crg

August 22nd, 2022 at 1:42 PM ^

Plausible deniability for the "official" representatives.  No one is at risk of lawsuits (or FOIA) if it's just proxies meeting.  Oregon needs to be the party to initiate contact anyway.  USCLA both reached out to the Big Ten, but it was a well kept secret until the end.  The real story, if true, is not that Oregon is reaching out but that someone from the Big Ten is agreeing to talk about details.

bogart

August 22nd, 2022 at 2:26 PM ^

No real inside knowledge, but I have thought all along that these schools are continually talking about realignment through proxies, lawyers, agents, etc.  Two years ago USC AD Brohm(sp?) warned the PAC 12 that he was expecting to be paid like Alabama and Ohio State, and that he would definitely exit the conference to achieve that.  Would he have stuck his neck out like that without knowing he had a landing spot?  I would bet there is endless scheming among all the usual suspects in college football.

Gameboy

August 22nd, 2022 at 1:34 PM ^

There are MANY universities "initiating" conversations about joining B1G. Ain't gonna happen though (at least not right now, UofO is down the list a bit)

MGoArchive

August 22nd, 2022 at 2:34 PM ^

In Athletics, which is what we're talking about, UO has more pull that UW. If UO goes, UW follows, and the Pac12 is donezo.

ND can stay independent even if the B1G adds all the desirable Pac12 teams. They can schedule all the major media markets between B1G and ACC. No one is going to lock them out, let it go.

TrueBlue2003

August 22nd, 2022 at 2:57 PM ^

Does UO more pull though?  Pretty sure their viewership potential is lower than UW's given Oregon has about half the population of Washington.

An analysis done by an Oregon blog had Oregon 3rd in PAC12 with Washington 2nd in terms of number of games with 1M viewers in the past five years.

And that's what the networks care about, which is what the conferences care about when evaluating teams to add.  Pretty sure all the analysis I've seen says UW is more valuable as an addition.

Vasav

August 22nd, 2022 at 2:11 PM ^

As someone who's mostly hostile to expansion, I'd be kinda more ok with this because it means some preservation of west coast football.

Also, if there is a 20 team league, I hope we adopt a 3-4-2 schedule - 3 schools you see for 4 years (some rivals will remain in your 3 forever), 4 schools you play home-and-homes with, and 2 schools you only see once in 2 years. After 2 years, you've seen 11 schools, after 4, all 19. And the 8 schools you only saw once will become your home-and-homes, unless they become your 4-year opponents.

jmblue

August 22nd, 2022 at 2:41 PM ^

 After 2 years, you've seen 11 schools, after 4, all 19.

Funny that there is a setup that allows you to see every rival school in a 20-team conference, but in our current 14-team conference we'll sometimes go four years without playing a team.

rice4114

August 22nd, 2022 at 2:31 PM ^

I think Rutgers has a larger football following than Stanford. They are a great add for Olympic sports but for football dollars you just add another Purdue/Northwestern to suckle from the teat.

Expansion sucks and I am fully in that camp now. You think a 18 year hiatus is rough wait until we had 6 more competitive teams. Admins making more cash, more commercials, less games with our secondary rivals, etc. If I could wave a wand the Big 10 would be the Big 10<< and still have an expanded playoff. Let the marquee games be in the form of a 12 team playoff. 

crg

August 22nd, 2022 at 2:55 PM ^

Stanford may not be the most ideal candidate from a football perspective, however it is stronger than some of the current Big Ten members.  Add to that their strength in other sports, academic/research qualities, their reinforcement of the West Coast footprint (already announced and prospective), and the fact that this helps to either 1) push ND to finally join a conference or 2) the Big Ten draws another decent option for that last spot - thus locking ND out of the Big Ten for some time... Stanford is a reasonable add.

mi93

August 22nd, 2022 at 4:00 PM ^

I'm with you on this and your UO/UW comment.  Get to 20 teams and another option is split football into old / new B1G.  Have a 9-game round robin in your half (grumpsters get their original B1G back), 2 games with the other half, one OOC (who needs much of an OOC schedule with 20 teams?).

TrueBlue2003

August 22nd, 2022 at 3:05 PM ^

I would have thought this as well, but they came out 5th on this list of PAC12 schools in terms of games with over 1M viewers in the past 5 years.

Maybe that's mostly propped up by games against USC, UCLA, ND and other strong non-conf opponents (they regularly schedule other P5 teams in addition to ND), but numbers here look surprisingly good.

