Michigan is now the ESPN Football Power Index favorite in each remaining game until hosting Ohio State on Nov. 28.

Submitted by Maizen on

Michigan is now the ESPN Football Power Index favorite in each remaining game until hosting Ohio State on Nov. 28.

— Joe Schad (@schadjoe) September 27, 2015

westwardwolverine

September 27th, 2015 at 5:23 PM ^

Makes sense. If the defense is as legit as it seems and we get the Rudock from the BYU game and not the UNLV game, we should enter that game with 1 loss. 

Maizen

September 27th, 2015 at 5:26 PM ^

MSU is going to be an enormous handful. They're still a really good football team and Dantonio always has them ready for the Michigan games. At night in Beaver Stadium and at Minnesota aren't going to be easy either. Lots of landmines left on the schedule. We just have to keep getting better each week!

westwardwolverine

September 27th, 2015 at 5:28 PM ^

I definitely don't think it will be easy, but I think we've looked like the best team in the Big Ten through 4 games outside of the QB spot. And with the step forward Rudock too this week, man...lot of potential for a big season. 

TruBluMich

September 27th, 2015 at 5:34 PM ^

What exactly have you seen that makes you think MSU is a very good football team? That Oregon win doesn't look very good anymore and they have struggled against both CMU and WMU. They are good but they are not as good as the talking heads in the media are claiming.

Maizen

September 27th, 2015 at 5:38 PM ^

What have I seen? They are 30-3 in their last 33 games and have handled Michigan 6 out of the last 7 years. They're a good team, and we don't know which Rudock will show up the rest of the year. Are they unbeatable? Hell no. But they are going to be a massive handful Oct 17th.

charblue.

September 27th, 2015 at 6:54 PM ^

the past must be relevant to poll voters who in spite of Sparty being outgained for the past three weeks in all of their wins, have been moved to the No. 2 spot without being downgraded. That respect is a function of their past record. Whether they are playing as well as Michigan will be determined, but they have the ranking at the moment to bolster any denial about their status. 

I agree, however, that those who have counted this as a loss for Michigan even before the season started are smaller in number now. 

BlueCube

September 27th, 2015 at 7:22 PM ^

as much knowledge about MSU and UM as we do from following them so closely. Those people vote on history. We can do better.

MSU was always a team that played great defense but the offense had to improve during the season. This year's defense sucks. Yes they can improve, however they don't have a new coach and new system like we do. There players should have a better handle on the game.

I don't think it's going to be a blow out because it's  a rivalry game. I don't have any fear of this years Spartan team.

ijohnb

September 27th, 2015 at 6:17 PM ^

Don't we just wait and see what happens before we crown ourselves GOAT. I think State is really good and have been for the last few years. After yesterday, I think we can beat them, but I think it would be a huge win over a legit top 5 team.

In reply to by ijohnb

B1G_Fan

September 28th, 2015 at 2:37 AM ^

They're are a good team and they always get up for big games under Mork. I still have the Hoke mindset of atleast it's a home game. There are no gimme games really but, there are no yea we're gonna get stomped games either.

 I like the fanbase getting excited and talking a lil shit, how long has it been since we been able to do that!? Enjoy it while we can

rob f

September 27th, 2015 at 5:58 PM ^

over the last several years, in no small part because Dantonio has taken advantage of U of M's woes. Whether they are "a damn good team" or not in 2015 is yet to be determined. 4 games in, though, they look more top 20 than top 2.

TruBluMich

September 27th, 2015 at 6:04 PM ^

You still haven't answered my question.  What have you seen that makes you think they are a damn good or really good team?  I seem to be the only one who is down to earth here.  They are ok, good or average team.  But they are not very good, damn good or any other way you want to put it.  They have a below average offense (ranked 93rd) and a below average defense (ranked 77th).  They had one score leads in the fourth quarter against two teams a very good team would have destroyed.  They almost lost a game, at home, to a team that was just beaten by 42 points on their home turf.  Do they suck, no, but after watching 4 weeks of MSU football they are not as good as they are being given credit for.

Maizen

September 27th, 2015 at 6:25 PM ^

Actually I did answer your question you just chose to ignore the answer. 

Ignoring what they've done last year and the year before with many of the same players is a choice you can make. I won't, because I like to use as much information as possible when I evaluate teams. 

