OT: Olympic Men's skating - Adam Rippon and why he didn't score higher

Submitted by Dennis on
Been watching men's figure skating tonight and openly gay US skater, Adam Rippon, had an absolutely amazing no-mistake performance, and the other athletes who scored higher than him fell. I was pretty pissed and thought he got jobbed, but apparently the judges are scoring on "innovation" this year... landing quad jumps, etc, bc some athletes in past years scored higher for flawless performances without trying new things. https://www.google.com/amp/ftw.usatoday.com/2018/02/why-adam-rippon-sco… In my opinion, you can try for quads but you shouldn't be rewarded if you can't land them. What do you think?

Paps

February 11th, 2018 at 10:42 PM ^

I dont think anything that has judges is truly a sport.  

 

And yes, the way that some officials can exert influence over a game in basketball, etc.... it's borderline for me

s1105615

February 12th, 2018 at 6:51 AM ^

If you are scored subjectively, or if you can smoke and drink while playing it’s a game & not a sport. So anything where you exert yourself physically but don’t have an opportunity objective standard to determine the outcome is a game. Anything that you can do at a high “professional” level while still being able to smoke and/or drink alcohol is a game. This means figure skating, ice dancing, bowling, golf, and poker are all games. If you call yourself a sports network or are providing sports coverage, these things don’t belong.

BroadneckBlue21

February 12th, 2018 at 9:15 AM ^

Sure, because football players and basketball players have not had drinks before performance, ever. Just because one can golf and smoke or drink it does not mean that there is no skill involved in the sport of it. One cannot optimally perform at golf while drunk. Nor do consistent pro bowlers simply drink it up line your local bowling league. Shit, I guess baseball is no longer a sport because a bunch of amateurs get together on weekends and play in beer leagues?

Maison Bleue

February 12th, 2018 at 5:03 PM ^

Not being obtuse, slightly joking maybe.

Sure, most sports are determined by who scores more runs, points, or goals. But there are officials in those sports subjectively enforcing rules that determine which team or individual scores more runs, points, or goals, so I guess I don't find it all that different. 

Figure skating, gymnastics, snowboarding, and diving officials are all judging on a points system that does not just measure artistic ability. It takes into account technique and accuracy and difficulty and I don't find it all that more subjective than calling accuracy of balls and strikes, or a penalty for pass interference, or a hand checking foul.

Maybe I am just a jaded Michigan fan though.

bronxblue

February 12th, 2018 at 3:42 PM ^

A basketball game is won or loss by how many points you score versus the other team.  A boxing match can end with a knock-out.  Figure skating is based 100% on how your performance is rated by a panel of judges.  So yeah, that's a meaningful distinction, unless you are going to trot out a trite "the refs decide every game, ever."

Maison Bleue

February 12th, 2018 at 5:03 PM ^

I am not so naive to think that "the refs decide every game, ever." But they certainly play a role in who wins or loses every game, ever. I agree with you that sports that are judged purely on your performance should be looked at with a suspicious eye. But outside of golf, bowling and timed/measured sports, I am pretty much always suspicious of officiating errors playing a roll in wins or loses.

Like I said above to Aero, maybe it's just the jaded Michigan fan in me.

VictorValiant

February 11th, 2018 at 10:42 PM ^

I realize that figure skating is popular, but this type of judging shows that figure skating is not a sport. (This is not to say it doesn't require a tremendous amount of skill. Ballroom dancing requires skill.) In an artistic craft like figure skating, I'm all for encouraging expanding the bounds of what humans can achieve.

B-Nut-GoBlue

February 12th, 2018 at 8:04 AM ^

Is swimming a sport or a weird skill some humans have when thrown in water? Is basketball a sport or a weird skill some humans developed with peach baskets, a bouncy ball, and a little bit of running added at some point. Is decathlon a sport or just a weird set of skills put together like jogging a little bit, throwing some stupid things around and jumping over some stupid obstacles?!

Indy Pete - Go Blue

February 11th, 2018 at 10:43 PM ^

His performance was spectacular. However, the difficulty factor is appropriately scored in these competitions, and you have to take the risk to get the reward. He didn’t take as many risks, and thus had a cap on his top score. Regardless, he was outstanding. Nagasu also had a phenomenal routine for the women! It was a great night for USA figure skating. As an aside, Zagitova was mesmerizing and skating on a different planet. I am very much anticipating watching her skate again. Medvedeva and Zagitova are absolutely must see TV.

amitrx

February 11th, 2018 at 10:54 PM ^

His technical score was roughly the same as the Russian guy.  The Russian guy skated a much tougher routine, and even though he fell because he is attempting harder jumps he gets more points.  The little bit of controversy is that his artistic score should be significantly higher. 

The technical score is more subjective due to the change in the scoring system, and less on "opinion judging". The artistic score is still based off of "opinion judging".

LSAClassOf2000

February 11th, 2018 at 11:30 PM ^

It's on the CBC as well. One of the advantages of living in the SE Michigan and a couple other markets in the US is that you get the luxury of Canadian television too. 

That being said, the wind conditions are reported to be pretty damn brutal, and they are saying some of the snowboarders aren't exactly happy that this is going right now. I don't know the exact "on / off" criteria though - they haven't been able to do most of the Alpine events, I think, because of an absolutely brutal wind and wind chills too. 

Harbaugh's Lef…

February 11th, 2018 at 11:48 PM ^

The gusts for Slopestyle were rough, really rough, especially when you're about to hit a jump. That said, that area of the mountain is much further down from where the Alpine events are so if Slopestyle was being hit at 45mph gusts, you can imagine how brutal they were on the courses.

stephenrjking

February 12th, 2018 at 2:04 AM ^

Saw some clips from the Giant Slalom course that they declined to race on. It looked brutal, nothing like normal conditions for alpine skiing. A Canadian skiing reporter, Brian Stemmle, was nearly killed when a camera was blown off of its perch and fell next to him. It's brutal.

Stemmle was also harshly critical of holding slopestyle in these conditions FWIW. He's an alpine guy, though.

Needs

February 12th, 2018 at 9:09 AM ^

It was a terrible decision to hold the competition. If they cancelled the GS, they should have canceled the freestyle. The conditions killed any chance that the women could do their most advanced tricks. Normally, those boarders are doing 1080s, the wind cut those down to 720s at best. It meant the winner was going to be based far more on the fluke of when the wind gusted than actual skill and ability. It made the competition both really basic and completely unfair.

The wind blowing up the hill either knocked them down short on the flat transition, or, if they went in with tons of speed, it carried them farther than expected (like in ski jumping) and they were bailing in the air. It was really lucky that no one seemed to get seriously hurt, given the really violent crashes a lot of them took.