Grampy

August 22nd, 2022 at 1:43 PM ^

Phil Knight is a wild card in this.  He has outsized influence at Oregon and the money to cushion Oregon’s lower media value if it comes to that.  He’s also not a guy to sit in his hands while the PAC-Whatever implodes. 

maizenblue92

August 22nd, 2022 at 1:59 PM ^

I think it is important to remember that the big realignment moves have been kept quiet until they are done and none of the leaked rumors have materialized. 

 

Michigan Arrogance

August 22nd, 2022 at 2:30 PM ^

This.

IMO, this is a bad sign for Oregon's admission to the B10 for two reasons:

  1. Phil Knight is their ambassador. Not sure the B10 wants a glorified booster involved so directly and speaks to who really runs the show in Eugene (ie, he's on equal footing as the Pres, regents/BOT, etc). I don't think the B10will see this as a positive.
  2. This leak. Leaks generally don't happen until it's about to happen and the deal is done. I suspect this is the B10 leaking and that they have no intention in admitting UO at this time.

The folks from the artile in the LA times over the weekend are very active on twitter the last 3 days covering this stuff. They say the goal of the B10 rn is to get 2 more from the PAC12 (Stanford/UW/Cal/UO, very much in that order) so that USC/UCLA have travel partners to alleviate travel burdens. Four more is possible, but not ideal for the B10 at this time. B10 wants ND 1st (but this likely won't happen until 2029 when the next media contracts are up) and Stanford+1 joining with USC now will help that along. FSU and Miami are next up. Then 2 more from the PAC.

Allegedly, Delany pushed hard for UNC the last time around (with Maryland) but they didn't go for it. I'd guess the top of the ACC aside from the FL schools and maybe GT go to the SEC, top of the remains of the Pac12 to the B10. B12 picks the dregs and/or B12 and the remains of the ACC add smaller schools

kookie

August 22nd, 2022 at 4:17 PM ^

There is no way the ACC can compete with their current contract. In five years, they will be so behind everyone else. By the end of their media deal in 2036, they will look like Div II schools. At a minimum, the ACC will use dissolving the conference as a threat to ESPN to renegotiate their TV deal. The ACC schools are going to be in play in short order. They only need half of the conference to agree to it. FSU/Miami/NC/Clem are yes votes for sure. VA is a likely target for another major conference and a probable yes. There are 5 of the 7 votes you need to end it. GT & Duke will likely be of value to another conference, so there are your 7.

mackbru

August 22nd, 2022 at 2:25 PM ^

Why no? It's pretty obvious that a league based on the Midwest/East wouldn't just randomly add 2 teams isolated on the West Coast. There will end up being 3ish more West Coast teams to balance everything out, and there should be. While Portland in and of itself isn't a big market, the entire West Coast is -- and if you steal, say, 5 of the biggest West Coast programs, you've locked down a large chunk of the country in terms of viewership, recruiting, TV revenue etc.

M_Born M_Believer

August 22nd, 2022 at 2:12 PM ^

While Portland, OR (closest metropolis) is not considered a "large" TV market, it does come in at 21st.  To make the West Coast expansion really work, there is the need to add additional teams out there.  Hence the constant rumors about Washington, Stanford, and Oregon.  Those teams would 'lock up' the remaining significant TV markets on the West Coast.

What I find interesting is there is very little to no chatter about either of the Arizona schools given that Phoenix is 11 on the list and one of the last large TV markets available. (Florida and Texas do not provide any viable solutions, though I highly doubt that one would be turned away if a solution presented itself)

bogart

August 22nd, 2022 at 2:33 PM ^

I agree with you about Phoenix.  And here is how the Big Ten might approach TX, FL, and GA.
Gene Smith said the FB schedule will become a year-to-year function rather than the current long-term method.  I will suggest that the Big Ten might attempt to make this easier by establishing some pre-arranged matchups that will involve one OOC school (i.e. TCU) playing a rotation of Big Ten teams in a neutral site.  The recent buzz about the TCU AD visiting Chicago provoked this idea.
In 2018 OSU played TCU in Dallas and the ratings were spectacular.  It was the highest rated game with 7.58 million viewers (ABC, 8 pm) and easily beat second place Texas vs USC (Fox) which garnered only 2.?? million, about one third. 
TCU would likely enjoy the exposure and the payday, playing a different Big Ten opponent every year without having to travel, and NBC might like the ratings on Saturday nights.
Maybe this arrangement would also work with Clemson in Atlanta or FSU in Jacksonville, although those teams are very successful with home game crowds.  But they both might warm to the idea of regular Big Ten opponents near home.
For the Big Ten this would get them into the southeastern and southwestern advertising footprint on a regular basis.  Until the ACC breaks up, the Big Ten has no other way to intrude into that territory.