I've watched most of their games this year including when they got up big on Air Force and WMU before coasting to the finish. All I said is that they are a really good football team, and every college football writer agrees with me hence their #2 ranking. I never said they were unbeatable or some juggernaut, but Michigan is going to need to bring their A game to win. I don't see what's wrong with any of that. You chose to disagree, fine, everyone is entitled to their own opinion.

You think MSU is not very good, I think they are. Let's just agree to disagree then because nothing you say is going to convince me otherwise. But regardless, go blue, we are all on the same side here.

 

marti221

September 27th, 2015 at 7:59 PM ^

Well put, and for the record, I 100% agree with you. You CAN use recent history when evaluating this year. They have many of the same good players with the same great coaching. They've shown they can win big games consistently, as a team, and as a coaching staff. Credit where credit is so. I do think UM has a good chance this year, and when/if they do beat them, it will be because they beat a top 10 team. MSU will lose no more than 2 games this season (no counting bowl game) IMO.



Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad

HAIL-YEA

September 27th, 2015 at 9:32 PM ^

The same great coaching minus arguably the best DC in the country the past few years They have been outgained by their opponents on the year. not the mark of a great team.  You know Oregon has a pretty good track record the past few years, it just so happens they aren't very good this year. 

BigBlue02

September 27th, 2015 at 9:38 PM ^

You actually still haven't answered his question. What part of their game makes them a very good football team? Their offense is not ranked very highly and their defense is not ranked very highly and they have played one team that is possibly good but just got destroyed at home. I guess being up big (although 2 or three scores isn't big when you consider it is Western and Air Force, but I digress) can count as a reason they are really good, but just because college football writers use the rankings from the beginning of the year doesn't mean that we don't have plenty to judge them on. So what makes them a damn good football team?

Maizen

September 28th, 2015 at 12:00 AM ^

Do you really need it spelled out for you after the success they have had the last few years? 23 seniors, finds a way to win games, NFL talent at QB and along both lines, etc

It's pretty hysterical people think MSU isn't good this year. Every team in college football is flawed. There is no perfect team. Too much parity. That doesn't mean there aren't a bunch of good teams. MSU falls into that category. I hope we kick their ass.

charblue.

September 27th, 2015 at 6:59 PM ^

necessary and scored a victory over a highly ranked team the second week when they were rated Top 5, so regardless of how your opponent fares after the fact, you don't get punished by anyone for not losing. They haven't lost when they were Top 5 when the season began and then beat another ranked opponent. That's how the system works. 

 

Clarence Beeks

September 27th, 2015 at 6:08 PM ^

Have you watched any of their games this year other than the Oregon game? Not the same defense as past years and lots of holes to fill still in the run game. Definitely still can develop, but in terms of what they've actually exhibited so far, they're a long way off (especially knowing what we now know about Oregon).

Reader71

September 27th, 2015 at 7:22 PM ^

I've watched all of their games. They have some problems, like most everyone. They are mot the same team they have been in the recent past, but they are a good team. If we played them at their house, they would be deserved favorites. The real problem isn't how good they are as a team, but they present some matchup problems against us. Their defensive backfield is weaker than it has been in years, but we haven't shown the ability to really test them in that regard. Our strength is running the ball out of tight formations, which is a problem, because their strength is stopping our type of running game. Defensively, we don't have a real weakness, but neither do they offensively. They're a balanced outfit, capable of running it pretty well and passing it pretty well. Those types of teams are hard to beat. Every D tries to make the O one-dimensional, but they can do both. I think it will he a very close contest. I think we will win, but my preseason pick is somewhere on here: I thought we would lose to Utah and not lose again til wr play Ohio.

alum96

September 27th, 2015 at 8:14 PM ^

Agree very much on matchup problems.   I am less concerned on our D v their O.  But our O is currently built for MSU to stop.  The teams hitting MSU are throwing for 300 yds -  the Qbs at CMU and WMU frankly look more composed and better than rudock.  MSU sells out everything to stop the run.  That is our bread and butter.  rudock needs to throw for 230+ without 2 INTs to solve that defense.  Otherwise they will just stack the line as thhey always do vs run based teams and wait for rudock errors.

That game is going to be about rudock vs that green (pun intended) secondary.

HAIL-YEA

September 27th, 2015 at 9:54 PM ^

 Every team we have played and every team we will play sells out everything to stop the run. Did you see BYU's safety's yesterday? Rudock isn't a good qb, but he can hit open receivers in the short passing game. It's all we will need.  I don't think MSU will be able to run on us, but they have a great tight end and some fast receivers. They will be a matchup problem for our defense because our lb's frankly arent good right now, and they have a good Oline to protect Cook.

