers. Each won an Academy award for their performance- so what's the problem?

Both were too old for their parts. Fonda was 41 and Voight 40 at the time. Voight's character was not an officer. His part called for a young man who was innocent before his experience which damages him emotionally as well as physically.

John Travolta was 24 (a full 16 years younger than Voight) and coming off of Saturday Night Fever the year before. he looked even a bit younger and could have better played a young innocent who was subjected to the horror of Vietnam. For the part of the nurse you could have stuck with Fonda and gone with the May-December aspect of the romance or you could have chosen someone like Debra Winger, then 23 (though still a relative unknown). Of course these two would star just 2 years later in a completely different kind of movie (Urban Cowboy).

Again, no knock on the actors but I felt they were wrong for the parts. Don't know the back story but I am guessing that Fonda wanted to do the film, and had the star clout to insist on a male lead close to her own age. 

bringthewood

February 26th, 2019 at 1:17 PM ^

2005 Fantastic Four

Not sure who to recommend but 2 of the 4 were really poor choices and made the movie suck

Ioan Gruffudd was horrible as Reed Richards
Jessica Alba - always keep her - as Sue Storm
Chris Evans was okay as Johnny Storm
Michael Chiklis as Ben Grimm was awful - old bald out of shape guy?
Julian McMahon the guy from Nip Tuck was okay as Victor Von Doom

The early Spiderman movie actor also sucked but Mary Jane  - Kirsten Dunst - was good

Harbaugh's Lef…

February 26th, 2019 at 2:22 PM ^

Yep... this, every single word. I like Affleck in the right role but at this point, it's really narrow for me but for him to follow Bale as Batman/Bruce Wayne really showed how out of his league he was for that role. The exact opposite of what the OP is asking, Bale was the perfect Batman for how the character was written.

saveferris

February 26th, 2019 at 2:22 PM ^

I think Affleck did a pretty damn good job as Bruce Wayne / Batman.  Was he as good as Christian Bale?  No.  But I think his performance more than stands up against say a Val Kilmer or a George Clooney, not that these are totally fair comparisons given the quality of script for the mid-90's Batman movies directed by Joel Schumacher.  Be interesting to see who they cast for the next movie that's due to start shooting towards the end of this year.

I saw an interesting interview with Kevin Feige, the President of Marvel Studios, where he was asked how he would fix the DCEU and he thought that DC's mistake was starting off with their strongest characters and trying to build an ensemble from that.  Part of the reason that Marvel has been so successful, in his opinion, is that they were forced to grab the lesser known characters that Marvel hadn't sold off to other studios (i.e. Spiderman, Fantastic Four, X-Men) and since these characters were less known and their stories less established, it was easier to weave them together into a larger story arc.