OT: Big 12 expansion seemingly down to BYU, Cincinnati, Houston

Submitted by Wolverine Devotee on

Nothing says Southwest like Cincinnati!

 

Source: BYU Big 12's No. 1 overall. Oklahoma wants Cincy. Texas of course wants Houston. Don't be surprised if compromise is Cincy & Houston

— Jason Williams (@jwilliamscincy) August 7, 2016

Ali G Bomaye

August 8th, 2016 at 3:17 PM ^

Well, Cincinnati is further west than West Virginia, and just about as far south...

 

But seriously, these are the only candidates that are even remotely plausible. Every other school considered (e.g. USF, UCF) doesn't have nearly enough of a following to pull their weight in a P5 conference.

In reply to by boliver46

East German Judge

August 8th, 2016 at 4:29 PM ^

Well joepa forsaked human decency and his moral compass for the sake of his football legacy.

 

BTW, FUCK penn state and all their delusional joepa loving fans!!!

MaizeAndBlueWahoo

August 8th, 2016 at 3:53 PM ^

Why is it ridiculous, and why is it some kind of massive barrier to scheduling?  College football never plays on Sunday.  College basketball on Sundays is easily avoided.  About the only real issue in major sports is baseball, but it's very common for baseball series to go Thursday-Saturday for various reasons.  The NCAA miraculously figured out how to include BYU in March Madness, it seems like it shouldn't be that hard for the Big 12 to figure things out too.

jcpdog

August 8th, 2016 at 5:31 PM ^

 I think you vastly underestimate Texas' ego in all of this. They aren't going to cowtow to anyone...Let alone BYU. Keep in mind all of the tournaments the Big 12 would have to schedule around Sunday for BYU. Which would vastly alter a lot of students being able to attend those events because they won't be able to schedule games (baseball, volleyball, basketball, soccer, softball etc.) BYU is going to have to start to give on the issue of Sundays if they want a seat at the Power 5 table. Simple as that. 

lilpenny1316

August 8th, 2016 at 4:10 PM ^

Oklahoma state legislature will likely throw their weight around to make sure both schools went together.  They will renew their rivalry with Nebraska and still have the Texas game in October as their one marquee OOC game. I've been pulling for a late November tripleheader of Bedlam, The Game and Iowa/Wisconsin since the expansion talk renewed this summer.

 

mgoblue0970

August 8th, 2016 at 4:17 PM ^

People said the same thing in earlier rounds of conference expansion... that Texas and Texas A & M were a package deal. 

Texas legislature threatened, or was rumored to, to get involved.

So if precedent means anything, I'm not holding my breath that OU and OSU have to go together.

SpikeFan2016

August 8th, 2016 at 3:20 PM ^

Cincinatti would be good for West Virginia's sake. They're actually close to each other and could make a convenient rivalry down the line. 

 

Also, would love another P5 school in Ohio to maybe sap some of OSU's pull eventually 

ak47

August 8th, 2016 at 3:49 PM ^

Cincy is more likely to hurt msu, and frankly our ability to pull the guys out of ohio than it is to pull top guys from osu.  It took a bad 5 year run by Texas before they didn't get the entire top 10 fo texas to comitt as juniors and A&M was a legitimate program for a long time.  When is the last time OSU had a bad 5 year run?

I mean hell we've been mediocre or worse for nearly a decade and its coincided with msu's best 10 year stretch ever and we still wipe the floor with them on the recruiting side of things.

San Diego Mick

August 8th, 2016 at 3:29 PM ^

San Diego St. would get considered but I guess that was never the case, SDSU has around 35,000 students and a big TV market and the CA recruiting avenues, oh well.

I suppose any 2 of the 3 schools mentioned would work IMO.

superstringer

August 8th, 2016 at 3:25 PM ^

Maryland & Rutgers... or Cinci & Houston.  Kind of the same -- two really nondescript options, done for expansion's sake, but not because of an actual desire to add those particular schools.

Well, at least we have a new #1 rival with Rutgers.

reddogrjw

August 8th, 2016 at 3:26 PM ^

bump Purdue to the East

 

Texas won't give up Longhorn Network and that is a deal breaker for B1G

 

adding Oklahoma and Oklahoma State to the B1G West would round out the conference nicely

tlo2485

August 8th, 2016 at 3:39 PM ^

Can't see Ok State ever in the B1G, but Oklahoma in the west would be great. It wouldn't surprise me if this is discussed between the two parties when their negotiations get closer. Oklahoma and Kansas wouldn't be bad additions. I think we will want more teams in the East/Southeast though.

As tough as it would be to imagine Oklahoma and Texas ever broken up, being in an elite academic conference with boatloads of cash and security is hard to pass up--not to mention the bonus of rekindling things with Nebraska and being associated with a lot more traditional powers and top public schools.

tlo2485

August 8th, 2016 at 3:30 PM ^

Why does Texas want another instate B12 school? TCU has already been outperforming them and A&M is taking recruits to the SEC. Do they think this will help the LHN?

jcpdog

August 8th, 2016 at 3:41 PM ^

 Well there are some political reasons for Texas wanting UofH. Texas recently bought a large parcel of land near the Medical Center here to build a satellite campus/facility of sorts and UofH got wind of it and aiming to block it. 

 It would seem through some backdoor channeling the word is UofH would step aside if Texas gives their blessing or helps them get into the Big 12:

 

http://www.hookem.com/story/texas-lawmakers-line-support-houstons-bid-j…

jcpdog

August 8th, 2016 at 4:10 PM ^

That's the thing......Texas doesn't have to be on top in the State for recruiting. There is enough top talent here that Texas could take 25 of the top kids in the state and there still would be talented enough kids to go around. They were the top dog this last recruiting cycle surging to a Top 10 class on signing day and then moved up a couple more spots once the Baylor defections were accounted for. 

Just as an example....look at how many Texas kids OU and LSU have already for the 2017 cycle. Its ridiculous. But...when its all said and done....provided a decent to a good season...Texas is still projected to finish strong in the state and has an outside chancce at some out of state kids as well. 

 

Texas' issue is the Longhorn Network. That seems to be the stumbling block and Texas won't budge off of it. Nor should it. Just like Notre Dame won't give up its NBC money to move to conference. Texas has some arrogance....I can see some of the powers that be want to move to be independent and schedule accordingly. Doubt it will happen...but I'm sure the thought has crossed their minds.