NCAA Petitions Supreme Court to Stop College Athletes From Receiving Expanded Education Related Benefits

Submitted by HelloHeisman91 on August 5th, 2020 at 3:01 PM

https://twitter.com/michaeleaves/status/1291070569807376384?s=21

 

The NCAA filed a petition Wednesday morning that asks the U.S. Supreme Court to press pause on allowing college athletes to receive an expanded number of education-related benefits.

 

In March 2019, a federal judge ruled that the NCAA's restrictions on what schools can provide to student-athletes violate antitrust laws. As part of that ruling, Judge Claudia Wilken ordered that schools should be allowed to provide an unlimited number of benefits to college athletes as long as those benefits are related to education. The NCAA appealed that decision in circuit court and lost earlier this year. Wednesday's filing indicates that the NCAA intends to appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court as well.

MGoBrewMom

August 6th, 2020 at 2:05 AM ^

now they’re sold out, but at least now you can’t get a singing Bag of dicks.

https://www.amazon.com/Singing-Bag-Of-Dicks-Multi-Color/dp/B07L6QFCX6/ref=pd_sbs_121_2/139-6081835-6217268?_encoding=UTF8&pd_rd_i=B07L6QFCX6&pd_rd_r=df53685f-68cb-46ca-ae12-4f58ffbfa084&pd_rd_w=Qchq1&pd_rd_wg=Y9cQG&pf_rd_p=b65ee94e-1282-43fc-a8b1-8bf931f6dfab&pf_rd_r=HVM7RGYQ1EXJ6B5GQD0A&psc=1&refRID=HVM7RGYQ1EXJ6B5GQD0A

highlow

August 6th, 2020 at 6:50 AM ^

FWIW as someone who pays attention to this stuff: on traditionally political topics (voting rights, 4th amendment / police stuff, war powers, abortion, religion, ACA) the Court splits cleanly and predictably along political lines.

On topics that are "apolitical" (a very risky definition) -- think copyright, patent, civil procedure -- the court doesn't necessarily split in that way and actually tends to do a usually very good job. My hunch is that "is the NCAA an antitrust cartel" leans apolitical, especially because none of the Justices went to a real CFB power. (Breyer went to Stanford, the rest went to an Ivy except for Thomas, who went to Holy Cross.)

1VaBlue1

August 6th, 2020 at 9:01 AM ^

Seems to me that the court generally falls in line with whatever it is that business wants.  Note that I do not claim to be an ardent 'follower' of all things SCOTUS.  However, since Roberts became Chief Wiggums, the Court has been universally one-sided in its dealings with 'apolotical' business cases.  The result has been the most big-business friendly Court in history - to the very much declining benefit of civil liberties and political representation.

Njia

August 5th, 2020 at 3:23 PM ^

This is one time that I want the Roberts Court to buck its pattern of narrowly-scoped rulings and just find that the entirety of the NCAA needs to be thrown on the ash heap of history.

Ihatebux

August 5th, 2020 at 3:55 PM ^

What counts as an education related expense?    What education expenses do college athletes already not receive? books? check. tuition? check. room and board? check. tutors? check.  laptops? check.

 Can you say a new car is needed to get to class and a big condo for the player and his family is required to study?  The article did say "monitary rewards for good grades"...."You went to class today Mr. Fields.  Here's $1000"

I'm totally down with athletes getting paid whatever they can get, but this doesn't seem to open much more up.

 

 

MRunner73

August 5th, 2020 at 4:05 PM ^

I am with you on these points you made. The devil is in the details here. It will get into the specifics. I would agree on expanded medical coverage for all student athletes. Some-not all-of these student athletes feel entitled. All of the perks Alabama football has to offer, comes to mind.

AresIII

August 5th, 2020 at 6:19 PM ^

I think the monetary rewards for good grades is where things will get hung up.  I agree with the other benefits, but we all know some schools will stretch those limits.  If the athletes (who are getting all or most of their education paid for) get rewarded $$$ for grades, then why shouldn't every student?  After all, aren't they all there "to play school."

I just think this is the NCAA's effort to prevent the kids from getting paid.

potomacduc

August 5th, 2020 at 3:59 PM ^

I wonder how many people hating on the NCAA in this thread are the same people touting the NCAA as the best entity to direct health/safety policy for member institutions in another thread.  ??

 

Forsakenprole

August 5th, 2020 at 4:42 PM ^

It is going to be impossible for them to face the groups of players in the PAC and the BIG in good faith, as if they ever could. But wow. On the heels of players requesting changes - many good, some seemingly misguided somewhat - for them to make a move like this? I don’t think the NCAA realizes that they are losing this, and they just can’t stop shoveling.

ThisGuyFawkes

August 5th, 2020 at 4:57 PM ^

Bit of a thread jack (although somewhat related) - Sarkisian (Bama OC) just got a raise to $2.5M. 

People will not bat an eye at Bama's decision to pay him this money (as if they could not find a qualified candidate for $1-$1.5M per year) but oh no, the kids want laptops --- somebody find my fainting couch 

https://www.espn.com/college-football/story/_/id/29601976/alabama-oc-steve-sarkisian-new-contract-worth-25m-annually

TruBluMich

August 5th, 2020 at 5:31 PM ^

Burn down the NCAA, start new and what ever else you want to say withholds one very important fact.  The NCAA is ran by the schools, which includes the ones that don't make up the top 1%.  Schools like Michigan can easily afford this, it won't be a huge competitive advantage and are most likely all for it.

bronxblue

August 5th, 2020 at 6:17 PM ^

This suit actually stems from a 2014 lawsuit, so if you want to see how long the court system in this country takes to get around to something this is a prime example.

Beyond that, it's just...the NCAA is going to lose and for some reason still desperately wants to be on the wrong side of history.  I'd actually be a little surprised if SCOTUS picks this case up, but we'll see.

Grampy

August 5th, 2020 at 6:58 PM ^

The NCAA is out of touch and don't seem to care.  This is consistent with their obsessive greed when it comes to sports played by their institutions.  They seem incapable of grasping the fact that they've already lost (Covid + BLM + shitting on their labor for, well, more than century) the grip they artificially (and illegally, by labor standards) created on 'their' product.  The need serious help, but who in their right mind would offer them any?

UrbanMeyerBurn…

August 5th, 2020 at 7:58 PM ^

Man fuck the NCAA. The P5 schools need to use this to their advantage and break away from the NCAA.