Wood_Chuckson

September 27th, 2015 at 7:50 PM ^

They're an above average team so far this season. They've been a really good team the past several years but from what I've seen thus far from sparty, they're trending downward. I've said from the jump that state is gonna lose in the Big House this season. It should be a good game but they will not leave out of A2 this year with Paul Bunyan.

 

Harbaugh is gonna have us READY come Oct. 17th. He knows how important that win is and not only will he make sure the team knows it, I'm pretty sure they're sick of sparty running their mouths. 

Maizen

September 27th, 2015 at 6:23 PM ^

Kind of a newbie here and I don't want to come across as complaing, but how/why is this comment getting downvoted? Last I checked we're all Michigan fans here. Is giving a little credit to the enemy that frowned upon?

trustBlue

September 27th, 2015 at 7:09 PM ^

First rule of MgoPoints is do not talk about MgoPoints.  

If you are really worried about your MgoPoints avoid posting anything on a Sunday, since people either irrationally exuberant or irrationally defeatist. 

Try checking in again around mid-week.

victors2000

September 27th, 2015 at 8:29 PM ^

me as much as Coach Dantonio has the past 8 years or so. I stopped thinking the way you're thinking after the 4th straight loss to those guys. Do you honestly think we are going to roll those guys when they come to Ann Arbor? This one is going to be behind the woodshed from the opening kick. I didn't think the Spartans had talent when they started this steak against us, I KNOW they have better talent now. Coach Dantonio lives for this game and when the Spartans get to Ann Arbor they are going to be ready to give us their A + game, Coach D is going to make sure of it. 

khyron2500

September 28th, 2015 at 5:12 AM ^

I am agreeing with MaizeHaze on this one. Anything can happen in rivalry games. They are going to come to Ann Arbor amped up and prepared. This MSU team might not be a #2, but they may be a pretty good team anyway. For what it's worth Oregon had their top QB against MSU, something Utah didn't have to deal with much. They looked like they had some tough spots against lesser opponents but there are a few more things to consider. Some good defensive turnovers have shortened their fields, so overall yards is a little skewed. The play style doesn't exactly yield high output either, despite what they may have done last year. And I look back to last year and see comparisons. Don't count on early struggles to mean much. Last year I thought they "struggled" with some teams early, despite the score line. Wyoming gashed them for several 40+ yard plays before eventually flopping in a scoreless second half. Despite a 56-14 Sparty win, giving up huge plays like that against a team that would go 4-8 isn't particularly convincing. But they ended the year well and looked pretty dominant after their few opening games. We can always win, but it is not going to be easy at all.

bluebyyou

September 27th, 2015 at 5:57 PM ^

A week ago, most of us thought the world was about to end and many were predicting a 6-6 season.  Then there was yesterday.

Before we talk about 10-2 or 11-1, I'd like to play a few more games and see if yesterday's magic will be repeated.

Speak softly......

alum96

September 27th, 2015 at 6:11 PM ^

Welcome to fan msg boards

Rudock has given us a nice half in both the UNLV and BYU games.  He needs to have those halves back to back vs MSU and OSU and prob PSU.  the other half of UNLV and BYU cannot show up for more than 10 minutes a game.

Its simplistic but with solid to good parts on the rest of the team it's going to come down to Rudock.

TrueBlue2003

September 27th, 2015 at 6:30 PM ^

He protected the football, didn't take unnecessary chances. I think we got exactly what we expected (in the preseason) and what we wanted from Rudock yesterday.  He chose not to go to some open guys in the second half, but with the lead and our defense, being super conservative sounds like exactly what he was coached to do, based on Harbaugh's postgame comments. Seemed like a very good game from him yesterday, given the situation and playcalling.

snowcrash

September 27th, 2015 at 6:47 PM ^

They'll be lucky to score if our defense plays the way it's been playing. PSU's offensive line was destroyed by Temple, and Minnesota has a wet noodle attack.

MSU will be tough. Their OL is strong enough that we won't be able to just crush them at the line of scrimmage like we did to Ore St, UNLV, and BYU.

 

alum96

September 27th, 2015 at 8:18 PM ^

PSU OL is getting better.  They didnt give up a sack for 2 weeks in a row - didnt research this week yet but Hack had a good game.  And they have a really good high star rb now making waves.  People need to stop acting like its a gimme game - their offense is getting better and their D is going to be top 4 in the league.